To no one's surprise, the foreign muslim invader and incest enthusiast who committed immigration fraud by marrying her brother, Rep Ilhan Omar is calling for an unconstitutional gun registry.

In addition to the 2nd Amendment prohibiting gun registries, the Firearms Owners Protection Act (FOPA) of 1986 also EXPRESSLY prohibits them.

There's only one reason why a government wants to create a gun registry - its because they want to seize guns that are in the hands of citizens.

@Retards_TikTok
@Retardsoftiktok

If having firearms didn’t matter, they wouldn’t be trying to disarm you.

The video shows a statement by current US Secretary of State Rubio in 2014: there he recalls that Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees, but the russian federation attacked, so he promises that the United States will forever support Ukraine

This is why the USA owes Ukraine. But the greater lesson here: never ever surrender your arms/nukes for any reason whatsoever.

This is “trad Russia,” the Empire fighting against the “evil, LGBTQ+ GAE-globohomo West.”

Russians can’t even criticize Islam without being gulaged.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/EternalMuscovite/77983

What are the Jews up to this week? Oh great, they’re hacking people’s phones through ads. Protect your mobile devices and computers, install adblockers now.

https://youtu.be/lnaZ6bRyTF8?

Every time I talk to other Millennials, Gen X, and the members of the Silent Generation that are still alive, it seems like we’re all in agreement: Boomers are just toddlers in adult bodies that had much better employment opportunities.

To put it a bit vulgarly, Canadian gun owners taking the piss out of the far left federal government. Other firearms have to be registered and, thus, reported, but not long guns (a positive thing Harper did during his administration). https://news.1rj.ru/str/SunflowerSociety/79747

The bad thing for the government is that Canada’s current gun crime is due to most of the guns used come across the border from the States and, unlike other farther away White nations, the good thing for White Canadians (at least the more right leaning and especially nationalist oriented) is that guns will also quite easily flow across the border if things get particularly spicy due to the Canadian government’s increasingly tyrannical policies. You have to figure they know this and are absolutely terrified by the prospect.

This is Putin’s Russia, the one Ukraine is fighting against!

https://news.1rj.ru/str/AzovUkraineSupport88/10418

You’d NEVER see any White women in any Western country be so excited to fuck Indian males — but Russia seems to be the exception. I think many Russian women would rather live in India with Indian men than be stuck in dirt poor Russia with its habitually drunk gopniks and Z-vets that are missing limbs/genitals from the SMO.

Continued break in the vaxx’s official narrative https://archive.is/Fz7Fs#selection-847.0-879.87

If nationalists don't want Western governments suppressing them, maybe they should stop being useful idiots for the enemy states.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine was actually a perfect moment for the nationalist movements. It was the vindication of all their warnings in the last decades. This was the moment to seize the opportunity and convince Western establishment to embrace nationalism (not petty nationalism but civilizational nationalism) and to revert all the anti-white policies.

The argument should have been the following: "The West is weak and cannot deter Russia due to all these leftist-liberal policies of the last decades. It is commendable that you recognize Russia as a threat. But if you are sincere and if you want to defeat Russia, then abandon the leftist policies, reverse the degeneracy that has been rotting our soul and making us vulnerable to enemies like Russia." Pure and simple.

Instead what do these nationalists do? They say the following:
"The West is weak and degenerate, that's why we should embrace Russia. It is not Russia, but our institutions and elites that are the real enemy. So we need to destroy them. And we should not fight against Russia, because our elites, who have been censoring us, regard it as a threat."

This is the most retarded and at the same time nefarious stance. Russia is not threatening your governments or elites. It is threatening YOU. Your homes, your families, your people. Noone asks you to fight for the elites. You are being asked to fight for your people.

Russian rule will not mean you get rid of your hated elites and get to simply rule your realms under Russian suzerainty (which is bad enough). It means Europeans will be deported en masse to Siberia and replaced by arrivals from Central Asia, Africa and India. That's what Russia has done since time immemorial. This is the basic modus operandi of Russian conquests - the population replacement. So was it in old Muscovy (e.g., Ivan III's destruction of Novgorod), in the Soviet Union (e.g., Holodomor in Ukraine, replacement of Baltic peoples with Russian settlers etc.) and now (replacement of Ukrainian population in occupied territories with arrivals from Central Asia and Caucasus).

You rail against "white genocide" through immigration, but Russian rule will be the actual white genocide - not through gradual immigration, but immediately and en masse. The only true white genocide is currently taking place in Russian-occupied Ukrainian territories.

Anyone claiming to defend the West should support Ukraine and see Russia as the enemy. Russia is currently Europe's primary nemesis. Any sincere European nationalist should aim, first and foremost, for Russia's destruction. The reversal of internal anti-white policies, the destigmatization of nationalism should not be the end in itself, but serve as the means to successfully counteract and defeat external enemies like Russia.

When people criticize the Second Amendment, when they say that it doesn’t matter, what they’re basically saying is that it’s okay if the government arrests you and sentences you to prison for exercising your right to keep and bear arms.

It’s that’s simple.

It’s exactly the same thing as criticizing freedom of speech.

The First and the Second Amendments are basically the same thing, except one applies to speech and the other applies to the right to keep and bear arms.

The Second Amendment doesn’t always prevent tyranny, just as the First Amendment doesn’t guarantee that the truth always prevails over lies and dogma — our objectively better arguments certainly haven’t captivated the masses over the establishment’s brainwashing.

But the important point of these Amendments is that the US government is legally restrained from throwing us in prison for exercising these natural rights.

Sure, you could argue some edge cases, some exceptions here and there, but for the most part these Amendments have done their job restraining a government that would otherwise take away and curtail much more of our rights.

Another way of looking at this: to claim that the Second Amendment was designed to prevent tyranny is like saying that the First Amendment was designed to prevent lies.

People often equate liberals with larger welfare states and more social programs. Helping the people with a taxes being collected is not the problem. The problem is that to liberals this is their worldview. Degrade every institution to a point where it holds no value and give it away to anti-social people and foreigners.