Forwarded from No more! Please remove yourself.
USEFUL INFORMATION
How To Handle A Vaccine Offer
>>> This post is for the newbies <<<
Q: Can your employer require you to be vaxxinated?
A: YES.
Q: Can you refuse?
A: YES
Q: Can they justifiably fire your butt for refusing?
A: YES
Why? Because refusal is belligerence.
So... what to do? What if you have a religious cause for not wanting to be vaxxed? Or what if you just aren't completely certain that it is safe? Or what if you absolutely KNOW it isn't safe because you have read the ingredients list? Is there something you can do besides refuse and get fired or accept and get vaxxed?
YES. YES. And finally YES. But first we have to understand something about "The Four Doors". Gather round...
The Four Doors
Everything in our commercial system is based on contract. It is all about offers. Here are some examples of offers:
1) I want you to get vaxxinated.
2) You owe me $100.
3) Would you like to go to lunch?
4) I am going to punch you in the nose.
5) Please show me I.D.
There are four - AND ONLY FOUR - ways to respond to an offer:
1) Argue
2) Remain silent
3) Unconditionally accept
4) Conditionally accept.
Look at offer #2, "You owe me $100."
Response #1 - If you argue, that is DISHONORABLE and makes you a debtor.
Response #2 - If you remain silent, the other party can get an agreement. You will agree by means of "agreement by acquiescence."
Response #3 - "Here is your $100."
Response #4 - "I conditionally accept your offer to pay you $100 upon proof of your claim I owe you $100.
If you do #1 or #2, you are being dishonorable and it makes you a debtor.
If you do #3 or #4, you are remaining honorable and it makes you a creditor.
Argument is bad. No agreement can be reached thus.
Silence is bad. If you have an obligation to respond in a matter, and you fail to respond, you are AT FAULT. You damage the other party so you become the debtor in the interaction.
Unconditional acceptance keeps you honorable, but usually isn't in your best interest.
Conditional acceptance is where the fun begins.
So let's say your employer says, "I will need you to get vaxxinated by January 1st."
If you argue, you can be fired for cause.
If you remain silent, you are agreeing - you acquiesce - and if you don't comply, you can be fired for cause.
If you unconditionally accept, you just go get the vaccine.
If you conditionally accept, it may look like this:
"I conditionally accept your offer to get vaxxinated upon proof of your claim that:
1) The vaxxine is safe; and
2) The vaxxine will cause no negative side effects; and
3) You agree to be liable for any and all damages."
See how this works? But I wouldn't stop here. There are many maxims of law. One of those maxims is "an unrebutted presumption is truth in commerce." That means if you make a presumption and I do not rebut your presumption, then we have agreed on said presumption. So in this case a good presumption would be:
"Your failure to adequately respond constitutes your agreement that:
- The vaxxine is NOT safe; and
- I will not be terminated from employment for your failure to prove the vaxxine's safety."
Of course there is a bit more to it, but not much.
_
How To Handle A Vaccine Offer
>>> This post is for the newbies <<<
Q: Can your employer require you to be vaxxinated?
A: YES.
Q: Can you refuse?
A: YES
Q: Can they justifiably fire your butt for refusing?
A: YES
Why? Because refusal is belligerence.
So... what to do? What if you have a religious cause for not wanting to be vaxxed? Or what if you just aren't completely certain that it is safe? Or what if you absolutely KNOW it isn't safe because you have read the ingredients list? Is there something you can do besides refuse and get fired or accept and get vaxxed?
YES. YES. And finally YES. But first we have to understand something about "The Four Doors". Gather round...
The Four Doors
Everything in our commercial system is based on contract. It is all about offers. Here are some examples of offers:
1) I want you to get vaxxinated.
2) You owe me $100.
3) Would you like to go to lunch?
4) I am going to punch you in the nose.
5) Please show me I.D.
There are four - AND ONLY FOUR - ways to respond to an offer:
1) Argue
2) Remain silent
3) Unconditionally accept
4) Conditionally accept.
Look at offer #2, "You owe me $100."
Response #1 - If you argue, that is DISHONORABLE and makes you a debtor.
Response #2 - If you remain silent, the other party can get an agreement. You will agree by means of "agreement by acquiescence."
Response #3 - "Here is your $100."
Response #4 - "I conditionally accept your offer to pay you $100 upon proof of your claim I owe you $100.
If you do #1 or #2, you are being dishonorable and it makes you a debtor.
If you do #3 or #4, you are remaining honorable and it makes you a creditor.
Argument is bad. No agreement can be reached thus.
Silence is bad. If you have an obligation to respond in a matter, and you fail to respond, you are AT FAULT. You damage the other party so you become the debtor in the interaction.
Unconditional acceptance keeps you honorable, but usually isn't in your best interest.
Conditional acceptance is where the fun begins.
So let's say your employer says, "I will need you to get vaxxinated by January 1st."
If you argue, you can be fired for cause.
If you remain silent, you are agreeing - you acquiesce - and if you don't comply, you can be fired for cause.
If you unconditionally accept, you just go get the vaccine.
If you conditionally accept, it may look like this:
"I conditionally accept your offer to get vaxxinated upon proof of your claim that:
1) The vaxxine is safe; and
2) The vaxxine will cause no negative side effects; and
3) You agree to be liable for any and all damages."
See how this works? But I wouldn't stop here. There are many maxims of law. One of those maxims is "an unrebutted presumption is truth in commerce." That means if you make a presumption and I do not rebut your presumption, then we have agreed on said presumption. So in this case a good presumption would be:
"Your failure to adequately respond constitutes your agreement that:
- The vaxxine is NOT safe; and
- I will not be terminated from employment for your failure to prove the vaxxine's safety."
Of course there is a bit more to it, but not much.
_
Forwarded from I Live Truth
DNA tracking through PCR testing on the Big Bang 9 years ago...
Forwarded from OwenBenjamin🐻
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This just made my mind gravy.
As said by Tom Barnett at the beginning of this thing and @amandhavollmer (and others) for years... guess ya really can’t catch a virus. Now THAT *fact* represents liberation — from victimhood, from pharma, from fear.
Celebrate your freedom!!
And when you’re done, decide what you’re going to do with it.
Celebrate your freedom!!
And when you’re done, decide what you’re going to do with it.
Forwarded from GreenMedInfo
9 years ago, I saw the DARPA/pharma merger coming in the development of transhumanistic vaccines when I wrote this article. Sadly, it has come to pass: https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/vaccination-agenda-implicit-transhumanismdehumanism
Greenmedinfo
Vaccination Agenda: An Implicit Transhumanism / Dehumanism
This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2018Visit our Re-post guidelines
Let's face it: the only real justification for using vaccines to
Let's face it: the only real justification for using vaccines to
Forwarded from Dissect the Truth
germ theory is a device of rockefeller medicine (snake oil salesmen), propagated by private interests to bring in their sacred cash cow (vaccines)
> SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated
> PCR test is not capable of diagnosing disease
> viruses don't exist
#novid19 #memewarfare
> SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated
> PCR test is not capable of diagnosing disease
> viruses don't exist
#novid19 #memewarfare
Forwarded from Triple Gem (Kim Vidya)
Amazing integrity and bravery among these women. ❤️ https://youtu.be/9wtz8yTKWvM
YouTube
Agendas and critical thinking with ladies of the Frontline.
I sit down with a few ladies with a HUGE message. You won’t want to miss what they have to say.
Forwarded from Rambaldi's Eye
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
YET ANOTHER TRUE EXPERT SINKS THE CDC OVER MASK USAGE
If Kristen Meghan's testimony and the following details in our post way back in Aug 2020 won't convince you of the serious dangers of mask-wearing.... we wish you the best of luck.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RambaldisEye/17
If Kristen Meghan's testimony and the following details in our post way back in Aug 2020 won't convince you of the serious dangers of mask-wearing.... we wish you the best of luck.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RambaldisEye/17