If WW3 happens, a lot of White people are going to die, and you can guess what the Western ruling class will say when WW3 is over: “We need more immigrants to replace the people we’ve lost.”

This is one major reason why I think the system wants to get rid of White males, and sending them off to die in brother wars is one way to do it.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/fyrgen/1083

All due condolences to the innocent Ukrainians and Russians suffering this conflict, but I just can't view this event as being isolated from the primary Globalist project of this century - the Agenda for the 21st Century.

We know through writings, plans and policies officially associated with the UN, the WEF, and major think-tanks that these self-appointed technocrats consider human overpopulation (and freedom) a problem, want to create more 'sustainable' lifestyles, to transform methods of food production, re-organise supply chains and reset the financial system.

This rather informative article—Up next: Global food crisis?—details several ways in which the Russian-Ukraine conflict just so happens to further these 'Sustainable Development Goals':

➖"Roughly a third of world exports of barley come from Russia and Ukraine combined, 29 per cent of wheat, 19 per cent of maize, as well as 80 per cent of sunflower oil."
➖Russia supplies a large quantity of the world's fertilizers and crop nutrients.
➖Rising fuel prices compound supply costs.
➖Russia imports all of its seeds.
➖"Russian agriculture is almost entirely dependent on imported equipment"

Beyond that article, we can speculate that Russia being cut off from the Swift Payment System may well push them to fast-track a new financial system, perhaps involving their CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency). And as Hapaperspective has pointed out, this conflict can only result in fewer masculine Russian and Ukrainian men. Both nations have a disproportionate number of folk who would stand against the NWO... if they hadn't been killed off.

So we can see how this drama appears to be rather convenient for the world-changers. Some side-effects of the conflict offer them direct results. Others enable them to play the Problem-Reaction-Solution card to get what they want. E.g. "We can't have such fragile supply chains so give us more control over them and we'll make sure this never happens again".

The pro-Putin people that keep criticizing the Ukrainian government’s decision to hand out rifles typically have very limited experience with firearms themselves, so I think it’s worth drawing attention to any videos from content creators that understand firearms and have actual experience on the matter.

https://youtu.be/Y4Bdo5hHtKg

I wonder what percentage of the American First crowd is genuinely pro-Putin — we know their leader Fuentes is a fanatical Putin simp. It would be great if they actually put their money where their mouth is and joined one of the pro-Russian militias fighting in Ukraine, considering how strongly they confess to feel. That would at least be respect worthy, but none of them are manly enough to back up what they believe with any real action. Like typical numale spectators, all they can do is cheer from the sidelines.

There’s just something deeply annoying about seeing fighting age males (notice I didn’t say men here) vehemently supporting one side of a war they aren’t open to fighting in themselves.

EDIT: This also applies to all the really anti-Russian pro-Ukrainian people. If you strong support one side, as a man, you should go and fight. IMO I think brother wars are bad and it would be best if we just didn’t attach ourselves to one side of conflict that has no outcome that benefits us.

I’ll be live with Thomas Baden Riess and Pox Populi in one hour.

https://youtu.be/RObYfBxrQOw

Going LIVE in 20 minutes! Mr Hapa has been really sound lately. I look forward to chatting with him. Do tune in!

99% White country ravaged by war, Blacks worst affected