Strangely, 'Refugees Welcome' activists don't want to open their homes to refugees!
These virtue signalling Marxist freaks are total hypocrites.

Visualise my surprise.

https://reclaimthenet.org/covid-surveillance-tech-remains-open-to-exploitation/

Political freedom and rights exist because of White Europeans, and it’s therefore something for Whites by Whites. That’s really how it should be seen, and it seems to me that even the majority of our liberal European ancestors understood that, even if they were abolitionist/egalitarian types that thought they could turn negros and indians into good Protestants - they still didn’t want to include them as equal members in their own respective society.

Whereas authoritarianism should be seen as something negative that you impose on outgroups.

Giving your own people rights and freedom isn’t the mistake, it’s extending rights and freedom to outsiders that inevitably exploit those things in order to take them away from your people that is the mistake.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/1707

This is the manosphere in 2022. I’m sure the feminists and all the jews behind them are chuckling.

https://youtu.be/JCh7VxKI8aI

Well this explains why Aaron Clarey advocates for vasectomy in a movement that has a predominately White male audience. Just as with feminism, behind MGTOW and the manosphere, you’ll always find Jews — Jack Murphy, Alexander Cortes and now Aaron Clarey, just to name a few. You could even go further back to the 2000s and the PUA movement headed by Jews like Neil Strauss and Ross Jeffries.

https://youtu.be/RDmh0lBr6ms

I’m calling on everyone reading this to post this article: https://counter-currents.com/2019/06/7-11-nationalism/

in Elon’s replies to this tweet: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1539275446625476614?s=21&t=W5qgz99QNwIRVitbxx0mQQ

These people have been in power for 2 weeks and we have:
- Record fuel prices
- Record cost of living increase
- Record food prices
- Blackouts
- Them giving themselves a payrise.

I’m reading the comments from this TG post, and the general sentiment is along the lines of “I hate the 2A and the 2A community because most 2A supporters aren’t racist AF like me!”

Half of the dissident right actually is retardedly spergy, hysterical and hopelessly juvenile. It’s no wonder this movement fails to grow even as normie conservatives are waking up to the great replacement.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/wehrwolfdynamics/302

Indiscriminately calling all normie conservatives cucks just because they’re still slowly taking the red pills on race isn’t going to make them swallow the red pills faster. Attacking them will only push them away.

Of course some conservatives deserve to be called cucks, some are absolute traitors. But your average White conservative/centrist is just your average non-Shitlib White guy that just doesn’t know better yet, or he’s afraid of thinking “racist” thoughts — he’s just in need of more deprogramming, more facts and better philosophy.

We shouldn’t expect so much from NPCs, but we shouldn’t hate them either.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/6785

Another reason why the Second Amendment needs to be a more prominent talking point for the Dissident Right is because it opens the door for discussion about race and race realism, and the only way to open that door and get the normie-cons to really listen is to take an explicitly pro-Second-Amendment position to show how the 2A is endangered by the irresponsible behavior of blacks with firearms.

It’s our job to show the conservative that he ultimately has to make a choice: The Second Amendment or diversity? Black gun violence pads the gun crime statistics in favor of the gun control lobby, which is full of Jews at the top. America does have a serious gun violence problem that make a mockery of the Second Amendment, but only when people don’t see race.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/6787

Absolute traitors.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/GunsNGadgets/889

From what I understand, it’s not a done deal yet. Also, the bill doesn’t force conservative states to have red flag laws if they don’t want them, it just puts federal money on the table to incentive states to do things like red flag laws, but not necessarily red flag laws. In other words, If this bill passes, it doesn’t mean that pro-2A states like Ohio, Idaho and Arizona will have red flag laws.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/pox_populi/2518

No, this bill has not passed the Senate yet. The bill, The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, isn’t imposing nationwide red flag laws, rather, it just puts federal money on the table to entice states if they want red flag laws or mental health services — states can get that money just for expanding mental health services instead of imposing red flag laws.

I don’t like this bill, it sucks, but it’s definitely been scaled down from what it was when Jerry Antifa-loving Nadler introduced it in the House as the “Protecting Our Kids Act.”

https://news.1rj.ru/str/Shadow_man_311/1527

Guns and Gadgets breaks down what’s actually in the gun control bill that’s currently in the Senate:

https://youtu.be/crmnYDltbhE

This is more info on the Las Vegas shooting by Stephen Paddock than I've come across yet, in a short Twitter video no less. All I knew is that it was claimed to be a Saudi-run op, that the "arms deal gone awry" story didn't really add up and that according to some video footage I remember watching+ survivors on the ground who have either since mysteriously croaked, gone radio silent or vanished, there were supposedly more shooters in more locations and hotels than just Paddock. Now this links him directly to employment under a govt. contractor. Wild.

https://twitter.com/RexTex25/status/1539431508720721923?s=20&t=IU5NOcJOtZNFpcMluLMV4w

I will be appearing on the @CounterCurrents podcast in 3 hours from now, to discuss common grammatical errors and how to avoid them.

Starting now with @MillennialWoes, discussing grammatical errors.

Odysee
Dlive

Questions & donations

There's a mindset prevalent in the Dissident Right which I find abhorrent: This approach to the male-female partnership as some kind of empirical, utilitarian thing measured only by criteria and not by natural attraction. There are folks in the DR who will say that a man's task should be to find a girl who's as young as possible, with measurably 'perfect' genetics and phenotype and who's just waiting to spend her life popping out as many children as possible between pleasing in both the kitchen and the bedroom. Hell, you wouldn't even need to meet her beforehand; a photo and a CV will suffice.

What about natural attraction, chemistry... dare-I-say-it, love and romance? All of this is dismissed as an irrelevancy or even an obstacle to 'optimal trad families'. It's a cold, clinical, detached approach to family-building and it expresses none of the beauty and devotion once so innate to our people. It's hard for me to imagine anyone taking this view towards marriage and family, unless they possess serious shortcomings that make courting and healthy social interaction impossible.