United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind (1923) - In 1906, Congress banned all immigrations except for that of “free white persons”. A Sikh man argued that Indians were actually the descendants of Indo-Aryans and therefore white. The case was laughed out of the Supreme Court due to the common sense understanding that however “white” the original high-caste Brahmins were, they were manifestly non-white by the 20th century

It’s strikingly ironic when a Christian dismisses the Second Amendment as “just words on paper,” because by that reasoning, the Bible — and every sacred text — would be reduced to the same.

You know what else is “just writing on a piece of paper bro”? A property deed and the very fiat money we all use to buy property — ownership of property is ultimately writing on a piece of paper. Like the Second Amendment, these things have real legal consequences.

So it’s not “just writing on a piece of paper bro.”

Nick Fuentes has literally built a cult around himself, and it’s a really fucked up one. If Jim Jones were still around he would be taking notes.

Seeing Americans deride the Second Amendment on Telegram while seated among firearms they lawfully acquired from a gun store, hanging out in an open chatroom full of militia-bros is textbook irony.

I think I now understand why Christian Dissident Rightoids hate the Second Amendment and want to shred our Bill of Rights.

I don’t wish to alienate Christians, and in fact I respect any belief system that can lead to larger White families, but as we all know, there are vocal factions of Christians that want the USA to be a Bible thumping totalitarian-theocracy. It is in debates about the Second Amendment that I come across these religious fanatics that insist that the Second Amendment “has failed us” and that “it’s just writing on a piece of paper.” Their main argument here is that the 2A (and the rest of our Bill of Rights) was intended for a “moral people,” and since our society is “immoral,” our rights should be called into question and/or done away with. It’s stupid on its face, but it’s done with a goal in mind.

All of their arguments are part of a ploy to justify what they really want — a Bible thumping totalitarian theocracy. These Bible thumpers masquerading as White Nationalists will disingenuously say that the Constitution is just writing on a piece of paper, but freak out when you say that the Bible is also just writing on a piece of paper. They will say that our Bill of Rights failed us, but absolutely flip out when you suggest that perhaps Christianity failed us, or that it was perhaps the wrong religion of the White-European race.

I’m not anti-Christian, but I don’t think these Christians have any credibility when they try to strawman our constitutional rights in order to divert blame for our society becoming “immoral” away from other issues, like Christianity failing to maintain its cultural dominance in society. If their argument is that our society has become too immoral to have their rights protected by our Constitution, wouldn’t the source of the problem be related to our previous Christian culture rather than the thing they argue should be taken away?

But I shouldn’t continue to entertain their disingenuous arguments. Their goal is to establish a totalitarian-theocracy above all else, and all of our rights are seen as a huge impediment to that goal. Christian totalitarianism and White Nationalism are not compatible anyway.

In other words, anti-2A Christians have no right to say we worship a document (the Bill of Rights) when they literally worship a document. That’s my main point. Don’t throw stones from a glass church.

Of course there’s way more to it than that.

At this pace Russia will disintegrate sooner than we think. After all, how will those regions remain connected to each other? No fuel - no motor travel. Aviation is also limited due to drone attacks and sanctions. Railways in Russia don't cover enough distance and have always been in a decrepit state - remember Russia is a shithole.

Ukrainian drone strikes achieve much more than seems on the surface. They accelerate Russia's long-overdue disintegration. And the West must support Ukraine in this endeavour. Russia's disintegration cannot come soon enough.

Indian wants to further obfuscate african crimes since making it public is creating awareness among White Americans. Given the oppertunity, most indians will work towards hurting local Whites then helping them.

This is the best video I've seen on Russian 'culture' and their future.

White liberals when they see negroes. Negroes are their sacred cows.

Alternate timeline:Iryna Zarutska would be visiting America as a tourist, and there'd be no non-Whites around to even worry about it. There would be no contest about what Ukraine is and where that territory ends because there is no Soviet union or russians to occupy parts of Eastern Europe to change the demographics.

Gosh, I wonder why camel urine would even be a sought after product in Russia.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/AzovUkraineSupport88/7543

Russian society is very primitive. Belief in horoscopes, sorcerers and many other kinds of superstitions is quite widespread in Russia.

For instance, Russians take horoscopes very seriously to the extent it is unimaginable in Western society. Their "self-improvement" websites abound with advise on what to do in life based on one's horoscope. There is also "self-improvement" advise in the West, however contentious it might be, but here it is framed rationally based on observable and disprovable things. In Russia it is different - it tends to be more obscurantist.

This is just one example. Belief in unverified healing substances or even supernatural powers is widespread in Russia, just like in every primitive society. This tendency also explains why Russians are very susceptible to conspiracy theories and masters at creating them in the first place.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/17700

It's sickening yet revealing that so many within the dissident right are STILL praising Coach Red Shill aka Gonzalo Lira: the now deceased brown man that enjoyed his life in Ukraine as an sex tourist that fucked Ukrainian prostitutes; because he flexed his wealth in Western-currency over the economically much poorer Ukraine. Despite living like a pampered pimp in Ukraine for several years before the invasion, a country that treated him very well, as soon as the invasion kicked off, he stabbed Ukraine in the back by shilling for the Russia invasion; pretending to be an independent journalist — a real journalist wouldn't have been so obviously biased. Anyway, I still can't think of more Jewish behavior, and he died like the rat he actually was. Yet even after his death, notable people within the Dissident Right still praise him and write eulogies. It's really bizarre, until you realize that the Kremlin still funds the Dissident Right, and Lira was an important part of the Kremlin's network of Western-right-wing shills.

https://x.com/JFGariepy/status/1892420021227249907

Wyvern The Terrible’s YouTube channel got taken down. The dissident right grifters he called out most likely had a hand in this.

NOW - Starmer announces mandatory digital ID for the right to work in UK.

Read more: https://www.disclose.tv/id/rx1rrribsr/

@disclosetv

Cemil writes about the historic territory of Ukraine, and how Ukraine has the legitimate claim to all the territory recently occupied by the Russian military, plus some of the territory within Russia’s pre-invasion borders.

https://radicaldose.com/historical-ukraine-its-1991-borders-and-beyond/

This is what life is like for people that don’t have the Second Amendment.

👆If you still believe that the Second Amendment is just some “useless writing on a piece of paper” than please explain to me why most people in other countries aren’t armed. Why didn’t this old British lady have a gun to defend herself?