> Intel Op
> Against Trump

For sure.

> American

Not so much.

This is a sign that the future of the West will be Hapa. It’s not what I care for, I’m not pro-Hapa. But if we don’t fix or even acknowledge this problem afflicting so many White males, they will inevitably end up dating Asian women.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/TheMadDimension/5223

“Hey lonely White Nationalists, at least I’m not an incel. Hehe.”

I bet he’s booking a flight to South East Asia already, another White man down.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/TheMadDimension/5231

It doesn’t bode well for this movement that the man behind Unite the Right is considering completely dumping WNism because he’s struggling to date White women; and when he talks about his problems other WNists don’t really listen to him, many just brush off what he’s saying and immediately conclude that it’s entirely his fault. I’m not saying that it isn’t his fault, but there’s at least some truth to what he’s saying.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/TheMadDimension/5230

An extremely well-written summary of the breakdown in sexual social norms and the historical relations between men and women:
https://brighteyes.substack.com/p/the-fuck-rate-is-about-to-implode

TL;DR — Civilization was built with the labor of average men because social norms and incentives gave mid men the opportunity to reproduce with halfway-decent women. Now mid-tier men are expected to settle for low-quality women or no women at all, and also settle for less in the way of career opportunities as well. Women of all tiers have been put in a position of bearing basically no real responsibility for anything. When those women age out of any hope of marriage or reproduction, immense human suffering and a straining of civilizational infrastructure will occur.

Not exactly a new take, but it's very concisely and eloquently expressed by bright eyes.

I would add one more specific point that I see absolutely no one talking about: what is going to happen to these "liberated" childless women once they have fully aged out of any eligibility for marriage or child-rearing? They will have no children to care for them. Their older family members will all be dead. Their friends will all be getting old too. They will be childless at 40, with several decades of lonely life ahead of them. What are they going to do for those remaining 30 years? Who will take care of them? What kind of impact do we suppose that will have on the already-overburdened healthcare systems?

I don't know the precise answer, but it sure as Hell won't be anything good.

> Let's digitize money

What could go wrong?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

@AltSkull48

War with Mexico incoming? The US can't help themselves. @EnjoyTheD

Trump 2024: Make War With Mexico Again

The absolute state of Canadian politics. The two main choices. Liberal versus Conservative. Striking difference between them, huh? https://news.1rj.ru/str/TheVoiceOfReason4ya/3634

Study on secession finds that identity, rather than income inequality, is the best predictor of secession. The authors used language identity but that's basically a proxy for ethnic/religious identity.

(Source, archive)

"The driver asserted his independence from the laws of the land."

This is what happens to people that think and act as if laws are just writing on a piece of paper that they can ignore without lethal consequences. This is why having GOOD laws (a Bill of Rights) matters so much.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZMICi--Mk4

"Only when the enemy fears for its own safety, including harsh retribution for its crimes, will it be dissuaded from its customary offensive strategy and further harm."

Another 200 IQ real-talk post from the verified 200 IQ man himself, Chris Langan.

https://gab.com/ChrisLangan/posts/109989279236395284

These women were in charge of ALL Investments at SVB - Say something nice

Say something nice about the 100% female investment team at SVB
This is Shannon Soccacia Chief Investment Officer at SVB and her team of highly qualified women investment bankers.
@EnjoyTheD

🏀s and 🌮s

"Compact" and "subcompact" handguns are a marketing scam.

Gun manufacturers love to sell you these gimmicky guns on the basis that they're "more concealable," but if that's the selling point then why the reduced barrel length? When you conceal a handgun, the barrel is going straight down inside your waistband; there's basically no difference between a 5" barrel and a 3" barrel in this situation.

The drawback, however, is that a shorter barrel means a shorter sight radius and less mass to absorb recoil with, which makes it harder to stay on target and produces snappier recoil.

In other words, by using a "compact" or "subcompact" handgun, you're handicapping yourself with a gun that's inherently more difficult to shoot.

The only thing that really affects concealment is the vertical length of the handgrip, but again, shortening this means sacrificing capacity.

My CCW is a full-size Beretta 92X, which has nearly a 5" barrel and 18+1 capacity. I've never had any issue concealing it and it's much more comfortable to shoot than my Glock 19 or M&P Compact.