More gun control inbound for Australia. The Australian government has to punish every Australian gun owner for the actions of foreigners.

🇦🇺🚨 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says tougher gun laws will be put to national cabinet, including proposed limits on how many firearms individuals can own or use and a review of licence durations as governments consider tighter controls nationwide.
🤔 ... law abiding citizens will be punished, for crimes committed by terrorists, who entered the country with the blessings of the politicians?
Dec 14, 2025 @ausvstheagenda

Unfortunately, at some point, some of these Western governments will just outright ban all civilian gun ownership. Obviously the real goal of these politicians is to totally disarm White man, but let’s entertain the big lie that these politicians are banning guns out of a genuine concern for public safety. After they ban all guns, but mass killings still occur, what will they ban next?

Do these politicians ever have the foresight to think, “if this ban fails, what will we ban next?” If smarter politicians were running the government, they would see the inherent danger in banning inanimate objects like guns. It sets a very bad precedents on so many levels, it’s a Pandora’s box of bad policy that will have no brakes.

Some naive White Nationalists may look at a total gun ban as a positive legal precedent, to later be applied to non-Whites, but the reality is that our current politicians, the people running our governments, would ban oxygen before banning non-Whites — my point is that this is where this ban train is headed. They won’t literally ban oxygen, but they’ll ban much more — almost everything — before even considering banning the types of people/races that are most likely to commit these mass murders.

Banning guns to stop mass shootings is like banning forks to stop obesity — and obesity kills more people in any single country than these “mass shootings” ever will.

I still see this belief floating around that we don’t actually have freedom of speech in the USA because you cannot criticize Jews. This is not completely accurate — if this were true, I would definitely be in prison already.

It just seems that the First Amendment only applies to US citizens. Non-citizens accused of “anti-semitism” can have their visa/green-card revoked, and institutions that get federal funding can have that funding revoked.

Hmmmm.

In your opinion, what exactly is “high culture”? And are you a consumer of high culture?

The reason I’m asking is because I believe the term “high culture” is typically conceived of and used in a very nebulous and subjective way. I haven’t found a solid, detailed definition of what exactly high culture is.

We all know what low culture is — trashiness — so is high culture just the opposite of low class culture? Obviously not, but it’s important to think about it by comparing it to the low and middle cultures.

Reid Houston writes about how Nix Jeelvy's assumptions about ordinary Americans on both sides of the political aisle are inaccurate and counterproductive. https://radicaldose.com/nick-jeelvys-views-on-americans/

I always thought the term
“coal rolling” meant something else… I learn something new everyday.

Another reason why gun rights should be important to everyone in the pro-White sphere — outside of their obvious utility — is that the debate over gun control is such a huge golden opportunity to emphasize racial differences and race pill more people. In countries that already have stringent gun control laws, this opportunity is greatly reduced; it can only be discussed within the context of the USA, which is less optimal for race pilling non-Americans.

Once knives are banned in some of these western countries that like banning tools rather than nons, it’ll be even harder to show people within those respective countries that nons are impulsive savages more likely to commit murder.

What I’m getting at here is that as Western countries become open air prisons that can ban everything and reduce individual rights and freedom to nothing, the races will become more equal on paper. That’s probably part of the reason why the establishment is so eager to take away your rights.

I believe that the majority of the ruling class — outside of whatever agenda they have — see their respective countries as nothing more than managerial projects that reflect on their personal ability to “get shit done.” They want to hit certain quotas on certain issues, like reducing “gun crime” or reducing incarcerations of negroes — and more importantly, making multiracialism run more smoothly. It’s like a CEO of a corporation firing loyal employees merely to make the accounting numbers look good to investors in the short term.

All that matters to them is getting the target numbers right.

No country is totally safe.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/martinezpolitix/17980

You can’t run away from diversity in the long term, but you can fight it. The question is how much space is the White man willing to fight for and occupy on this planet? The non-White world doesn’t care what geographic space you see as your ancestral homeland — because in the grand scheme of things that doesn’t matter in any real way. It’s just a moral notion.

What is real is force and demographic expansion.

I'm certain Africans are prioritised importation by all elites. In Vietnam, I met a 130IQ Vietnamese girl with fluent English and multiple degrees that told me she'd been trying to get into Australia for years but constantly had her applications rejected. Yes we have tens of thousands of 60IQ Africans running loose in Australia.
Not that I support any non European migration, but it's clear that they're not allowing the best of the non White world to enter and are instead prioritising the absolute worst. This is why the purely economic motivation for immigration (among elites) doesn't hold up. Their motive is more demonic than economic

Modern American Hero Origin Story.

I guess his son had a nightmare childhood