This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A rather swarthy looking Russian soldier (soviet mongrel physiognomy) admits to kidnapping and (he implies) raping a Ukrainian woman in Russian-occupied Berdyansk, just because she spoke to him in Ukrainian at a gas station.
These soviet mongols are raping White women, while half of the “Dissident Right” cheers them on, and the other half thinks we should remain neutral.
These soviet mongols are raping White women, while half of the “Dissident Right” cheers them on, and the other half thinks we should remain neutral.
🤬28👏1
Forwarded from Radical Dose
Radical Dose proudly presents the life of John Singleton Mosby, as related by Asa Carter.
https://radicaldose.com/john-singleton-mosby-confederate-raider/
Radical Dose
https://radicaldose.com/john-singleton-mosby-confederate-raider/
Radical Dose
Radical Dose
John Singleton Mosby - Confederate Raider - Radical Dose
Radical Dose proudly presents the life of John Singleton Mosby, a colonel in the Confederate army and famed Civil War cavalry raider.
👍1
I’m generally in favor of meritocracy (within race), but taken to an extreme, you end up supporting the other team (race) rather than your own, and certainly at the expense of your own people. Your team is your race. Winners or losers among them, low class and high class, they are still your people regardless — your race.
The “racial supremacy” accusation is an old strawman used against racial nationalists, as if supremacy is at the core of modern racial nationalism — it’s not. But objectively Whites are supreme as long as every other race wants to co-habitat with them, living in their countries, under their better infrastructure and systems of governments, and seeking out their DNA via miscegenation.
Owen is nothing more than civnat that flirts with racialism for edginess points and comedic value.
The “racial supremacy” accusation is an old strawman used against racial nationalists, as if supremacy is at the core of modern racial nationalism — it’s not. But objectively Whites are supreme as long as every other race wants to co-habitat with them, living in their countries, under their better infrastructure and systems of governments, and seeking out their DNA via miscegenation.
Owen is nothing more than civnat that flirts with racialism for edginess points and comedic value.
👍34👏12
"The strategy Washington developed is the same strategy that has been used by revolutionaries since then, most notably by Mao Zedong during the Long March and by the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan: keep an army in the field. Washington understood that the British could not keep fighting indefinitely. They could certainly win, if they defeated the Continental Army, but as long as the colonies kept an army in the field it would require the British to spend resources fighting them. Eventually, King George would have to give up.
This was probably a rose-colored view of things. Unlike the case of Mao Zedong versus Chang Kai-Shek, King George was thousands of miles away, and the Continental Army could not directly threaten the British homeland. Unlike the case of the Mujahedeen versus the Soviets, the patriots did not have the overwhelming support of the local population.
However, there is one parallel here worth noting: just as Mao’s revolutionaries managed to control the countryside, slowly isolating Chang Kai-Shek’s army to urban centers, the patriots began to dominate the colonial countryside. While tory militias could, in theory, have gone toe-to-toe with patriot militias, tory militias began to disband, and tory citizens were migrating to British-controlled cities en-masse. They did this because they feared patriot militias, and they were seeking protection from British regular troops. Patriots, on the other hand, could count on no such protection, so they remained in the countryside, conducting guerilla raids on British patrols and supply trains. Thus, by fielding a large regular army on the American continent, the British unwittingly strengthened the revolutionary cause in the countryside.
At this point in the war, there were over 30,000 British regulars and mercenaries in the colonies, with more on the way. This is more than twice as many troops as the US has in Afghanistan in 2018, and we have a population more than fifty times the British population during the American Revolution. Furthermore, the logistical nightmare of moving troops and equipment halfway across the world in 2018 doesn’t even compare to the challenges the British faced with 18th-century technology. This was a huge, expensive undertaking, and it wasn’t unreasonable for the colonists to expect the British to negotiate. George III’s stubbornness is what kept the war going."
https://www.quora.com/How-much-did-the-French-Revolution-and-Napoleon-s-wars-contribute-to-the-success-of-the-American-Revolution-Without-it-would-the-colonies-keep-their-independence
This was probably a rose-colored view of things. Unlike the case of Mao Zedong versus Chang Kai-Shek, King George was thousands of miles away, and the Continental Army could not directly threaten the British homeland. Unlike the case of the Mujahedeen versus the Soviets, the patriots did not have the overwhelming support of the local population.
However, there is one parallel here worth noting: just as Mao’s revolutionaries managed to control the countryside, slowly isolating Chang Kai-Shek’s army to urban centers, the patriots began to dominate the colonial countryside. While tory militias could, in theory, have gone toe-to-toe with patriot militias, tory militias began to disband, and tory citizens were migrating to British-controlled cities en-masse. They did this because they feared patriot militias, and they were seeking protection from British regular troops. Patriots, on the other hand, could count on no such protection, so they remained in the countryside, conducting guerilla raids on British patrols and supply trains. Thus, by fielding a large regular army on the American continent, the British unwittingly strengthened the revolutionary cause in the countryside.
At this point in the war, there were over 30,000 British regulars and mercenaries in the colonies, with more on the way. This is more than twice as many troops as the US has in Afghanistan in 2018, and we have a population more than fifty times the British population during the American Revolution. Furthermore, the logistical nightmare of moving troops and equipment halfway across the world in 2018 doesn’t even compare to the challenges the British faced with 18th-century technology. This was a huge, expensive undertaking, and it wasn’t unreasonable for the colonists to expect the British to negotiate. George III’s stubbornness is what kept the war going."
https://www.quora.com/How-much-did-the-French-Revolution-and-Napoleon-s-wars-contribute-to-the-success-of-the-American-Revolution-Without-it-would-the-colonies-keep-their-independence
Quora
How much did the French Revolution and Napoleon’s wars contribute to the success of the American Revolution? Without it, would…
Answer (1 of 3): The French Revolution was not a good thing for Americans because their independence was still so fragile and a bad example like the French Revolution left the Americans without any friends. How could the best example in the most inspired…
⚡8👍2🤔2
Forwarded from The Gramscian Radio
On this 4th of July, we celebrate the enduring spirit of the Founding Fathers—those bold pioneers of liberty who defied tyranny. These men established a republic rooted in ideals of liberty & prosperity. The birth of America wasn't just a fight for independence, but the beginning of a nation. The Naturalization Act of 1790 was one of the first legislative steps in this new nation, establishing a uniform rule of naturalization. It established the foundation for the nation's dedication to its posterity. From sea to shining sea, the spirit of America lives in every Heritage American. Today they stand at the door steps of tyranny where these once United States stood as birthright to themselves & their posterity, so liberty may rule in the land soaked in the blood of patriots & tyrants. Today lets celebrate those enduring ideals. God bless America, & may the star-spangled banner wave into a future where the United States are of America by living up to its own ideals of the 1790s Naturalization Act.
👍14
Forwarded from Radical Dose
HapaPerspective on why America took up arms against the crown:
“The American War for Independence was not some sudden reaction to a 2% tax. It was the result of a multifaceted struggle involving taxation without representation, economic control, political autonomy, and the defense of personal liberties — resistance against gun confiscation.”
https://radicaldose.com/revolutionary-reality-why-america-fought-for-independence/
Radical Dose
“The American War for Independence was not some sudden reaction to a 2% tax. It was the result of a multifaceted struggle involving taxation without representation, economic control, political autonomy, and the defense of personal liberties — resistance against gun confiscation.”
https://radicaldose.com/revolutionary-reality-why-america-fought-for-independence/
Radical Dose
Radical Dose
Revolutionary Reality: Why America Fought for Independence - Radical Dose
HapaPerspective takes the occasion of July 4th to explore the history of why America fought for independence.
⚡12👍1
Forwarded from The Gramscian Radio
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The enduring spirit of Heritage America lives inside Heritage Americans. Thomas Russeou is one such leader who carries the torch for the vanguard.
👍12⚡1😁1
Forwarded from American Freedom Party
On this 4th of July, the American Freedom Party reflects on the vision of our Founding Fathers—a vision of a Nation built on freedom, sovereignty, and a national White identity. Today, it is clear that the America we see is a far cry from what they intended. Our borders are porous, our European traditions are under attack, and our Constitution is routinely ignored or undermined.
The Founding Fathers envisioned a nation where citizens enjoyed the fruits of their labor, exercised their rights without fear, and lived in an homogeneous society grounded in common values and mutual respect. Instead, we see a country where the interests of Jewish elites takes precedence over those of hardworking Americans, where diversity has destroyed our unity, and where governmental overreach stifles true Americans.
Our nation is under a form of hostile occupation—not yet through overt military conquest, but through the erosion of our White cultural and political foundations. However, this Independence Day, we reaffirm our commitment to peacefully reclaiming the America that our Founding Fathers envisioned. We must work to restore our borders and our historic demographic, and do so in order to protect our traditions for ourselves and our posterity.
The American Freedom Party seeks to unite Our People under the banner of true Heritage American values, and to rebuild a nation that reflects the greatness and integrity that once defined it.🇺🇸
🇺🇸 #AFP #IndependenceDay 🇺🇸
The Founding Fathers envisioned a nation where citizens enjoyed the fruits of their labor, exercised their rights without fear, and lived in an homogeneous society grounded in common values and mutual respect. Instead, we see a country where the interests of Jewish elites takes precedence over those of hardworking Americans, where diversity has destroyed our unity, and where governmental overreach stifles true Americans.
Our nation is under a form of hostile occupation—not yet through overt military conquest, but through the erosion of our White cultural and political foundations. However, this Independence Day, we reaffirm our commitment to peacefully reclaiming the America that our Founding Fathers envisioned. We must work to restore our borders and our historic demographic, and do so in order to protect our traditions for ourselves and our posterity.
The American Freedom Party seeks to unite Our People under the banner of true Heritage American values, and to rebuild a nation that reflects the greatness and integrity that once defined it.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
⚡13
HapaPerspective pinned «HapaPerspective on why America took up arms against the crown: “The American War for Independence was not some sudden reaction to a 2% tax. It was the result of a multifaceted struggle involving taxation without representation, economic control, political…»
Chadwick is a wild writer.
https://radicaldose.com/7-reasons-why-america-is-the-greatest-country-in-the-world/
https://radicaldose.com/7-reasons-why-america-is-the-greatest-country-in-the-world/
Radical Dose
7 Reasons why America is the Greatest Country in the World - Radical Dose
Chadwick celebrates Independence Day by listing 7 reasons why America is the greatest country in the world.
⚡6
Forwarded from American Freedom Party
The American Freedom Party's writing staff has just published a compelling critique of Trump's green card statements.
In this article, AFP Workforce Writer Clark Mason delves into the various issues surrounding these statements, other remarks made by the former president, as well as exploring what defines a real American.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤔8
Forwarded from The Banned Effect ✡️
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Pajeet dumpling maker
😁11🤯5
Forwarded from Kenziepuff
“The first step in liquidating a people is to erase its memory. Destroy its books, its culture, its history. Then have someone write new books, manufacture a new culture, invent a new history. Before long the nation will begin to forget what it is and what it was.” —Milan Kundera
👍11
Forwarded from Dull Academic Incessant Liturgical Yapping: Philosophical Orations on Order & Reaction
Since this went viral, folks all over have been shitting on rural places and talking about how this won't work because all the women are in the cities.
I have good news to report: that is incorrect, young women are not all in the cities.
The correlation between the ratio of young women to young men in a county to the county's percentage of the population that lives in Urbania is non-existent; the percentage of a county's urban population can explain less than a third of a tenth of a percent of the differences between counties in their proportions of young women to young men.
There might be less young women in rural areas, but it's a function of there being less people, including less young men.
Now, on the other hand, anon, do you think the average urbanite or ruralite young woman is going to match your values better? Which is more likely to be religious? Which is more likely to be family-oriented? Which is more likely to be open to taking the poor pill?
I have good news to report: that is incorrect, young women are not all in the cities.
The correlation between the ratio of young women to young men in a county to the county's percentage of the population that lives in Urbania is non-existent; the percentage of a county's urban population can explain less than a third of a tenth of a percent of the differences between counties in their proportions of young women to young men.
There might be less young women in rural areas, but it's a function of there being less people, including less young men.
Now, on the other hand, anon, do you think the average urbanite or ruralite young woman is going to match your values better? Which is more likely to be religious? Which is more likely to be family-oriented? Which is more likely to be open to taking the poor pill?
⚡18👏2
Deep down, leftists already know that diversity isn’t our strength, that’s why they live in gated communities and gentrified neighborhoods. They just want YOU to believe that diversity is a strength, because they hate you. That’s why they say “diversity is our strength.”
👍27👏7
This is one reason why it’s so difficult to red pill leftists. They already know!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/13949
https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/13949
Telegram
HapaPerspective
Deep down, leftists already know that diversity isn’t our strength, that’s why they live in gated communities and gentrified neighborhoods. They just want YOU to believe that diversity is a strength, because they hate you. That’s why they say “diversity is…
👏10😨2
Virtue signaling for leftists isn’t just about maintaining status within a moral community, it’s also about maintaining status over whites seen as part of other moral communities.
By trying to convince you that diversity is a strength — by believing in it themselves without practicing it — they are attacking other whites via psychological poison. It is a sort of White on White violence.
They’re like the doctors injecting themselves with saline while telling you to take every vaccine.
By trying to convince you that diversity is a strength — by believing in it themselves without practicing it — they are attacking other whites via psychological poison. It is a sort of White on White violence.
They’re like the doctors injecting themselves with saline while telling you to take every vaccine.
👏7