At the end of the day, Americans want to just be left the fuck alone, but the United States as an Empire is a menace that wears American identity as a skin suit, which put Americans in the crosshairs of the people the US disappoints.

Not everything that Trump does is wrong.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/TheConspiracyHole/47741

I’m tired of being diplomatic on Telegram with people that just have a rabid hatred of Americans, it’s nothing more than a political dissident containment zone anyway. Nothing anyone here says is going to change the fact that Americans exist and have their own political priorities separate from what people in other countries want — which is why most of them voted for Trump rather than Kamala. If you can’t understand that, oh well.

Here in the US, the two party political system we’re stuck with is like two used car dealerships. Both will rip you off and sell you a pile of shit, but one used car dealership offers you a used car with air conditioning, a cleaned interior, leather seats, and new tires.

Americans — like anyone else would — voted for the best option, or rather, the least terrible president.

The autism is just too strong in these parts of the internet.

In many ways, the USA’s two party system has infected the world, with all its negative partisanship. It’s tantamount to Europeans telling me which American football teams to cheer for or boo at, and I’m trying to tell them that sportsball is gay.

I support Ukraine, and I wish the USA would send more weapons to aid Ukraine’s defense.

However,

If you are upset that Americans prioritized their own interests in the USA over that of Ukraine at the ballot box — an absurdly unreasonable thing to expect from Americans — then what you should be advocating for is Americans receiving Ukrainian citizenship. That would only be fair, and you could argue that Ukraine is also their homeland.

Obviously this is a silly suggestion, but a fair one to an absurd demand.

I sometimes wonder if some of the pro-Ukraine Telegramers are trying to bait me into defending Trump. All because I don’t think Americans should cuck on their own political interests at the ballot box for any other country.

It’s obvious that Trump isn’t great for Americans, but it’s also incorrect to argue that every single thing he does is bad, because “orange man bad”; or that Kamala would be amazing for America, simply because she’s not Trump. But this whole debate isn’t anywhere near the actual issue.

Trump appealed to more of the issues that Americans (white people here in this country) actually care about — limiting immigration, lower taxes, gun rights, no men in women’s sports, and etc… A lot of the people that voted for Trump weren’t necessary even rightwing or MAGA people, but a silent majority that saw the insanity of the establishment left, and Trump was the only viable alternative in a two party system — only two realistic options were available for POTUS. Americans aren’t at fault here, it’s the current system.

You don’t need to convince me that Trump is the worst human alive or that “Aryan Kamala” is our savior, I think they both suck, and the whole two party system sucks. End of story.

But this all ultimately revolves around Ukraine, because the real expectation or demand from vocal autists-for-Ukraine is that Americans should cuck on their own political interests for that of another country (Ukraine). As someone that supports Ukraine, I find that to be insane.

Other than on a couple important issues, there actually isn’t a huge difference between democrats and republicans. Trump was once a democrat that funded Kamala. Most of the oligarchs don’t actually care about either party, because they just switch affiliation when it suits them.

If Kamala had won, they would have cozied up with the left to advance oligarchy. It makes no difference to them.

We don’t even know that Kamala and Tim Walz would have actually supported Ukraine enough to have mattered, or would have done anything good for Whites in America. Kamala’s father is a Marxist professor, so it’s quite possible she’s been brain washed to be a closet communist — after all, she wants to disarm Americans. She’s also a “capitalist” with support from neo-liberal oligarchs.

Then there’s the accelerationist argument that a Kamala victory is great because it would lead to a civil war, but that argument is entirely predicated on believing that Americans would take up arms against the government, which is a position I don’t see these particular accelerationists genuinely sticking with.

Back on the subject of Ukraine, I believe Ukrainians are winning the war on their own now — they’ve increased their domestic drone production. Plus many of you wanted Europe to form a military alliance separate from the US backed NATO. So the way events have transpired with the US pulling support from Ukraine has worked out to your advantage in many ways — Ukraine’s more reliable allies are doubling down on support for Ukraine and strengthening their military. If Kamala was POTUS and continue US support for Ukraine, this wouldn’t have happened.

Many of the American oligarchs have a long history of switching their political affiliation.

Most oligarchs see politics like a horse race track, betting on which ever party/candidate they think will win. That’s why most of Trump’s new inner circle of oligarchs in his second term were once never Trumpers, and Peter Thiel is now apparently off the Trump train.

Oligarchs generally aren’t committed to a political party or any political values beyond their own personal wealth and success. That’s why they flip. For the last 15 years, most of the oligarchs sides with the liberal-left, waving rainbow flags. Now some of them jumped ship to be republicans, wearing cowboy hats or MAGA hats. It’s all bullshit. Politics to them is a fucking hat.

Hell, I wouldn’t be surprised if someday, Kamala runs as a republican.

Ukraine is kicking Russia’s ass without US aid.

https://youtu.be/4CuvESiDCok?

lol

https://news.1rj.ru/str/syrianchristian/2238

I think it’s safe to say now that the Egyptians didn’t build the pyramids.

https://youtu.be/zZjU_hioDfQ?

To excavate or not to excavate, that’s the question now. Mainstream archeology of course doesn’t want any further investigation, because, god forbid, they’d have to rewrite their textbooks.

https://m.economictimes.com/news/new-updates/egypts-giza-pyramids-mystery-deepens-radar-finds-underground-structures-twice-as-deep-as-the-eiffel-tower-stretching-across-2-km/amp_articleshow/119335918.cms

I think Putin genuinely wants a ceasefire now, because Russia cannot afford to continue the war. lol

Ukraine just has to keep fighting and they’ll win.

McGregor is going for the populist shill, next will come anti Ukrainian conspiracies and pro Russian views, don’t even get excited about him coming to “save Ireland”.

BLM was an animal rights movement.

This is a great video from Nix that I think was inspired by a conversation we had about monarchy vs the liberal forms of government that replaced it.

He makes a great point about monarchy being an inferior form of government, in which the state is just the private property of a monarch, which has a stifling effect on nationalism — people are less willing to fight for a country and government that fundamentally isn’t their’s.

In contrast, a more liberal form of government makes the state public property, thereby making the citizens stake holders that can be personally involved with matters of the state, thereby making them invested in it — and more willing to fight for it. This facilitates nationalism.

https://youtu.be/5SVRTFfHFE4?

Sure, monarchy is more romantic; but it’s not nearly as practical, effective, efficient, realistic, and dare I say, as moral as a liberal form of government: a democracy or a republic. Monarchy, as a form of government, is just a vestigial system — a cultural relic that has far outlasted its necessity, continuing more out of tradition than utility.

But the dissident right clings to the idea of monarchy, because it looks better in online memes, or on a political compass that makes them appear as traditional and conservative as possible. To be a monarchist in the 21st century is literally the definition of being a LARPer, because it demonstrates a lack of interest in psychology and the dynamics of society as it actually functions in reality.

To make an analogy, monarchy is to a liberal republic/democracy what a horse drawn carriage is to a modern car on a highway.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/16395