Funny, that?

Feeble and inexperienced men tend to cope by clinging to an impertinent arrogance which we would typically expect only from spoiled children.

This is easily observable in the so-called academics, who despite spending the majority of their lives inside the four walls of a classroom, always end up believing they’re the best of humanity and capable of producing the best and fairest ideas.

But not a single one of them knows or understands his own body or develops an appreciation of his own limits.
They can’t lift or dig or fight yet they like to declare themselves the ‘leading minds’ of those who do lift, dig and fight.

They actually despise men who work and end up regarding physical labour as unworthy of their own special intelligence.

By trying to seperate the mind from the physical body, these people have made of themselves a reprehensible class of narcissistic brats, who have the audacity to declare themselves the all-knowing rulers of society.

How humbled these so-called intellectuals would be by their first gym or sparring session. They’d quickly realise their ideas and perspectives are as weak and as flawed as they are.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/theferrymanstoll/16117

To add to what Blair is saying here, some of the most “intellectual” and well read people I’ve met in real life have often been some of the weakest.

One aspect of declining fertility which nobody thinks or talks about is downward social mobility. The Baby Boom in the 40s and 50s happened concurrently with a mass uplifting of Americans, driven by postwar wealth and the GI Bill. What we are facing right now is a mass decline in the social status of people and therefore opportunities they could present to their hypothetical children.
This doesn't seem to be a reversible trend, barring truly radical social upheaval. It'll also have a strong dysgenic effect as only those who don't mind declining in status, i.e. the unambitious, non-thumotic and generally dull reproduce, thus drastically decreasing the quality of white people over time.

You see a lot of this dysgenic effect among the online right. People are downright giddy at the prospect of becoming a powerless serf of Peter Thiel or Donald Trump. Any time I propose ambitious political moves, someone inevitably appears in my chat and insists that we must all become lower middle class tradesmen living in the middle of nowhere, growing cabbage and having a lot more children than we can secure houses and land for, inevitably dooming them to even greater downward social mobility. Naturally, it’s accompanied by calls for authoritarian government and contempt for participation in political processes. It’s all men without chests who can’t wait to become someone’s slave.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/8005

The only part where I disagree with Nix is where he discourages moving to the “middle of nowhere where.”

I think it really depends, and there are absolutely strategic and economic benefits to moving to rural areas, especially if you’re of the tribe and train mentality.

Whereas there are definitely disadvantages to living in a city filled with your political and demographic enemies.

However, I’m speaking from an American perspective, cities might be strategically better in certain European contexts.

In the American context, cities are shitlib/antifa/non-White strongholds. They’re not conducive to the tribe and train strategy, nor are they places where nationalists can win local political power.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/8007

Shieeet.

76 shots fired and not one was hit? Yeah, that’s sun man aim.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/leaklive/21324

If a negro is firing a gun, the safest place to be is where he thinks he’s pointing his gun.

The New York Times
Editor-in-chief: Joseph Kahn
Kahn is of Lithuanian Jewish descent and the eldest child of a Jewish refugee who was allowed into America when no one in Europe wanted them. This is the gratitude refugees show their hosts.

Russia is indeed trad, never said what tradition exactly

OC

Most Americans that I’ve seen and interacted with IRL support Ukraine — or rather, they don’t support Russian military aggression — even most of the conservatives I’ve talked to in person see the Russia government as the big bad aggressor.

So this whole idea that Americans are natural ziggers that collectively support the Kremlin because Washington DC is now holding back NATO countries, or because select “conservative” e-celebs like Nick Fuentes, Striker or Alex Jones simp for Putin, it’s all just internet rubbish — they don’t speak for the majority of Americans on either side of the political aisle.

There are also still many American conservatives that see Russia from the lens of the Cold War.

A major part of the thinking behind the idea that American conservatives are mostly ziggers or ziggers-adjacent comes from a map of reality based on twitter and telegram. For example, I believe the popularity of both Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes is severely overblown by people within the dissident right. Not a single American conservative I’ve ever talked to has ever mentioned either one of them, nor Ukraine or Russia. They’re usually too oblivious on the topic to even remotely be a zigger.

The zigger-right, both within America and Europe, is an astroturfed faction of the right that’s funded and pumped up by the Kremlin, and its army of bots, to appear much bigger than it actually is.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/14620v