The whole meme of obese Americans shoveling cheap fast food goyslop into their mouth is about as true as the stereotype of British people being toothless alcoholic football hooligan-skinheads that subsistence on beans and pints.

It’s not entirely false, but it’s only partially accurate of a particular class of people within that country — a sub-class of the lowest working class.

In otherwords, a lot of the memes denigrating any particular Western nation often ignore class by depicting the entire nation as their lowest class.

The caricature of the obese, McDonald’s‑loving Walmart shopper bears little resemblance to the American who lives in a McMansion, keeps a gun rack, and drives an enormous Ford pickup—he can’t afford that lifestyle and probably lives in a trailer park. These “Ameribro” memes flagrantly erase the full spectrum of class and income that exists here.

Which all just goes to show how ignorant the memes are.

Third Venetia relates the history of Friul in honour of the Day of the Friulian Homeland, April 3rd.

https://radicaldose.com/the-friulian-homeland/

Radical Dose

There’s little doubt in my mind that this anonymous leak, which allegedly includes “all Kremlin assets in the West” could expose many prominent dissident right figures.

https://x.com/YourAnonCentral/status/1912292853855973635

Reid Houston exposes the latest VDARE money grab and laments the sorry state of white identity politics in America.

https://radicaldose.com/vdare-graduates-from-grift-to-shakedown/

Radical Dose

Hapaperspective refutes the notion that Americans are fat slop-eaters with no food culture.

https://radicaldose.com/guide-to-american-culture-the-rise-of-fast-casual/

Radical Dose

Hot take: I don’t think conversations like this:
“Your nation is doomed”
“No yours is more doomed”
“Nu uh yours is”
are a productive use of time.

People act surprised by this. They're negroes, what did you expect?

As this European in my chat just pointed out: corporate US-based fast food chains (especially the shit tier ones) operating in Europe are the main reason why Europeans have a negative view of American culinary culture. These corporate chains are hurting our image abroad, which further hurts our relationship with other countries. We aren't exporting our best — we absolutely have better.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspectivechat/21200

Cemil Kerimoglu exposes the true character of the Russian state.

https://radicaldose.com/russia-is-an-artificial-entity/

black queer declares open season on White people and says he will stab them in the heart like Karmelo Anthony.

⚫️ walks, sipping a drank, as one of ours lies bleeding out. No aid was rendered. Clout posting over calling for help.

How can we tolerate this?
@TheWesternChauvinist11

Today is the anniversary of the Battles of Lexington and Concord, which were fought on April 19th 1775 — the first shots of the war for American independence.

After giving it much thought for a very long time, I’ve continued to come to the conclusion that it isn’t logically consistent or even reasonable to separate nationalism from an individual right (and a human right) to keep and bear arms.

The idea of human rights may not be popular around here, but hear me out on this one.

Without the right to keep and bear arms being universally seen as an absolute human right and duty of all men in all countries, long term nationalism is doomed to remain in a state of peril. In a world where people cannot right the wrongs within their own respective homeland, against a tyrannical and unjust government that clings to power through force, it is inevitable the military age males in the tens of millions will have no recourse but to flee to other countries — thus facilitating migrant crises.

One of the chief complaints of the ongoing migrant crisis in Europe has always been that the migrants are mostly military age males. One critical idea implied by this argument is that these warfighting aged males should remain in their homeland to fight against whatever it is they’re fleeing from, rather than fleeing in the first place like cowards. But if they have no means of warfighting against tyranny, how can we reasonably call them cowards? We cannot fault them at all.

If we ever criticize or downplay the importance of a universal right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of resistance against tyranny, what credibility do we have when we complain that military age males are crossing into and squatting in our own homelands?

What we have to understand is that problems in other countries, should they persist, become a migrant crisis at our doorstep — and without the possibility or means of resistance, these mostly male migrants will show up here.

I’m not arguing that we should always care about the human rights of black and brown males, but it is important for our arguments and reason to be consistent and align with reality, and to advocate for ideas that will, one day, spread to the non-white world in ways that could reduce migrant problem — or at least give us grounds to credibly shame military age males claiming to be refugees.

Now we are even witnessing millions of white males migrating from their ethnic homelands, because they lacked sufficient means to resist or deter the violence brought upon them by a tyrannical government.

Without the means to fight against tyranny, the will to resist is supplanted by the will to be a migrant and flee. A world with continuous mass migration is a world where nationalism will forever continue to be an uphill struggle.

What must do our best to eliminate the reasons (or rather, the excuses) as to why they come to our countries in the first place!

In short, any male that has access to military weaponry via a right to keep and bear arms thus has no credible right or excuse to be a refugee. That’s the point.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/16574

I’m well aware that this is often the case with non-White migrants...

I’m not trying to suggest that non-White refugees have the same feelings of honor and patriotism that Whites have, that they would resist tyranny in their own homeland rather than flee to the West and live an easier life as parasites. But as in most cases, without the means for them to even fight in their own homeland, it’s hard to really know.

The point I was ultimately trying to make is that our very own people, prone to sympathy, need to see that these men are cowards and mere opportunistic parasites in the first place — but unfortunately the male military-age migrants have credibility when they claim to be refugees because they really don’t have the means to resist or overthrow their corrupt governments.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/9807

I’m going to have to write another post for Radical Dose to explain my thesis here and address all of the critiques. Telegram posts won’t suffice.

We all heard N… This is how most Americans feel about McDonald’s today. I’m even embarrassed I ate at McDonald’s twice last year, it makes me feel like I’m an N…

My point here again is that the memes regarding American culture are wrong, off by at least 25 years.

Some people hate America so much, they’ll try to convince you that Pajeet and Squatemalan street food is superior to anything made by Americans in the USA.

It just goes to show how far people on Telegram are willing to libel Americans out of some infantile spite.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/AltSkull48/19465?comment=924450

I just watched the movie “The Founder” about Ray Kroc, the man that made McDonald’s into a giant, international corporate fast food chain with a franchise business model — one of the first of its kind.

I decided to watch it just because McDonald’s is still such a major aspect of all the anti-American “Amerimutt” memes, despite McDonald’s rapidly declining popularity in American culture since the beginning of the 21st century.

Although the movie The Founder isn’t 100% accurate in the story of Ray Kroc and McDonald’s — the screenwriters obviously took some liberties to make the story more exciting for film — I still found the story convincingly accurate and compelling enough to give a realistic perspective of American culture and the McDonald’s phenomenon.

Both Ray Kroc and the McDonald brothers were Whites of recent White-immigrant backgrounds: they all had at least one immigrant parent from Europe. I’m not saying this to suggest that they are less American, but that the men behind McDonald’s had a strong European background, and therefore McDonald’s is as European as it is American.

To make a long story very short without spoiling the movie: Ray Kroc is a natural forward thinking, expansion driven businessman that gradually appropriated the McDonald’s restaurant brand and methodology, gradually taking it away from the McDonald brothers; the latter (the McDonald brothers) wanted to keep the restaurant brand as a more small, local chain. Unlike the McDonald brothers, Ray Kroc understood that certain corners had to be cut for the franchise to be profitable enough to thrive beyond a handful of franchisee operations. Ultimately Ray Kroc won because he made more money with his approach, thereby having more means to take over the entire brand.

After watching the movie, I found myself feeling more sympathetic toward Ray Kroc. He was just a product of capitalism, doing what was necessary to succeed while initially trying to keep the less-ambitious McDonald brothers on board. In the movie, Kroc ultimately screwed over the McDonald brothers, but I couldn’t help but feel it was their fault that Kroc turned on them.

The relevant take away regarding McDonald’s is that the “Ameribro” or “Amerimutt” memes are wrong to depict McDonald’s as exclusively a product of American culture — more accurately, McDonald’s is a product of post-industrial society and capitalism.

McDonald’s was just inevitable, and so are people like Ray Kroc, who are just doing their job in a cut throat economic system. In the movie, Ray Kroc isn’t the bad guy, he’s just a captain having to sail the rough capitalist sea of his time, who reluctantly has to get rid of the people that aren’t on board with sailing anyway.

There’s a fictional scene in the movie The Founder where a franchisee, Joan, suggests to Ray Kroc, the CEO and franchisor of McDonald’s, that he should replace the real ice cream ingredient in McDonald’s milkshakes with an instant milkshake powder. This is suggested to Ray Kroc to save money, because the large freezers used to store the ice cream for milkshakes made the McDonald’s stores unprofitable.

Although this whole scene is fictional, it still sheds light on why fast food companies serve food that is more premade, processed, pre-frozen and/or loaded with preservatives, and therefore less natural in quality.

The reason why fast food restaurants serve food that is lower in what we might call natural quality correlates with why they’re a successful business that can maintain many locations all over the world.

It’s not American culture that’s facilitating this, it’s just the nature of a large business: the need to maintain overhead and remain profitable.

https://youtu.be/n5uadToINEY?