Could someone tell the Nazbols Exposed Telegram channel admin to at least use the whole video I made about CRP rather than just showing his users a small clip of it? I don't even care about getting any credit for it, but why not show the whole video?

EDIT: It's absurd that more people have seen this clip on his channel than the entire video from its source.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/nazbolsexposed/1267

“Richard Spencer is asked about accusing dissident right thought leaders of being on Russia's payroll and repeatedly calls them traitors.” -Rinzler from that chat.

Notice Spencer’s awkward smile after the first question, his smile says it all: “I totally wasn’t referring to Keith Woods and Joel! Trust me!”

This must have been extremely awkward for their stream discussion, because who else could Spencer be talking about except people like Woods and Joel? And the livestream questions really put them all on the spot, hilarious.

“Richard Spencer calls Joel Davis a pro-China propagandist; Davis says he wants the West to model itself on China.” - Rinzler.

Wow, it’s been a LONG time since Spencer has shown some common sense, and as someone that’s half Chinese, he’s damn RIGHT about the Chinese and trusting your gut. No White person I know would ever want to emulate the Chinese, especially how they govern. Chinese people don’t care about rights at all.

THIS IS A REPOST, I uploaded the wrong video by mistake!

Speechless

Covid disappeared quicker than Black Lives Matter after the election.

I still can’t comprehend how people in the DR like Keet Woods and Joel continue to praise how the Chinese govern, as if they’re some sort of role model for White Nationalists to follow, when I don’t even trust the Chinese running restaurants anymore.

And I’m saying this as someone that is half Chinese.

https://youtu.be/--OnclX8yac

"We say 'Hmm, you guys are doing it better than us, and we want to compete with you, so we want to copy your good ideas, to imitate you.'"
— Joel Davis

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/5467

It's commendable to see Spencer ridicule this absurd belief that we can ever succeed by imitating the Chinese political model or their behaviour. Not only is such ant-like collectivism against our general behaviour (see Kevin MacDonald, and additional elaboration by Fróði, who both say that the group tactics and dynamics of north-western Europeans are a result of a common and shared individualism), but any behaviour that the Chinese do is for their benefit. We cannot simply imitate them without also benefitting them, because we lose what is unique about ourselves and our own interests and natural methodology.

See also American Krogan's recent post about Chinese promoting western anti-White propaganda. Is this based? Of course they are simply doing what is good for them, but by extension that is bad for us!

I'm reminded of the behaviour of many Christians (no less Martin Luther) and their avid love for the 'Old Testament.' These books were written by Jews, for Jews, and whenever White Christians imitate them and claim how 'based' these books are, how much Solomon's wisdom or David's psalms connect with them spiritually, how it speaks about the foreign nations as enemy and how they will be their slaves, they neglect that this spiritual hatred is about you. They forget Carl Schmitt 101; Friend-Enemy distinction. In this literature, in this propaganda, we are the enemy, we are the slave, we are the evil heathens worshipping false idols in high places, and so imitating their worldview for ourselves, as Christianity has done, does not change the fact of where we lie in the worldview of the enemy.

We have to do what is good for ourselves by drawing strength from what is within ourselves and what is suitable for our people. As Stephen McNallen says, we must "drink from our own well." There is no universal one size fits all strategy that wins every time. By adopting the worldview, tactics, propaganda, history and religion of our enemies, we lose any understanding of ourselves and what is good and right for us.

⚔️ A note on the Russian invasion of Ukraine

1. Putin is honest when he says the goal of the invasion is to DE-NAZIFY and DE-MILITARIZE Ukraine.

2. Ukraine has absolutely nothing to gain from the invasion. And the West (our West) has nothing to gain from it.

3. Russia is not an alternative to the post-WW2 anti-Fascist ideological paradigm. Russia is a part of that paradigm.

3. The "Jewish oligarch" talking point is irrelevant. Russia also has Jewish oligarchs and Putin will not end the system of oligarchy in Ukraine. The presence of Jewish elite figures in Ukraine doesn't invalidate Ukrainian nationalism any more than it invalidates nationalism in other countries with Jewish elites.

4. Ukraine has always had dysfunctional and corrupt governments. Zelensky just happened to be president when the country was invaded — no one is fighting for his government. Ukrainians are fighting for the simple reason that their country has been invaded by a foreign power. That's what normal people do.

5. Everyone saying that Ukrainians shouldn't fight to defend their country against a foreign invasion is a nihilist and doesn't deserve to be taken seriously. This isn't a video game.

6. The Western neo-liberal establishment has nothing to lose from this war. NATO has become 10x more significant because of the Russian attack on Ukraine. Sweden and Finland are rushing to become members. Three weeks ago you could have claimed that NATO is an obsolete entity. No one is saying that anymore. If anything, the Western liberal establishment is the party that has gained the most from this attack — while Ukraine has lost the most.

/ @guidetokulchur

Anti-Tank Guided Missiles (ATGMs) are a big part of modern warfare: one of major weapons making tanks and all armored vehicles increasingly obsolete.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/CIG_telegram/18403

This is a war where we all lose.

🇺🇳 NATO posting black suns?

https://twitter.com/NATO/status/1501146212938010628

@CIG_telegram

Taking the piss out of Keith Woods is basically fair game for anyone at this point.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/keith_woods/2424

https://odysee.com/@Woodlader.4:a/the-basics-of-home-survival:a

Sharing again this very useful video by our man in the woods. Even if you aren’t lucky enough to live in the forest, everything Woodlander says here applies to urban living too.

Uh oh...

https://news.1rj.ru/str/BellumActaNews/73314

Reproduction strategies

Today we look at the two strategies of reproduction: r-selection and K-selection

r-selection
This reproduction type is about sheer numbers. Species who are practicing this tend to have many descendants, however the effort they put in raising and educating them is rather low. Sometimes even the community is tasked with raising individuals and not the biological parents.

Individuals in r-selected communities are also disposable. This reflects in a decreased level of empathy amongst the members.

Examples for species practicing r-selection: rabbits, mice, Sub-Saharan aboriginals, Australian aboriginals.

K-selection
In contrast to the r-selected species, this type of reproduction is about quality of the individuals. Focus is laid on education and putting effort and energy into few individuals. Parents mostly take care of their own offspring, which stays with them for a much longer time.

Examples are: wolves, elephants, descendants of Indo-Europeans and Denisovans.

@EuropeanTribalism

This is a perfectly normal and reasonable thing to say.

But for some reason if Ukrainians take the same position about their own territory, they’re “dying for nothing” according to the Nazbol types. 🙄

I can’t take these nerds seriously.

Where people like myself, Pox, Hwitgeard and now Spencer disagree with people like Joel Davis and Keith Woods on China has very little to do with economics, to assume that the entire scope of our criticisms is just China’s economic policies is quite the straw man.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/ImperiumPressOfficial/1024

"We say 'Hmm, you guys are doing it better than us, and we want to compete with you, so we want to copy your good ideas, to imitate you.'"
— Joel Davis

Is this a good idea and worth imitating?

https://news.1rj.ru/str/leaklive/5525

https://news.1rj.ru/str/CIG_telegram/18437

Could be real. Could be fake. Could be from years ago. In any case, the sight of tanks with the hammer and sickle should be an unwelcome sight to anyone with a brain, let alone right-wing nationalist sentiments.

A question for the theory boys and those who think this is just Trad Christian Russia vs Gay America: what would you do if tanks with communist flags rumbled into your town?