Even if people fail on multiple points, they might still be good enough if there is a good explanation. (e.g. young, out of practice, worked with c++ the last years)
https://twitter.com/vanillacoder/status/1255507493465346048
https://twitter.com/vanillacoder/status/1255507493465346048
X (formerly Twitter)
Моноид-тян 🤔 vanillacoder@mastodon.social (@vanillacoder) on X
Читаю про собеседования:
>Even if people fail on multiple points, they might still be good enough if there is a good explanation. (e.g. young, out of practice, worked with c++ the last years)
>Even if people fail on multiple points, they might still be good enough if there is a good explanation. (e.g. young, out of practice, worked with c++ the last years)
Science fact of the day: nobody has ever learned C++.
https://twitter.com/zooko/status/1208106551065665536
https://twitter.com/zooko/status/1208106551065665536
Twitter
zooko❤ⓩ🛡🦓🦓🦓
Science fact of the day: nobody has ever learned C++.
C++ is an interpreted language.
Every compiler interprets the standard differently.
https://twitter.com/wakomeup/status/1257556893477883904
Every compiler interprets the standard differently.
https://twitter.com/wakomeup/status/1257556893477883904
Twitter
Wako 👁️
C++ is an interpreted language. Every compiler interprets the standard differently.
What is a C++ programmer's favourite Pokémon?
RAIIchu.
https://twitter.com/cjdb_ns/status/1198648695845208064
RAIIchu.
https://twitter.com/cjdb_ns/status/1198648695845208064
Twitter
Christopher Di Bella
What is a C++ programmer's favourite Pokémon? RAIIchu.
