A very insightful comment from Mr Tilde. The system co-opts and/or platforms movements that keep the gentile tax-cattle masses distracted with issues that don’t really lead them off the plantation, toward actual freedom and independence from the system. I can see more red pill movements being afforded a platform in the future, a sort of hollow freedom of speech afforded as additional pressure release valves will be needed to keep the growing DR from actually taking power (for real change) or leaving the system altogether.
“I have been seeing a lot of Red Pill stuff on women becoming popular on YouTube, the same platform that bans you for remotely being ‘racially conscious’.
I mean, women already served their purpose for the globaloids by helping them destroying family and marriage, and so now it's open season on them. It's why Lia Thomas controversy is a thing (you can thank feminists for that). Women today aren't as important as a political group as they used to be, at least compared to trans and colored people.”
“I have been seeing a lot of Red Pill stuff on women becoming popular on YouTube, the same platform that bans you for remotely being ‘racially conscious’.
I mean, women already served their purpose for the globaloids by helping them destroying family and marriage, and so now it's open season on them. It's why Lia Thomas controversy is a thing (you can thank feminists for that). Women today aren't as important as a political group as they used to be, at least compared to trans and colored people.”
👍3
Just as with the red pill movement and their issues with women, someday in the future, I think discussions about race realism and White well being will be allowed, protected and even promoted by the system, but as just another release valve by the ruling class looking down at us like cattle that want re-segregated enclosures — “okay, the White cattle want their own pens, let’s let them talk about it and release some steam so they don’t revolt.” If that’s all we want, they’ll let us talk about it, as long as we don’t blame them and the you-know-who tribe, and as long as we don’t have any potential at obtaining real power to do anything ourselves — I think a more meaningful ban on modern firearms and laws against living off the their grid will the conditions here, before they allow a controlled increase of freedom of speech.
When there’s no potential for us to separate ourselves from them, when they have a secured monopoly on real power, they’ll let us have YouTube again, because then it won’t matter — it’ll be useful to the system if it releases pressure and keep the masses distracted. White Nationalism will just be reduced to a white well being pressure valve with people like Jason Köhne selling pro-White pillows to more people. It won’t matter.
When there’s no potential for us to separate ourselves from them, when they have a secured monopoly on real power, they’ll let us have YouTube again, because then it won’t matter — it’ll be useful to the system if it releases pressure and keep the masses distracted. White Nationalism will just be reduced to a white well being pressure valve with people like Jason Köhne selling pro-White pillows to more people. It won’t matter.
👍1🤔1
What I’m saying is: when agenda 2030 goals are met and everyone is chipped, all money and IDs are digital, and the majority are extremely dependent on a system that can suppress any true revolt with the flip of a switch, then and only then will more freedom of speech — including neutered versions of White Nationalism — be allowed.
🤔1
If you don’t understand what I’m saying, just look at what the red pilled community has become. Today, It’s hopelessly pathetic in its inability to actually change anything as a movement — it’s not a movement, just an online pity party full of mgtows, incels and angry young men. It’s been scrubbed of critical thinkers and conclusions that lead to the JQ and questioning the legitimacy of the system. If the same fate befalls the dissident right, it’s completely dead as a movement. The system is now allowing red pilled channels on YouTube because it’s a toothless non-movement. You’re allowed to complain about women, if that’s all you’re doing.
👍6
If you’re not aiming for real power and independence for yourself and your people, then you’re not part of a real movement.
Forwarded from The Woodlander
For those on the right who were never really on board with opposing the great reset, or were not really bothered by the restrictions or legislation introduced during the covid scam, to those who see the coming struggle as just a distraction from historical talking points, you are missing the biggest opportunity the right has ever had to bring the public over to our side.
Digital id's, financial hardship, rising prices, food shortages, loss of rights and freedoms, these things when highlighted and fought against will have the public agreeing with you, once they are on your side they will be much more open to listening to points of view they've been told are wrong for over 70 years.
Digital id's, financial hardship, rising prices, food shortages, loss of rights and freedoms, these things when highlighted and fought against will have the public agreeing with you, once they are on your side they will be much more open to listening to points of view they've been told are wrong for over 70 years.
🔥8
Forwarded from Morgoth's Review
Here's a tip on political pragmatism: Do not proudly anoint yourself the most racist and anti-semitic man on the internet one week and then deliver a lecture to everyone on political realism the next.
😁16👍2
How many times and how many different ways do I have to explain why being armed and being skilled in the use of arms is important? It’s all so tiresome. I guess the people that don’t understand this were just born to be slaves after all.
👍2
People that believe it’s important to be armed should have total authority over people that don’t value being armed. That’s the real way to return to tradition.
👍3
It’s sad to see that the mind virus of credentialism has infected such a large number of people, to such a degree that even within our own communities some people don’t have the confidence to teach themselves certain skills when it isn’t through some official institution that can give them a badge or a certificate that makes it “official.” This is going to be a huge problem for us, as more and more of our people are purged and totally barred from institutions where “official experience” is acquired.
You don’t need permission or “official experience” to learn anything, to have skills, to do things that need to be done. As we increasingly become a vilified minority, you better internalize this.
You don’t need permission or “official experience” to learn anything, to have skills, to do things that need to be done. As we increasingly become a vilified minority, you better internalize this.
👍18
Most skills aren’t rocket science, you can teach yourself almost anything, from woodworking to military tactics, but maybe not brain surgery. Most everything you’d ever need to know is in a book or on several YouTube channels. You don’t need “official experience and training” if your IQ is in the three digits.
👍16
Forwarded from LiveLeak
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A robot dog patrols the empty streets of Shanghai in China with a loudspeaker as a reminder of sanitary measures. The authorities have introduced containment of the country's economic capital after identifying several thousand cases in recent days.
Follow us -> LiveLeak
Follow us -> LiveLeak
Remember when Gonzalo Lira (aka Coach Red Pill) and Keet Woods criticized the Zelenskyy regime, at the beginning of the war, for as they put it, “handing out assault weapons like candy to untrained civilians, to facilitate atrocity porn.” It’s been roughly a month since they made that claim, and where is this “atrocity porn”? I’ve seen some footage of Russian soldiers shooting at Ukrainian civilians, but these civilian victims were clearly and visibly unarmed non-combatants — e.g. visibly unarmed civilians protesting and an old couple driving a car. If there is any footage of dead/injured civilians, the pro-Russian side has been brushing it off as fake pro-Ukrainian propaganda, with evidence — e.g. bogus pictures of body bags filled with people pretending to be dead. Both sides must be showing remarkable restraint when it comes to limiting civilian casualties, if both sides are resorting to faking casualties for propaganda. Who the hell really knows what’s going on in Ukrainian, but one thing seems certain to me: the majority of Ukrainian civilians that received firearms from their government are using them for their intended purpose, and that Gonzalo dramatically embellished the truth (virtually lying) when he claimed that most of the guns ended up in the hands of criminals that used them for criminal purposes.
The pro-Russian side might counter my point by trying to say that Zelenskyy just failed in his attempt to maximize civilian casualties by handing out weapons, because the Russians are just so amazing at discriminating civilians vs armed combatants, but then what was even their point about atrocity porn and “rifles being handed out like candy” in the first place? Most of the legitimate civilian casualties ( “atrocity porn” ) were from Russian artillery strikes on civilian apartment complexes.
If Keet and Gonzalo’s original claim is that was a tragedy that Zelenskyy turned civilians into combatants that could get killed, that might at least make sense, but it wouldn’t result in atrocity porn for the Western MSM to go and claim Russians are killing civilians, it would just be another headline reading “brave Ukrainian hero martyred for his homeland” — so, not atrocity porn.
The pro-Russian side might counter my point by trying to say that Zelenskyy just failed in his attempt to maximize civilian casualties by handing out weapons, because the Russians are just so amazing at discriminating civilians vs armed combatants, but then what was even their point about atrocity porn and “rifles being handed out like candy” in the first place? Most of the legitimate civilian casualties ( “atrocity porn” ) were from Russian artillery strikes on civilian apartment complexes.
If Keet and Gonzalo’s original claim is that was a tragedy that Zelenskyy turned civilians into combatants that could get killed, that might at least make sense, but it wouldn’t result in atrocity porn for the Western MSM to go and claim Russians are killing civilians, it would just be another headline reading “brave Ukrainian hero martyred for his homeland” — so, not atrocity porn.
👍2
You’ve got a great point Nix, but there are some serious Jerry-Springer-esque Nazi types out there that really hinder our movement, and we don’t know what else to call them.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/1166
https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/1166
Telegram
Nicholas R. Jeelvy
This will probably surprise many people, but I agree with BAP that using enemy terminology is dangerous unless we can mount the linguistic equivalent of a 50% attack on the word or series of words.
Nowhere is this more evident than in the attempt to use…
Nowhere is this more evident than in the attempt to use…
Forwarded from Computing Forever Official
We must secure our food supply and a future for our people
❤7
Forwarded from Nicholas R. Jeelvy
“For the “post-Pacifist” German mainstream, the most bitter paradox of all is that the Russians might not have attacked Ukraine had they foreseen Germany’s response: that the Bundestag would cancel the new Russian gas pipeline, invest in regasification terminals, send weapons to Ukraine, reaffirm its fealty to Nato, and move to drastically upgrade its armed forces with a €100 billion injection.
The Russians could not possibly have known these things. …”
They could have, if they had listened to Kevin MacDonald. In Individualism and the Western Liberal tradition, he describes the Western habit of altruistic punishment, which are acts of punishing people for moral offenses which hurt the punisher more (sometimes far more) than the punished.
German/European behavior towards Russia has been exactly that.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/luttwak-has-putin-made-nato-stronger/
The Russians could not possibly have known these things. …”
They could have, if they had listened to Kevin MacDonald. In Individualism and the Western Liberal tradition, he describes the Western habit of altruistic punishment, which are acts of punishing people for moral offenses which hurt the punisher more (sometimes far more) than the punished.
German/European behavior towards Russia has been exactly that.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/luttwak-has-putin-made-nato-stronger/
The Unz Review
Luttwak: Has Putin made NATO stronger?
In Unherd, the extremely opinionated Edward Luttwak offers some opinions: All this has now slipped into oblivion in today’s Europe, where Nato’s centrality and its US leadership are largely uncontested. The Russians assessed Nato as weak because it was weak…
👍2🤔2
In other words, if the you-know-whos had better arguments, they wouldn’t put so much money and effort into censoring us.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/guidetokulchur/2745
https://news.1rj.ru/str/guidetokulchur/2745
Telegram
Guide to Kulchur
People who are genuinely persuasive don't need to censor, bully, cajole or use legal weapons. It is these tools rather than much-vaunted "high verbal IQ" that have been used to assert dominance time and again. It's easy to run an industry if you literally…
👍1
Forwarded from Traditional Europe
"All a people need in order to rise up against tyranny is a leader bold enough to take up the banner."
~The Saga of Harald Hardrade, c.45
~The Saga of Harald Hardrade, c.45