"Around SUV's, never be at ease!"

Black presenters uncomfortable with a white man describing himself as Jamaican after he has spent his life in Jamaica as a citizen. But clearly would all agree a black person doing the same here is British... Illogical based upon an unwillingness to separate out nationality, indigeneity, ancestral connections or cultural experiences. Africans are also latecomers to Jamaica, the original Indian inhabitants died out or were moved to South American territories after Spanish colonisation.

https://metro.co.uk/2021/11/24/white-yardie-channel-4-hit-with-ofcom-complaints-over-heritage-row-15656699/

Libertarianism can't contain them. NRx can't distract them. They didn't fall for the Intellectual Dark Web. So a new sandbox to turn right-wing dissent into an easily monitored, politically ineffectual game is being rolled out. This reminds me of the puff pieces promoting neoreaction and the Intellectual Dark Web. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-rise-of-the-neoclassical-reactionaries

I will be starting an irregular "ounce" hangout in 1 hour from now (6pm ET, 3pm PT, and 10pm in Britain). You can post superchats here or here (crypto). The live chat will be at @mwpublic.

Now yuo see. Wøøp Wøøp
https://youtu.be/4j3CLEEgcvE

From now on, when someone asks me what my religion is, I’m going to say it’s the Second Amendment.

Having spent most of my life in close proximity to people of all races, it’s rare to come across a non-White person that deeply cares about constitutional/natural rights out of principle. Regardless of their IQ level or learnedness, their support for rights begins and ends with what benefits them in the present. Often, it seems as if their concept of time (particularly the future) is in itself too lacking for the concept of rights to even be worth consideration — in other words, they have zero foresight: they don’t care about fair trials if they aren’t being tried in a court. And even any concern they may express for the rights of others, usually coethnics (i.e. Mexican migrants wanting illegals to have the vote) is almost never out of principle; when non-Whites express concern about their people’s rights, they’re indirectly expressing concern about whatever will benefit them as individuals in the near-present. Non-Whites rarely care about rights in any meaningful or altruistic capacity beyond the self, because they have a more limited imagination surrounding any context of political rights, and this severely limits their capacity to have moral qualms when rights could be violated down the road. They just don’t care about rights: there are almost no non-Whites that care about your right to freedom of speech.

The only exception to this would be with Jews: they like expanding select rights that facilitate vices and rights that aid their collective agenda, while they simultaneously advocate for the limiting of the natural rights our founding fathers wanted us to have.

Rather than pushing away Libertarians or the 2A community, it’s better for us to try to win them over by explaining to them that most non-Whites will never care about the 2A, free speech, property rights, etc... only Whites care about rights.