Heroic Texas father rescues abducted daughter by tracking her cell phone after Christmas Day kidnapping
https://nypost.com/2025/12/27/us-news/heroic-texas-father-rescues-abducted-daughter-by-tracking-her-cell-phone-after-christmas-day-kidnapping/?utm_social_post_id=635974739&utm_social_handle_id=134486075205&sr_share=facebook&sr_share=facebook

https://redd.it/1pxzgi0
@manpill

Great Rant About "Women And Children"

> "Yes!! It bloody rips my knitting that phrase, which implies that men are deserving of being maimed or murdered and we shrug it off!! At what point does someone age out of being a child and then we’re not meant to care any more? Also it implies that women and children cannot be active members of a group, they’re just baggage."

Thought I'd share this. A post I found on Threads where a user (a female one to boot) was criticizing the "women and children" phrase. Once in a while you find postings of intelligence and meaning on social media, and this is one such post I thought was worth sharing here. I've ranted before how much I hate this phrase which is so terribly sexist against not only men for obvious reasons, but also women with how infantalizing it is to them. I never even thought of that, but this person is right in how this phrase doesn't even really acknowledge either women or children as people, but as mere baggage. It's equally misandrist and misogynistic; de-valuing the lives of men/boys and making it as if their deaths or suffering doesn't matter, and it also infantalizes women/girls and denies them agency. It's an antiquated phrase that's long overdue to be stricken from the public lexicon. To me being equal and egalitarian is to equally acknowledge both groups and help both out, not one or the other.

https://redd.it/1py2gv4
@manpill

Incongruencies

It's genuinely difficult to tell what's a psyop and what's actual ignorance. Incongruencies are seemingly a part of women's natural mode of thought (feeling/illogical expression) but on a world wide scale, well.. it's catastrophic.

When does "women be tripping" cross over into intentional territory.

I think answering this question would solve a lot of cognitive dissonance.


https://redd.it/1py4lt2
@manpill

We're all agreed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7swLLdF7ns&list=FL3ff8tJbE6LVhzOtxYsf0lQ&index=607

https://redd.it/1py5ofh
@manpill

Rant: Homeless Shelter PSA: Only featuring women

We have a homeless shelter in my area that over the Christmas holidays put out a couple of PSAs on their Facebook page> I have donated to them over the years, not a lot of money, but a little. That stops this year. Most of the clientele are men, as men make up the vast majority of the homeless in our area.

All their PSAs featured only women. I also found out they donate a portion of the money to other shelters in the area who ONLY service women

https://redd.it/1py6acm
@manpill

A tennis match labelled a "battle of the sexes" took place in Dubai yesterday. Read the article this is no joke. The worlds number 1 female tennis player was given a 9% instant advantage to level the field!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/tennis/article-15417669/BBC-apologise-technical-issue-scuppers-broadcast-Battle-Sexes-match-Nick-Kyrgios-Aryna-Sabalenka-fans-complain-bizarre-tennis-court.html

https://redd.it/1pxyv1t
@manpill

Thank you to the BBC, who covered our ‘Lost Years’ demonstrations in Norwich and Great Yarmouth. 🧸❤️♻️ | PAPA - People Against Parental Alienation
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1GVtpaxFwk/

https://redd.it/1py7gbk
@manpill

Eli Hart died because of feminism?

His biological mother was full of shit, and government still thought it's okay to give this kid to his psychopath biological mother.

Meanwhile, his dad and step-mom were really caring about him. They were against this decision because of the obvious red flags. But who cares...

I think child protection services had a positive discrimination for biological mother.

What do you think?

Here is the link of a video about this event:

https://youtu.be/wzybp0G1hFE?si=boY59dWex0_spwnG

https://redd.it/1pydqcu
@manpill

Gillette attacked men and lost - YouTube
https://youtu.be/OuN0N2lsMQ4?si=OqOZ8h30JV6bDVi2

https://redd.it/1pyeejs
@manpill

World No.1 Women’s Tennis Star Loses to Injury-Ravaged Male Player, a Major Blow to the Equal Pay Narrative
https://calfkicker.com/world-no-1-womens-tennis-star-loses-to-injury-ravaged-male-player-a-major-blow-to-the-equal-pay-narrative/

https://redd.it/1pyhioa
@manpill

The Demonization of Porn is misandry

The demonization of Porn can only be explained by misandry. The reason as to why Porn is always picked upon is because it allows Men to have a sexual outlet outside of chasing Women. Both Feminists and Conservatives have a problem with this because they both think that Men who don't chase Women are causing the "birth rate crisis" that so many of them go on about.

Think about it, why do the people who complain about abuse in the Porn industry not talk about banning restaurants, farms or construction? Because they are industries that a lot of Women would not give up, they care about them. The reason why people will go after Porn is because they know most Men will not fight back.

That's why it doesn't matter what the evidence says, people can point to the studies that show a negative correlation with Porn and Violence, people can point to the lack of evidence for ideas like "objectification" and "sexualization" and they will come up with the next bogus statistic, because it's not a real problem, it's just a way of demonizing Men for being sexually interested in Women - the equivalent of a medieval Lady admonishing her peasants.


Why do you think Feminists and Tradcons alike will go after Video Games, Sex Dolls, Porn, Sex Workers etc. They all have in common a way of Men coping with the fact Women are not interested in them. So, as a coping Mechanism it's not that Men are not interested in Women but the exact opposite. Women aren't interested in Men, but society cannot accept that because it makes Women look bad,so Men must be blamed for the "birth rate crisis" that Women are pursuing...

Now, the first objection anyone will bring is that some people have attacked written porn, but no-one is asserting that Fifty Shades of Grey is oppressing Men, the justification is always that Women are "giving the game away" and therefore violating the assumption that Women are more romantic than Men. The assumption is that anything bad must be desired by men and anything good must be desired by Women.


So, in conclusion, Men are being blamed through Porn for the "birth rate crisis" that is the result of Women not being interested in Men, therefore the Anti-Porn movement is a result of misandry.

https://redd.it/1pykjll
@manpill

(rant) Most people are completely blind to real gender dynamics

I'm in another sub about addiction, and a woman posted something along the lines of:

"recovery isn't designed for women"

"we have certain struggles that they dont talk about"

"the advice they give like try harder or exercise isn't very helpful"

I pointed out that thats not very helpful for anyone regardless of gender.

But the kicker is that women actually do better than men in recovery. theyre more likely to stay sober for longer, and complete longer programs.

So many people today, even lots of men, assume women are disadvantaged in every way in society, and the world is designed for men, when really everything sucks for everyone, and women are generally given significantly more leeway and privileges in most areas. it can be a literal fact that women have more success in an area, but they'll still be like "this isn't designed for me?" assumes men are doing great "damn we gotta make this better for women"

It's so crazy growing up and realizing that gender inequality is completely backwards to how people portray it. with rare exceptions.

the fact that men are seen as more powerful and make more money are always touted as evidence that were more privileged, when really this just makes it so men are more likely to have tough jobs at the expense of their personal health, and more likely to be assumed as doing something wrong in any given situation.

and then theres the stuff that should be obvious, like circumcision, parental rights, attitudes toward acceptable dynamics in a hetero relationship. (if theres mild emotional abuse from the man, the woman's friends and family will likely intervene, but if its the other way everyone just denies) people just refuse to ever see men as victims.


https://redd.it/1pyt2gw
@manpill

Some feminists respond to “Not all men” is genuinely so stupid

So this may be a bit of a rant of anyone doesn’t like to read them.

Anyways, I was on the “feminist” sub reading some threads cause I wanted to believe there is some hope in this world for some of them.
I stumbled upon the “not all men” discussion, no it’s not the “not all men, but always a man”.
So this woman was talking about how she was speaking with her male friend about men sexually harassing women , and he responded with “not all men do that, cause I’ve never SH a woman” and she came to that sub and posted about it and how men always bring that up in an argument (which is 100% valid btw). So some women responded to her and the majority of the responses (and most upvoted) were saying that when a man says that he’s trying to make the conversation about him and being a child.
And I can’t even fathom how stupid that response was, And why it’s had so many upvotes.
Like yore saying that men do something so bad about a whole gender and lumping me in with predators and weird people , and when I respond with not all men, cause I’ve never done anytime remotely close to these horrors, you think I’m trying to make the conversation about myself.
Come on some feminists are so delusional and their whole personality is about men.
I personally don’t get angry at this stuff cause it’s the internet and there are so many stupid people with stupid opinions.
But this boiled my blood somehow.
Don’t get me wrong I support women, but this is just so stupid from these modern feminists that are so obsessed with men.

https://redd.it/1pyvfl7
@manpill

She took off with the kids

So, about a year ago, my ex and myself started really having problems. She forced me out of the house, and for the next year I continue to pay all the bills for her and for our five children. Two children are not my biological children, but I have been their father for 10 years. I have a six-year-old and a one-year-old with my ex and I had one daughter from a previous relationship living with me. When she forced me out, my bio daughter came with me because she stated the ex was abusive to her. She was, at that time, not allowed at the house between the hours of 6 AM and 8 PM.. Just her. So she came with me and the other four stayed at the house. My ex pushed me out of. I continued paying the bills and supporting the other four wow simultaneously finding myself a place to live and taking care of the daughter that stayed with me who was mentally and emotionally deeply struggling. So after a year of draining all of the savings and retirement income we had supporting two households, I told her we would have to start splitting the bills to support the younger kids during the separation. She didn’t like that so she stopped letting me come over or see the kids or even talk to the kids about a month ago. The landlord informed me the day after Christmas that she had vacated the house that I had been paying for and for the next three days, I asked her repeatedly where she was and where she took the kids. This morning she told me she took them and moved them 1000 miles away and that if I wanted to see them, I would have to Venmo her $1000 and then we could possibly discuss me talking to them on the phone. Because I did not sign a voluntary acknowledgment of paternity the law does not count me as their father. This means I have no parental rights. I am currently talking with lawyers, but of course they want thousands of dollars and I have no dollars and nowhere to really turn For help. At this point I just feel like I am going to become another one of those statistics of fathers that lose their kids because I was not smart enough to legally cover myself. This feels hopeless. I guess I am just putting the story out there For any guy that reads it, make sure you are legally in rind as your children’s father. Even if it feels awkward, even if it feels like you will always love her, even if you don’t believe in 1000 years, she would ever try to be cruel or hurtful, simply to spite you, even if you truly love her, protect yourself guys. Because I never in 1 million years would have thought I would be in this position.

https://redd.it/1pyyr99
@manpill

Women's in group preference is more important than you think

One of the biggest challenges men face when it comes to advocating for men’s rights is that women have an in-group preference and men don’t. (https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women) This means that whenever there is a problem facing women, all women can unite to help solve the problem for women as a whole. Now, they might disagree on the what the causes of those problems are, or on what the solutions to those problems should be, but every woman feels a kinship with other women because of their gender, the way men might feel kinship with other men because of their nationality or race or ethnicity or city of birth. Men just don’t have that feeling for other men. We don’t naturally divide the genders into two groups, with men on one side and women on the other. Some men might start to do this after bad experiences, and after having analyzed the situation and realized that change needs to happen on a societal level in order to solve the problems facing men, but this isn’t our default behavior. That’s why feminism is a worldwide movement, while men’s rights is a fringe curiosity.

This has far reaching consequences for public discourse and policy. Since women have this in group preference, they have no problem advocating for policies that help women and hurt men, the same way Americans have no problem advocating for policies that help America and hurt other countries.  Or any country for that matter. On the flip side, men will never advocate for policies strictly because they help men. We will advocate for policies that we think are best for everyone involved. For example, women fought for alimony, no fault divorce and default custody because it benefits women. Men will fight for shared parenting because it’s what’s best for children. Women will advocate for programs that help women. Men advocate for programs that help men to be more productive in society. It’s like men and women are in a fight, and men don’t realize it.  

A big part of the problem is that it’s hard to understand that many of our wives, mothers and sisters will put “women” as a group above their husbands, sons and brothers. We’ll see it with our own eyes and deny it simply because we love the women in our lives. Whether it's the feminist that wants equality whenever it suits her, or the trad wife that wants traditional roles with the security of no fault divorce, alimony and child support every woman is looking out for themselves. 

The crazy thing is, I think women might believe that men have in-group preference as well. Much of their feminist theory is a projection. They think men create a patriarchy to benefit men, because they create political movements to benefit women, and can’t imagine that men actually think that we are all on the same side. 

In any case, I don’t think the situation is hopeless. I just think that if men’s activists want to actually get things done, we have to understand what we’re up against. I don’t think men’s rights will ever be a big movement unless men can figure out something else to rally around besides our gender. Not because men’s rights aren't important, but because we have to work with our psychology, not against it.
Edit: What do you think men can unite around as a proxy for our gender, since uniting around being men doesn't seem to work?



https://redd.it/1pyyl0a
@manpill

This video made me (M24) realize what was missing from my personality: competition and aggression

This video is lowkey life-changing for me. Just watched it and afterwards wrestled my friend. I already have better self esteem. I'm an only child so I never had any siblings to play fight with.

I've always been more withdrawn and worried about banter type language, and so I never really poke fun at people. I also never initiate physical contact like I just did when I jabbed my friend in the gut.

Video made me understand how I was socialized incorrectly. it was filmed the year I was born.

https://youtu.be/wPgoyK_5KV0?si=coSM0YFIkcSq909h

tagged discrimination because classifying the way men naturally interact with the world as impolite and taboo is discrimination.

https://redd.it/1pz65en
@manpill

Circumcision

Been thinking about this lately and i’m disappointed I was circumcised. My partner is against circumcision and i’m envious who have their normal human function still. I don’t really get it, is it because it protects sensitivity and makes masturbation easier? My dad says so you don’t get dick cheese, yea dude I own a fucking shower. My dad probably asked the nurse at the hospital what she prefers. It isn’t based on anything and i’m sure this fucked world uses the skin of babies for something else.

https://redd.it/1pz6rxw
@manpill

Florida mother is accused of shooting her adult son on Christmas Day after a family argument outside a restaurant.
https://lawandcrime.com/crime/mother-shot-son-outside-red-rooster-restaurant-for-being-disrespectful-on-christmas-police/

https://redd.it/1pz8k4j
@manpill

This is why men don’t talk about their feelings…#shorts
https://youtube.com/shorts/ap0QyVrhRP8?si=BHq5yoaNc4sHzXIJ

https://redd.it/1pz9rf5
@manpill

If this sub is about men’s rights why is nearly every post about feminists and women..? Shouldn’t you be focused on yk.. men’s rights???



https://redd.it/1pz51ju
@manpill

The grass isn't greener on the female empowerment side: My experience working in digital marketing, and why men maintain an edge in the future

A lot of guys here seem to think women succeeding in their careers lead a healthy social life. They couldn't more wrong when reality demands sacrifice, even subservience to distinct team cultures.

Years ago, I worked for a mid-sized advertising firm whose primary business was White Label Search Engine Optimization (SEO). My boss was very hands on, as he himself designed the user interface customers themselves use to procure our services. My job, to be specific, was copyediting articles that are published and geo-tagged at Google. So basically, I work on the creative side and was with many women.

It's interesting I'm only telling this story now that I've become more travelled and have went to a more entrepreneurial path. Because I'm finally seeing the difference of my experience then vs now.

Most of my peers at my previous company were strong independent women types, a few feminists. I absolutely had no problem with them. In fact, I tried my best to get along. However, they had a major problem with my work ethic, instead. This is the Philippines (Southeast Asia) and corporate culture here is very fond of imposing absurd quotas. Instead of 23 articles per day, I could only do 18 and a portion of these edited articles didn't pass the SEO standards.

Now, the real drama happens during team meetings. Or should I say demolition jobs. At first they would include me. But as my work started to affect the general dynamic of the team, they would hold secret meetings without me. One of the most feminist-leaning girls, who's older than me, made sure to give me some coaching every time these meetings occurred. I didn't feel comfortable, so I resigned not long after.

I know they only want to give constructive feedback. But I personally felt threatened how it was handled. And after months of cozying up with the 'cool kids' in the Sales Dept, I still had no close allies in the office whom I could lean onto.

This is just one company. I eventually moved on to the importing industry, but I kept in touch with my ex-colleagues and university buddies who remained in the marketing, advertising & media industry. As years went by, I noticed the following symptoms in that particular industry which made me not regret my departure:

1. An industry that masks real problems with algorithmic manipulation and flashy distractions

Much of the lucrative contracts actually revolve around political PR that triggers people's insecurities. This is why we saw a massive decline in progressive messaging in 2025, despite what most professionals are advocating. This is on top of the clientelistic nature of the profession which can make an entire team a prostitute in the end.

2) Lack of honesty in internal dynamic

While it's true women-majority teams are generally more harmonious, groupthink is actually stronger. Problems reported outside of the mainstream are rarely brought up. Even though the agreed-upon decision may have good intent, the result is often less effective than it would be reported. Despite a strong start, workshops go nowhere. Implementation is slow while tech disruption wrecks havoc. Budgets are wasted. This is especially true in online ad-fraud detection software business.

3) There's a quiet discrimination against men

So these teams want to move faster? They need to inject diversity. I'm not just talking about men in general, but those with unique backgrounds. Adtech firms tend to hire effeminate men who only work in cushy jobs and get along easy with girlbosses. While true that most senior executives are men, middle management is most occupied by women. Hence, there's a social barrier in getting certain problems known in the first place. You'll find days when it's difficult to even personally talk to your female superior.

4) Marketing girlies are definitely far more trapped under capitalism than most of us

Imagine you pour every fiber of your soul into your work. You may have a boyfriend but