“They’ll likely have to be sacrifices for any kind of racial awakening. Shtf, food shortages or riots in the city, white liberals get targeted because of their own cucked ideologies, all of a sudden they realize that white people are their in-group and there’s nothing they can do to change that.” - @HippocleidesDoesntCare from the chat.

Sad but true.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective_chatroom/93183

At first glance this is a boomer conservative tier meme poking fun at shitlibs that support gun control while whining about fascism. But if you look past that, there’s something a bit deeper here that applies to people across the entire width of the political spectrum: a willingness to surrender their physical power (gun rights) in exchange for security provided by the system, by another class — traditionally a superior class of men that would not ever surrender their arms under any conditions.

As fanatically pro-Second Amendment as I am, I also can’t help but sometimes wonder how many people actually deserve freedom from brutal tyranny. Aristotle once said that some people were born to be slaves in his book on Politics, and this is easily observed in individuals that express any sort sentiment in support of the government having an absolute monopoly on violence — e.g. “gosh, I don’t need to own military style weapons.” Do such people deserve the right to vote or speak freely? Freedom isn’t free.

For people that don’t understand where I’m coming from, this is the kind of sentiment I’m referring to: these people that would surrender their rights if “our guys” were in charge. The lack of foresight of these people is astonishing, they only want the second amendment when they feel it’s immediately needed, but then want to shred it when their people are in power. Imagine if the founding fathers were so short sighted and thought “we don’t need this right anymore.” Where would that leave us today?

https://news.1rj.ru/str/mickmckevittnjp2q/332?comment=253

You call it an assault weapon. I call it common-sense assault skateboard control.

Nix basically says that harder tyranny is on the horizon, would anyone within the dissident right even remotely disagree with this? I would imagine not, but people need to focus on how to deal with it.

Fight, flee or submit: those are your only three options against tyranny. This is why I talk about the Second Amendment (fighting) and living in rural areas (fleeing), yet I still encounter heavy criticism from individuals within this community that are unwittingly telling us that the ability to defend yourself or flee “doesn’t really matter,” “is a crutch” or “is part of the problem,” which means they’re really advocating for only the last option: submission. If you think “the second amendment is just a crutch” and that “we should stay in the cities and stop ‘white flighting’” you are just setting yourself up to be subjugated and potentially killed by the system and its urban golem.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/1599

“The problem is that without a will to fight, the 2nd amendment cannot be used for its intended purpose.”

Yes, and you could also say “the problem is that without the will to survive as a race, Nationalism is not a viable political concept.” At one time in my life, I lost interest in Nationalism because I thought that it had zero traction with the vast majority of White people; and at the time I was right because this was years before the whole 2015 migrant crisis that initially gave this movement momentum.

What I’ve learned is that we can’t let the present inform us on what ideas, rights or concepts are good or viable, because our conditions are constantly changing, and our people can change their will in reaction to these conditions and unforeseen events.

The Second Amendment is inherently important regardless of whether our people have the will to use it as intended or not in the here and now.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/6613?comment=93222

“When there's a way, there will be will” — Nix Jeelvy.

YES.

I forgot about this case. I saw the video and remember it being clear-cut self defense

https://www.opb.org/article/2022/02/07/bend-shooting-barry-washington-jr-death-ian-cranston-trial-deschutes-county/

Statements like these are why some Pagans say mean things to Christians online.

Nothing to see here

The dissident right’s “schizo” faction has been vindicated yet again.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/edwardslavsquat/95

The leading voice of conservatism in Official Ireland.

🔗 twitter.com

They look like abos. Lmao
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DevonStack/2069

Answering: "What's coming next?"

Everything I said back in January when Covid restrictions were first being dropped in England, before Ukraine. Simple cause & effect from the very first domino - Lockdowns.

Apparently a lot of people in the DR scoff at the whole concept of our people having constitutional rights (the only thing that protects them from 3AM SWAT team raids) because “it’s just writing on a piece of paper dude” — even though money, laws (government itself) and noscripts like “king”, “property owner” and “leader” are just abstract concepts as well, ultimately writing on a piece of paper. People seem to think they can decide what’s “just writing on a piece of paper” and what isn’t.

But okay then, what would be better? Perhaps rights as a religion? Would that be a better way of preserving and enhancing them for our posterity?

What’s the alternative? Think long term.

As long as we live in a world with laws, courts and law enforcement (government) then constitutional rights absolutely matter. Even if you think your rights are just “writing a piece of paper” that the system can try to ignore or infringe on — something I see people saying all over telegram — it’s still something much more real than any political philosophy discussions on telegram, it’s something we can rally around and believe in, something that can impact law and legal discourse.

Our nations are their rubbish heaps.

https://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/Danny-Danon-Send-African-migrants-to-Australia