For most of my youth, I was homeschooled. I don’t understand how any government can rationalize to the public its plans to curtail parents’ freedom to homeschool their own children. I was homeschooled because the local public schools in my area (American public schools) were too violent, trashy and ghetto.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hvitgardr3/4182

Morgoth gives Spencer entirely too much credit here. Spencer is not highly intelligent. He's not big-brained. There isn't a coherent intellectual core to what he says. His statements should not be analyzed intellectually. They simply need to be diagnosed.

Spencer is a midwit, a narcissist, and a fantasist. I first met him in 2009, and even then, his basic pattern was clear to me. He's primarily motivated by a desire to seek attention (positive first, of course, but when people naturally tire of him, negative attention is good enough, as long as you are paying attention to HIM).

Spencer's main routine for narcissistic attention-seeking is to set himself up in a particular ideological community (first conservatives, then the dissident Right) and then to signal hard against that community's natural assumptions. This is how he backed himself into advocating ethical child porn because of his hatred of conservatives.

You can't arrive at the truth by simply negating the views of other people, except purely by accident. But Spencer is really indifferent to truth. Everything he says is just a narcissistic game. Which is why he should simply be ignored.

Spencer is also at heart a fantasist which leads him time after time to be a fool. He looks at the EU and instead of seeing it as an enemy of Europe that must be destroyed, he imagines what HE would do if he ran the EU. I once likened it to an officer in a trench under artillery fire refusing to attack the gun raining death upon his men because he fantasizes about how HE would use it. Spencer clearly wants to be Macron. He fantasizes about what HE would do with an EU army, even though in reality, it would be used to crush nationalism. Spencer fantasizes about being the Schmittian sovereign, so he applauds state power, even when it is being used to wreck our societies or crush our movement. Of course, state power falls rather lightly on Richard (so far) because he comes from money.

Spencer has always been a fool and a traitor at heart, because real devotion to the true and the good is meaningless to a pathological narcissist. Calling openly for censorship of the movement should make his folly and treason clear to every serious person in this cause.

I hope Ed Dutton is hanging out with this mattoid simply to collect material for another fascinating HBD-based expose like his biography of Phil Rushton. If so, he's playing a dangerous game. At this point, continued association with Spencer looks more like bug-chasing than clout-chasing.

https://morgoth.substack.com/p/the-problem-with-spencerism?s=w

Weird how Woods has more of a problem with cow milk than gene therapy

This doesn’t look good at all. If you still think the scamdemic wasn’t a globalist ploy, think again.

“On May 22-28, 2022, the 75th World Health Assembly will convene at United Nations (U.N.) headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, with delegates from 194 nations, to vote on the Biden administration’s amendments that will hand over national sovereignty and authority to the WHO, which during the COVID pandemic, carried the water bucket for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regarding the Wuhan lab. 
On Jan. 18, 2022, officials from the Biden administration quietly sent the WHO extensive amendments without an official statement or a single press conference. These proposed amendments are written to strengthen the organization’s ability to unilaterally intervene into the affairs of nations merely suspected of having a ‘health emergency’ of possible concern to other nations. If these amendments are approved, the WHO will have the power to declare an ‘international health emergency,’ nullifying the powers of nation states.”

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/biden-s-amendments-hand-u-s-sovereignty-to-the-who/article_efcbf104-d20b-11ec-b257-b7c86410fc43.html

I wanted to make a video about the recent mass shooting in Buffalo NY, but I haven’t had the time to read the 180 page manifesto that the shooter supposedly left behind. Thankfully someone from the YouTube gun community did a great job of picking it apart — you can genuinely depend on gun-tubers to see through these sort of glow ops. The TL;DW: it was definitely written by someone else to create the pretext for more gun control and online censorship.

https://proveit.video/v/3153809612/DELETED-BY-YOUTUBE--Buffalo-rampager-s-writings-broken-down

Here’s a thought: next time our people get a chance to make a government and write up a constitution, of course we should have legally protected freedom of speech, but virtue signaling shouldn’t be covered under freedom of speech. Virtue signaling isn’t speech and therefore it should be banned. If people want to express their political beliefs, they should be forced to articulate them as arguments/statements, as seen here on Telegram; that should be the only way people are legally allowed to express or share political ideas and opinions — no stickers, no hashtags, no signs nor symbols within any political context should be allowed. Virtue signaling shouldn’t be covered by freedom of speech, because again, it isn’t speech.

Looking at the demographic of the people who manage and censor twitter and thinking that the real reason they hate Elon Musk is that think the white man has returned to resurrect The Raj.

The @Distributist is currently in a debate where he's trying to advocate healthy birthrates in order to maintain a population, without saying that the goal is to maintain the genetic group. He's losing. And of course he's losing, because his (Jewish) interlocutor has predictably claimed that black Africans can adopt "our" "values" and thus be a perfectly legitimate replacement for "our" population. But it's still population replacement - because Dave didn't dare say that he cares about the actual population.

He tried to get around this by saying that you need to have Jews in order to maintain the population of Israel, but of course his (Jewish) interlocutor easily swiped this aside by saying that the Jews comprise multiple ethnic groups - ie. people can convert into the religion and thus gain citizenship to Israel, thus maintaining that country's population.

So that tack doesn't work either. They've got this sown up. You either admit that you care about race, or you lose the debate.

As this defeat closed in on him, Dave attempted to fight against it, saying that mass immigration from non-European countries is bad because of linguistic barriers to integration into the white population - but of course this was futile, because his interlocutors simply advocated more stringent methods to integrate people (ie. to replace the white population).

Civic nationalism is a joke, a farce, and a trap designed to debilitate you, a gun designed to backfire on you. Stop falling for it.

Dave (aka The Distributist) is probably just afraid of appearing “racist.” This is why the whole concept of “racism” itself is so problematic. As a concept and a word, it needs to be totally deconstructed until it has zero legitimacy.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/millennialwoes/5152

“I just don’t want to be labeled a racist, because I’m not a racist. Racism is bad: a racist is a bigoted supremacist asshole and that’s just not me! I’m not an asshole. So yeah, I just shouldn’t talk about race nor defend my people as a race, because that could mean I’m a racist.” That’s more or less the mental gymnastics going on right now in the mind of so many White people that otherwise know what’s going on.

The whole concept of “racism” is what’s holding our people back, it’s like a magic spell that makes them retarded on race.

Some gas stations across the country are already bracing for the Next Big Thing involving surging fuel prices, namely the price per gallon potentially exceeding $10.00.

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/gas-prices-usa-inflation-joe-biden/2022/05/17/id/1070265/

There’s a character in the movie Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure. It’s the films main antagonist, Francis Buxton.

That’s Richard Spencer. Character traits and all. It really doesn’t go any deeper than that.

Like Francis to Pee-Wee’s bike, Spencer thought he was ennoscriptd to leadership on this side of things. Unfortunately for him it takes more than above average intelligence and rich parents to be a leader. This was proven by Spencer getting mogged out of the forefront by some kid streaming from his parent’s basement.

Frankly, I hate to say this, but Dinesh D’Souza ended up having the best take on Spencer (although for totally disingenuous reasons). He’s basically just a “racist” shitlib/Democrat/progressive. In fact, I don’t even think Spencer can be considered “racist” anymore. Look for him to be defending BLM/CRT etc. 5 years from now.

He’s absolutely desperate to be famous and is constantly angling for a spot on CNN with his takes. It’s actually kind of sad to watch.


https://news.1rj.ru/str/MorgothsReview/2755

PeeWee Herman’s Big Adventure was one of my favorite movies as a little kid, and one of the funniest I can still enjoy as an adult. I’ve got to give credit to GladiusMaximus for pointing out that Richard Spencer behaves a lot like Francis Buxton — a rich boy that believes he should get whatever he wants without care or consideration for principles or decent, mature behavior.

https://youtu.be/C5P5eQiKNQs

“A world without huge regions of total wilderness would be a cage; a world without lions and tigers and vultures and snakes and elk and bison would be - will be - a human zoo. A high-tech slum.”

Edward Abbey

Yet another example of the system treating violent black thugs with kid gloves, especially when they assault and kill Whites.

https://youtu.be/41_QQk9W_04

Yes, he is Jewish.

Both the Online Right™ and Leftists are caught up in arguing from the position of theory rather than from a realistic, natural and biological basis of humans as mammals.

That breastfeeding is natural and normal has been acceptable for all time before humans branched off from earlier species, yet arguing over milk, whether synthetic formula, plant based or that of a different species as best for a baby represents how detached we are from that natural grounding.

If in doubt — Nature knows best.

…