I think in many ways, it might be more accurate to see the American Revolution as a second English Civil War. In many ways it was a continuation of this Anglo-Saxon push toward greater liberty and sovereignty.

Since getting banned from YidTube, my friend Wyvern the Terrible has found the bulk of his video content and reuploaded it to his new channel on Rumble, which is where he will be posting his new content. His specialty has been exposing the Kremlin’s massive influence over the Dissident Right, which is important to understand since there is still a major war going on right now in Europe.

https://rumble.com/v70gndy-what-is-information-laundering-and-how-to-spot-an-influencer-engaged-in-it.html?

Although I appreciate Fortisaxx’s sentiment on many things, I’d have to side with Hapaperspective here, as he is more in line with history. The American Founder’s view would undoubtedly be considered politically to the right of most right wingers today and they definitely harkened back to the English Civil War (Cromwell and the Parliamentary Roundheads were a regular reference point for them, as they saw themselves as the heirs to those Englishmen and, frankly, ethnically a large percentage of them literally were their descendants). To say either Cromwell or the Parliamentarians in general were liberals would be laughable.
Now, having said that, the American Colonists of the late 18th Century had imbibed in Enlightenment beliefs, but they were mostly of the Anglo-Scottish kind, which was more ‘conservative’ than the far more radical French Enlightenment (and, yes, I know Montesquieu was French, but the exception tends to prove the rule and he was more in line with his beliefs with the Scottish Enlightenment philosophers than most of the radical Philosophes such as Rousseau were promulgating). The main leaders of the American break from England merged these very conservative Enlightenment views with the earlier Anglo-Celtic Protestant worldview of their English and Scots-Irish ancestors; including those who fought Charles I and the Royalist Cavaliers in the 1640s. As many have pointed out in the past, they were not the same as the extremists who took control in France a few years later, especially the Jacobins during the Terror, so to equate them with either radicalism or even the more moderate liberalism we tend to think of today is erroneous. The American Founders would be as liberal as Adam Smith or Frances Hutcheson, not like some latter stage John Stuart Mill.
This brings up another point. As with Mill, the Founders of Canada were of a different era. They were men of the mid-Victorian, rather than Georgian, era. The conservatism of the 1860s was really more akin to that earlier form of liberalism. If you trace the British Conservative Party and its progeny in Canada, they came out of what were deemed as the “liberals” of English during the late 17th and 18th Century: the Whigs. The English Tories of that earlier era were more ardently monarchist and true believers in the Church of England as the only truly acceptable form of religion. The Whigs were open to Dissenting Protestants and though still supportive of the monarchy, they had more sympathies to republican ideals. As such, one would say Canada’s Founders were really closer to these Whigs and, in many respects, to the American Founders, though with more of the Victorian mindset that was taking hold throughout the Anglosphere (with greater emphasis on “science” in all things, the White Man’s Burden, etc).
So, yes, in some respects Canada had a more ‘reticent and reserved’ idea of governance and undoubtedly a more monarchist heritage, but they were still far closer to the American Founders on most things than they differed. In a sense, both were Classical liberals in the older sense of what that means, but also very strongly right wing nationalists; to an extent neither country exhibits today.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/17865

Not only can the American Revolution be seen as a second English Civil War, but also as America’s first civil war. And just as interesting, the Seven Years War in Europe that occurred a decade before the American Revolution was actually the First World War, which was triggered in the New World in the Ohio Valley when George Washington was serving the British Empire as a colonial militia officer. It was triggered by George Washington’s miscalculations in dealing with the French.

The Seven Years War in Europe was triggered by George Washington. lol

Ameribros, share this around: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJvFfTOxvvM

These No Kings! protests will result in the opposite of the intended effect: it makes Trump look great. These protestors are your typical Berniebro, mentally ill, weak and dysgenic shitlib types. What do we do with these people once we have power?

https://youtu.be/FC3eO3Le1sE

Never give up your gun rights, because your government and your racial enemies are always scheming up ways to take them away, that’s why we have the Second Amendment here in the US exists as a strong legal protection — something a lot of dissident righters still refuse to understand. There’s no moderate or in between position here: If you don’t support your right to keep and bear arms, then you support the government disarming you — It’s one or the other. You have to pick one!

Also, here’s an excellent video by Lilly Gaddis. She gets it.

https://youtu.be/wlUXgjx5p4k

Where does “gun culture” come from? How does it start? How do you get one? And when and how does it end?

I’ve heard people tell me, “well unlike you Americans we can’t/shouldn’t have gun rights because we don’t have a gun culture.”

If you were an animal in a cage, someone could try to argue that living in a cage is your culture. So would freedom from confinement in a cage be against your culture?

I’ve heard people say “we don’t have a culture of free speech.” They unwittingly imply that no freedom of speech is their natural and correct state of affairs. It’s some form of psychological domestication, like a government official is living inside their head.

My opinion: Just as freedom of speech, gun rights are not even a matter of culture. You can have a gun culture or a culture of freedom of speech, but the prerequisite is the legal protection of those rights. The culture aspect is just a symptom of having rights that aren’t restricted by the government.

A concise genetic overview of the Italian people, tracing their diverse ancestral roots across six regional clusters. It examines haplogroups, autosomal DNA, and ancient migrations that made Italy one of Europe’s most genetically varied nations.

https://radicaldose.com/italian-genetics/

There’s East Asian dudes in the crowd with the protesters, and it looks like they’re chanting with them. lol. What a timeline.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/RealLandDownUnder/130471

People want to believe that the AI bubble will burst. Yeah okay, maybe its growth will temporarily taper. But we all should remember that people said the same thing about the entire internet after the dotcom bubble, yet here we are, all of us online on our mobile devices.

If Nationalists don’t adjust their sails for where the technological wind is blowing, they will be left behind.

Right, that’s exactly what I’m trying to say. But there are people that think AI is over because “the bubble will burst!”

If not us, who?
If not now, when?

"War is when the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself."

- Benjamin Franklin

Somehow the British government arrests more people for their speech than any other country. That’s incredible.

I can see how some BritNats come to the conclusion that Russia and China are better, and how they’ll save them from the “evil West,” even though they’re very wrong about all that.

But yes, the British government has got to go.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/gramscianradio/6921

This is where most male Hapas are at psychologically. And this is one reason why I don’t generally like other Hapas — they’re typically a weird, cringey bunch.

Guess which race this will hurt the most. Some people are predicting massive chimp outs.

JUST IN - Decarlos Brown Jr. indicted on federal charges with "violence against a railroad carrier and mass transportation system resulting in death," which makes him eligible for the death penalty.

Read more: https://www.disclose.tv/id/e7p11zano2/

@disclosetv

Whenever you see someone complaining about online spammers and scammers, just remind them that it’s non-Whites — especially Indians — that have ruined the internet. White people aren’t taking time out of their day to send out spam.

where is the lie?