HapaPerspective – Telegram
HapaPerspective
3.09K subscribers
6.69K photos
1.51K videos
21 files
5.94K links
A wicked Hapa of the West, for the West. We must reclaim America.

If you like my work, please consider buying me a cup of coffee: buymeacoffee.com/HapaPerspective

If you want to direct message me: @thehapaperspective
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Eternal Muscovite ✙ ∆ (M)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Observer in the occupied Donbas records and comments on the apparent mass burial of Russian casualties, who arrive by the truckload.
😁8😱3
With so many people in the Dissident Right simping for Putin, with many of them ostensibly identifying with British heritage, you gotta wonder if their heads are screwed on straight. If the ziggers had their way… well, the tweet pictured above demonstrates that many ziggers want more than Ukraine.

Russia is struggling in Ukraine, but that doesn’t mean they’re not going to be a threat elsewhere around Europe, especially with the help of China.
💯21🌚3
Just like the annexation threats, the trade war between Canada and the USA is proving to be a nothing-burger. Hopefully everyone can chill the fuck out and go back to focusing on the things that actually matter, like you know, race, our rights, and building communities.

I don’t even think tariffs are really what Trump wanted, just like with the annexation threats, it was nothing more than a scare tactic to get Trudeau to work with him on the border issue and combat drug trafficking.

Trump’s modus operandi has always been to threaten to do something extreme, to feel out the other party’s boundaries, then he asks for less, so he appears to be compromising on what he actually wanted.
👍13
Forwarded from Risky’s Raiders
18👍4💯1
Risky’s Raiders
Photo
YES! 🔥
15👏1
I understand if you think Kamala Harris would have been a better POTUS to red pill normie Whites, better than Trump for the economy, and no techbro oligarchy. But know this: the Democrats really DO NOT WANT TO WIN.

Gun control is not a winning cause to support. If Democrats wanted to win, they have to genuinely support American’s rights. And they also need to become the party of strong borders and mass deportations.

By supporting unpopular policies, like gun control, what’s clear is that the Democrats handed the Republicans victory on a silver platter. It is the Liberals’ collective stupidity that paved the way for orange man and his Zionist cult.
👍10
HapaPerspective
I understand if you think Kamala Harris would have been a better POTUS to red pill normie Whites, better than Trump for the economy, and no techbro oligarchy. But know this: the Democrats really DO NOT WANT TO WIN. Gun control is not a winning cause to support.…
What a lot of people don’t understand about the United States political environment is that a lot of people are single issue voters.

There are people that voted for the Democrat candidates just because they hate Trump, or because they’re pro-choice, or because they want to keep their squatemalan landscaper — those are some example of single issue voters currently aligned with the left. But hardly anyone voted for the Democrats because their main concern is gun control. Sure, some people (homos in my book) may say they support gun control, but it’s not their main issue that decides which party they vote for. In stark contrast, there’s tens of millions of Americans that will vote for whichever party/candidate that at least claims to protect their right to keep and bear arms — and so far, they’re only voting for Republicans because they see that party as the pro-2A party.

If Democrats really wanted to defeat Trump, you’d think they would have done a survey of the political landscape to see what policies people actually want, especially the single issue voters that exist in the millions. But nah, they let Trump have a monopoly on the 2A voters. And honestly, I think that alone was enough to secure Trump’s victory.
👍7
This picture encapsulates how stupid it is for anyone to get invested in either side of this delayed (and most likely cancelled) trade war between two countries that no longer represent White interests.

It’s like a fan of one football team hating anyone from the city of a rival football team, meanwhile both teams are comprised of negro athletes and owned by Jews.

It’s the same energy, it’s fake and gay.
💯29
Forwarded from Division Galicia ꑭ
You must be Pro-white first and foremost otherwise it doesn’t matter wtf your ideology is
💯37
Forwarded from Nicholas R. Jeelvy
People with favourable views of Andrew Tate are overwhelmingly nonwhite.
👍23🤬2
🤔
🤔19😁11
Forwarded from No BS it's the Jews®️
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Tucker Carlson talks about israeI’s involvement in the assassination of JFK.

He’s in the danger zone.
https://t.co/yPu2pHeuRM
👍5👏2🤬1
I keep hearing people saying that we should build pro-White institutions — by institutions, what is usually meant is some kind of formal organization — but what exactly would such institutions look like? Don’t say “we need a White ADL” because that’s just not happening, at least not in any formal way that is explicitly pro-White.

The only thing that I can see working are intentional communities, like Orania in South Africa. I believe it’s a private community structured like a corporation, with residents own shares.

Any way White advocates go about building a formal organization is going to be insanely hard within an anti-White system. Not impossible, but hard enough that it will have to operate discreetly and in roundabout ways to avoid being shutdown.

The intentional community strategy is like a perfect middle ground between the hide-innawoods-militia types and the people that think we should just build brick-and-mortar institutions downtown. Both the former and latter miss the mark, because the effective strategy is somewhere in the middle.

You need to get away from mainstream society enough that you can carve out your own society (not just you and your family, but a community) and you need to be able to defend your community from both physical and legal threats; because without a real community, you can’t even begin to build anything resembling formal, brick-and-mortar institutions, like a bank.
👍10
Forwarded from Stonetoss
👍172😁1
👏28🤔71