Put aside the fact that this woman is brown, she’s telling the truth here about Uvalde. This is how government actually works: it doesn’t work for you, it works for itself.

https://youtu.be/RD9xehhHUck

Far too many people in the “Dissident Right” still assume that government (and any one of its institutions) is something that will automatically represent the interests of their people, because in their view “government = nation.“ This is something that they blindly take for granted without any thought or real life experience with government. The government is nothing more than a bureaucratic machine, a system, a big part of the entire system that is being used to suppress you and downgrade your existence. Given the nature of big government, it’s inevitable that it would form part of the entire interconnected network of other facets of the system, like the NGOs and the big corporations — they’re all facilitated by big government, and often funded by big government and run by people connected directly to government power (e.g. politicians as large shareholders). People complaining about NGOs and big corporations without being critical of the government’s role is like complaining about penguins and polar bears without understanding that you live near the North Pole.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/thuletide/2927

Progressives must own the misery they have caused and be held to account.

These are the types of people who watch VICE videos on Cartel violence in Mexico and then ignore how Mexico's strict gun laws have no attenuating effect on mass shootings. Journalists, mayors and all sorts of officials are murdered all the time in Mexico. Just in March, a mayor in Michoacan was gunned down. The violence there is so bad, that some towns are arming kids.

Here’s another mass shooting that you won’t be hearing much about.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10879145/Gunman-killed-four-Tulsa-hospital-rampage-legally-bought-assault-rifle-HOURS-shooting.html?ito=social-facebook

“Burgers?”

https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmericanKrogan/2684

It’s curious how eating meat is so unhealthy but now that Beyond Meat is able to industrially and synthetically reproduce meat, it’s become a healthy product recommended by celebrities and politicians.

Around blacks, NEVER relax. And carry gun.

Here’s what you tell your shitlib friends: “Asian Hate” crime doesn’t actually exist (according to their own shitlib standards) because 99% of the perpetrators are Sub-Saharans. Same applies to White shitlibs that are attacked by blacks. If they aren’t going to wake up to the problem, they deserve zero sympathy from us.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/6598

“They’ll likely have to be sacrifices for any kind of racial awakening. Shtf, food shortages or riots in the city, white liberals get targeted because of their own cucked ideologies, all of a sudden they realize that white people are their in-group and there’s nothing they can do to change that.” - @HippocleidesDoesntCare from the chat.

Sad but true.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective_chatroom/93183

At first glance this is a boomer conservative tier meme poking fun at shitlibs that support gun control while whining about fascism. But if you look past that, there’s something a bit deeper here that applies to people across the entire width of the political spectrum: a willingness to surrender their physical power (gun rights) in exchange for security provided by the system, by another class — traditionally a superior class of men that would not ever surrender their arms under any conditions.

As fanatically pro-Second Amendment as I am, I also can’t help but sometimes wonder how many people actually deserve freedom from brutal tyranny. Aristotle once said that some people were born to be slaves in his book on Politics, and this is easily observed in individuals that express any sort sentiment in support of the government having an absolute monopoly on violence — e.g. “gosh, I don’t need to own military style weapons.” Do such people deserve the right to vote or speak freely? Freedom isn’t free.

For people that don’t understand where I’m coming from, this is the kind of sentiment I’m referring to: these people that would surrender their rights if “our guys” were in charge. The lack of foresight of these people is astonishing, they only want the second amendment when they feel it’s immediately needed, but then want to shred it when their people are in power. Imagine if the founding fathers were so short sighted and thought “we don’t need this right anymore.” Where would that leave us today?

https://news.1rj.ru/str/mickmckevittnjp2q/332?comment=253

You call it an assault weapon. I call it common-sense assault skateboard control.

Nix basically says that harder tyranny is on the horizon, would anyone within the dissident right even remotely disagree with this? I would imagine not, but people need to focus on how to deal with it.

Fight, flee or submit: those are your only three options against tyranny. This is why I talk about the Second Amendment (fighting) and living in rural areas (fleeing), yet I still encounter heavy criticism from individuals within this community that are unwittingly telling us that the ability to defend yourself or flee “doesn’t really matter,” “is a crutch” or “is part of the problem,” which means they’re really advocating for only the last option: submission. If you think “the second amendment is just a crutch” and that “we should stay in the cities and stop ‘white flighting’” you are just setting yourself up to be subjugated and potentially killed by the system and its urban golem.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/1599

“The problem is that without a will to fight, the 2nd amendment cannot be used for its intended purpose.”

Yes, and you could also say “the problem is that without the will to survive as a race, Nationalism is not a viable political concept.” At one time in my life, I lost interest in Nationalism because I thought that it had zero traction with the vast majority of White people; and at the time I was right because this was years before the whole 2015 migrant crisis that initially gave this movement momentum.

What I’ve learned is that we can’t let the present inform us on what ideas, rights or concepts are good or viable, because our conditions are constantly changing, and our people can change their will in reaction to these conditions and unforeseen events.

The Second Amendment is inherently important regardless of whether our people have the will to use it as intended or not in the here and now.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/6613?comment=93222

“When there's a way, there will be will” — Nix Jeelvy.

YES.

I forgot about this case. I saw the video and remember it being clear-cut self defense

https://www.opb.org/article/2022/02/07/bend-shooting-barry-washington-jr-death-ian-cranston-trial-deschutes-county/