https://www.elcorreogallego.es/amp/galicia/alerta-en-la-flota-dobla-su-precio-el-gasoleo-y-ya-obliga-a-amarrar-barcos-MF10629599

Fishing fleets in Spain, Italy, and Morocco have decided to remain docked due the increase in diesel fuel prices. It’s not worth going out to sea, the cost of gas outweighs the return made on the day’s catch.

Expect the same breakdowns to occur in farming and ranching. This is how we end up eating the bugs.

While we’re all bickering about whose “side” to take in Russia vs NATO, our real and eternal enemies are pulling all the strings and pushing us all towards abject humiliation and servitude.

I’m sick of people in the DR acting like everything is so terrible right now, like their world is falling apart all around them and trannies are hiding under their bed, because that kind of thinking just leads them into endorsing everything from communism to Islam, or anything just because it’s different, all because they’ve black pilled themselves into retardation. Meanwhile, they’re sitting comfortably in their own room with food in their stomach, computers, and presumably they live in a safe area. If they’re American, they also have more rights protecting them than they would anywhere else in the entire world — they don’t appreciate the rights they have because they don’t understand them, they don’t understand what their situation would be like without such rights because they’ve learned to take them for granted.

All of this could change very soon, but for right now your immediate situation is not nearly as bad as some of you think it is.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/DevonStack/1997

Problem, reaction, solution. Funny how the problems are always global, and the solution is always globalism.

I saw some recent post again about "never relax" and thought I'd point out once more that it's arguably derived from an old Roman idea: Si vis pacem, para bellum. The full phrase is: Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparat bellum.

Translation: He who desires peace, prepares for war.

The fact that the Ukraine-Russia war and the propaganda surrounding it are fulfilling the end goals of Agenda 21 makes it obvious, too obvious in fact, that this is not all it appears to be.

I'm live with TBR.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6CwMEecvdY

Just as well that race is a social construct!

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2019/08/12/world-must-prepare-biological-weapons-target-ethnic-groups-based/

I’m honoured, almost to the point of speechlessness, to be invited on Frodi’s show. Don’t worry, by Sunday the words will have come to me and it will be a great chat, I’m sure.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/guidetokulchur/2639

This whole notion that the conflict in Ukraine is this struggle between “based christpilled Russia” vs “The Gay American Empire” (GAE) is all wrong, both sides are gay.

https://twitter.com/_super_shy/status/1502092942873444364

Nationalism for me but not for thee. Hand rubbing intensifies.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israels-knesset-passes-law-barring-palestinian-spouses-2022-03-10/

Child soldiers are now all of a sudden wonderful and progressive.
Remember, this is the same media that attacks parents in the West who teach their children how to shoot.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/BertieBassett4Life/2414

I'm with Thuletide on this matter. We have seen a lot of political theatre in the past two years, even more in the past two weeks, and a 'break up' between Putin and the WEF is definitely peak theatre. It even sounds like a pro-wrestling storyline.

However, I see no signs that Putin is walking back on the Agenda 21 path, nor than he has abandoned Dugin's Eurasianism either. Both paths are models of centralised globalism, not nationalism. It also seems that the threat of this Eurasian power-bloc is the reason that some nationalists are more sympathetic to GAE and NATO (for fighting Communism in the past) in the hope that this will push back against the new rising Eurasianism, or that Europe, with the inevitable collapse of the EU and individual national sovereignties, will be caught between the two.

Indeed, if Russia has severed itself from the WEF's global vision, it now has the opportunity to develop a larger power-bloc with China and the East, and you can certainly see why the Western globohomo is so angry at this. However it is also very likely that this is all just a PR move on behalf of the WEF.

Now Eric Striker is claiming that "Davos/WEF is an instrument of US based Jewish finance. Conspiracy theorist misdirectors wanted people to believe that WEF is the sovereign (just like they used to do with the UN) but now this has been disproven for the idiocy it always was."

The problem here is that people like him, and most nationalists for that matter, see globalism as a single power from all else is subject to. Furthermore the most significant shift between global power in the past to now is that it was physically or locally centralised (Morgoth's 'Elephant'), but now global power exists everywhere and nowhere (Morgoth's 'Whale'), it is both global and centralised but also decentralised in physicality, members can leave and join but the power remains centralised, and this is what the WEF is and why it is such a threat and why it is sovereign.

Globalism is the inevitable result of centralisation and centralisation is the direction towards which power itself always moves. The reason that Nationalism is so anathema to the global system is that it limits centralisation, it involves the recognition of power in others without attempting to oppose it or assimilate it into one's own, unless of course it becomes a direct threat to one's own (in the example of Communism). Nationalism involves Game Theory, it works if everyone does it. We are living in an era which has thoroughly rejected nationalism, an age of competing power-blocs, each vying for their own globalism. There are multiple globalisms for want of a better phrase. And of course one bloc may hold global dominance (America and the West for a while), but if this should shift, then a new globalism may take the stage.

I should also direct you all again to Guessedworker's Parsing The Contest of Elites:
"Historically, these elites have by no means been monolithic in form or singular in their interests. They are human beings, after all. They shift generationally and, because they are opportunists and hustlers, always with the flow of political possibility. There is a natural tension between worldviews, not least those of Jews, always mindful of their ethnic struggle for Olam Ha-ba, and WASPs totally unmindful of that or, of course, of their own peoplehood, and simply, mechanically given to modernity and a narcissistic, even sociopathic individualism extending no further than their own epidermis."

If there were to be a shift from dominance by finance to dominance by technology (where data is the new currency), what would this mean for Jewish power? Would they jump ship to where the new source of power lies, or remain rooted in finance? Would this cause any tension and division between such groups as the technocratic world moves around them?

With me, it’s rather simple. Globalism isn’t a movement, it’s an ideology. Multiple groups can hold it, even if they’re opposed to each other. Globohomo is one disposition, Eurasianism another, Make Cheap Knockoff Shit and Whine About Muh Nanking (it’s more elegant in the original Mandarin) a third.

People like us are compelled to spend time time online learning about political philosophies, old and new; tuning in for the latest takes on global events; and debating theology or ideology with others. But as far as I'm concerned, as things stand, all of that is mere intrigue and entertainment. We don't hold power, so can't put any of it into practice.

I've been politically and philosophically aware (to varying degrees) for about 20 years. But here in 2022 I've concluded beyond doubt that our efforts are best spent on the following:

A) Becoming as self-sufficient as possible. Learning and practicing traditional skills.
B) Educating oneself about how the law system actually works. This is our most tragic specific ignorance.
C) Forming and strengthening real-life, local friendships and networks.

We can entertain ourselves with political theory, historical events, debates and esoterica in our spare time, so long as we're prioritising those three things. As dissidents, we're so far away from having any kind of influence over the System that it's almost laughable to think that our 'hot takes' and debates mean anything.

From hereon I'll be reading books about permaculture and homesteading rather than essays on the Third Position. I'll be listening to podcasts about Trust Law rather than livestream debates. I'll be digging and building rather than debating. That's my intention, anyway.

I’ll be live with Mr. Murdoch in about 10 minutes on the White Rabbit Radio Odysee and Dlive channels.

Btw If you are stocking up on food (which you should) dont tell anyone about it, dont brag to your normie friends just do it silently. To my Ameribros if you have a nice pantry full of food and you dont have a weapon, then you have a loot crate.

In the Nationalist Narnia metaverse, sending African troops to the Ukraine is "based."

One’s teeth falling out is a clear metaphor for losing one’s strength, force, or effectiveness. To call one “toothless” is to say they are weak and harmless. There’s really no way to confirm it, but I’d bet money that this dream became more and more common as our men became more domesticated/emasculated, especially post-WW2.