The fertility crisis will NOT be fixed by measures like banning abortion or contraception. We know this because even in countries where these things are banned or extremely socially unacceptable, they STILL have low fertility rates.

The thing stopping people having children is the poor economic climate and lack of optimism for their prospects. It makes family planning a necessity and people with intelligence factor in these problems into their desire to procreate.

I think status of parenthood also plays a huge role in increasing birthrates. Economics, housing, personal finance certainly play a role but if those were really the main issue you would see higher birthrates in economically more fortunate people, which isn't the case. Look at the past people who had none of these things would still have 4-12 kids. Breeder cults are a great example of this. In those communities the status of parenthood is elevated and thus they have higher birthrates. Men care about the economic side of things women care about the status.

Statistically speaking banning abortion would be the worst possible thing for the white race. White children are dying from it but without it there would be far more blacks and browns. Planned parenthood was founded by a racist who wanted to euthanize blacks, which was a point of contention a few years ago. It’s sort of like saying that what hitler did was bad because of the war and death that followed, despite the economic and social turnaround in Germany at the time, and that he shouldn’t have stepped up as chancellor.

The fact is that without legal abortion, there would be far more George Floyds, Karmelo Anthonys, and Trayvon Martins around us.

Sorry Christians and conservatives, the liberals are right about abortion. There’s only two options here: you’re either pro-choice or pro-n*gger. Pick one.

I used to work with a woman of Chinese heritage, though born and raised in Canada, who taught in mainland China for a couple of years. By the end of it, she grew to completely despise the Chinese people. Said they were the worse bunch of grifters she ever encountered, always grinding for higher marks when they weren’t warranted, being devious about how they completed work, and constantly had parents go to demand every sort of accommodation and special treatment regarding enhancing grades or getting extra bonus work just to raise the grades more (none of which she agreed to). She was so disillusioned with people of her race that she became the loudest advocate for having the strongest restrictions on students trying to pull a fast one in respect to school work and exams. She always said they simply cannot be trusted. It was quite the condemnation, much stronger than anyone else made. https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/16833

A curious thing about present-day America is that the people who claim to have read the Federalist Papers are currently supporting the tyrant these papers predicted and cautioned against, while the people who're claiming to fight the tyrant spent the last 20 years denouncing the authors of the Federalist Papers as incurably problematic slave-owning dead white men.

A Republic, if you can bloody well keep it.

The Curse of Eddie comes for Kazakhstan.

https://astanatimes.com/2025/05/kazakhstan-records-lowest-birth-rate-in-a-decade/

is he out of his fucking mind

https://youtu.be/Yb00eIw2Mrs?

The noscript of this article is kind of click bait, but not in a bad way — he isn't advocating for censorship. When I read this article, I couldn't help but imagine that the author was mainly thinking about certain types of people within the Dissident Right: folks on Telegram and Twitter letting outrage-porn, memes, short videos, peer pressure and propaganda shape their entire view on everything from politics and history to philosophy. Despite being a supporter of legal freedom of speech, I found myself mostly in agreement with the author.

The democratization of speech has not led to a golden age for the exchange of ideas. It has led to every form of education, depth or reflection drowning in a sea of ​​emotionally driven chatter. Arguments do not become stronger — only shorter. Whoever can package their opinions in a meme wins. Whoever nuances, loses.

We must stop pretending that free speech is a neutral phenomenon. It is a force. And every force must be controlled. Not with state totalitarianism or censorship, but with a cultural rebirth of something that has all but disappeared: responsibility.

Responsibility to think before you speak. Responsibility to know the difference between a feeling and a truth. Responsibility to be silent sometimes, to listen. To acknowledge that not all knowledge is self-evident, that not everyone should be heard equally, that some voices carry more than others — not because they shout louder, but because they know more.

https://radicaldose.com/freedom-of-speech-was-a-mistake/

Batka responds to Dan Eriksson with some thoughts of his own on the nature of speech and discourse.

https://radicaldose.com/freedom-of-speech/

Radical Dose

LOL, even Russia’s closest ally is supplying ammunition to Ukraine.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/intelslava/75271

Nix is right about MAGA being a party of scammers.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/10117

Drew Pavlou is flexing on a china numba one bot by threatening to blow up the 3 gorges dam.

I love this fucking timeline.

https://x.com/DrewPavlou/status/1927898136262902221

I never understood why so many figures in the “Dissident Right” allied themselves with and protected Academic Agent.

Eddie Gerard pens a companion piece to Colin Liddell's deconstruction of the tradwife meme.

https://radicaldose.com/so-i-heard-youd-like-a-tradwife/