The most consequential issue facing the dissident right really is the 2A — whether or not we can resist blatant tyranny — the movement just doesn’t realize it yet on a collective level. If we’re disarmed, It won’t matter how many arguments we win, how much truth we reveal, nor will it matter what political theories we subscribe to when ultimately it will all just amount to Molyneux-esque “reason, logic and evidence” in the face of enemies that are more than willing to employ government force to totally and permanently shut us all down for wrongthink and for being White, hetero, traditional, unvaxxed and etc... That’s where the West seems to be headed.

You’d think that someone that records their device screen for their audience would at least be smart enough to clear their browser history if they watched porn beforehand, especially someone with a catholic audience like Nick Fuentes. What a shockingly reckless lack of discretion by Fuentes.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/1496

There’s no legal political solution, especially in a place like Britain where everything right of center seems to get banned. The ruling class aren’t going to allow you to have an inch of your government.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/idenglandofficial/684

TFW the libtards try to use dead kids to demand I surrender my arsenal.

Another coincidence? There’s nothing more Jewish than gun control.

https://forward.com/fast-forward/503785/steven-dettelbach-nominee-for-atf-chief-highlights-his-judaism-at-senate-hearing/

That’s quite kosher coming from a White guy that left South Africa, a place where Whites are slaughtered as the SA government pushes for “land reform” to dispossess Whites.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1529730751964532736

Just an irrelevant organisation with no actual power.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/CovidRedPills/13637

This photo is so awful, it could induce racist feelings towards the Chinese.

People ask if it was this or that book that radicalized me but it was never a book. It was going to Paris and witnessing first-hand the filth and criminality of a nonwhite population in a modern Western city. It took four years for the message to sink in, but when it did, there was no going back.

This persistent idea on the dissident right that we need stronger, more “muscular” government, it’s never fleshed out, it’s never thought through, the people promoting it have never explained why or how it will guarantee us anything that we want. Western governments are arguably stronger and more “muscular” than they’ve ever been in recent history — literally at our expense — and the end result isn’t a new Reich, it’s just more globohomo tyranny, more bio-leninism (diversity hires), more box checkers, more FBI, more ATF, more CIA, more Zionism, more non-White migrants, and more laws curtailing our natural rights. Government power has not lessened anywhere in the West as far as I know, and things have only gotten worse. So what is it about increasing government that’s going to benefit us in the long run? I have yet to hear a compelling argument.

You might as well ask for a stronger, more “muscular” WEF or WHO at this point, big governments around the world seem to be fully committed to globalism anyway.

These same people within the DR that don’t specify what they really mean when they advocate for stronger government, they’ve historically criticized freedom and rights as just “liberalism” or “individualism,” and if you disagree you’re immediately labeled a “lolbertarian.”

But where does their line of logic lead us? Considering the current trajectory, what road would it lead us down if we followed them? It’s your rights and freedom that have been on the chopping block for a some time now, is more government going to reverse that? It seems to me that the boot is coming down on our neck, so do you really want that boot to be bigger?

Government isn’t naturally some force of White primacy. As it grows in size, it prefers more migrants, SJWs, new diversity hires and surveilling/arresting Nationalists that undermine its internal cohesion (control) across the growing number of races, cultures and nationalities it governors and collects taxes from. Big government intrinsically has every incentive to promote diversity and reject Nationalism, and it has far less incentive to care about your quality of life and sense of purpose.

Edit: I’m not trying to downplay the influence of the you know who tribe, but can’t you see how this works out for them?

Seeing claims that the Buffalo and Texas shooters were in the same discord and groomed by the same guy called 'Armand.'

Haven't been able to confirm anything yet.

I'm quite a fan of Ted Kaczynski for many of his ideas, but one of the most important is the Power Process. The Power Process describes how technology makes us feel unfulfilled because it takes away the process whereby we feel achievement, meaning and purpose in our lives, and many people replace this process with surrogate activities that fill this desire but are ultimately fruitless.

I have often mentioned my Naturalist, biocentric worldview which informs the fundamental layer of both my spiritual beliefs and my political ideals. I see man as mammal as the lowest common denominator for all things, and while not everything can be reduced to the biological level (such as the spiritual), it is epiphenomenal to it. Consequently I see most human behaviour, including writing this post for you to read, as superfluous nonsense.

The Natural state of man is reproducing and raising a family, becoming strong warriors and loving mothers to defend ones family and home. Everything else is either a betterment or a detriment to that goal. The role of politics is to defend that goal, the role of economics should be a means to an end of that goal too, and of course spirituality should be concurrent with that goal, and it is on this issue that paganism finally made sense to me many years ago, as well as how harmful an inclusive, universal faith can be. Some people feign superiority that such a primitive mindset is somehow below them, or they make excuses for how it can be more nuanced, but ultimately that's what matters on the most foundational level of all things. If one were to answer the question of 'Why does race matter?', it is because it is informed by such a biocentric worldview of natural human tribalism.

Returning to Kaczynski, it is from this position that the Power Process spoke to me, and it answered the question which I have long asked myself about the decay of modern society and the depression which is associated with it — we are not living according to our natural state, but completely against it for superficial ends. It is such a simple idea, and yet its implications are wide and interconnected. Those who are deeply invested in surrogate activities will put up complex walls of defense for why he is wrong or why their surrogate activity is actually part of the Power Process. I recall a Counter Currents podcast with Greg Johnson and Rich Houck about the legacy of Ted Kaczynski, where Greg accused Ted of naivety for considering culture and science surrogate activities. Cope. In the grand scheme of things, they are, especially in so far as people would be willing to die for culture and science but not for their own flesh and blood. Surrogate activities have inverted our priorities and we no longer see the world through the natural and organic lens of kinship, blood, life, home and hearth. Is it any wonder we are so detached from reality and depressed? It's why we're losing — too proud of our cultural, technological and intellectual accomplishments to even know how to do the basics of life.

Anyway — my good friend @Fyrgen recently recorded a new podcast for his website (which you can subscribe via Substack, SubscribeStar and Patreon), in which he discusses the Power Process with Heiðrūn. If you haven't subscribed, please do so, and help support his efforts, or if you cannot, please give them your time and share them.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/fyrgen/1394

His new episode discusses his thoughts on The Northman and the moral paradigm of the film from a Heathen perspective.

One thing we noted on a recent episode about economics was that UBI seems to be a shift in how the state views its population, as an impediment more than an asset. UBI is the last step in the government deciding that it's easier to just get it's people to shut up and generate what wealth it can some other way (typically selling off its own resources)

A lot of these people in the DR that don’t believe that rights exist nor matter are just like upper-crust hipsters that don’t care about money and belittle everyone that has to work for it, because their rich parents continue to give them a huge allowance and buy them everything.

The real crutch is the false sense of power they feel from scoring points in philosophy debates in some chatroom. When they end up in a court room for wrongthink or owning a banned item/book, suddenly they’ll believe in rights.