Pedro Gonzales (🇲🇽) retweeting Sohrab Ahmari (🇮🇷) gushing over Tinkzorg (🇸🇴) telling white Americans how to run their country.

This is what passes for “based” in 2022.

Considering how things are now, a sensible society would burn down every single university. A lot of philosophy professors are promoting things along the lines of Herbert Marcuse and his Frankfurt school. I know this from first hand experience, I had professors that dressed up like communists and recommended books like Eros and Civilization.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/millennialwoes/5805

A conservative is somebody who thinks spending trillions on foreign wars and aid has a net zero effect on taxes, but not collecting several billion in student loan accounts due will cause taxes to be raised significantly 🥴🤡

DOJ and FBI are so corrupt that they're redacting their reasons for redactions in their justification for raiding a U.S. president's home.

However much contempt you have for these lawless agencies, it's not nearly enough.
https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1563199497463033857?t=6LOyfKs9-pvwKFQIKkWSuA&s=19

And here we come to the limits of the conspiracy frame.

Why is it that absolutely everything the elites do or have planned is up for debunking or questioning except the Holocaust, which is the central plank of the post-war liberal project in the west?

Why is it that the conspiracy community have a hard stop on Jewish interests when they're supposedly ''going down the rabbit hole'' no matter where that leads?

https://news.1rj.ru/str/mrn_death/40342

An excellent article written by @NixJeelvy serves as a great response to @MorgothsReview's post for why this moral paradigm exists, especially among boomers in the conspiracy frame:

"The consideration that individual self-expression is the ultimate good and that collective, in-group beneficial action, as inculcated in the National Socialists and personified by Adolf Hitler, is the ultimate evil has informed the entire gamut of culture since 1945. But it did not come into being spontaneously. Rather, it percolated into culture beginning in 1960, because it was enshrined in law in 1946."

"The judgements in the Nuremberg show trials codified the rules by which politics would be conducted in the future world. As Maurice Bardèche put it:

The condemnation of the National Socialist Party goes much further than it seems to. In reality, it reaches all the solid forms, all the geological forms of political life. Every nation, every party which urges us to remember our soil, our tradition, our trade, our race is suspect. Whoever claims right of the first occupant and calls to witness things as obvious as the ownership of the city offends against a universal morality which denies the right of the people to write their laws. This applies not just to the Germans; it is all of us who are dispossessed. No one has any more the right to sit down in his field and say: “This ground belongs to me.” No one has any more the right to stand up in the city and say: “We are the old ones; we built the houses of this city; anyone who does not want to obey our laws should get out.” It is written now that a council of impalpable beings has the capacity to know what occurs in our houses and our cities. Crimes against humanity: this law is good; this one is not good. Civilization has the right to veto."

"The concept of the ultimate evil as described by the Boomer Truth Regime aren’t just morally repugnant — they are illegal under the post-Nuremberg legal paradigm."

This Sunday at 8pm EST, Hapaperspective joins me on my Odysee channel to play Project Zomboid, as we chat about culture and politics.

Good morning, kings.

Rule of thumb: If your ancestors wouldn't eat it then you should probably not be eating it.