Linkstream – Telegram
Linkstream
173 subscribers
32 photos
3 videos
2 files
899 links
Various links I find interesting. Mostly hardcore tech :) // by @oleksandr_now. See @notatky for the personal stuff
Download Telegram
System 2 Attention (S2A).
- Soft attention in Transformers is susceptible to irrelevant/biased info
- S2A uses LLM reasoning to generate what to attend to
Improves factuality & objectivity, decreases sycophancy.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.11829
In this paper, we introduce generative agents--computational software agents that simulate believable human behavior. Generative agents wake up, cook breakfast, and head to work; artists paint, while authors write; they form opinions, notice each other, and initiate conversations; they remember and reflect on days past as they plan the next day.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03442
https://github.com/joonspk-research/generative_agents
👾1
https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI
if you are into Stable Diffusion
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
insanely detailed LLM inference visualization from Brendan Bycroft
https://bbycroft.net/llm
🔥2
Nuclear Reactor Simulation (interactive!)

https://dalton-nrs.manchester.ac.uk/
3
https://twitter.com/MistralAI/status/1733150512395038967
beautiful. on friday. even more beautiful.
👍2
ChatGPT: sometimes “hallucinates” (tries to guess the details not in the training set).
OpenAI: tries to counter that
Google: hold my beer, let’s hallucinate the actual Gemini model presentation!

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/12/google-admits-it-fudged-a-gemini-ai-demo-video-which-critics-say-misled-viewers/
👍2
Google has good researchers and not so good product managers, as always.
Loosely related: Terence Tao was saying "LLMs help me with math" for a while already.

“The FunSearch paper by DeepMind that was used to discover new mathematics is an example of searching through generative patterns and employing evolutionary methods to creatively conjure up new solutions. This is a very general principle that lies at the core of creativity.”
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-04043-w
🔥1
> Unfortunately , too few people understand the distinction between memorization and understanding. It's not some lofty question like "does the system have an internal world model?", it's a very pragmatic behavior distinction: "is the system capable of broad generalization, or is it limited to local generalization?"
-- a thread from François Chollet

> by popular demand: a starter set of papers you can read on the topic.

"Comparing Humans, GPT-4, and GPT-4V On Abstraction and Reasoning Tasks": https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09247

"Embers of Autoregression: Understanding Large Language Models Through the Problem They are Trained to Solve": https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13638

"Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality": https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18654

"The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn 'B is A'": https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12288

"On the measure of intelligence": https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547 not about LLMs, but provides context and grounding on what it means to be intelligent and the nature of generalization. It also introduces an intelligence benchmark (ARC) that remains completely out of reach for LLMs. Ironically the best-performing LLM-based systems on ARC are those that have been trained on tons of generated tasks, hoping to hit some overlap between test set tasks and your generated tasks -- LLMs have zero ability to tackle an actually new task.

In general there's a new paper documenting the lack of broad generalization capabilities of LLMs every few days.
1
"Noisy TV problem" is solvable by introducing yet another level of abstraction :)
Curiosity-Driven Exploration via Latent Bayesian Surprise
https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.07495

More on the topic: https://lilianweng.github.io/posts/2020-06-07-exploration-drl/
🤔3
> In this study, we show that when aiming for limited precision, existing approximation methods can be outperformed by programs automatically discovered from scratch by a simple evolutionary algorithm.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.08472