“America vs Europe.”
See what I’ve done here? Usually the generalization is the inverse of this because there seems to be more Euros on rightwing Telegram. But this is the insane level of overgeneralization I keep coming across around here.
I don’t think Europe is just a hyper urban, effete, cucked up Arab dominated groomer continent. However, I will pretend that’s exactly what it is if you look at a picture of a couple ratchet negroes in some ghetto city and say “that’s ‘murica.”
See what I’ve done here? Usually the generalization is the inverse of this because there seems to be more Euros on rightwing Telegram. But this is the insane level of overgeneralization I keep coming across around here.
I don’t think Europe is just a hyper urban, effete, cucked up Arab dominated groomer continent. However, I will pretend that’s exactly what it is if you look at a picture of a couple ratchet negroes in some ghetto city and say “that’s ‘murica.”
👍13💩1
“The ZOG regime will try inasmuch as possible to depict this conflict as being one of democracy versus authoritarianism, and liberty versus despotism. We must, however, deconstruct that narrative and impose our own. White vs. Yellow. Aristocratic egalitarianism vs. Oriental despotism. Smiling, heroic Aryan warriors vs. faceless Asiatic hordes. This will not only delegitimize the regime by exposing its hypocrisy, but also awaken people in the West as to the fundamentally racial and ethnic nature of conflict — not just this conflict, but every conflict on the planet.
Above all, dissidents must not allow themselves to be suckered into carrying water for either side of this conflict.”
https://counter-currents.com/2022/08/the-china-question/
Above all, dissidents must not allow themselves to be suckered into carrying water for either side of this conflict.”
https://counter-currents.com/2022/08/the-china-question/
Counter-Currents Publishing
The China Question | Counter-Currents
3,485 words Nancy Pelosi’s flight landed in Taiwan on August 2 despite very loud and vigorous protests from the People’s Republic of China. For the time being, the Chinese have done little but whine impotently, rattle their sabers, and announce military exercises…
❤5👍4
Forwarded from The End Times
Australia with their Covid concentration camps and Canada arresting truckers. Go say HH in Germany, or offend a tranny online in the UK.
👍10
America has its flaws, but you can legally open carry a rifle while yelling “Heil Hitler” on the streets through a megaphone and not even have to worry about getting arrested for it. I’m not saying you should do that, but you legally can. America is still number one for freedom, even as our freedom is under attack.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/demacre/19095
https://news.1rj.ru/str/demacre/19095
Telegram
The End Times
Australia with their Covid concentration camps and Canada arresting truckers. Go say HH in Germany, or offend a tranny online in the UK.
👍14💩3🔥1
It’s millennials with degrees that have been relegated to peasant status, they’re the new indentured servants saddled with student loan debt. But this isn’t as much of an issue for the ruling class/tribe that already have the money to send their children to the top universities — you know, the schools you have to go to for elite status and connections, like Yale and Harvard. Go to school if you want, but go to a state school to lessen the financial burden and don’t expect to get a career (much less into elite positions) just because you have a degree.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/thuletide/3388
https://news.1rj.ru/str/thuletide/3388
Telegram
Thuletide
The Left wins because 1) they have huge financial backing, 2) they have smart people in high places, and 3) they control the institutions that smart people have to pass through to get to the high places.
Nothing will change if Right-Wingers voluntarily embrace…
Nothing will change if Right-Wingers voluntarily embrace…
👍7👎2
I’m not convinced that we can take our country back by doing some long march through the institutions like the left did many years ago. University degrees are more expensive and worthless than ever before, probably more time consuming to obtain and require you to appear to conform to leftist cultural norms, dogma and the SJW curricula that’ll be shoved down your throat; not to mention that the the left also has power over most other institutions like the major corporations that you’ll probably apply to after getting your degree, so whatever job you get with a degree is probably going to keep you around and working under the same leftists you had to tolerate in university. If you still think that’s how this movement is going to get its hands on power, then by all means, go to school. Good luck.
I regret going college and I now view it as a total scam.
Go to school if you want to be a lawyer or a medical doctor, and only after you’ve really thought it through after a cost-benefit analysis. Otherwise don’t waste your time and money.
I regret going college and I now view it as a total scam.
Go to school if you want to be a lawyer or a medical doctor, and only after you’ve really thought it through after a cost-benefit analysis. Otherwise don’t waste your time and money.
🔥16👍6
My experience in college in a nutshell: if I expressed any right wing beliefs, my professors tried much harder to find a reason to lower my grades. All of the students that conformed to their professors’ beliefs got much higher grades despite how low effort their papers were.
Once in college, I had a shitlib anthropology professor that drank alcohol from a flask in front of us and went on drunken tirades about how Whites are the villains of history. That’s what you’re paying for when you go to university, you’re paying the salaries of people that hate your race and give lectures about it.
Once in college, I had a shitlib anthropology professor that drank alcohol from a flask in front of us and went on drunken tirades about how Whites are the villains of history. That’s what you’re paying for when you go to university, you’re paying the salaries of people that hate your race and give lectures about it.
👍19🤔2🔥1
Forwarded from SwallowedInBlack
Problem. Reaction. Solution. Biometric passports the answer to airport queues - didn't see that one coming...
https://hugotalks.com/2022/08/06/its-oh-so-predictable-%F0%9F%98%A1-hugo-talks/
https://hugotalks.com/2022/08/06/its-oh-so-predictable-%F0%9F%98%A1-hugo-talks/
Hugo Talks
It’s OH SO Predictable! 😡 / Hugo Talks - Hugo Talks
Visit the post for more.
Forwarded from Pox Populi
Planning on doing a livestream in a couple of hours, depending on how quickly I get things set up.
It’ll be a brief round-up of some noteworthy events that have occurred around my neck of the woods and an AMA, then you can switch over to @Hapaperspective ‘s gaming stream followed by the Writer’s Bloc with @nixiejeelvy. (If those guys are streaming today, that is)
Sounds like a pretty epic line-up if I do say so myself.
It’ll be a brief round-up of some noteworthy events that have occurred around my neck of the woods and an AMA, then you can switch over to @Hapaperspective ‘s gaming stream followed by the Writer’s Bloc with @nixiejeelvy. (If those guys are streaming today, that is)
Sounds like a pretty epic line-up if I do say so myself.
Forwarded from The Germ Channel
Been watching vids by the professor of profilicity, Moeller, lately… and I came upon this one where he argues that morality “does not exist”:
https://youtu.be/QdsDzZDMzKM
Look at the man’s face, body, mannerisms, way of speaking, etc. and you will see a man that I’m willing to bet my life savings has never ever in his entire life had to engage in violence. He’s as soft as soft could be… a middle class German intellectual raised in a bubble.
And this is important because, I understand morality as the following: morals are those values which you personally would use violence to impose. Guys like Moeller are so removed from personal violence that, for them and their experience of life, there is no morality. Violence is 100% outsourced to the State by them and takes on the abstract and almost purely technological character of laws and regulations.
But in the company of people with morals as I understand them, if you break the moral code, you are at risk of violence against you. That’s the difference between morals and mere preferences. I have morals because are certain things that, if you do them, I will get violent with you. Molest my children or abuse my wife and I will literally attack you (enforce morality). But for someone like Moeller, I suspect that even if he caught someone raping his wife, he would have a very hard time doing anything but call the police.
https://youtu.be/QdsDzZDMzKM
Look at the man’s face, body, mannerisms, way of speaking, etc. and you will see a man that I’m willing to bet my life savings has never ever in his entire life had to engage in violence. He’s as soft as soft could be… a middle class German intellectual raised in a bubble.
And this is important because, I understand morality as the following: morals are those values which you personally would use violence to impose. Guys like Moeller are so removed from personal violence that, for them and their experience of life, there is no morality. Violence is 100% outsourced to the State by them and takes on the abstract and almost purely technological character of laws and regulations.
But in the company of people with morals as I understand them, if you break the moral code, you are at risk of violence against you. That’s the difference between morals and mere preferences. I have morals because are certain things that, if you do them, I will get violent with you. Molest my children or abuse my wife and I will literally attack you (enforce morality). But for someone like Moeller, I suspect that even if he caught someone raping his wife, he would have a very hard time doing anything but call the police.
YouTube
If Morality Exists Everything Is Permitted. (Q&A)
Morality is dangerous. Here is why.
#Morality #slavojzizek #samharris
Why Sam Harris is Wrong - A Critique of Sam Harris' "The Moral Landscape" (in 2020):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGt0I5MbQSI
(Article by Slavjo Zizek) If there is a God, then anything…
#Morality #slavojzizek #samharris
Why Sam Harris is Wrong - A Critique of Sam Harris' "The Moral Landscape" (in 2020):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGt0I5MbQSI
(Article by Slavjo Zizek) If there is a God, then anything…
👍6
Forwarded from LaDarc's Ghost
Multiracial fascism is just putting ideology before blood again. No thanks. It's the same shit as "I don't care if they're purple, so long as they respect the constitution!"
👍11
Forwarded from Nicholas R. Jeelvy
I’m not going to be live streaming today, but I plan to stream a couple days in a row next weekend. Be sure not to miss The Writers Bloc though.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/2066
https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/2066
Telegram
Nicholas R. Jeelvy
Tonight on the Writers’ Bloc, we’ll be hosting Anthony Bavaria for The Best Month Ever, a review of Counter-Currents articles published in July.
Tune in to our Dlive and Odysee channels at 22:00 CET, 4pm EST, 1pm PST. Send your questions, comments and donations…
Tune in to our Dlive and Odysee channels at 22:00 CET, 4pm EST, 1pm PST. Send your questions, comments and donations…
❤3👍1
Forwarded from The Germ Channel
AY YO *tames the horse* SO YOU BE SAYIN’ *rides in on chariots from the steppe* YOU BE TELLIN’ ME *conquers vast hordes of brown indigenes* YOU BE TELLIN’ DAT *uses conquered slaves to build colossal world wonders* DAT WE WUZ *begins to intermingle with natives* WE WUZ KANGZ N SHEEIT? *interbreeds out of existence*
😁4
This is tantamount to a woman giving young male incels dating advice like "just get a good job, women want financial stability ya know" but we all know countless incels and dating-market-losers that have excellent jobs.
Obviously money and influence are always better to have than not. Our race collectively still has a lot of wealth and influence, certainly enough to make a difference; and I bet a lot of wealthy and influential White people are more red pilled than we think, but they aren't powerful enough to do anything for us with their resources right now other than donating to podcasters. For them to speak out or do anything would put them at risk.
The critical problem is how the system is more rigged against us than ever before, especially if you even look or smell like a healthy, traditionally person that is politically right of center. You can't climb the conventional ladders toward financial success and influence the way boomers did, just getting degrees and working your way up — working harder than everyone else to get there because you're a hetero White male — without running the risk of getting found out, doxxed and barred from the whole system.
As for peasant revolts, we're not peasants. A lot of the people in this movement come from the middle class and up, so we'd have to look at the history of middle class revolts. And I'd be willing to bet a not so insignificant chunk of the people in this movement are college educated but underpaid professionals, that's why people in these circles talk so much about getting into trades — it's because they already went to university and had to pay to find out that the whole system is rigged against them.
I don't want our people to become lowly peasants, but I don't think they will be even if they homestead, as long as they own their own land and have the means to defend it. Peasants don't typically own their own land, and they're usually genetically lower class (lower IQ) — think of whiggers as being the modern day White peasant class, as well as the Starbucks Barista that has a Master's degree in gender studies and a boat load of debt.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/thuletide/3390
Obviously money and influence are always better to have than not. Our race collectively still has a lot of wealth and influence, certainly enough to make a difference; and I bet a lot of wealthy and influential White people are more red pilled than we think, but they aren't powerful enough to do anything for us with their resources right now other than donating to podcasters. For them to speak out or do anything would put them at risk.
The critical problem is how the system is more rigged against us than ever before, especially if you even look or smell like a healthy, traditionally person that is politically right of center. You can't climb the conventional ladders toward financial success and influence the way boomers did, just getting degrees and working your way up — working harder than everyone else to get there because you're a hetero White male — without running the risk of getting found out, doxxed and barred from the whole system.
As for peasant revolts, we're not peasants. A lot of the people in this movement come from the middle class and up, so we'd have to look at the history of middle class revolts. And I'd be willing to bet a not so insignificant chunk of the people in this movement are college educated but underpaid professionals, that's why people in these circles talk so much about getting into trades — it's because they already went to university and had to pay to find out that the whole system is rigged against them.
I don't want our people to become lowly peasants, but I don't think they will be even if they homestead, as long as they own their own land and have the means to defend it. Peasants don't typically own their own land, and they're usually genetically lower class (lower IQ) — think of whiggers as being the modern day White peasant class, as well as the Starbucks Barista that has a Master's degree in gender studies and a boat load of debt.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/thuletide/3390
Telegram
Thuletide
https://news.1rj.ru/str/thuletide/3388
Hiding out on a homestead or being a redpilled electrician and waiting for the NWO to blow over isn't going to stop White people from going extinct or change the course of Globalism. You have to be in the political game to win…
Hiding out on a homestead or being a redpilled electrician and waiting for the NWO to blow over isn't going to stop White people from going extinct or change the course of Globalism. You have to be in the political game to win…
👏8👍3
No one looks at their toolbox and thinks "ah yes, who needs a hammer when you have a screwdriver! The screwdriver did the job, so the hammer is useless." However, too many DR folks think in this linear fashion, as if there must be one solution, one thing that we do, one path we all go down, and that the viability of one solution should call into question the viability of all other solutions.
There's no single magic bullet to the problems we face, there's no single solution that trumps all others. Having money isn't a magic bullet, nor is influence, nor our rights, nor our gun rights, nor winning all the intellectual arguments, nor having more podcasts, nor homesteading or anything else. There is no single solution or one thing that will save us — it's the whole set of tools in the toolbox, altogether, that matters, not a single tool in isolation. You have to respect the importance of each solution as part of a whole set of capabilities that we can combine depending on how our situation changes.
There's no single magic bullet to the problems we face, there's no single solution that trumps all others. Having money isn't a magic bullet, nor is influence, nor our rights, nor our gun rights, nor winning all the intellectual arguments, nor having more podcasts, nor homesteading or anything else. There is no single solution or one thing that will save us — it's the whole set of tools in the toolbox, altogether, that matters, not a single tool in isolation. You have to respect the importance of each solution as part of a whole set of capabilities that we can combine depending on how our situation changes.
🔥16👏4👍3
Forwarded from Hwitgeard
While I think that Pax Tube and others (Eric Striker and Keith Woods for example) are prime examples of what I call "Philosophical Hipsterism", those who are contrarian for contrary's sake to score hot takes before everyone else, I do agree with the latter part of Pax Tube's post. The power of the WEF is not rooted in communism. It is neither communism, nor capitalism, nor even feudalism, but rather a new political order that does not even have a name yet. Morgoth has an excellent recent article and video on this very issue, and how this new, nameless order of technocratic dystopianism is far from the liberalism to which we are currently wont.
However Pax Tube is wrong on everything else here, especially that the WEF is just another liberal NGO. Not only is it not liberal for the above reasons, but it is important to understand that the WEF itself is less important compared with its members who are sovereign in power and the global nodes across which this power reaches. Furthermore the suggestion that they are behind the curve compared with other NGOs is just odd, especially when they are now connected with those other NGOs and corporations who have either become assimilated into it, or run concurrent with its policies. Power does not lie behind one organisation, but a cluster of individuals and corporate entities where it exists both everywhere and nowhere.
However Pax Tube is wrong on everything else here, especially that the WEF is just another liberal NGO. Not only is it not liberal for the above reasons, but it is important to understand that the WEF itself is less important compared with its members who are sovereign in power and the global nodes across which this power reaches. Furthermore the suggestion that they are behind the curve compared with other NGOs is just odd, especially when they are now connected with those other NGOs and corporations who have either become assimilated into it, or run concurrent with its policies. Power does not lie behind one organisation, but a cluster of individuals and corporate entities where it exists both everywhere and nowhere.
Telegram
Pax Tube
Some of the discourse around the World Economic Forum is just absurd. The idea that the WEF has somehow puppeted all world governments and is implementing global “communism” is unmoored from reality. The WEF is just another liberal NGO - and if anything,…
👍3👎1
Forwarded from American Krogan
"Based" Gonzalo Lira is spreading misinformation about Wounded Knee and American history on Twitter. If you're actually interested in what happened at Wounded Knee, I discuss it in depth in Chapter Two of my BioShock series. I start talking about it from around 38 mins in to about 58 mins in. Unlike random memes on social media, I actually read and cited several historical sources.
EDIT: For the record, perhaps our government sucks today, but back then, the government was doing all it could to protect White men, women and children from being slaughtered by savages on the plains.
EDIT: For the record, perhaps our government sucks today, but back then, the government was doing all it could to protect White men, women and children from being slaughtered by savages on the plains.
👍6
Just by looking at this conservative estimate, if the Biden/Kamala administration try to expands control, things could get very difficult for them.
“...the firearm industry trade association, updated the industry estimate of Modern Sporting Rifles (MSRs) in circulation in the United States to 24,446,000 since 1990. That is an increase of over 4.5 million rifles since the last estimate was released in 2020...
...There are more MSRs in circulation today than there are Ford F-Series trucks on the road.”
This number the article gives is just a very conservative estimate — the actual number is likely exponentially higher when you consider other varieties of “assault rifles,” battle rifles and carbines. Also, I absolutely hate the term “modern sporting rifle” but just replace that term with AK and AR style semi-auto rifles.
https://www.nssf.org/articles/commonly-owned-nssf-announces-over-24-million-msrs-in-circulation/
“...the firearm industry trade association, updated the industry estimate of Modern Sporting Rifles (MSRs) in circulation in the United States to 24,446,000 since 1990. That is an increase of over 4.5 million rifles since the last estimate was released in 2020...
...There are more MSRs in circulation today than there are Ford F-Series trucks on the road.”
This number the article gives is just a very conservative estimate — the actual number is likely exponentially higher when you consider other varieties of “assault rifles,” battle rifles and carbines. Also, I absolutely hate the term “modern sporting rifle” but just replace that term with AK and AR style semi-auto rifles.
https://www.nssf.org/articles/commonly-owned-nssf-announces-over-24-million-msrs-in-circulation/
NSSF
Commonly Owned: NSSF Announces Over 24 Million MSRs in Circulation
NSSF updated the industry estimate of Modern Sporting Rifles (MSRs) in circulation in the United States to 24,446,000 since 1990.
👍3