The poison pill of Duginism masterfully deconstructed by Greg Johnson:

https://counter-currents.com/2013/11/north-americanism-a-cautionary-tale/

Eat the lab-grown meat! It’s for your own good, goyim! We’re just trying to heal the world. [Rubs hands and smirks]

Progressives haven't "won" a single argument in 150 years. They just pass laws top-down and ban their opposition.

This is why you need to be pro-Second Amendment, among other reasons. I think the left is innately better at acquiring, consolidating and utilizing state power. Without the leverage of a large state to facilitate their tyranny, they have no power over us.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/BertieBassett4Life/2840

A huge problem on the dissident right (and with modern Whites in general) is that people only think in terms of months or years, while our enemies think in terms of decades or even centuries. This is why they win and we lose.

Indeed, but that kind of revolution will never come from the top nor with the assistance from any part of the government, partially because they’ll never allow a rightwing march through the institutions, among many other reasons.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/BertieBassett4Life/2861

I get comments like these fairly often from other mixed-race people that discover my channel, that through their own mixed-race identity issues see the problems with race mixing and diversity being imposed on Whites in White countries, and how mainstream culture is one sided in its criticism of White interests. And in general, there are many non-Whites out there that understand that Whites becoming a minority in Western countries is not a good trend.

The whole racial nationalism vs ethno nationalism debate is just putting the cart before the horse.

When I see footage like this, I’m much more inclined to believe the Ukrainian side when they talk about their military victories. These Russian soldiers are pointing their rifles at each there, they have no plan for dealing with ambushes, no coordination, no return fire, and they’re bunched up so close that a couple explosives would probably wipe out a single platoon.

https://youtu.be/4Lpf_KsFYg8

The Journalist exists to cozy up to Power, to amplify, defend and make palatable the narratives of Power, and to attack anyone who criticises Power

With every waking moment the Journalist tries to better understand where the Power emanates from, not to critique or expose it, but to better fine tune his writing to more closely align with Power’s desires and agenda. He does it in the hope Power notices him and gives him advancement.

The Journalist is constantly on the hunt for the enemies of Power in order to slander and harass them. He will use any and all manner of tactics to achieve this, he will lie, attack people’s families, try to get people fired etc. To the Journalist the guilt or innocence of his victim is irreverent, the personal character of his victim is not so irreverent. The more decent and accomplished his target is the more he relishes in their personal destruction. See Roger Scruton as an example of someone who received the Journalist treatment.

The Journalist is utterly devoid of anything a normal person would consider a morality. He sees absolutely no contradiction in writing propaganda that’ll lead to a war that’ll kill hundreds of thousands of brown people while at the same time penning an Op-ed decrying racism. It isn’t that he couldn’t understand the contradiction in what he’s doing, he simply doesn’t care.

The Journalist sees his powerless victims as his abusers, and his entire “profession” as being persecuted by the people he attacks. Thus criticism to the Journalist is a personal attack of the most egregious nature. If exposed as a wilful liar the true morality of the Journalist is apparent in his outrage - he lied for the right reasons, it was a good lie, a necessary lie!

You need to think of every tweet or personal posting of the Journalist as a mini job interview, even if he has a job, because he can always get a more prestigious one. He’s poking, he’s prodding, he’s throwing things at the wall to see what sticks, he’s saying what he thinks most closely approximates the right things Power wants to hear. The fact he most often appears to be a liberal is irrelevant, he is simply a sycophant to Power.

It looks like “muh based China” is still under covid lockdowns in many areas, not that the whole country wasn’t a prison to begin with. Don’t ever listen to anyone that tells you China is “based.”

https://youtu.be/XBfLm98oFTM

Love it when WNs say China are a NS country, then you see people in poverty eating rats

🎙 Livestream today:

Kulchur Lodge Radio | AMA

Hapaperspective joins me to answer questions from the audience and talk about life in the Kali Yuga.

Join us in the live chat SUNDAY at:
1pm New York / 18:00 London / 19:00 Stockholm

📺
► DLive (livestream)
► Odysee (livestream)
► Send questions & superchats

Wonderfully articulated argument here by Frodi. My own worldview is broadly informed by the belief that our ancient ancestors were wiser, healthier and more spiritually attuned than we are. (It's actually a realisation I got from reading Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock about 20 years ago, if you're curious.)

https://news.1rj.ru/str/guidetokulchur/2752

First recorded usage of the term 'transhumanism,' from New Bottles for New Wine (1950) by Julian Huxley, the first director of UNESCO:

"We are already justified in the conviction that human life as we know it in history is a wretched makeshift, rooted in ignorance; and that it could be transcended by a state of existence based on the illumination of knowledge and comprehension, just as our modern control of physical nature based on science transcends the tentative fumblings of our ancestors, that were rooted in superstition and professional secrecy.

The human species can, if it wishes, transcend itself — not just sporadically, an individual here in one way, an individual there in another way, but in its entirety, as humanity. We need a name for this new belief. Perhaps transhumanism will serve: man remaining man, but transcending himself, by realizing new possibilities of and for his human nature."

This is not the first time the English have come face to face with the Feudal Society and its tyranny. When the Norman Kings took the noscript 'King of England', rather than the old 'King of the English', they effectively controlled not only the people. but the land and its resources. Individual ownership gave way to state ownership, and rather than self-reliance and self-sufficiency the people worked for their Feudal Lords. Their land was stolen and they became serfs. Familiar? In these days such figures as Robin Hood, Hereward the Wake, and Edric the Wild rose up in revolt against this tyranny. They were noblemen, today it is down to the Common Folk since there is little of 'nobility' left on our side. We shall rise to that challenge!

Slavishly obeying authority, no matter how corrupt and venal, doesn’t make you illiberal it just makes you a chump.

Nix is live.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/1191

RACE.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmericanKrogan/2561

The answer is simple: there’s always the possibility of changing your people’s faith and values later, but you can’t change race. Once your race is an extreme minority, it’s as good as gone in a way that’s absolutely permanent and irreversible.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/buildingathirdforce/1373

Religion doesn’t matter if your race is extinct.