Lola Daviet was a French 12-year-old girl living in Paris. Lola, like many young girls, loved gymnastics. She was very happy to be selected to participate in the French championship.

Sadly, that dream was never allowed to become reality, because exactly three years ago, on October 14th 2022, Lola was kidnapped, raped, tortured, and ultimately murdered by Algerian migrant Dahbia Benkired. Lola's mutilated body was later discovered in a suitcase.

Benkired, of course, had already received an order to leave the territory and was therefore illegally in France.

For Lola, and for the thousands of other victims of the Great Replacement, we demand remigration.

19-year-old medical student Maria Ladenburger was cycling home in the German city of Freiburg when she crossed paths with Hussein K.

Hussein had entered Europe through Greece, where he was convicted in 2013 of attempted murder and robbery. He was sentenced to 10 years in juvenile jail but got out very quickly.

In 2015, Hussein entered Germany and got asylum by lying about his nationality, age and criminal record. He was placed in a foster family in Freiburg, where he went out to look for another victim.

Nine years ago to this day, Hussein spotted Maria and knocked her off her bicycle, choked her and dragged her to the bank of the Dreisam River. There he raped Maria, causing severe internal injuries and leaving bite marks.

Hussein then pushed Maria, who was still alive but unconscious, in the river, where she drowned. A jogger found her body the next morning.

For Maria and for the thousands of other victims of the Great Replacement, we demand remigration for all hostile foreigners and prison for Merkel and her "Wir schaffen das" criminals.

Thirteen centuries ago, Muslim armies that had already conquered Portugal, Spain, and southern France, were continuing their plundering and conquest, pushing ever further into Western Europe.

However, on October 18/19, 732, Abdul Rahman’s Muslim army was halted, defeated, and driven back by Charles Martel and his troops in the Battle of Poitiers. This battle is one of the most important in European history because it marked a turning point in the Islamic expansion into the West.

The period that followed is known as the Reconquista, the centuries-long struggle of European Christians to reconquer southern France, Spain, and Portugal from the Islamic rulers. It would take a lot of blood, sweat and tears by many generations of Europeans, but in 1492, the West was ours once again.

Charles Martel is depicted centrally in the painting, holding his warhammer, called ‘martel’ in French. Charles Martel was also the grandfather of Charlemagne and the inspiration for many European leaders who chose the name Charles.

If we can once again muster the courage and self-sacrifice of our ancestors, no challenge will be too great.

We’re training a new generation of brave and capable young men from all over Europe to become leading Remigration activists. We WILL reconquer Europe!

Earlier this year, Afghan asylum seeker Enamullah O. attacked a group of toddlers in a German park. One of the toddlers and a man who tried to protect them died of their wounds. Three others were also stabbed.

Even though it was shown in court that Enamullah had attacked a woman with a knife months before and that he specifically searched for “motivating combat music” minutes before attacking the toddlers, today Enamullah has been declared not criminally responsible for the attack and will be ‘treated’ in a psychiatric hospital.

Presiding judge Karsten Krebs announced the decision at the Aschaffenburg Regional Court, stating that the killer's “mental illness rendered him incapable of understanding the nature of his actions at the time of the crime”.

Without remigration of hostile invaders and replacement of anti-white judges and politicians, this nightmare will become our daily reality.

Nee, links heeft de verkiezing in Nederland niet gewonnen. Integendeel.

Lees mijn opinie (gratis) op Doorbraak: https://doorbraak.be/nee-links-heeft-de-nederlandse-verkiezing-niet-gewonnen

Vanessa Preger-McGillivray, 24, was working as a waitress in Vienna when she crossed paths with islamic terrorist Kujtim Fejzulai exactly five years ago.

Fejzulai had already been convicted for supporting ISIS but was released early. He then got caught in Slovakia trying to illegally buy ammunition, something the Austrian authorities were aware of but chose to ignore. Warnings by Turkish authorities were also ignored.

On the 2nd of November 2020 Fejzulai went on a killing spree in central Vienna, killing four and injuring 23 others. Videos of the attack were quickly scrubbed from the internet.

Fejzulai was, contrary to what media proclaimed, NOT a 'lone wolf'. He was helped by at least four accomplices who were eventually convicted. Heydayatollah, Z., the terrorist' roommate in their luxurious taxpayer funded social housing apartment, had seen Fejzulai collect the weapons and ammunition for the attack and supported him instead of warning police.

There are literally millions of ticking time bombs like Fejzulai and Heydayatollah in Europe. Unless we remigrate them all, we will have failed our children.

Share this story so that it is not forgotten. We must make sure that Vanessa and the other victims did not die for nothing.

There is a verdict in one of my twelve court cases and criminal investigations.

The court said it did not have the jurisdiction to convict me but one of our activists was convicted and very heavily punished simply because he humouristicaly turned the tables on a leftist doxxer.

In Rotterdam a statue of a random black woman was inaugurated “because statues should not be dedicated to white men”.

You won't believe this one but it's true.

Nizar Trabelsi, a Tunisian migrant in Belgium, planned a terrorist attack on American🇺🇸 personnel at a military base and at the American embassy in Brussels.

He was caught before he could enact the attack. Soon after, it was discovered that fourteen other Al-Qaeda terrorists in Belgium wanted to break Trabelsi out of prison using heavy weapons and explosives.

Long story short, the U.S. demanded Trabelsi be extradited to the U.S. for planning a terrorist attack on American personnel. Trabelsi was eventually extradited, but subsidised leftist NGO's fought the extradition in court and a leftist judge decided the extradition infringed Trabelsi's human rights "because it could not be guaranteed the U.S. would treat Trabelsi humanely". The judge argued Trabelsi risked life in prison without parole in the U.S., which would be "inhumane".

Trabelsi was taken back to Belgium and released. Yesterday, news leaked that the Belgian government, on orders of the judges, awarded Trabelsi with €90.000 and €350.000 in 'damages'.

What makes this even crazier is that these same judges are not worried about human rights when teenagers are given prison sentences for 'racist memes'. In Western-Europe, literal terrorists are protected while peaceful nationalist activists are being hunted down.

In the Netherlands, an asylum seeker followed a 17-year-old girl named Lisa, dragged her into the bushes and then pushed her into a ditch. Possibly startled by something, he then fled the scene.

Lisa immediately called the emergency services and told hem her attacker had fled.

Emergency services then heard Lisa scream. Her body was later found with many stab wounds. The public prosecutor assumes the asylum seeker had returned to finish his work.

A bloodied kitchen knife was later found in the locker of the asylum seeker at the taxpayer funded migrant centre where he resided. During the investigation, two police officers were sexually assaulted when they entered one of these migrant centres to question an asylum seeker.

There are over 300 of these taxpayer funded asylum centres spread all over the Netherlands. We are forced to pay for the hostile invasion of our own country.

For seven years now, my lawyer and I have been asking the judges what exactly I am supposed to have said or done that forms the basis of their prosecution.
"Where and how, exactly, did I incite to hatred?"
It is still completely unclear to this day.

Judge Mieke Butstraen (Court of Appeal) finally iresponded to this in the ruling. She only did so because she was obliged to do so due to the 𝘰𝘣𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪 𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘪 objection we raised in our written submissions.

Judge Butstraen wrote:
“It is not the case that it must be specified which concrete material acts the accused is precisely alleged to have committed.”

Well, if even 𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐓 isn’t required anymore, what is your 𝐫𝐔𝐥𝐄 𝐨𝐅 𝐥𝐀𝐰 still worth then? What does such a ruling even mean anymore? Absolutely nothing!

The 30th of December, the Supreme Court will decide wether this ruling, that convicted me to a prison sentence, holds.

The above mentioned ruling dates from earlier this year, but I'm writing about it because something miraculous happened in one of my other court cases for hate speech (officially called 'incitement to hatred').

For the first time in 7 years of court cases, a judge actually asked the Public Prosecutor to provide concrete evidence.

In a case wherein I am prosecuted because of a lecture I gave at Leuven University, a judge from the Leuven Court of First Instance asked the Public Prosecutor to specify where and how exactly I 'incited to hatred'.

This must seem completely normal to an international audience, and rightly so, because just as you can only defend yourself against accusations for murder if you know WHO you've allegedly murdered, it's impossible to defend yourself against accusations of 'incitement to hatred' if the public prosecutors (and the courts, in all but this case), refuse to tell you HOW you incited to hatred.

But in Belgium we are far from normality, so even such a slight resemblance of a functional court is a unique breath of fresh air in a suffocating legal environment.

Sadly, today I received the answer of the Leuven Public Prosecutor and it's just as bad as the above mentioned judge Mieke Butstraen. Public Prosecutor Veerle Devos writes:

"The Public Prosecutor states that it is essential to look at the totality of the lecture and not at concrete parts of the lecture to determine the intent of the defendant (Dries Van Langenhove).

During the lecture by the defendant, certain groups of society were negatively generalised or linked to criminality, intellectual inferiority or dangers to society. The cumulative effect of such statements creates negative stereotypes and an "us-them" narrative. The lecture, thereby, normalised discriminatory thought patterns."

In short: they can't and won't specify anything. If they feel that I incited to hatred, that's enough.

We will have to wait until next year to see if the judge will accept this -- as all of his colleagues have before.

In any case, my real fate will be decided on the 30th of December in the Supreme Court. Thank you for your prayers and support.

In the same week the Belgian government passed a record budget for asylum hotels and centres…

…news leaked that almost 1 in 5 calls to emergency services (112 EU, 911 US) remain unanswered due to lack of funds.

Our politicians hate us and prioritise invaders that hate us too.