Oh no! Tropicana’s in trouble. Canada’s orange juice counteroffensive begins.
You thought this was a trade war over aluminum and auto parts? Think again. Canada just fired a citrus-flavoured cruise missile at the American Empire’s breakfast table: a 25% tariff on Florida orange juice.
U.S. OJ exports to Canada just collapsed to a 20-year low. Tropicana now goes for $13.99 at Metro grocery stores, meaning a carton of orange juice now costs more than a bottle of prosecco in Rome. Meanwhile, Canadian brands (bottled in Quebec, oranges from Brazil) are half the price and flying off shelves.
Why the citrus cold war? Florida is MAGA country. Orange juice is Trump’s maple syrup. The Liberals didn’t even pretend: this was a political strike. Ottawa targeted it because it hurts the one state that lives in Donald’s orange shadow, Mar-a-Lago land. Now Canadians sip apple juice in quiet rebellion, flipping the bird to a breakfast empire.
The fall of Florida OJ is symbolic. It’s not just about tariffs or trade balances, it’s about the collapse of the post-war North American grocery dream. Even Loblaws can’t make Tropicana taste like 2017 when it cost $3.61. It’s 2025 now. Supply chains are broken. Trust is broken. Nobody wants their juice squeezed by Davos.
And so, orange juice becomes the latest casualty in a West that can’t manage orchards, trade policy, or its own crumbling economic narratives. What was once a breakfast staple is now a symbol of a bloated empire taxing itself into irrelevance, where even a glass of juice becomes a geopolitical statement, and the average citizen is left squeezed dry. The Empire is now literally drinking its own.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
You thought this was a trade war over aluminum and auto parts? Think again. Canada just fired a citrus-flavoured cruise missile at the American Empire’s breakfast table: a 25% tariff on Florida orange juice.
U.S. OJ exports to Canada just collapsed to a 20-year low. Tropicana now goes for $13.99 at Metro grocery stores, meaning a carton of orange juice now costs more than a bottle of prosecco in Rome. Meanwhile, Canadian brands (bottled in Quebec, oranges from Brazil) are half the price and flying off shelves.
Why the citrus cold war? Florida is MAGA country. Orange juice is Trump’s maple syrup. The Liberals didn’t even pretend: this was a political strike. Ottawa targeted it because it hurts the one state that lives in Donald’s orange shadow, Mar-a-Lago land. Now Canadians sip apple juice in quiet rebellion, flipping the bird to a breakfast empire.
The fall of Florida OJ is symbolic. It’s not just about tariffs or trade balances, it’s about the collapse of the post-war North American grocery dream. Even Loblaws can’t make Tropicana taste like 2017 when it cost $3.61. It’s 2025 now. Supply chains are broken. Trust is broken. Nobody wants their juice squeezed by Davos.
And so, orange juice becomes the latest casualty in a West that can’t manage orchards, trade policy, or its own crumbling economic narratives. What was once a breakfast staple is now a symbol of a bloated empire taxing itself into irrelevance, where even a glass of juice becomes a geopolitical statement, and the average citizen is left squeezed dry. The Empire is now literally drinking its own.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
👏12🤡7😁5❤2🥴2🤮1
Canada’s Two Immigration Systems — And Only One Works
Canada’s economy still benefits from those who play by the rules. (Emphasis on playing by the rules). A new CIBC report shows that permanent residents who arrive through the legal process are climbing the economic ladder faster than ever. Many already live and work here before receiving status, and they’re contributing meaningfully to the economy without adding pressure on housing, hospitals, or infrastructure. They didn’t break the system — they followed it.
While Ottawa trumpets these numbers to justify its broader immigration agenda, it conveniently ignores the growing underclass of border crossers, illegal entrants, and refugee claimants overwhelming the very systems our legal newcomers sustain. The truth is simple: we have two immigration systems in this country. One is legal, merit-based, and delivers results. The other is chaotic, unsustainable, and quietly devastating.
The CIBC data is revealing. In 2024, over 50% of permanent resident visas went to people already living in Canada — up from 39% in 2019. These individuals didn’t require housing, social assistance, or emergency healthcare the moment they arrived. They were already working, studying, or building their lives. No wonder they’re closing the wage gap with Canadian-born workers in record time, some reaching parity in less than two years. Though it's an open question, whether this category, while not a burden to the system, still contribute to a net loss for Canada's working class.
But while legal immigrants are vetted, integrated, and typically come with job experience, education, or family support, the open-border model delivers something very different. Canada’s cities, from Toronto’s shelter grid to Montreal’s overwhelmed social services, are straining under the weight of mass entry driven not by compassion, but by the geopolitical consequences of forever wars and regime change crusades designed on foreign shores and rubber-stamped by our elite.
Let’s be honest: the working class in this country, including recent legal immigrants, didn’t vote for this. They didn’t ask for their kids to be priced out of housing. They didn’t ask to wait 18 hours in ERs while billions are spent processing asylum claims for those whose countries were shattered by wars Canada blindly endorsed. The bureaucrats who pushed these policies don’t live in the affected neighborhoods. They sip wine at WEF panels while ordinary Canadians absorb the costs.
The government wants applause for the successes of legal immigration. But the same government refuses to separate that success from its open-door failure. It hides behind the positive statistics while flooding the system with unvetted claimants, global instability, and ideological crusades that serve neither Canada nor its citizens. This is not immigration policy. It’s managed decline with a humanitarian mask.
If we want an immigration system that works, we must defend the distinction between legal order and ideological chaos. A sovereign country does not erase its borders in the name of virtue. It secures them in the name of justice.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Canada’s economy still benefits from those who play by the rules. (Emphasis on playing by the rules). A new CIBC report shows that permanent residents who arrive through the legal process are climbing the economic ladder faster than ever. Many already live and work here before receiving status, and they’re contributing meaningfully to the economy without adding pressure on housing, hospitals, or infrastructure. They didn’t break the system — they followed it.
While Ottawa trumpets these numbers to justify its broader immigration agenda, it conveniently ignores the growing underclass of border crossers, illegal entrants, and refugee claimants overwhelming the very systems our legal newcomers sustain. The truth is simple: we have two immigration systems in this country. One is legal, merit-based, and delivers results. The other is chaotic, unsustainable, and quietly devastating.
The CIBC data is revealing. In 2024, over 50% of permanent resident visas went to people already living in Canada — up from 39% in 2019. These individuals didn’t require housing, social assistance, or emergency healthcare the moment they arrived. They were already working, studying, or building their lives. No wonder they’re closing the wage gap with Canadian-born workers in record time, some reaching parity in less than two years. Though it's an open question, whether this category, while not a burden to the system, still contribute to a net loss for Canada's working class.
But while legal immigrants are vetted, integrated, and typically come with job experience, education, or family support, the open-border model delivers something very different. Canada’s cities, from Toronto’s shelter grid to Montreal’s overwhelmed social services, are straining under the weight of mass entry driven not by compassion, but by the geopolitical consequences of forever wars and regime change crusades designed on foreign shores and rubber-stamped by our elite.
Let’s be honest: the working class in this country, including recent legal immigrants, didn’t vote for this. They didn’t ask for their kids to be priced out of housing. They didn’t ask to wait 18 hours in ERs while billions are spent processing asylum claims for those whose countries were shattered by wars Canada blindly endorsed. The bureaucrats who pushed these policies don’t live in the affected neighborhoods. They sip wine at WEF panels while ordinary Canadians absorb the costs.
The government wants applause for the successes of legal immigration. But the same government refuses to separate that success from its open-door failure. It hides behind the positive statistics while flooding the system with unvetted claimants, global instability, and ideological crusades that serve neither Canada nor its citizens. This is not immigration policy. It’s managed decline with a humanitarian mask.
If we want an immigration system that works, we must defend the distinction between legal order and ideological chaos. A sovereign country does not erase its borders in the name of virtue. It secures them in the name of justice.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
💯8🤮5⚡3👍2🔥2❤1
Tragedy in the GTA: A Father Murdered While Protecting His Family
A 46-year-old father of three, identified as Abdul Aleem Farooqi, was killed in the middle of the night during a home invasion in Vaughan. The York Regional Police say the incident occurred shortly before 1 a.m. on Sunday near Andreeta Drive and Barons Street. Farooqi was found inside his home with fatal trauma and was later pronounced dead at the scene.
Preliminary investigation suggests that three armed intruders targeted the home in a robbery. In a horrifying act of devotion, Farooqi is believed to have tried to protect his four-year-old daughter, reportedly held at gunpoint—when he was shot dead in front of his children. The suspects remain at large.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford, visibly outraged, criticized Ottawa’s criminal code, calling the justice system “sickening.” He highlighted the wave of violent break-ins across the Greater Toronto Area and called for urgent reform, emphasizing the right to defend one’s home.
This is not just another headline. It’s a pointed reminder that citizens are paying the human cost of policy failures. A peaceful family, who broke no laws, was invaded, and a father was murdered defending his family. Meanwhile, legal reforms trail behind, leaving law-abiding residents exposed to violent predators.
In a nation that prides itself on safety and order, this crime should be a call to action, not conceding to the trajectory of decline and lawlessness. Stronger laws protecting citizens’ right to defend their homes, swifter justice for violent offenders, and recognition that “household sovereignty” is not a privilege but a necessity.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
A 46-year-old father of three, identified as Abdul Aleem Farooqi, was killed in the middle of the night during a home invasion in Vaughan. The York Regional Police say the incident occurred shortly before 1 a.m. on Sunday near Andreeta Drive and Barons Street. Farooqi was found inside his home with fatal trauma and was later pronounced dead at the scene.
Preliminary investigation suggests that three armed intruders targeted the home in a robbery. In a horrifying act of devotion, Farooqi is believed to have tried to protect his four-year-old daughter, reportedly held at gunpoint—when he was shot dead in front of his children. The suspects remain at large.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford, visibly outraged, criticized Ottawa’s criminal code, calling the justice system “sickening.” He highlighted the wave of violent break-ins across the Greater Toronto Area and called for urgent reform, emphasizing the right to defend one’s home.
This is not just another headline. It’s a pointed reminder that citizens are paying the human cost of policy failures. A peaceful family, who broke no laws, was invaded, and a father was murdered defending his family. Meanwhile, legal reforms trail behind, leaving law-abiding residents exposed to violent predators.
In a nation that prides itself on safety and order, this crime should be a call to action, not conceding to the trajectory of decline and lawlessness. Stronger laws protecting citizens’ right to defend their homes, swifter justice for violent offenders, and recognition that “household sovereignty” is not a privilege but a necessity.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🥱8💯7🤡4🤯3😢3❤1😁1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Premier Pours Out Crown Royal in Fiery Protest as Diageo Shuts Ontario Plant
Ontario Premier Doug Ford sent a message, and 26 ounces of Crown Royal, straight into the pavement this week after whisky giant Diageo announced plans to shutter its Amherstburg bottling plant, costing over 250 jobs.
“They’re dumb as a bag of hammers,” Ford said during a press conference in Kitchener, before dumping out a full bottle of the iconic Canadian whisky. “You hurt my people, I’m gonna hurt you,” he added, vowing retaliation against Diageo’s French-based CEO and hinting that a boycott — or even pulling the brand from LCBO shelves, is on the table.
The backlash follows Diageo’s decision to close the plant by February 2026. While the company says Crown Royal will still be mashed, distilled, and aged in Canada, much of the bottling will reportedly move to Illinois. Unifor Local 200, which represents the 207 unionized workers affected, says talks with the province are already underway about removing Crown Royal from provincial shelves altogether.
For the Ford government, this isn’t just about one plant, it’s about a pattern. Diageo had already paused a major investment in St. Clair Township in 2024, frustrating local officials and prompting speculation about broader U.S. trade tensions. “I haven’t bought a bottle since,” said St. Clair Mayor Jeff Agar. “I think this has to do with tariffs and the doom-and-gloom across the border.”
Union officials echoed those concerns. “This can happen to anybody,” said Unifor’s John D’Agnolo. “You’ve got to make a statement. Enough’s enough.”
Even whisky drinkers are being drawn into the standoff. “We moved here for this job,” said Jocelyn Girard, a mother of four who relocated her family to Amherstburg after being hired at the plant. “Now we’re just hoping for a miracle.”
Ford’s political theatre may not reverse Diageo’s decision, but it taps into a deeper frustration. Global corporations rake in Canadian profits, gut local jobs, and call it efficiency. When Ottawa stays silent, Ontario pours its whisky in protest.
Crown Royal sales to Canada are already down 60% in the U.S., according to Kentucky-based industry experts. But with Diageo holding firm, a working-class showdown may be brewing — over jobs, dignity, and the last drops of Canadian whisky bottled on Canadian soil.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Ontario Premier Doug Ford sent a message, and 26 ounces of Crown Royal, straight into the pavement this week after whisky giant Diageo announced plans to shutter its Amherstburg bottling plant, costing over 250 jobs.
“They’re dumb as a bag of hammers,” Ford said during a press conference in Kitchener, before dumping out a full bottle of the iconic Canadian whisky. “You hurt my people, I’m gonna hurt you,” he added, vowing retaliation against Diageo’s French-based CEO and hinting that a boycott — or even pulling the brand from LCBO shelves, is on the table.
The backlash follows Diageo’s decision to close the plant by February 2026. While the company says Crown Royal will still be mashed, distilled, and aged in Canada, much of the bottling will reportedly move to Illinois. Unifor Local 200, which represents the 207 unionized workers affected, says talks with the province are already underway about removing Crown Royal from provincial shelves altogether.
For the Ford government, this isn’t just about one plant, it’s about a pattern. Diageo had already paused a major investment in St. Clair Township in 2024, frustrating local officials and prompting speculation about broader U.S. trade tensions. “I haven’t bought a bottle since,” said St. Clair Mayor Jeff Agar. “I think this has to do with tariffs and the doom-and-gloom across the border.”
Union officials echoed those concerns. “This can happen to anybody,” said Unifor’s John D’Agnolo. “You’ve got to make a statement. Enough’s enough.”
Even whisky drinkers are being drawn into the standoff. “We moved here for this job,” said Jocelyn Girard, a mother of four who relocated her family to Amherstburg after being hired at the plant. “Now we’re just hoping for a miracle.”
Ford’s political theatre may not reverse Diageo’s decision, but it taps into a deeper frustration. Global corporations rake in Canadian profits, gut local jobs, and call it efficiency. When Ottawa stays silent, Ontario pours its whisky in protest.
Crown Royal sales to Canada are already down 60% in the U.S., according to Kentucky-based industry experts. But with Diageo holding firm, a working-class showdown may be brewing — over jobs, dignity, and the last drops of Canadian whisky bottled on Canadian soil.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤡19😁4❤1💩1💯1
Canada’s Data Isn’t Ours — And Our Elites Just Admitted It
"70 prominent Canadians" (nice word for elites), from Margaret Atwood to former governors general and civil liberties groups — have signed an open letter warning Ottawa that Canada has lost digital sovereignty.
They cite hard numbers:
• 90% of internet traffic is routed through the United States
• American tech giants earn $20B/year tax-free off Canadian creators
• Cloud infrastructure? Controlled by Amazon, Microsoft, Google
• And thanks to CUSMA, Canada can’t even require data to be stored here
They’re asking PM Carney to reverse course on his decision to kill the Digital Services Tax after Trump threatened retaliation. They’re demanding Ottawa withdraw the Strong Borders Act, which opens the door to warrantless data collection and U.S. cross-border surveillance. And they want public consultations on the foreign control of our digital infrastructure.
Their tone is urgent. Their fear is clear: Canada is no longer a digital nation-state , it’s a client node in a hostile system.
And for once, they’re not wrong, but their motives are highly suspect.
But here’s the twist: many of these same elites helped build the very system they now warn against. They cheered censorship bills, digital ID rollouts, and Ottawa’s complicity in the U.S.-led surveillance order. Only now — faced with the boomerang of Trump’s second term, do they cry foul. Is just performative outrage, only to continue selling out our digital soverignty?
Yet their panic tells us something real: the mask of “liberal democracy” is slipping, and the U.S. tech empire no longer even bothers to disguise its dominion.
Let them scramble. Let them plead.
Sovereignty isn’t begged for. It’s taken back.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
"70 prominent Canadians" (nice word for elites), from Margaret Atwood to former governors general and civil liberties groups — have signed an open letter warning Ottawa that Canada has lost digital sovereignty.
They cite hard numbers:
• 90% of internet traffic is routed through the United States
• American tech giants earn $20B/year tax-free off Canadian creators
• Cloud infrastructure? Controlled by Amazon, Microsoft, Google
• And thanks to CUSMA, Canada can’t even require data to be stored here
They’re asking PM Carney to reverse course on his decision to kill the Digital Services Tax after Trump threatened retaliation. They’re demanding Ottawa withdraw the Strong Borders Act, which opens the door to warrantless data collection and U.S. cross-border surveillance. And they want public consultations on the foreign control of our digital infrastructure.
Their tone is urgent. Their fear is clear: Canada is no longer a digital nation-state , it’s a client node in a hostile system.
And for once, they’re not wrong, but their motives are highly suspect.
But here’s the twist: many of these same elites helped build the very system they now warn against. They cheered censorship bills, digital ID rollouts, and Ottawa’s complicity in the U.S.-led surveillance order. Only now — faced with the boomerang of Trump’s second term, do they cry foul. Is just performative outrage, only to continue selling out our digital soverignty?
Yet their panic tells us something real: the mask of “liberal democracy” is slipping, and the U.S. tech empire no longer even bothers to disguise its dominion.
Let them scramble. Let them plead.
Sovereignty isn’t begged for. It’s taken back.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤡8💯4🌭3
Carney’s “Good Conversation” with Trump: Tariffs Remain, Sovereignty Strains
Prime Minister Mark Carney says he had a “good conversation” with Donald Trump this week. But for Canadian workers still bleeding from U.S. tariffs, there’s little comfort in vague pleasantries and diplomatic ambiguity.
The surprise chat, not formally disclosed by the PMO until days later — came as Canada quietly lifted most of its own retaliatory tariffs on $60 billion worth of U.S. goods. Carney framed the move as a gesture of goodwill. Pierre Poilievre called it what many suspect it is: a capitulation.
While Carney insists the trade file is being handled with “discipline,” and that his new Clerk of the Privy Council, Michael Sabia, is in Washington to push for relief, there’s no signal that Trump plans to lift the boot off Canada’s neck. Not on steel. Not on aluminum. Not on anything.
Instead, Canadians are being asked to trust a process that has already proven one-sided and a Prime Minister whose strategy amounts to smiling through bruises.
Behind the scenes, the realignment of power is clearer. CUSMA clauses now constrain Canada’s ability to shield its data, protect its digital economy, or even demand cloud infrastructure be based within our borders. U.S. surveillance and trade leverage reach deeper into the Canadian state than ever — and all the while, Ottawa avoids confrontation in hopes of being seen as “reasonable.”
But this is not diplomacy. It is surrender in slow motion. What good is a budget of “austerity and investment” when the very sectors you’re investing in; manufacturing, defence, digital sovereignty — remain chained to the whims of a foreign president and trade tribunal?
Canada is not sovereign if it cannot set its own trade terms, tax tech giants, or even keep its own data inside its borders. We are not a partner in CUSMA. We are a tenant, politely asking the landlord to stop raising the rent — while dismantling our own locks in the name of cooperation.
Carney may think charm and patience will bring results. But Canadians deserve leaders who won’t mistake capitulation for diplomacy, or handshake politics for sovereign protection.
The question now isn’t whether Trump will lift tariffs. It’s whether Canada will ever again lift its head and show true courage.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Prime Minister Mark Carney says he had a “good conversation” with Donald Trump this week. But for Canadian workers still bleeding from U.S. tariffs, there’s little comfort in vague pleasantries and diplomatic ambiguity.
The surprise chat, not formally disclosed by the PMO until days later — came as Canada quietly lifted most of its own retaliatory tariffs on $60 billion worth of U.S. goods. Carney framed the move as a gesture of goodwill. Pierre Poilievre called it what many suspect it is: a capitulation.
While Carney insists the trade file is being handled with “discipline,” and that his new Clerk of the Privy Council, Michael Sabia, is in Washington to push for relief, there’s no signal that Trump plans to lift the boot off Canada’s neck. Not on steel. Not on aluminum. Not on anything.
Instead, Canadians are being asked to trust a process that has already proven one-sided and a Prime Minister whose strategy amounts to smiling through bruises.
Behind the scenes, the realignment of power is clearer. CUSMA clauses now constrain Canada’s ability to shield its data, protect its digital economy, or even demand cloud infrastructure be based within our borders. U.S. surveillance and trade leverage reach deeper into the Canadian state than ever — and all the while, Ottawa avoids confrontation in hopes of being seen as “reasonable.”
But this is not diplomacy. It is surrender in slow motion. What good is a budget of “austerity and investment” when the very sectors you’re investing in; manufacturing, defence, digital sovereignty — remain chained to the whims of a foreign president and trade tribunal?
Canada is not sovereign if it cannot set its own trade terms, tax tech giants, or even keep its own data inside its borders. We are not a partner in CUSMA. We are a tenant, politely asking the landlord to stop raising the rent — while dismantling our own locks in the name of cooperation.
Carney may think charm and patience will bring results. But Canadians deserve leaders who won’t mistake capitulation for diplomacy, or handshake politics for sovereign protection.
The question now isn’t whether Trump will lift tariffs. It’s whether Canada will ever again lift its head and show true courage.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🔥7💯5🤡3🤯1💩1
Freeland Talks ‘Made in Canada’ Steel — But Substance Still Lags Behind Slogans
Speaking outside Hamilton’s iconic ArcelorMittal Dofasco steelworks, Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland claimed industry leaders had reached a quiet consensus: as Canada embarks on a massive infrastructure push - rails, ferries, shipyards, it should use Canadian steel and aluminum wherever possible.
It was a polished moment in an otherwise gritty sector still bruised by foreign competition, American tariffs, and Ottawa’s own erratic trade strategy. The backdrop was Hamilton, once the heart of Canada’s industrial might, now struggling to reclaim its role in the nation’s future.
Freeland’s summit included a tight circle of rail and maritime executives, union leaders, and elected officials, including Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who joined virtually. While the closed-door meeting yielded no formal commitments, Freeland called it “practical” and “productive”, the kind of vague optimism that’s become Ottawa’s hallmark.
But many Canadians remain skeptical. What does “as much as possible” really mean when it comes to Canadian materials? And why, just weeks earlier, did B.C. Ferries sign another deal for Chinese-built vessels, bypassing Canadian yards?
Freeland was quick to say she was “encouraged” by what she heard — but words don’t lay keel or pour steel. Labour groups and local manufacturers want binding procurement policies, not political encouragement.
Meanwhile, the Canadian steel and aluminum industries are still reeling from the fallout of the U.S. trade war. Canadian exports face a punishing 50% tariff at the border. Ottawa responded with $60 billion in counter-tariffs, many of which were just lifted in a show of “good faith” toward Washington, despite no reciprocal relief.
The message to domestic producers is mixed at best: you’re vital, until you’re inconvenient.
Still, Ottawa insists help is coming. A new $450 million, three-year fund, announced by AI and Digital Innovation Minister Evan Solomon during a visit to Hooper Welding, is meant to cushion Canadian firms against trade shocks. But critics say it’s a Band-Aid, not a blueprint.
If Ottawa is serious about “building Canada,” it will need more than roundtables and rebate programs. It will need a sovereign industrial policy — one that doesn’t cave to foreign pressure, offload jobs abroad, or apologize for defending domestic capacity.
Until then, summits like this one may boost headlines. But they won’t find markers for our steel.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Speaking outside Hamilton’s iconic ArcelorMittal Dofasco steelworks, Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland claimed industry leaders had reached a quiet consensus: as Canada embarks on a massive infrastructure push - rails, ferries, shipyards, it should use Canadian steel and aluminum wherever possible.
It was a polished moment in an otherwise gritty sector still bruised by foreign competition, American tariffs, and Ottawa’s own erratic trade strategy. The backdrop was Hamilton, once the heart of Canada’s industrial might, now struggling to reclaim its role in the nation’s future.
Freeland’s summit included a tight circle of rail and maritime executives, union leaders, and elected officials, including Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who joined virtually. While the closed-door meeting yielded no formal commitments, Freeland called it “practical” and “productive”, the kind of vague optimism that’s become Ottawa’s hallmark.
But many Canadians remain skeptical. What does “as much as possible” really mean when it comes to Canadian materials? And why, just weeks earlier, did B.C. Ferries sign another deal for Chinese-built vessels, bypassing Canadian yards?
Freeland was quick to say she was “encouraged” by what she heard — but words don’t lay keel or pour steel. Labour groups and local manufacturers want binding procurement policies, not political encouragement.
Meanwhile, the Canadian steel and aluminum industries are still reeling from the fallout of the U.S. trade war. Canadian exports face a punishing 50% tariff at the border. Ottawa responded with $60 billion in counter-tariffs, many of which were just lifted in a show of “good faith” toward Washington, despite no reciprocal relief.
The message to domestic producers is mixed at best: you’re vital, until you’re inconvenient.
Still, Ottawa insists help is coming. A new $450 million, three-year fund, announced by AI and Digital Innovation Minister Evan Solomon during a visit to Hooper Welding, is meant to cushion Canadian firms against trade shocks. But critics say it’s a Band-Aid, not a blueprint.
If Ottawa is serious about “building Canada,” it will need more than roundtables and rebate programs. It will need a sovereign industrial policy — one that doesn’t cave to foreign pressure, offload jobs abroad, or apologize for defending domestic capacity.
Until then, summits like this one may boost headlines. But they won’t find markers for our steel.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤡9💯7⚡1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A Father’s Last Stand and a Nation’s Quiet Surrender
In Vaughan, Ontario, 46‑year‑old father of four Abdul Aleem Farooqi confronted three masked men who broke through the back door of his home. He died doing what any father, husband, or sovereign citizen instinctively would: defending his family.
It was no random act. According to police, this was a targeted home invasion, an operation aimed at money. The armed intruders made off with mobile phones and fled the scene after gunning him down in front of his wife and children.
This is where the tragedy deepens.
Instead of praising the man’s courage or acknowledging the growing lawlessness spreading across suburban Canada, York Regional Police issued a statement not of justice, but of submission. Their message to citizens? Don’t fight back. Comply. Pray you Survive.
Translation: Your home is no longer your castle. Call 911, after the invaders leave.
But what if they don’t?
What if they leave your children traumatized? What if they take more than property?
We have crossed a Rubicon. In the name of multicultural harmony and progressive restraint, we have surrendered the one thing no free people can afford to give up: the right to self-defense.
For decades, Canadians were told to disarm: physically, morally, spiritually. In return, they were promised protection. But now that protection is melting away. Illegal border crossings are up. Organized gangs are thriving. Refugee streams from failed globalist wars are pouring into a fragile housing market and underfunded security apparatus. And citizens are told to stay calm, stay compliant, and stay silent.
This is not compassion. This is engineered vulnerability.
A generation ago, a man like Farooqi would’ve been lauded, a citizen-soldier defending sacred ground. Today, he’s a casualty of a society that has forgotten its own center of gravity.
No nation survives when it tells its citizens to surrender their instincts. No civilization endures by outsourcing its defense to a bureaucracy that arrives after the blood is already on the floor.
This isn’t just about Vaughan. It’s about a philosophy, one that rejects the very notion of rootedness, duty, and righteous defense, over blind compliance and state dependency.
True sovereignty does not begin in Parliament. It begins at the threshold of your own front door.
Abdul Aleem Farooqi died defending his. And that simple act: tragic, heroic, real, is worth more than a thousand slogans from those who live behind gates and security details.
Let his death be remembered not just as a tragedy, but as a line in the sand.
Because if we can’t protect our homes, we don’t have a country.
And we’re not going to let them take that, too.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
In Vaughan, Ontario, 46‑year‑old father of four Abdul Aleem Farooqi confronted three masked men who broke through the back door of his home. He died doing what any father, husband, or sovereign citizen instinctively would: defending his family.
It was no random act. According to police, this was a targeted home invasion, an operation aimed at money. The armed intruders made off with mobile phones and fled the scene after gunning him down in front of his wife and children.
This is where the tragedy deepens.
Instead of praising the man’s courage or acknowledging the growing lawlessness spreading across suburban Canada, York Regional Police issued a statement not of justice, but of submission. Their message to citizens? Don’t fight back. Comply. Pray you Survive.
Translation: Your home is no longer your castle. Call 911, after the invaders leave.
But what if they don’t?
What if they leave your children traumatized? What if they take more than property?
We have crossed a Rubicon. In the name of multicultural harmony and progressive restraint, we have surrendered the one thing no free people can afford to give up: the right to self-defense.
For decades, Canadians were told to disarm: physically, morally, spiritually. In return, they were promised protection. But now that protection is melting away. Illegal border crossings are up. Organized gangs are thriving. Refugee streams from failed globalist wars are pouring into a fragile housing market and underfunded security apparatus. And citizens are told to stay calm, stay compliant, and stay silent.
This is not compassion. This is engineered vulnerability.
A generation ago, a man like Farooqi would’ve been lauded, a citizen-soldier defending sacred ground. Today, he’s a casualty of a society that has forgotten its own center of gravity.
No nation survives when it tells its citizens to surrender their instincts. No civilization endures by outsourcing its defense to a bureaucracy that arrives after the blood is already on the floor.
This isn’t just about Vaughan. It’s about a philosophy, one that rejects the very notion of rootedness, duty, and righteous defense, over blind compliance and state dependency.
True sovereignty does not begin in Parliament. It begins at the threshold of your own front door.
Abdul Aleem Farooqi died defending his. And that simple act: tragic, heroic, real, is worth more than a thousand slogans from those who live behind gates and security details.
Let his death be remembered not just as a tragedy, but as a line in the sand.
Because if we can’t protect our homes, we don’t have a country.
And we’re not going to let them take that, too.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
👏16🤡6🤬5🤯4👍3💯3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇨🇦 Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre makes the case to end "temporary foreign workers program"
"Why are our youth being REPLACED by low-wage foreigners who are ultimately being EXPLOITED?"
Fair question.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
"Why are our youth being REPLACED by low-wage foreigners who are ultimately being EXPLOITED?"
Fair question.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
👍19🤡12💯6💩2🌚1
Ottawa’s Labour Dilemma: Tensions Rise Over Canada’s Temporary Foreign Worker Program
A fierce debate over Canada’s reliance on temporary foreign labour has ignited after Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre called for the complete dismantling of the Temporary Foreign Worker (TFW) program, arguing it displaces young Canadians and artificially depresses wages. “Why are the Liberals shutting our own youth out of jobs and replacing them with low-wage, temporary foreign workers from poor countries?” he asked during a press event in Mississauga. He emphasized that the blame lies not with the workers themselves, but with what he described as a coalition of Liberal elites and corporate profiteers.
The TFW program was originally conceived as a targeted solution for industries facing short-term labour shortages. However, Poilievre claims it has ballooned into a structural dependency: diluting local labour markets, particularly for entry-level and blue-collar jobs. His proposal would preserve agricultural labour streams like the Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program (SAWP), but eliminate broader use across the service and manufacturing sectors, forcing a reset of Canadian hiring practices.
Government figures attempt to challenge his narrative. Immigration Minister Lena Diab’s office says the 105,000 permits cited by Poilievre include renewals, not just new entries. In fact, only 33,722 TFWs actually entered Canada from January to June, and overall temporary worker arrivals are down 125,903 compared to the same period last year. Still, with permits trending higher than the government’s original 82,000 cap, trust in the system’s limits is eroding.
Behind the policy clash lies a deeper demographic and economic rift. Canada’s population grew by just 20,107 people in Q1 2025, the slowest pace since 2020, and all of it driven by immigration. Deaths outnumbered births by over 5,600 in that period, according to Statistics Canada. As Prime Minister Mark Carney looks to scale immigration back to 5% of population share from its current 7%, business lobbies are voicing the opposite concern: labour scarcity. “Their top issue is tariffs. The second is how to get more foreign workers,” Carney admitted. Of course, they're addicted to cheap labour over hiring Canadians.
This divide reflects a core tension in Canada’s "post-pandemic" labour strategy: whether to rebuild domestic self-sufficiency or double down on globalized labour outsourcing. The Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) ridiculed Poilievre’s proposal as “ridiculous,” arguing that no urban Canadian youth will move to work rural jobs in Saskatchewan. But critics counter that cheap labour becomes a crutch, discouraging investment in local training, and leaving entire industries addicted to temporary fixes.
The numbers suggest that the program, while shrinking slightly, remains massive in scale. With Canada’s housing market straining under pressure and trust in national institutions waning, the debate over who fills entry-level jobs and why—cuts to the heart of Canada’s identity crisis. What began as a policy tool has become a symbol of elite detachment from working-class realities.
Poilievre’s proposal, taps into a broader mood of economic dislocation, demographic anxiety, and calls for renewal. Whether it gains traction will depend on whether Canadians believe their government still works for them, or merely for the balance sheets of globalized supply chains.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
A fierce debate over Canada’s reliance on temporary foreign labour has ignited after Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre called for the complete dismantling of the Temporary Foreign Worker (TFW) program, arguing it displaces young Canadians and artificially depresses wages. “Why are the Liberals shutting our own youth out of jobs and replacing them with low-wage, temporary foreign workers from poor countries?” he asked during a press event in Mississauga. He emphasized that the blame lies not with the workers themselves, but with what he described as a coalition of Liberal elites and corporate profiteers.
The TFW program was originally conceived as a targeted solution for industries facing short-term labour shortages. However, Poilievre claims it has ballooned into a structural dependency: diluting local labour markets, particularly for entry-level and blue-collar jobs. His proposal would preserve agricultural labour streams like the Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program (SAWP), but eliminate broader use across the service and manufacturing sectors, forcing a reset of Canadian hiring practices.
Government figures attempt to challenge his narrative. Immigration Minister Lena Diab’s office says the 105,000 permits cited by Poilievre include renewals, not just new entries. In fact, only 33,722 TFWs actually entered Canada from January to June, and overall temporary worker arrivals are down 125,903 compared to the same period last year. Still, with permits trending higher than the government’s original 82,000 cap, trust in the system’s limits is eroding.
Behind the policy clash lies a deeper demographic and economic rift. Canada’s population grew by just 20,107 people in Q1 2025, the slowest pace since 2020, and all of it driven by immigration. Deaths outnumbered births by over 5,600 in that period, according to Statistics Canada. As Prime Minister Mark Carney looks to scale immigration back to 5% of population share from its current 7%, business lobbies are voicing the opposite concern: labour scarcity. “Their top issue is tariffs. The second is how to get more foreign workers,” Carney admitted. Of course, they're addicted to cheap labour over hiring Canadians.
This divide reflects a core tension in Canada’s "post-pandemic" labour strategy: whether to rebuild domestic self-sufficiency or double down on globalized labour outsourcing. The Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) ridiculed Poilievre’s proposal as “ridiculous,” arguing that no urban Canadian youth will move to work rural jobs in Saskatchewan. But critics counter that cheap labour becomes a crutch, discouraging investment in local training, and leaving entire industries addicted to temporary fixes.
The numbers suggest that the program, while shrinking slightly, remains massive in scale. With Canada’s housing market straining under pressure and trust in national institutions waning, the debate over who fills entry-level jobs and why—cuts to the heart of Canada’s identity crisis. What began as a policy tool has become a symbol of elite detachment from working-class realities.
Poilievre’s proposal, taps into a broader mood of economic dislocation, demographic anxiety, and calls for renewal. Whether it gains traction will depend on whether Canadians believe their government still works for them, or merely for the balance sheets of globalized supply chains.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
💯7🤡6👍2
🇨🇦 “Sex-for-Rent” in Canada: When the State Fails, Desperation Becomes Policy
They used to call this a developed country. Now in cities across Canada, young women are offering sex in exchange for rent.
Not in a red-light district, not in some dystopian novel, but on local classifieds, Facebook groups, and student housing boards. It’s being normalized. Rebranded. “Consensual,” they say. “Practical,” even. As if transactional sex-for-shelter is just another side hustle in Carney's Canada.
Let’s be clear: there isn’t much choice here. When your other option is a tent behind a bus station, it’s survival. This is what happens when a country forgets its own citizens. When housing becomes an asset class for foreign buyers. When jobs vanish. When the government floods the labor market, inflates the population, and pretends it’s helping.
Meanwhile, the same politicians who built this mess fly business class to climate conferences and lecture the public about "liberal values". But they won’t build and increase the housing supply. They won’t cap migration. And they certainly won’t admit that their “just-in-time globalism” has collapsed into something rotten and unrecognizable.
The cultural left shrugs and calls this liberation. But deep down, everyone knows this is a death rattle. Civilization doesn’t die in fire, it dies when your daughters start trading sex for rent and your government calls it progress. Welcome to economic feudalism, updated for the gig economy.
What’s most shocking is how quiet many conservatives have been. As if saying the obvious truth would be impolite. As if this is just one more issue to campaign on instead of a red line. A sovereign country doesn’t let this happen. A sovereign country protects its young girls, its women, its workers, its future. And yet here we are.
This isn’t about sex. It’s about surrender. To global finance. To open borders. To a class of elites who will never be asked to make these choices. But the rest of us see it clearly. We’re not imagining the decline. We’re living it.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
They used to call this a developed country. Now in cities across Canada, young women are offering sex in exchange for rent.
Not in a red-light district, not in some dystopian novel, but on local classifieds, Facebook groups, and student housing boards. It’s being normalized. Rebranded. “Consensual,” they say. “Practical,” even. As if transactional sex-for-shelter is just another side hustle in Carney's Canada.
Let’s be clear: there isn’t much choice here. When your other option is a tent behind a bus station, it’s survival. This is what happens when a country forgets its own citizens. When housing becomes an asset class for foreign buyers. When jobs vanish. When the government floods the labor market, inflates the population, and pretends it’s helping.
Meanwhile, the same politicians who built this mess fly business class to climate conferences and lecture the public about "liberal values". But they won’t build and increase the housing supply. They won’t cap migration. And they certainly won’t admit that their “just-in-time globalism” has collapsed into something rotten and unrecognizable.
The cultural left shrugs and calls this liberation. But deep down, everyone knows this is a death rattle. Civilization doesn’t die in fire, it dies when your daughters start trading sex for rent and your government calls it progress. Welcome to economic feudalism, updated for the gig economy.
What’s most shocking is how quiet many conservatives have been. As if saying the obvious truth would be impolite. As if this is just one more issue to campaign on instead of a red line. A sovereign country doesn’t let this happen. A sovereign country protects its young girls, its women, its workers, its future. And yet here we are.
This isn’t about sex. It’s about surrender. To global finance. To open borders. To a class of elites who will never be asked to make these choices. But the rest of us see it clearly. We’re not imagining the decline. We’re living it.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤬12💯10😁4💩3❤2😢2🤡2🙏1
RCMP Arrest “Queen of Canada” Romana Didulo in Saskatchewan Raid
RCMP have arrested self-styled cult leader Romana Didulo, known to her followers as the “Queen of Canada,” during a livestreamed raid in the village of Richmound, Saskatchewan.
Police say 16 adults: 11 women and five men, were taken into custody after officers executed a search warrant on the decommissioned school her group had occupied since late 2023. Four replica handguns were seized.
Didulo,
who declared herself head of a fictional “Kingdom of Canada,” has gained notoriety for issuing pseudolegal decrees and urging her followers to defy Canadian laws. Her presence in Richmound sparked months of tension with local residents, who accused the group of creating disturbances and illegally using the building.
All 16 remain in custody pending investigation. Charges have not yet been announced.
#Saskatchewan
🍁 Maple Chronicles
RCMP have arrested self-styled cult leader Romana Didulo, known to her followers as the “Queen of Canada,” during a livestreamed raid in the village of Richmound, Saskatchewan.
Police say 16 adults: 11 women and five men, were taken into custody after officers executed a search warrant on the decommissioned school her group had occupied since late 2023. Four replica handguns were seized.
Didulo,
who declared herself head of a fictional “Kingdom of Canada,” has gained notoriety for issuing pseudolegal decrees and urging her followers to defy Canadian laws. Her presence in Richmound sparked months of tension with local residents, who accused the group of creating disturbances and illegally using the building.
All 16 remain in custody pending investigation. Charges have not yet been announced.
#Saskatchewan
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤡23😁8🫡5
Woman Killed, Suspect Dead, Seven Injured in Mass Stabbing on Manitoba First Nation
An 18-year-old woman was killed and seven others injured in a mass stabbing on Hollow Water First Nation early Thursday morning, RCMP say.
The suspect, identified as 26-year-old Tyrone Simard, the victim’s brother, died after crashing into an RCMP vehicle while fleeing in a stolen car around 6:50 a.m. on Provincial Road 304 near Black River First Nation. The Mountie involved was seriously injured but is expected to recover.
Police said the attacks began shortly before 4 a.m., when a First Nation safety officer reported an assault. Multiple victims, ranging in age from 18 to 60, were found at two separate scenes in the community, about 160 kilometres northeast of Winnipeg.
RCMP Supt. Rob Lasson said Simard was known to police but did not disclose further details. He emphasized that the suspect and victims all knew each other. Officers continue to canvass the community to ensure no further victims are missed.
Chief Larry Barker of Hollow Water urged residents to support one another, calling the tragedy devastating for the community.
#Manitoba
🍁 Maple Chronicles
An 18-year-old woman was killed and seven others injured in a mass stabbing on Hollow Water First Nation early Thursday morning, RCMP say.
The suspect, identified as 26-year-old Tyrone Simard, the victim’s brother, died after crashing into an RCMP vehicle while fleeing in a stolen car around 6:50 a.m. on Provincial Road 304 near Black River First Nation. The Mountie involved was seriously injured but is expected to recover.
Police said the attacks began shortly before 4 a.m., when a First Nation safety officer reported an assault. Multiple victims, ranging in age from 18 to 60, were found at two separate scenes in the community, about 160 kilometres northeast of Winnipeg.
RCMP Supt. Rob Lasson said Simard was known to police but did not disclose further details. He emphasized that the suspect and victims all knew each other. Officers continue to canvass the community to ensure no further victims are missed.
Chief Larry Barker of Hollow Water urged residents to support one another, calling the tragedy devastating for the community.
#Manitoba
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🌚12😢4🙏4🤬1
Finance Minister Says Canada Must ‘Reinvent’ Economy Like 1945
Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne says Canada faces a moment of economic reinvention on the scale of the post-war boom of 1945.
Speaking at the Liberal cabinet retreat in the Greater Toronto Area, Champagne argued that the country must shift away from its dependence on U.S. markets in the wake of President Donald Trump’s trade war and mounting tariffs. “I often make an analogy between 2025 and 1945. In 1945, Canada reinvented itself, and I think this is one of those moments,” he told reporters.
He said Ottawa’s plan will focus on major projects and new technologies such as artificial intelligence, while also acknowledging looming cuts in the public sector after years of hiring growth during COVID-19. “There will be adjustment in different places,” Champagne said.
Prime Minister Mark Carney echoed the message earlier this week, promising a federal budget that reins in operational spending while funnelling billions into infrastructure and industry. Champagne framed the approach as “capital expenses for the future,” intended to build resilience and growth.
The finance minister also drew attention to Canadians’ frustration with rising costs. “Canadians have been tightening their belt for quite some time. Times have been challenging for many families across the nation. So, it’s only normal that from a government perspective we do the same,” he said.
While promising a forward-looking budget, Champagne did not rule out the possibility of job losses in government, stressing instead that efficiency, technology, and value for money will guide policy.
The cabinet retreat also drew attention for its guest list: the Prime Minister’s Office invited Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts, a close Trump ally linked to Project 2025, a reminder of how deeply U.S. political currents continue to shape Canadian debates about sovereignty and economic direction.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne says Canada faces a moment of economic reinvention on the scale of the post-war boom of 1945.
Speaking at the Liberal cabinet retreat in the Greater Toronto Area, Champagne argued that the country must shift away from its dependence on U.S. markets in the wake of President Donald Trump’s trade war and mounting tariffs. “I often make an analogy between 2025 and 1945. In 1945, Canada reinvented itself, and I think this is one of those moments,” he told reporters.
He said Ottawa’s plan will focus on major projects and new technologies such as artificial intelligence, while also acknowledging looming cuts in the public sector after years of hiring growth during COVID-19. “There will be adjustment in different places,” Champagne said.
Prime Minister Mark Carney echoed the message earlier this week, promising a federal budget that reins in operational spending while funnelling billions into infrastructure and industry. Champagne framed the approach as “capital expenses for the future,” intended to build resilience and growth.
The finance minister also drew attention to Canadians’ frustration with rising costs. “Canadians have been tightening their belt for quite some time. Times have been challenging for many families across the nation. So, it’s only normal that from a government perspective we do the same,” he said.
While promising a forward-looking budget, Champagne did not rule out the possibility of job losses in government, stressing instead that efficiency, technology, and value for money will guide policy.
The cabinet retreat also drew attention for its guest list: the Prime Minister’s Office invited Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts, a close Trump ally linked to Project 2025, a reminder of how deeply U.S. political currents continue to shape Canadian debates about sovereignty and economic direction.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤡20❤4💯2
Carney says Canada will join ‘military assistance’ pledge for Ukraine
Prime Minister Mark Carney confirmed Canada is prepared to join its "allies" in offering “direct and scalable military assistance” to Ukraine once a ceasefire or peace agreement is reached.
Carney made the commitment virtually at a meeting of the so-called “Coalition of the Willing,” yesterday where 26 allied nations pledged to contribute troops or maintain a military presence on land, at sea, or in the air to "reassure Kiev" after the fighting stops. French President Emmanuel Macron described the effort as a future “reassurance force,” while British Prime Minister Keir Starmer emphasized the need for U.S. backing.
The plan would likely force Canada to reconsider its role in Latvia, where Carney recently announced troops would remain until 2029. Military experts say Ottawa does not have the capacity to maintain both deployments at scale.
Earlier in the day, Macron and other European leaders met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff, pushing for guarantees of long-term support. Zelenskyy’s office said the talks focused on security assurances across air, land, sea, and cyberspace.
The theoretical coalition as Zelensky called it, also agreed to supply Ukraine with additional long-range missiles, even as U.S. President Donald Trump signaled he was still seeking a path to peace but avoided setting timelines.
European officials stressed the pressure on Moscow must be sustained, with Berlin warning sanctions could intensify if Russia resists negotiations. For Canada, the pledge underscores a growing strategic bind: extending costly commitments abroad while navigating an economy already under heavy strain at home.
#Canada #Ukraine
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Prime Minister Mark Carney confirmed Canada is prepared to join its "allies" in offering “direct and scalable military assistance” to Ukraine once a ceasefire or peace agreement is reached.
Carney made the commitment virtually at a meeting of the so-called “Coalition of the Willing,” yesterday where 26 allied nations pledged to contribute troops or maintain a military presence on land, at sea, or in the air to "reassure Kiev" after the fighting stops. French President Emmanuel Macron described the effort as a future “reassurance force,” while British Prime Minister Keir Starmer emphasized the need for U.S. backing.
The plan would likely force Canada to reconsider its role in Latvia, where Carney recently announced troops would remain until 2029. Military experts say Ottawa does not have the capacity to maintain both deployments at scale.
Earlier in the day, Macron and other European leaders met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff, pushing for guarantees of long-term support. Zelenskyy’s office said the talks focused on security assurances across air, land, sea, and cyberspace.
The theoretical coalition as Zelensky called it, also agreed to supply Ukraine with additional long-range missiles, even as U.S. President Donald Trump signaled he was still seeking a path to peace but avoided setting timelines.
European officials stressed the pressure on Moscow must be sustained, with Berlin warning sanctions could intensify if Russia resists negotiations. For Canada, the pledge underscores a growing strategic bind: extending costly commitments abroad while navigating an economy already under heavy strain at home.
#Canada #Ukraine
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤡40👎18👍5🤬2🤮2
Statistics Canada says most of the losses came from part-time work, with core working-age Canadians between 25 and 54 hit the hardest. The participation rate, a key measure of how many people are working or seeking work, slid to 65.1% — its lowest point since COVID-19 disruptions.
Sectors exposed to tariffs bore the brunt: scientific and technical services shed 26,000 jobs, transportation and warehousing lost 23,000, and manufacturing fell by 19,000. Construction was a rare bright spot, adding 17,000 roles.
Economists had expected modest job growth, but BMO’s Douglas Porter called the report “arguably the weakest since the pandemic days.” With inflation still stubbornly high, the losses may pressure the Bank of Canada to consider rate cuts when it announces its next decision on September 17.
This marks the second consecutive month of decline, after 41,000 jobs were lost in July, raising concerns that Canada’s labour market is sliding deeper into a prolonged slowdown.
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤔12🤬8🎉2