This video of WTC7 is becoming increasingly hard to find. "Pull it."

Apparently this clip is from 1997. It makes sense that it was before 2010. I think, before 2010, all of this stuff was really just a joke to white people. They could laugh about mass immigration, as Carlin and the chump interviewer do, because it seemed so unlikely and preposterous that mass immigration would actually lead to any real danger for white people.

While Carlin does mention actual demographic numbers ("too many whites") his main point is that blacks and browns are coming to our countries because we "owe them" something, and we need to "pay it back". Namely, we owe them money for past wrongs.

Giving them money is something that can be immediately conceptualised (especially from the vantage point of the very wealthy late 90s). By contrast, allowing them into our countries so that they interbreed with us, outbreed us and eventually drive us to extinction, is something that cannot be immediately conceptualised. It's such an extreme thing that I think, even when pre-2010 white people said the words, they weren't thinking about what it really meant. It was just a "clever" nihilistic conversation piece, a thing to say to shock/impress other equally educated white people, who would reward the speaker with a smug guffaw.

The reality of the Great Replacement would be anything but funny. First, the mass violence against an increasingly vulnerable white (former) majority. Then the gradual loss of fertile white women to "stronger" coloured men who can "protect" them. Then the virtual total loss of white people as a social element (extinction). Then the rapid spiralling into dysfunction of our former societies. Then finally, the total disintegration of those societies into ethnic warzones between different non-white groups.

In 1997, these realities did not need to be contemplated, because nobody really believed that they would ever happen. They even believed that you could tempt fate, as these two silly men do in this clip, and that it still wouldn't happen, or that if it did, it would somehow be okay (which shows that they hadn't seriously thought it through). They were like children playing with matches. "No, the house isn't going to burn down - but even if it does, that'll be fun!"

Post 2010, discussion around this has taken on a much more serious, vindictive and political tone - even more so since 2020. It's not just comically extreme rhetoric any more; it's entire university departments, the sole and explicit mission of various NGOs, the pledge of many political parties, the focus of real international agendas, and the reason for many careers being cut short.

My point is, I'm not sure that a conversation like this one from 1997 would occur today between two white comedians. Everyone knows now that it's actually real.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/HuxDeluxe/5831

Even though I explicitly support White Nationalism, I’ve started noticing a few normiecon/MAGA types sharing my content on their own Telegram channels, probably because of my pro-Second Amendment posts. It’s just proof of what I’ve been saying all along: If you want conservatives to listen to you, speak their language by talking about other relevant topics that people generally value and understand on the right; that means talking about medical tyranny, gun rights, the great reset, how the election was rigged, how the feds are corrupt and evil, the culture war, Ruby Ridge and etc... You can’t win their hearts and minds if you alienate yourself from their worldview by LARPing as some kind of 1930s fascist political philosopher, they’re not going to listen to that.

I've had it. This guy was a fucking prick and I'm glad he's dead.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/tolerantfellowgram/614

Yes, this seems like good news. My concern is that the Shapiro crowd will just subvert the concept. (Yes, you could say the concept was subverted from its inception, by being called "the Cathedral".)

https://news.1rj.ru/str/remnantposting/1183

And by that logic, does growing your own food also give you a false sense of food security?

If you’re someone that genuinely believes gun rights give people “a false sense of security” I better not ever see a gun in your hand under any conditions. I don’t care what the circumstances are, even if your daughter is being raped — you’ve forfeited your right to have a gun in my book. If you talk like this as a gun owner, you’re an absolute hypocrite twat if you haven’t gotten rid of your guns at the nearest police gun-buyback.

Remember, the ruling class want us to be absolutely naked and defenseless against their system. So if you’re going to be another mouthpiece for that part of their agenda, all I ask is that you not be a hypocrite.

NPCs in the dissident right 🤦‍♂️

One thing that actually gives many people a false sense of security is the government. “The military and police will protect us! They’re on our side!” says the conservative that is just barely starting to realize that these are the henchman-institutions that will be (and already are) weaponized against him, on behalf of the system. At least conservatives have already figured out that the alphabet-agencies are not friends.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/7730

Same thing with “smart” gun technology, they want to be able to turn off everything you own. It’s ultimately about control.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/AltSkull48/5225

Another great perspective on gun rights from https://news.1rj.ru/str/hvitgardr3

What book is this from?

Apparently, Muslims have their own word for something similar to being a "cuck"—news to me!

If you’ve ever wondered where Keith Wood’s beliefs and a lot of Nazbol/Statist philosophy actually comes from:

https://youtu.be/d7uEXsOjESw

Normies love adopting the moral framework of their enemies and then trying to one-up them from within the playpen—it's not good enough that Kyle legitimately defended himself, they think it's more credible to say that he defended himself from """whites"""—but if you highlighted the true ethnicity of his attackers, that would be totally unacceptable and beyond the pale.

Mainstream Amerikan politics is just an "anti-racism" contest to see who can lay the most blame on whites and kiss the most black and jewish ass.

When people say “America has a gun violence problem” and “America is the reason why we can’t have a sensible debate about guns in my country,” they fail to see that the gun violence issue isn’t a gun issue at all: most all of the gun violence in America isn’t being committed by actual Americans — because blacks aren’t Americans.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/vdare/9785

It’s understandable why blacks blast rap music in their cars, because that’s their music, the lyrics and beats resonate with their innately simian and low-vibration sensibilities.

But what is it with certain types of White people, usually very low class, that always have rap music blasting from their car? I keep coming across one such person in my small town: she always parks in front of the liquor store and leaves her windows open so the whole parking lot can hear dindu “bix nood” lyrics over trap beats coming from her car. I understand that people like rap music on occasion; it is what it is, and for most young White people it’s just a phase. But if that’s all you listen to in your car — literally just “bix nood fuck dat ass muthafucka bitch” lyrics over repetitive beats and nothing else — your brain is seriously getting fried.

“The emotionalism of America comes from Italians” typed the brown man, his sausage-like fingers still trembling from his weekly mental breakdown over the internet. This time surely, he thought to himself, I would convince the English that I am in fact white.

New video fellers... been working on this for awhile, finally finished it. A much better look at Tacitus's Germania than an old video I made a couple of years ago. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cd3_T1yUtek