"Leaving aside the Middle Ages, in the quadripartite hierarchy as it appeared among the Aryans of the ancient Mediterranean world, and still more among those of the Hindu-Iranian civilisation, the properly Aryan element was concentrated in the two superior castes and determined the values which dominated these cultures, while in the two other castes another blood, coming from subjugated aboriginal peoples, predominated; this fact could lead one to interesting conclusions about the racial background involved in the development of the civilisations of each of the aforementioned types. ... The 1914-1918 war shows clearly, in fact, that the ‘noble’ democratic ideology was only a cover, while the part which international finance really played is now well-known. And today, in the new war, this appears even more clearly: the sentimental pretexts offered have proved to be more and more inconsistent, and it is obvious, on the contrary, that material and plutocratic interests, and the desire to maintain a monopoly upon the raw materials of the world, as well as upon gold, are what have set the ‘tone’ of the fight of the democratic Allies and have led them to take up arms and ask millions of men to sacrifice their lives. ... Every usurpation has a degradation as its fatal consequence: this process almost always presupposes the infiltration of socially and racially inferior elements. In the case of the Western bourgeoisie these elements have been supplied by Hebraism. Let us not delude ourselves: the type of the plutocrats and of the capitalists, the three kings of bourgeois and democratic civilisation, is essentially a Jewish type, even when precise physical descent from the Jewish race cannot be demonstrated. ... And, given these facts, it is obvious that, by means of elective affinities, this civilisation had to be completely opened to Hebraism, which has scaled its main positions of responsibility with ease, and has taken over control of all its powers by means of its own specialised racial qualities. ... But it is unquestionable that England is a typical case of this phenomenon, which is hardly new, and, to tell the truth, exhibits a characteristic phenomenon of inversion. To be specific, in England monarchy and nobility still exist and, until yesterday, a military class with an unquestionable heritage of character, sang-froid and contempt for danger existed also. But it is not in such elements that the centre of the British Empire lies, but rather in the Jew and the Judaised Aryan. The degenerate remains of a ‘civilisation of warriors’ serve a ‘civilisation of merchants’, which – normally – would rather have had to serve them. ... Proceeding from what is below to what is above, it can therefore be said that an unavoidable need for social justice in the international arena and a revolt against the hegemony of nations incarnating the ‘civilisation of the merchants’ may be the immediate determinant of the war. But the one who fights the war on such grounds can find in it also the occasion to realise, simultaneously, a higher experience, that is, fighting and being a hero not so much as soldier but as warrior, as a man who fights and loves to fight not so much in the interest of material conquests as in the name of his King and of his tradition. And beyond this stage, in a successive phase, or a higher class, this same war can become a means to achieve war in the supreme sense, as asceticism and ‘path of God’, as culmination of that general meaning of living, of which it was said: vita est militia super terram."

- Julius Evola in Soul and Race of War

Plato is the foundation of western thought and western religion. His work is the intellectual scaffolding of ancient Christianity. It is based around the idea of unity, or the truth as one. God is truth, beyond space and time, the “Being of Being.” Logos is the unity of all Archetypes in the divine nature of Christ from whom all things were made. This means all science is based on logos with truth as the foundation. Alexander Dugin, a man often condemned and almost never read, bases much of his political ideas on Plato and Platonism.

Plato’s core is the Archetype, or Idea: the truth of anything in particular. Justice is one transcendental aspect of the good that can manifest in different ways. Modernism rejects this, claiming that there is no “justice,” just specific, different just acts we all call “justice.” The Postmodern idea is that not only is there no justice, but there aren’t even just acts. All is language; all is image.

Truth is reason and freedom: man derives from the same source and creator as everything else, so we can learn. Because this source is spiritual, our freedom makes sense. If something is true, then it is unchanging. If its unchanging, then it cannot be physical. If its not physical, then it is spiritual. If it is spiritual, then it can only be known by the soul. Our problem is that we live in an age where reason and freedom are nothing but words without referents. They are marketing gimmicks. Only mindless consumption matters, and those who can consume the most are the “most successful” in society and should be envied. There is no truth here. As society gets more and more insane, those who love the truth – Logos – will be marginalized and hated. Knowing the truth is a revolutionary act.

Dr Mathew Raphael Johnson

For when we are entirely ignorant of what we are, we will also be ignorant of what we show concern for, showing concern for everything rather than ourselves for whom we should show the chief concern. If that which uses the body is the soul, and the body in respect to the soul occupies the category of an instrument, and all other things have been discovered for the sake of the instrument to help its fluctuating nature, clearly our chief and first concern should be for that which leads and comes first, and our secondary concern for that which comes second. Hence the wise man will not be careless of his health, not because he thinks the body is pre-eminent, but because he instructs it for the use of the soul, so that it may obey without hindrance the soul’s functions; and in the third place he will take care of the third category of things, managing externals for the preservation of the instrument. Therefore he will take care of the soul first, perhaps even exclusively, given that the care shown for things after the soul is directed towards its progress.

Hierocles of Alexandria, Commentary on the Golden Verses

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_welfare_in_Nazi_Germany

I am surprised that this is allowed to sit on Wikipedia. The Nazi Party enacted animal welfare laws unparalleled at the time, and I would argue unparalleled by even the most so-called "advanced" countries today, where animal welfare is a chief concern of regular people.

The most interesting part is what the judicial comments reveal, namely that the animal was to be "protected for itself" ("um seiner selbst willen geschützt"), and made "an object of protection going far beyond the hitherto existing law" ("Objekt eines weit über die bisherigen Bestimmungen hinausgehenden Schutzes"). Viewing animals as an end in themselves, to use a Kantian phrase.

This view is very much in keeping with Evola's notion that nature is not to be considered as some refreshing respite from the hustle and bustle of everyday urban existence, in the way the bourgeois viewed - and continues to view - it today. Instead, the unified man, the differentiated man, views nature in it's self, and seeks to hear the language of nature and experience its wild ferocity.

"The opposition between action and contemplation, however, was unknown to the ancient Aryans. Action and contemplation were not regarded as the two terms of an opposition. They designated merely two distinct paths to the same spiritual realisation. In other words, it was thought that man could overcome the conditioning of individuality and participate in the supernatural reality by means of contemplation or, equally, by means of action. ... [R]ecovering awareness of the ancient Aryan conception of action must be considered an essential task. This conception must operate with transformative effectiveness, evoking vital forces in the new man, aware of his race. ... But the Aryan race considered itself to be the army of the Olympian principle: accordingly, it is necessary to restore this conception among Aryans, as being the justification, or the highest consecration, of any hegemonic aspiration, but also of the very idea of empire, whose anti-secular character is basically very obvious. To the traditionally based world view, all apparent realities are symbolic. This is therefore true of war as well, as is seen from the subjective and interior point of view. War and the Path of God are thus merged into a single entity. ... In the Edda, it is said that ‘no matter how great the number of the heroes gathered in Valhalla they will never be too many for when the Wolf comes’. The ‘Wolf’ here is the symbol of dark and wild powers which the world of the Aesir had managed to chain and subdue [Ragnarøkkr as 'Kali Yuga']. The Aryo-Iranian conception of Mithra, the ‘sleepless warrior’, who at the head of the Fravashi of his faithful wages battle against the enemies of the Aryan God of Light is completely analogous. ... Here, the Muslim tradition serves as transmitter of the Aryo-Iranian tradition. The idea of ‘holy war’ – at least as far as the elements that we are considering are concerned – reached the Arabian tribes via the world of Persian speculation. It was, therefore, a late rebirth of a primordial Aryan heritage, and seen from this perspective we can certainly adopt [...] a saying of the Prophet, who, when he got back from a military expedition, said, ‘I return now from the lesser to the greater war’. ... This is also the idea that reveals itself in a text of the ancient Aryan warrior wisdom, the Bhagavad-Gita: 'Thus knowing oneself to be transcendental to the material senses, mind and intelligence, O mighty-armed Arjuna, one should steady the mind by deliberate spiritual intelligence and thus – by spiritual strength – conquer this insatiable enemy known as lust’ (3:43). ... In the esoteric respect, as a matter of fact, ‘paradise’, ‘the celestial realm’ and analogous expressions are nothing but symbolic representations – concocted for the people – of transcendent states of consciousness on a higher plane than life and death. ..."

- Julius Evola in The Aryan Doctrine of Combat and Victory
(Part 1/2)

"... To understand these we should first clarify the meaning of the image of the soul as demon, genius or double. ... A close relationship was believed to exist between this entity and the mystical powers of race and blood. The demon seems in many aspects to be similar to the lares, the mystical entities of a stock or of a progeny, of which Macrobius, for example, asserts: ‘The gods are those who keep us alive – they feed our body and guide our soul.’ It can be said that there is a relationship between the demon and ordinary consciousness analogous to that which exists between the individuating principle and the individuated principle. The former is, according to the teaching of the ancients, a supra-individual force, superior, therefore, to birth and death. The latter, i.e., individuated consciousness, conditioned by the body and the outer world, is destined as a rule to dissolution or to an ephemeral and indistinct survival. In the Nordic tradition, the image of the Valkyrie has more or less the same meaning as that of the demon in Classical Antiquity. In many texts the image of the Valkyrie merges with that of the fylgja, that is, a spiritual entity at work in man, to whose power the destiny of man is subject. And as kynfylgja the Valkyrie is – like the lares of ancient Rome – the mystical power of the blood. The same thing applies to the Fravashi of the Aryo-Iranian tradition. The Fravashi, a famous Orientalist explains, ‘is the intimate power of any human being, it is what keeps him alive and sees to it that he is born and exists’. At the same time the Fravashi are, like Roman lares, related to the primordial powers of a stock, and are, like the Valkyries, terrifying goddesses of war, dispensers of fortune and victory. ... Not all escape the dissolution of the ‘I’ into that lemuric residuum of which Hades and Niflheim were ancient symbolic representations. Immortality is the privilege of the few, and, according to the Aryan conception, specifically the privilege of heroes. Continuing to live – not as a shadow, but as a demigod – is reserved to those which a special spiritual action has elevated from the one nature to the other. ... Another life arises within the life of the individual when freed by the Dionysian rhythm, almost like the emergence of his own abysmal root. The Wildes Heer, the Furies, the Erynnyes and other analogous spiritual natures are symbolic representations of this force. They therefore correspond to a manifestation of the demon in its terrifying and active transcendence. Sacred games represent a higher level of this process. A still higher level is that of war. ... Let us come now to the overall meaning of these ancient heroic traditions, that is, to the mystical conception of victory. The fundamental idea was that there was an effective correspondence between the physical and the metaphysical, between the visible and the invisible; a correspondence whereby the works of the spirit manifested supra-individual features and were expressed through real operations and facts. ... In the Aryan world light, solar splendour, glory, victory, divine royalty are images and notions which appear in the tightest conjunction, not in the sense of abstractions and inventions of man, but rather with the meaning of latent potentialities and absolutely real actualised capacities. In such context the mystical doctrine of fight and victory represents for us a luminous apex of our common tradition of action. ... The traditional conception is also based on the presupposition that, far more than individuals, the mystical primordial powers of the race are at work in ‘holy war’. These powers of the origins are those which create world-wide empires and bring to men ‘victorious peace’."

- Julius Evola in The Aryan Doctrine of War and Victory
(Part 2/2)

Since the Greeks, ethics for Europeans have designated virtues whose practice forms the basis of the ‘good life’: generosity over avarice, honour over shame, courage over cowardice, justice over injustice, temperance over excess, duty over irresponsibility, rectitude over guile, unselfishness over greed, etc. The good citizen is one who always tries to strive for excellence in each of these virtues (Aristotle).

This will to excellence does not in any way exclude the existence of several modes of life (contemplative, active, productive, etc.), each arising from different moral codes, and each finding their place in the city’s hierarchy. For example, European tradition, expressed in the ancient tripartite model, made wisdom prevail over force, and force over wealth.

Alain De Benoist

SUN YOUR BALLS

I think it is time to share this important esoteric message again to you because it has been a while since I have talked about it.

You need to be exposing your balls to the sun. Why?

- Exposure to sunlight = optimal function of mitochondria
- This boosts function of the Leydig cells in the testicles where testosterone is made = higher testosterone. Blood flow is also empowered which makes all of your machinery down there work optimally.

It’s quite sinple really.

Now, let’s dive a bit deeper. In today’s castrated world, when is the last time that your nether regions would have been FREE in the natural world, nude and exposed to the sun like they are meant to be, like every other animal on this Earth?

The Lion and the Gorilla suns his balls through his experience of life. The human keeps his caged in tight underwear (stop wearing underwear), Never to see the sun. You are cut off from some of your PRIMAL POWER!

HOW TO DO IT


Simply pull your pants down in a private area and allow the sunlight to bless the fellas. A good starting session is 20 minutes, remember to consider that this skin area likely hasn’t been exposed to sunlight for many months if not years, so take appropriate care to work up to exposure. NO SUNSCREEN.

The ideal time of the day would be either early morning or just before noon. Avoid maximum UV times.

An old Abraham Myerson’s study in “The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology” found that men who exposed their torso to UV light and UV rays saw their testosterone levels increase to 120%. And when they exposed testes to UV light and UV rays, they were able to boost testosterone levels to a whopping 200%! Now we don't want to rely on what study's say, but every guy that does it feels the difference.

If you don't believe me, try it + get some direct sunlight on your balls...
They literally respond to the sun, they grow and squirm around, powered up by Apollo's blessings.

You will feel stronger and more powerful... YOU'LL BE ROCK HARD AND READY TO RUMBLE.

This is the knowledge they forbid... they want you indoors, CLOTHED, under fake light.

Those with sunned balls will inherit the earth.

 “What can my enemies do to me? My paradise and my Garden are in my heart wherever I go. They are with me and never leave me. If I am imprisoned, it is seclusion for worship. If I am killed, it is martyrdom. If they expel me from my land, it is hijrah.”

- Ibn Taymiyyah

"It hardly needs to be said that, in the 1914-1918 World War, the former [liberal, democratic-bourgeoisie] ideology was proper to the Allies and above all to the western and Atlantic democracies, while the latter [virile, active, heroic] was essentially represented by the Central Powers. According to a well-known Masonic watchword – which we have often recalled here – that war was fought as a sort of great crusade of worldwide democracy against ‘militarism’ and ‘Prussianism’, which, to those ‘imperialist’ nations, represented ‘obscurantist’ residues within ‘developed’ Europe. ... What were called in the Masonic jargon ‘anachronistic residues’ meant really the survival of values peculiar to the whole of traditional, warlike, virile and Aryan Europe, while the values of the ‘developed world’ did not mean anything but the ethical and spiritual decline of the West. ... That war was intended to consolidate ‘democratic imperialism’ against any dangerous troublemakers; the new war is intended to mark the end of this ‘imperialism’ and of several myths which serve it as ‘alibis’, and to create the preconditions for a new age in which warrior ethics are to serve as the basis for the civilisation of the collective of European peoples. In this sense the present war can be called a restorative war. It restores to their original standing the ideals and the views of life and right which are central to the original traditions of the Aryan peoples – above all the Aryo-Roman and Nordic-Aryan ones – so central that, when they decayed or were abandoned, this led inevitably to the fall of each of those peoples and power passed into the hands of inferior elements, both racially and spiritually. ... The true warrior ideal implies not only force and physical training but also a calm, controlled and conscious formation of the inner being and the personality. Love for distance and order, the ability to subordinate one’s individualistic and passionate element to principles, the ability to place action and work above mere personhood, a feeling of dignity devoid of vanity are features of the true warrior spirit as essential as those which refer to actual combat. ... There is not really ‘imperialist materialism’ and ‘warlike brutality’, on the one hand, and, on the other, ‘love for culture’ and interest in ‘spiritual values’. Rather, there are spiritual values of a given type and of a properly Aryan origin, which oppose a different, intellectualistic, ‘humanistic’ and bourgeois conception of these. It is useless to delude ourselves that a warrior civilisation can have the same consideration for the so-called ‘world of sciences and arts’ as that which they enjoyed in the previous age of liberalism and of the Nineteenth-century bourgeoisie. They may retain their own significance but in a subordinate manner, because they represent not what is essential, but the accessory. The main thing consists instead in a certain inner style, a certain formation of the mind and character, a simplicity, clarity and harshness, a directly experienced meaning of existence, without expressionisms, without sentimentalisms, a pleasure for commanding, obeying, acting, conquering and overcoming oneself. ... It is only by working from the energies which in the test of the fire of combat decide the freedom, dignity and mission of the peoples that true understanding, collaboration and unity of civilisation can be forged."

- Julius Evola in The Meaning of the Warrior Element for the New Europe

"The vicissitudes of this war have exposed contrasts in this respect [on 'inner race'], which we would like to discuss briefly here. We shall limit ourselves essentially to the extreme cases, represented, respectively, by Russia and Japan.

It is now well known that Soviet Russia’s conduct of war does not attach the slightest importance to human life or to humanity as such. ... In general, as recent events have shown, the Russian can always face death readily because of a sort of innate, dark fatalism, and human life has been cheap for a long time in Russia. ... The death of the bolshevised man on the battlefield represents, thus, the logical culmination of the process of depersonalisation, and of the destruction of every qualitative and personal value, which underlay the Bolshevik ideal of ‘civilisation’ all along. ... We see here one specific form, albeit one almost incomprehensible to our European mentality, of readiness for death and self-sacrifice, which affords perhaps even a sinister joy in the destruction both of oneself and of others.

Recent episodes of the Japanese war have made known to us a ‘style’ of dying which, from this point of view, seems to have affinities with that of Bolshevik man in that it appears to testify to the same contempt for the value of the individual and of personhood in general. ... Once again, there is something in this which is hardly comprehensible to the Western mind. However, if we try to understand the most intimate aspects of this extreme form of heroism we find values which present a perfect antithesis to those of the lightless ‘telluric heroism’ of Bolshevik man. The premises here are, in fact, of a rigorously religious or, to put it better, an ascetic and mystical character. We do not mean this in the most obvious and external sense – that is, as referring to the fact that in Japan the religious idea and the Imperial idea are one and the same thing, so that service to the Emperor is regarded as a form of divine service, and self-sacrifice for the Tenno and the state has the same value as the sacrifice of a missionary or martyr – but in an absolutely active and combative sense. ... Behind this, according to Zen, that is, the religion of the samurai, there is something incomprehensible and uncontrollable, infinite in itself and capable of infinite forms, so that it is called symbolically sunya, meaning ‘empty’, as against everything which is materially substantial and bound to specific form. ... One can take hold of one’s own life and cast it away at its most intense moment out of super-abundance in the certainty of an eternal existence and of the indestructibility of what, never having had a beginning, cannot have an end. What may seem extreme to a certain Western mentality becomes natural, clear and obvious here.

Here, a little historical reminiscence is called for. Although this is not widely known, our ancient Roman traditions contained motifs concerning the disinterested, heroic offering of one’s own person in the name of the state for the purpose of victory analogous to those which we have seen in the Japanese mysticism of combat. We are alluding to the so-called devotio. ... According to the ancient Roman ritual of devotio, as weunderstand it, a warrior, and above all a chieftain, can facilitate victory by means of a mysterious unleashing of forces determined by the deliberate sacrifice of his own person, combined with the will not to come out of the fray alive. ... And so, in our heritage, points of reference are indicated which stand in radical opposition to the sub-personal and collectivist heroism we discussed above, and not only to that, but to every tragic and irrational vision which ignores what is stronger than fire and iron, and stronger than life and death."

- Julius Evola in Varieties of Heroism

Why are Bosnia and Serbia excluded from the Slavic group, since 4th image shows then being identical to Croatia, Herzegovina and Slovenia? (with Bosnia even more Slavic than the rest)

Good point. That map is not my creation, but I always find critiquing sources leads to greater truth. The original author may be confused because when one looks at Y-DNA of the region there is a very interesting presence of an I haplogroup lineage from the old hunter-gatherers of Europe. The author probably assumed, with incorrect stereotyping, that this non-Aryan line must therefore be 'Anatolian' when in reality the prescence of I haplogroup actually shows an isolation from the various Aryan invasions and is therefore a preservation of more ancient indigenous European DNA.

Another branch of I represents another, long-separated branch of these hunter-gatherers and survives in Scandinavia. I suspect the author of that map included this in his 'Germanic' label as others sometimes do. This lineage was not ubiquitous in the Paleolithic, but following the last major cooling in the Ice Age I lineages came to dominate, with proto-I1s re-taking Scandinavia as the glaciers melted and proto-I2s dominating ancient Southern Europe.