What you tolerate shows people what they can get away with.

Imagine my shock. LOL

Fashy Story Hour - 2.1

Liberalism Unmasked
Act I - Part III - Liberalism With the Mask Off

So I came up with this poll after a debate I had with friend on Discord. A lot of people on the right like to say that the Constitution (mainly the Bill of Rights) is just writing on a piece of paper and therefore it doesn't matter to our enemies, or even that its very existence is contributing to our loss of rights — I don't understand how they conclude the latter — but it follows that if our Constitution is just "writing on a piece paper" then so too is the Bible and all religious texts, laws, all philosophy and etc... To an extent, it's true that all ideas are just writing on pieces of paper; for example, without White people the Constitution would end up just be totally forgotten and abandoned — no Whites no rights. However, I think it's inconsistent to NOT apply this same logic to everything else. Even though the rights protected by the Bill of Rights predate written language, in our age of laws, law enforcement, courts (civilization) these "pieces of paper" like our Constitution still matter as long as the ideas resonate in the hearts and minds of the people; these "pieces of paper" are therefore useful for informing our people, giving them concepts to rally around and maintain within this system. In other words, our Bill of Rights has real legal power because there are still enough of our people around that believe in it and care about it, that will fight and die for it, and therefore it isn't "just a piece of paper." Otherwise, if it is "just a piece of paper that doesn't matter at all" than so too is the Bible and the Ten Commandments, and it follows that no Christian should waste any of their time reading any of it.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/7150

TL;DR: Just as the Bible isn’t “just a collection of paper” if people believe in it and can properly understand it, our Constitution also isn’t just “writing on paper” that can be ignored if enough people really believe in it and are willing to fight for it — White people. This is why the right to keep and bear arms is still legal in the US but not Mexico, even though the Mexican constitution states that Mexicans have a right to keep and bear arms too. Mexicans, being the more obtuse brown people that they are, aren’t intelligent enough to collectively care about their rights, so a constitution for them is meaningless. This is why I think our ruling class want Whites to be a minority: they want a population that is easier to control, a population that doesn’t care about rights, and that necessitates fewer White people. Fewer Whites = Fewer Rights.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/7152

The pro-Constitution community is far less fringe than the dissident right; in fact, it’s basically just the general political position of non-shitlib White America.

EDIT: This is why it’s detrimental for this movement to counter signal or diminish the value of the Bill of Rights, because conservatives will immediately stop listening to you, and rightfully so. Instead, tell them that the browning of America will comprise their rights and they’ll listen.

My favorite coffee mug. If anyone from my family asks, it’s from a free background checking service.

Sold here: https://meme-magic-merch.myspreadshop.com/early+life+wikipedia+t+shirt-A62675bad149dcc6d2d866217?productType=31&sellable=ka12BMpvq3f0o1oNdyMY-31-32&appearance=1&size=29

Just an average day in #LosAngeles 😎

Were some of the founding fathers flawed men with some flawed beliefs? Absolutely. But does that negate the value of our natural rights and our existence as a nation? Absolutely not.

You can point to some philosemitic quotes from Washington or Hamilton and use that to conclude that all of America was “totally ZOGged up from day one!” but let’s not forget that Hitler was also a philosemite for a good chunk of his life — in his youth he saw Jews as just Germans of a different faith and defended them as such, this is literally what he said about himself in Mein Kampf. Hitler almost didn’t figure out the JQ, think about that.

“Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.”
― Frank Herbert, Dune

I will be live tomorrow evening July 23 at 5:30pm est (note we are coming on and hour early)
with Nix Jeelvy "Borzoi vs Moldbug the Review"
https://odysee.com/@whiterabbitradio:9/2022WRRLive22JulyBorzMoldpt1:2

It’s more like 6/90. 6% of the population are black males and they likely commit over 90% of the gun crime. They’re more likely than anyone else to be the victims of gun violence. If you look at the national gun violence memorial website, it features white victims of gun violence on the front page, but when you look at states and cities, it’s 90% black people.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/Chossingston/12804

This is the proposed future.

Urbanite shitlibs, cell phones out, stampeding over each other to get their proof-of-monkeypox-vaccine QR code scanned first in order to receive their daily soylent ration: that’s the future I see for the West, for the people that give up their rights for comfort and security.

“Pozzed stuff is happening in your country, better give up your heritage.” - Every retard.

These are the kind of people saying “America has just been a Jewish owned mulatto stud farm since day one!” These are the types who advocate for Caesarism and want their rights taken away, all in the hope of getting a state issued girlfriend and UBI.

1. Just because an idea isn’t censored doesn’t mean the idea is off the mark.

2. Just because criticism a figure and/or organisation is tolerated relative to other targets of criticism does not mean those figures or organisations are blameless.

3. Just because certain mainstream, low-brow, or popular outlets, have focused their attention on 1 and/or 2 does not invalidate the need for such attention.

The DR would do itself a favour to get this through its head.