"Comparison of the Chaldaean Oracles (attributed to Zoroaster) and Schelling on the Absolute as Trinity:

The five first contain the whole Principles of Schelling
I. [Where the Paternal Monad is.]—(The Absolute.)
2 [The Monad is enlarged, which generates Two.] (The polar Law.)
3. [For the Dyad sits by him (the Monad), and glitters with Intellec tual Sections.] (Productive Dyad of Thesis & Antithesis)
4. [And to Govern all things, and to Order all things not Ordered.]
(Polarity the Law of all Manifestation, the one universal Pantoplast.)
5. [For in the whole World shineth the Triad, over which the Monad
Rules.] Synthesis, Trichotomy [For the Mind of the Father said, that
all things be cut into three.]

Zoroaster has one final stage that Schelling doesn't mention:
6. [Whose Will assented, and then all things were divided.]
and by this omission rendered his system either spinosistic-barren,
or groundless."

- The Notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge (CN III 4424)

“The curse of every ancient civilization was that its men in the end became unable to fight. Materialism, luxury, safety, even sometimes an almost modern sentimentality, weakened the fibre of each civilized race in turn; each became in the end a nation of pacifists, and then each was trodden under foot by some ruder people that had kept that virile fighting power the lack of which makes all other virtues useless and sometimes even harmful.”

Theodore Roosevelt

The Greeks understood race as the autochthones. This is close to Hesiod's Five Ages.
Man may be born of the blood of the warring gods; Prometheus forming him of the clay of the earth; or the Nymphs who raise him from the trees.
The Roman race was born of the wolf, and the great genealogy surrounding the heroism of Romulus and Remus. This reminds us that there is something hidden and fateful in race. It is neither spiritual nor biological alone.
The strength of this conception can be seen in that neighbouring states had their own very distinct myths of race. Often so different that it would be more appropriate to call them separate species.
Today we have fallen from an idea of a single, global race into the sub-races. Which is what is meant by identity – a racial and species pessimism.

Not only have the deeper meanings of race been forgotten, the same degeneration has happened to its subsets: the town or city or polis, the clan, the family. These subsets (and caste, which was also racial) were more significant to one's identity than broader race. Where the modern man is barely aware of distinctions between 'ethnicities' (races) and is afraid to recognize significant differences in 'races' (effectively sub-species), the traditional man implicitly understood that there would be differences in character within all the families that made up all the clan lineages that populated every locality.

This rich experience of human society came from the awareness of spiritual and biological forces being present within race. Without that awareness, the meaning behind family and clan fades, every town or city begins to appear the same as the next, and the race left with no culture blends with and adopts foreign elements until it becomes something new.

The World Wars was the Illiad of Western Civilization. Just as Troy fell, the West fell. And just as Aeneas escaped with the Sword of Troy and would go on to establish Rome, so too are we the sons of the West who will found our own sublime civilization.
Do not lose hope nor hang on to a past that is lost. We are embarking on an Odyssey of a new Aryan foundation.
A golden dawn is on our horizon, its our job to keep marching into it.
-Ronin

Buddha and the Personal God

There follows a symbolical test. The personal God, the Hebraic "I am that I am," the God of being, whose essence is his existence, as such, cannot not be, that is, he is bound to being, he is passive with respect to being. He has not the power to go beyond being. It is here that the test occurs. Who can "disappear'? That is, who is lord both of being and of nonbeing? Who rests neither on the one nor on the other? Brahmā cannot disappear. Instead, the Buddha disappears. All the world of Brahmā is amazed and recognizes "the high power, the high might of the ascetic Gotama." Limitation is removed. The dignity of the atideva, of one who goes beyond the world of existence itself, not to mention the "celestial" worlds, it is only left to Mara the malign to try in vain to dissuade the Buddha from spreading the doctrine.

Here, then, is one of the extreme points in the test of the vocations: not to crave even the highest of all lives"—not only to pass from this shore to the other, but to apprehend that which lies beyond both. The words of the Awakened One are: "Nature, the gods, the lord of generation, Brahmā, the Resplendent Ones, the Powerful Ones, the Ultrapowerful Ones, all things, I have known, how unsatisfying are all things: this have I recognized and I have renounced all things, abdicated from all things. detached myself from all things, forsworn all things, disdained all things. And in this. O Brahma, not only am I your equal in knowledge, not only am I not less than you. but I am far greater than you".

Julius Evola, Doctrine of Awakening, 7

Beard? Moustache? Clean shaven? Obsession with the trappings of manhood is essentially a feminine quality.

Instead, develop those internal aryan traits. A love of truth and simplicity; shunning unnecessary displays of wealth; avoiding unnecessary harm and violence of thought, act, or speech; equanimity in all situations; detachment; non-aversion to physical and mental discomfort; being laconic and loving silence.

In other words: develop yourself from the inside out.

Man is microcosm to macrocosm.
Be as ice on the inside and let nothing can harm you on the outside.

"Modern Western man, for the most part a regressive human type, can be compared, in various respects, to a crustacean: he is all the “harder” in his external behaviour as man of action, as unscrupulous entrepreneur, as organizer and so on, as he is “soft” and inconsistent on the plane of interiority." - Julius C. Evola

"Through the “unquestionable/undoubting Consciousness of their own Spiritual-Power ”, the Waves are tamed/subdued [gebändigt] – “made frozen” – they freeze like Ice." - Guido von List, The Mystery of the Runes.

Some of you have asked how a Sophoclean tragedy fits into our Studies in Reaction series:

https://www.imperiumpress.org/product-page/sophocles-ajax

So far, the series has been all non-fiction works, but some of the most based material you'll find is aesthetic—drama, fiction, poetry. Our series encompasses all that, and much more is planned.

As for Sophocles' Ajax specifically, it sketches out Homeric man better than anyone but Homer—in some ways better, because it contrasts Homeric man to the later, classical Greek. We tend to think of Socrates and Achilles as being cultural expressions of the same ethos, but Achilles is a rough-hewn barbarian and Socrates is a sophisticated urbanite. It would be like equating Hegel and a Norse berseker.

Sophocles shows us the barbarian in the shape of Ajax and what he values most in life. And what he values above all else is honour. Honour sounds abstract to us today but it means something very definite: honour is what other people think of you. And when they think little of you, what you feel is shame. Shame is an inherently social phenomenon, is the result of a collective and corporative culture, where the locus of moral authority is outside the individual—sociologists call this shame culture. Think feudal Japan. When the locus of moral authority is within the individual, he feels guilt, and the guilt culture is one where each man judges himself. He may judge according to a standard, but he decides whether the standard has been met. Think the modern West.

Shame culture is what traditional societies look like, and Sophocles gives us a dilemma. Ajax has been dishonoured and has an impossible choice: face his comrades who don't respect him, or do the unthinkable. In the end what is unthinkable to us is not what is unthinkable to him, which shows you just how far we are from our honour-obsessed barbarian roots. Hence, a study in reaction.

This connects with what I wrote before regarding the multiple aspects of the Solar which Evola made use of. First there is the 'Uranic' element, that primordial force of order, authority, and virility. This element corresponds with the 'archaic' ideals of Ajax in Sophocles and Homer, and the transition away from old Uranic worship is evident in that it was mostly gone by Homeric times. It was superceded, or built atop of, by the developed 'Apollonian' element that came with the later Olympian gods. The Olympian ideal of classical Greece is what is most familiar to us as height of Greek culture. It was a grand age full of the greatest philosophy and art; at least until one looks at its origins—the trunk from which it sprouted—and beyond all its aesthetic expression and moralizing one finds it has deviated from its founding principle.

This is perhaps what Nietzsche meant to say in Birth of Tragedy when he haphazardly declared that the 'Apollonian' needed to re-unite with the 'Dionysian;' the Solar symbol developed in the golden age of Olympian victory but began to lose the concepts of honor and shame, and with it its primordial essence. It is not a telluric or naturalistic element missing, but a 'primordial' and essential one which precedes the still Olympian Dionysian frenzy. Interesting that Nietzsche when expounding this concept saw Sophocles as the last great Greek artist and Socrates as the birth of the new Classical man. He was very close to being right.

"I see nothing but a world of ruins, where a kind of front line is possible only in the catacombs." - Julius Evola / Painting: Roman Ruins by Giovanni Ghisolfi

A bit rough around the edges, but I'm still learning. And lo-res because I have slow internet.

https://youtu.be/PzlmJJ1WiUA