👎12💩5🤮2🤡2🤣1
💩10
Do you have a foreskin?
Anonymous Poll
53%
Yes
35%
No it was stolen from me😭
4%
No i cut it off later in life
7%
I dont have a penis💅
😢6❤🔥2🤯2🍌2
How do you feel about the passing of former U.S. politician (((Joseph Isidore Lieberman)))?
Anonymous Poll
20%
I feel indifferent.
28%
Another one bites the dust.
50%
I don't know who he was.
3%
(Other opinion, reply below)
What is the most commonly performed surgery in the United States?
Anonymous Quiz
8%
Colonoscopy
12%
Wisdom teeth removal
2%
Brain surgery
1%
Amputation
2%
Laser eye surgery
1%
Heart transplant
2%
Appendix removal
63%
Male circumcision
4%
None of the above
4%
Lobotomy
Forwarded from Sexual Subversion - LGBT Agenda
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Former Nickelodeon actress Amber Frank claims that Nickelodeon production computers were full of child p"rn
🤬17🤣4😡2🤮1
What do you agree with more?
Anonymous Poll
44%
"My eyes may wander, but my heart comes home."
56%
"Whoever looks at another woman with lust, he has already committed adultery in his heart."
✍4
Did this really happen? (Meme above)
Anonymous Poll
22%
Yes & skin used for lamp shades, fat as soap, their ashes were used as fertilizer & other evils.
78%
No.
📊 Where did the Scandinavians come from?
Anonymous Poll
19%
Corded Ware migration
8%
Ancient Anatolian migration
6%
Anatolians intermixing with Corded Ware culture
30%
Atlantis
11%
Other
26%
Don't know
📊 Do you believe the first Briton was black or the first Irishman was black like the "science" says?
Anonymous Poll
6%
Yes, they were black but were conquered
2%
Yes, they were black and evolved
10%
No, they weren't racially black but were dark skinned
82%
No, it's completely fake they were white
❤1
📊 How many people (not bots) on average are on your block lists?
Anonymous Poll
46%
0 I'm a man
27%
3-5 I'm a man
8%
5-10 I'm a man
5%
10-20 I'm a man
7%
20+ I'm a man
1%
0 I'm a female
2%
3-5 I'm female
0%
5-10 I'm female
1%
10-20 I'm female
3%
20+ I'm female
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (ȚepeȘ)
The toughest is from Kentucky, giving a mandatory minimum of 1 year in prison for felony-level opinions/material/etc...
The Constitution either enables this, or is useless to stop it.
🔗 Salty Texan
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬11😢9⚡1
📊 What caused the decline of Mediterranean societies?
Anonymous Poll
43%
Race mixing
7%
They were always in decline
1%
Bubonic Plague
4%
They never collapsed
1%
They collapsed along with Nordic countries
14%
Rise of Islamism/Ottoman Empire
2%
Mongol Invasions
16%
Christianity
3%
They were conquered by the Germans
10%
Other
🤡1
Forwarded from White_Power🇮🇹🇺🇸✨⚡️
The Jewish attack on free speech continues as lawmakers have drafted a bill to make flyering in California illegal.
AB 3024, proposed by Assemblymember Chris Ward, D-San Diego, as a bill to “curb hate littering,” would expand the state’s definition of “intimidation by threat of violence” in the state’s civil code to include “distribution of hateful materials on the private property of another without authorization for the purpose of terrorizing … in reckless disregard of the risk of terrorizing the owner or occupant of that private property.” The bill defines “terrorizing” as causing “a person of ordinary emotions and sensibilities to fear for personal safety.” Those who commit hate littering could be sued in civil court by victims for “actual damages suffered … and, in addition, exemplary damages, a civil penalty of $25,000, and attorney’s fees.”
https://web.archive.org/web/20240326003425/https://jweekly.com/2024/03/25/california-bill-would-let-victims-of-antisemitic-flyers-sue-whoever-distributed-them/
AB 3024, proposed by Assemblymember Chris Ward, D-San Diego, as a bill to “curb hate littering,” would expand the state’s definition of “intimidation by threat of violence” in the state’s civil code to include “distribution of hateful materials on the private property of another without authorization for the purpose of terrorizing … in reckless disregard of the risk of terrorizing the owner or occupant of that private property.” The bill defines “terrorizing” as causing “a person of ordinary emotions and sensibilities to fear for personal safety.” Those who commit hate littering could be sued in civil court by victims for “actual damages suffered … and, in addition, exemplary damages, a civil penalty of $25,000, and attorney’s fees.”
https://web.archive.org/web/20240326003425/https://jweekly.com/2024/03/25/california-bill-would-let-victims-of-antisemitic-flyers-sue-whoever-distributed-them/
🤬5👏2
Should distributing flyers that tell the truth be considered littering?
Anonymous Poll
8%
Yes, if it's too offensive.
90%
No, so long as it tells the honest truth & is not an environmental hazard, it's not.
2%
(Other opinion, reply below)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
White men and women should be armed at all times
⚡36👍4
📊 Should concealed carry be legal everywhere?
Anonymous Poll
83%
Yes
8%
No
9%
No, it should be legal but not where there tends to be large crowds
📊 What's worse?
Anonymous Poll
21%
100% black
29%
50% black 50% white
40%
Equally bad
9%
Neither are bad