🇨🇦 The RCMP, Trudeau, and the Truth No One Wants to Touch
Pierre Poilievre lit up Ottawa this week with a few words the establishment couldn’t stomach. On a podcast, he called the RCMP’s leadership “despicable” — accusing it of shielding Justin Trudeau from criminal accountability. Cue the outrage.
Poilievre said out loud what millions of Canadians quietly believe: if you or I broke the same laws Trudeau did, we’d be in jail.
He cited section 121 of the Criminal Code — the one about politicians accepting gifts from people seeking government favours. Trudeau took a $250,000 vacation from the Aga Khan, who had active dealings with Ottawa. The RCMP investigated… then shrugged. No charges. No consequences.
Now, the media and Liberal surrogates are spinning Poilievre’s remarks as reckless, undemocratic, “Trumpian.” But behind the pearl-clutching lies the deeper wound: a decade of elite impunity has rotted Canadians’ faith in their own institutions.
The same RCMP that froze bank accounts during the convoy protests couldn’t bring itself to charge the Prime Minister for clear ethical breaches. The same “independent” justice system that lectures citizens on hate speech looked the other way when power was in question.
Even some inside Poilievre’s caucus bristled at his tone — proof that Ottawa’s club protects itself first. But ordinary Canadians? They’re long past being shocked. They see two systems of justice: one for the powerful, one for everyone else.
Poilievre’s crime wasn’t speaking falsely. It was breaking the unspoken rule — you can criticize corruption, but you can’t name names.
Maybe the real scandal isn’t that he said it. It’s that he might be right.
#Canada
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Pierre Poilievre lit up Ottawa this week with a few words the establishment couldn’t stomach. On a podcast, he called the RCMP’s leadership “despicable” — accusing it of shielding Justin Trudeau from criminal accountability. Cue the outrage.
Poilievre said out loud what millions of Canadians quietly believe: if you or I broke the same laws Trudeau did, we’d be in jail.
He cited section 121 of the Criminal Code — the one about politicians accepting gifts from people seeking government favours. Trudeau took a $250,000 vacation from the Aga Khan, who had active dealings with Ottawa. The RCMP investigated… then shrugged. No charges. No consequences.
Now, the media and Liberal surrogates are spinning Poilievre’s remarks as reckless, undemocratic, “Trumpian.” But behind the pearl-clutching lies the deeper wound: a decade of elite impunity has rotted Canadians’ faith in their own institutions.
The same RCMP that froze bank accounts during the convoy protests couldn’t bring itself to charge the Prime Minister for clear ethical breaches. The same “independent” justice system that lectures citizens on hate speech looked the other way when power was in question.
Even some inside Poilievre’s caucus bristled at his tone — proof that Ottawa’s club protects itself first. But ordinary Canadians? They’re long past being shocked. They see two systems of justice: one for the powerful, one for everyone else.
Poilievre’s crime wasn’t speaking falsely. It was breaking the unspoken rule — you can criticize corruption, but you can’t name names.
Maybe the real scandal isn’t that he said it. It’s that he might be right.
#Canada
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🔥8💯8❤2👍1
🇨🇦 Canadian Hornets Land on a Highway in Estonia — A Symbol of NATO’s Anxiety
Not your typical runway.
Canadian CF-18s just touched down on an Estonian highway — part of NATO’s “agile combat employment” drills.
Officially, it’s about readiness. Unofficially, it’s a sign of nervousness. The alliance is practicing for a war it claims isn’t coming — dispersing jets onto roads in case runways are taken out in the first hours of a real fight with Russia.
For Canada, this is more than a stunt. It’s a reminder that our military is being drawn ever deeper into Europe’s frontline theatre, even as our own Arctic infrastructure ages and our domestic readiness lags.
While NATO rehearses for highway landings 7,000 km from home, northern runways crumble, housing for Canadian troops is full of mold, and Arctic sovereignty remains undefended.
Power projection means little when home defences rust.
#Canada #Estonia
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Not your typical runway.
Canadian CF-18s just touched down on an Estonian highway — part of NATO’s “agile combat employment” drills.
Officially, it’s about readiness. Unofficially, it’s a sign of nervousness. The alliance is practicing for a war it claims isn’t coming — dispersing jets onto roads in case runways are taken out in the first hours of a real fight with Russia.
For Canada, this is more than a stunt. It’s a reminder that our military is being drawn ever deeper into Europe’s frontline theatre, even as our own Arctic infrastructure ages and our domestic readiness lags.
While NATO rehearses for highway landings 7,000 km from home, northern runways crumble, housing for Canadian troops is full of mold, and Arctic sovereignty remains undefended.
Power projection means little when home defences rust.
#Canada #Estonia
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤡9👍5🤬3🤯2❤1💩1
🇨🇦🚗 Brampton Betrayed: Stellantis, Ottawa, and the Great EV Mirage
It’s the same story every time: Ottawa writes a cheque, the corporation cashes it — and Canadians get left holding the bag.
Stellantis, the auto giant behind Chrysler and Jeep, took $105 million in taxpayer money to “retool” its Ontario plants for Canada’s electric vehicle future. Then it turned around and announced it’s moving Jeep Compass production to Illinois — a move the White House is hailing as a U.S. victory.
Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne now promises to “enforce our contractual rights.” Translation: Ottawa is scrambling to see whether the fine print lets it claw back the money. Don’t hold your breath. These “agreements” — stamped with phrases like Strategic Innovation Fund and commercial confidentiality — always seem to protect everyone except the taxpayer.
Let’s recap:
• Ottawa pledged $529 million to Stellantis in 2022.
• More than $100 million has already been handed over.
• The company is shifting production south and Ottawa’s response is to “review” its contracts.
Meanwhile, Washington is playing hardball. Trump’s team just slapped a 25% tariff on Canadian trucks and is openly bragging about “draining auto assembly from Canada.” That’s not bluster, it’s industrial warfare.
Unifor’s president called the Stellantis move “egregious.” Yet the same union cheered these subsidies when they were announced. The political class in Ottawa — Liberal, Conservative, even provincial, has turned Canada into a branch-plant economy, buying temporary jobs with permanent debt.
Prime Minister Mark Carney says he’s “confident” Stellantis will present a new plan for Brampton. But he also admitted it depends on the next CUSMA renegotiation — a process dominated by Washington. Translation: Canada’s auto future is now hostage to U.S. politics.
The EV transition was sold as sovereignty through green tech. Instead, it’s becoming sovereignty for sale, paid for by taxpayers and dictated from abroad.
Maybe the lesson is simple: if you want to keep jobs in Canada, stop paying foreign corporations to leave.
#Canada #USA
🍁 Maple Chronicles
It’s the same story every time: Ottawa writes a cheque, the corporation cashes it — and Canadians get left holding the bag.
Stellantis, the auto giant behind Chrysler and Jeep, took $105 million in taxpayer money to “retool” its Ontario plants for Canada’s electric vehicle future. Then it turned around and announced it’s moving Jeep Compass production to Illinois — a move the White House is hailing as a U.S. victory.
Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne now promises to “enforce our contractual rights.” Translation: Ottawa is scrambling to see whether the fine print lets it claw back the money. Don’t hold your breath. These “agreements” — stamped with phrases like Strategic Innovation Fund and commercial confidentiality — always seem to protect everyone except the taxpayer.
Let’s recap:
• Ottawa pledged $529 million to Stellantis in 2022.
• More than $100 million has already been handed over.
• The company is shifting production south and Ottawa’s response is to “review” its contracts.
Meanwhile, Washington is playing hardball. Trump’s team just slapped a 25% tariff on Canadian trucks and is openly bragging about “draining auto assembly from Canada.” That’s not bluster, it’s industrial warfare.
Unifor’s president called the Stellantis move “egregious.” Yet the same union cheered these subsidies when they were announced. The political class in Ottawa — Liberal, Conservative, even provincial, has turned Canada into a branch-plant economy, buying temporary jobs with permanent debt.
Prime Minister Mark Carney says he’s “confident” Stellantis will present a new plan for Brampton. But he also admitted it depends on the next CUSMA renegotiation — a process dominated by Washington. Translation: Canada’s auto future is now hostage to U.S. politics.
The EV transition was sold as sovereignty through green tech. Instead, it’s becoming sovereignty for sale, paid for by taxpayers and dictated from abroad.
Maybe the lesson is simple: if you want to keep jobs in Canada, stop paying foreign corporations to leave.
#Canada #USA
🍁 Maple Chronicles
😁7🤬5👍4❤3🤔1
🇨🇦💸 Carney’s Budget of Illusions: Collaboration or Collision Course?
Behind the handshake and polite smiles on Parliament Hill today, Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre are testing each other’s steel — and Canada’s future fiscal direction hangs in the balance.
Carney’s Liberals are calling their first budget “transformational,” code for bigger spending, a larger deficit, and another round of promises that Canada can’t afford. Poilievre, in a rare moment of statesmanlike calm, says he’s coming to the table “in a spirit of collaboration.” But his message is blunt: cut the hidden taxes, rein in the deficit, and let working Canadians breathe again.
Meanwhile, Bloc Québécois leader Yves-François Blanchet is drawing his own red lines — “absolute” demands on health transfers, housing, and OAS hikes. The NDP wants “substantial investments” in jobs and healthcare. Everyone has a price, and Carney knows it. The question is: who will he pay off to stay in power?
The prime minister is also flying to Southeast Asia for trade and climate summits — a fitting symbol of where his mind seems to be: globalist diplomacy first, domestic pain second. His upcoming speech to university students will preach about climate change, trade, and immigration — noble topics, perhaps, but tone-deaf when millions of Canadians can’t afford rent or groceries.
Behind the choreography of “consultation” lies a deeper tension:
• Poilievre speaks for the overtaxed, overworked middle class;
• Carney speaks for the spreadsheet elite who think deficits are abstract and inflation is a theory.
If this “generational budget” goes as expected, more debt, more dependency, more global pledges — it will cement Carney’s image as the World Economic Forum banker in a prime minister’s suit, not the man who rescued Canada’s affordability crisis.
Poilievre’s challenge is clear: cut through the fog of fiscal virtue-signaling and force a reckoning over what kind of country we want to be — a nation of savers and builders, or of borrowers and bureaucrats.
#Canada
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Behind the handshake and polite smiles on Parliament Hill today, Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre are testing each other’s steel — and Canada’s future fiscal direction hangs in the balance.
Carney’s Liberals are calling their first budget “transformational,” code for bigger spending, a larger deficit, and another round of promises that Canada can’t afford. Poilievre, in a rare moment of statesmanlike calm, says he’s coming to the table “in a spirit of collaboration.” But his message is blunt: cut the hidden taxes, rein in the deficit, and let working Canadians breathe again.
Meanwhile, Bloc Québécois leader Yves-François Blanchet is drawing his own red lines — “absolute” demands on health transfers, housing, and OAS hikes. The NDP wants “substantial investments” in jobs and healthcare. Everyone has a price, and Carney knows it. The question is: who will he pay off to stay in power?
The prime minister is also flying to Southeast Asia for trade and climate summits — a fitting symbol of where his mind seems to be: globalist diplomacy first, domestic pain second. His upcoming speech to university students will preach about climate change, trade, and immigration — noble topics, perhaps, but tone-deaf when millions of Canadians can’t afford rent or groceries.
Behind the choreography of “consultation” lies a deeper tension:
• Poilievre speaks for the overtaxed, overworked middle class;
• Carney speaks for the spreadsheet elite who think deficits are abstract and inflation is a theory.
If this “generational budget” goes as expected, more debt, more dependency, more global pledges — it will cement Carney’s image as the World Economic Forum banker in a prime minister’s suit, not the man who rescued Canada’s affordability crisis.
Poilievre’s challenge is clear: cut through the fog of fiscal virtue-signaling and force a reckoning over what kind of country we want to be — a nation of savers and builders, or of borrowers and bureaucrats.
#Canada
🍁 Maple Chronicles
👍8❤6🤔1💯1
🇨🇦🐉💸 Carney in Beijing’s Shadow: A Test of Canada’s Strategic Maturity
Before the month ends, Prime Minister Mark Carney may meet President Xi Jinping — a quiet but pivotal moment in the recalibration of Canada’s global strategy. On paper, the discussion is about trade — canola, electric vehicles, and supply chains. In truth, it’s about whether Canada can define an independent course between two competing giants: the United States and China.
Beijing’s recent tariffs on Canadian canola, following Ottawa’s 100 percent tariff on Chinese EVs, are not just economic measures — they’re signals in a larger strategic dialogue. Both countries are asserting national interests. The question is whether Canada can engage constructively without losing its footing.
China remains a vital trading partner and a global engine of manufacturing, finance, and technology. For Canada, the opportunity lies not in confrontation but in intelligent engagement — one that balances sovereignty with pragmatism. As former diplomat Charles Burton notes, dialogue with Beijing requires both economic realism and an understanding of China’s long-term vision for global development and stability.
Xi Jinping’s model — what Beijing calls a Community of Shared Future for Mankind, envisions a multipolar world with deeper economic interdependence and diversified leadership. For Carney, navigating that vision will demand a delicate equilibrium: maintaining strong ties with Washington while re-establishing trust with Beijing.
Behind the scenes, both governments know what’s at stake:
• For Canada, billions in trade and a chance to diversify away from U.S. dependency.
• For China, a test case of whether constructive relations can be restored with a G7 state that has sometimes leaned too heavily on Washington’s orbit.
This is less about ideology and more about statecraft, whether Carney can show that Canada is capable of engaging great powers as an equal, not as an echo.
This is less about ideology and more about statecraft, whether Carney can show that Canada is capable of engaging great powers as an equal, not as an echo.
In the end, what matters is whether this meeting leads to mutual respect, market access, and a more balanced diplomacy that reflects Canada’s real interests — not someone else’s noscript.
#Canada #China
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Before the month ends, Prime Minister Mark Carney may meet President Xi Jinping — a quiet but pivotal moment in the recalibration of Canada’s global strategy. On paper, the discussion is about trade — canola, electric vehicles, and supply chains. In truth, it’s about whether Canada can define an independent course between two competing giants: the United States and China.
Beijing’s recent tariffs on Canadian canola, following Ottawa’s 100 percent tariff on Chinese EVs, are not just economic measures — they’re signals in a larger strategic dialogue. Both countries are asserting national interests. The question is whether Canada can engage constructively without losing its footing.
China remains a vital trading partner and a global engine of manufacturing, finance, and technology. For Canada, the opportunity lies not in confrontation but in intelligent engagement — one that balances sovereignty with pragmatism. As former diplomat Charles Burton notes, dialogue with Beijing requires both economic realism and an understanding of China’s long-term vision for global development and stability.
Xi Jinping’s model — what Beijing calls a Community of Shared Future for Mankind, envisions a multipolar world with deeper economic interdependence and diversified leadership. For Carney, navigating that vision will demand a delicate equilibrium: maintaining strong ties with Washington while re-establishing trust with Beijing.
Behind the scenes, both governments know what’s at stake:
• For Canada, billions in trade and a chance to diversify away from U.S. dependency.
• For China, a test case of whether constructive relations can be restored with a G7 state that has sometimes leaned too heavily on Washington’s orbit.
This is less about ideology and more about statecraft, whether Carney can show that Canada is capable of engaging great powers as an equal, not as an echo.
This is less about ideology and more about statecraft, whether Carney can show that Canada is capable of engaging great powers as an equal, not as an echo.
In the end, what matters is whether this meeting leads to mutual respect, market access, and a more balanced diplomacy that reflects Canada’s real interests — not someone else’s noscript.
#Canada #China
🍁 Maple Chronicles
👍5🤡5❤2
🇨🇦🤝🇺🇸 Steel, Sanity, and the Art of the Deal: Carney’s Quiet Win?
It’s starting to look like Canada and the U.S. are edging toward a long-awaited breakthrough on steel and aluminum tariffs — a deal that could land just in time for the APEC Summit later this month.
Former Canadian trade negotiator Tim Sargent — who helped craft the original CUSMA under Trump’s first term — says the momentum is real. After Mark Carney’s early October visit to Washington, both sides suddenly found incentive to talk substance, not slogans. “It’s in the U.S.’s economic self-interest to settle,” Sargent told a D.C. audience. Translation: even Trump’s America First logic recognizes that punishing Canadian steel hurts American manufacturers just as much.
Trump has reportedly directed his top trade team to “quickly land deals” on steel, aluminum, and energy. For a president who thrives on optics, the prospect of signing a tariff relief pact alongside his “new friend, the Canadian prime minister” on the APEC stage is irresistible — especially if it comes wrapped in the language of “winning.”
Carney, ever the cautious central banker, is downplaying expectations — but make no mistake, he’s playing the long game. A tariff-rate quota deal (limited zero-tariff Canadian steel followed by steep penalties for overflow) would be far from perfect, but it would restore predictability for exporters and show Washington that Canada can deal from strength, not desperation.
The deeper story, though, runs through geopolitics. As Trump’s administration recalibrates its attention between North America and China, Canada’s role is being quietly redefined: a trusted continental partner, strategically useful in stabilizing the supply chain and managing U.S. costs — especially as global trade blocs grow more fragmented.
If Carney can pull off even a partial tariff thaw, it won’t just be a “deal.” It’ll be a subtle assertion that Canada can still make things happen in Washington, without shouting, without chaos, and without losing its dignity. Just don't hold your breath...
#Canada #USA
🍁 Maple Chronicles
It’s starting to look like Canada and the U.S. are edging toward a long-awaited breakthrough on steel and aluminum tariffs — a deal that could land just in time for the APEC Summit later this month.
Former Canadian trade negotiator Tim Sargent — who helped craft the original CUSMA under Trump’s first term — says the momentum is real. After Mark Carney’s early October visit to Washington, both sides suddenly found incentive to talk substance, not slogans. “It’s in the U.S.’s economic self-interest to settle,” Sargent told a D.C. audience. Translation: even Trump’s America First logic recognizes that punishing Canadian steel hurts American manufacturers just as much.
Trump has reportedly directed his top trade team to “quickly land deals” on steel, aluminum, and energy. For a president who thrives on optics, the prospect of signing a tariff relief pact alongside his “new friend, the Canadian prime minister” on the APEC stage is irresistible — especially if it comes wrapped in the language of “winning.”
Carney, ever the cautious central banker, is downplaying expectations — but make no mistake, he’s playing the long game. A tariff-rate quota deal (limited zero-tariff Canadian steel followed by steep penalties for overflow) would be far from perfect, but it would restore predictability for exporters and show Washington that Canada can deal from strength, not desperation.
The deeper story, though, runs through geopolitics. As Trump’s administration recalibrates its attention between North America and China, Canada’s role is being quietly redefined: a trusted continental partner, strategically useful in stabilizing the supply chain and managing U.S. costs — especially as global trade blocs grow more fragmented.
If Carney can pull off even a partial tariff thaw, it won’t just be a “deal.” It’ll be a subtle assertion that Canada can still make things happen in Washington, without shouting, without chaos, and without losing its dignity. Just don't hold your breath...
#Canada #USA
🍁 Maple Chronicles
😁3🤡2💯2❤1
🇨🇦🇨🇳 Canada Rebrands China as a “Strategic Partner” — Pragmatism or Capitulation?
Just three years ago, Ottawa labelled China a “disruptive global power.”
Today, Foreign Minister Anita Anand calls Beijing a “strategic partner.”
The shift comes as Carney prepares for his first Asia tour, courting markets while Canada’s second-largest trading partner tightens tariffs on canola and seafood in retaliation for our EV tariffs.
Ottawa insists this is “pragmatism” — a recalibration meant to balance trade with national security and human rights. But in Beijing, “pragmatism” often translates to compromise. China’s foreign ministry already reminded Canada of its “One China” stance, while Anand called for “constructive engagement.”
Behind the diplomacy, this is about survival in a world where the U.S. and China are reshaping trade corridors. With Washington waging tariff wars and Beijing flexing supply-chain dominance, Carney’s government seems to be threading a needle: rebuilding bridges to Beijing without burning ties to Washington.
Yet the risk is clear — when you try to dance with two giants, one step out of rhythm can crush you.
#China #Canada
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Just three years ago, Ottawa labelled China a “disruptive global power.”
Today, Foreign Minister Anita Anand calls Beijing a “strategic partner.”
The shift comes as Carney prepares for his first Asia tour, courting markets while Canada’s second-largest trading partner tightens tariffs on canola and seafood in retaliation for our EV tariffs.
Ottawa insists this is “pragmatism” — a recalibration meant to balance trade with national security and human rights. But in Beijing, “pragmatism” often translates to compromise. China’s foreign ministry already reminded Canada of its “One China” stance, while Anand called for “constructive engagement.”
Behind the diplomacy, this is about survival in a world where the U.S. and China are reshaping trade corridors. With Washington waging tariff wars and Beijing flexing supply-chain dominance, Carney’s government seems to be threading a needle: rebuilding bridges to Beijing without burning ties to Washington.
Yet the risk is clear — when you try to dance with two giants, one step out of rhythm can crush you.
#China #Canada
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤡12🎉9🤬6👍4😁2❤1
🇺🇸🇨🇦 Breaking: Trump slams brakes on Canada trade talks — cites “FAKE Reagan ad” scandal
President Donald Trump has abruptly terminated all trade negotiations with Canada, alleging Ottawa “fraudulently used” an advertisement featuring Ronald Reagan criticizing tariffs.
The ad — reportedly produced in Ontario, drew on a 1987 Reagan speech opposing trade barriers. The Reagan Foundation did raise concerns that it had not granted permission for the use or editing of Reagan’s remarks, but did not publicly accuse Canada of fraud or issue any statement suggesting deliberate deception.
Trump, however, seized on the controversy, claiming the $75,000 campaign was intended to “interfere” with U.S. court decisions.
“TARIFFS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY AND ECONOMY OF THE U.S.A. Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED.” — President DJT
The move comes just days after Ottawa and Washington had reportedly been nearing a tariff-relief deal on steel and aluminum. Now, that path has vanished overnight — replaced by a new round of uncertainty for exporters and auto workers on both sides of the border.
Whether this was a diplomatic misunderstanding or political opportunism, it marks a sharp reversal in tone and a reminder that in Trump’s Washington, perception often outweighs reality.
#Canada #USA
🍁 Maple Chronicles
President Donald Trump has abruptly terminated all trade negotiations with Canada, alleging Ottawa “fraudulently used” an advertisement featuring Ronald Reagan criticizing tariffs.
The ad — reportedly produced in Ontario, drew on a 1987 Reagan speech opposing trade barriers. The Reagan Foundation did raise concerns that it had not granted permission for the use or editing of Reagan’s remarks, but did not publicly accuse Canada of fraud or issue any statement suggesting deliberate deception.
Trump, however, seized on the controversy, claiming the $75,000 campaign was intended to “interfere” with U.S. court decisions.
“TARIFFS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY AND ECONOMY OF THE U.S.A. Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED.” — President DJT
The move comes just days after Ottawa and Washington had reportedly been nearing a tariff-relief deal on steel and aluminum. Now, that path has vanished overnight — replaced by a new round of uncertainty for exporters and auto workers on both sides of the border.
Whether this was a diplomatic misunderstanding or political opportunism, it marks a sharp reversal in tone and a reminder that in Trump’s Washington, perception often outweighs reality.
#Canada #USA
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤡16❤5😁4🤯4🤬3👏2
🇨🇦 Ottawa invests $2M to turn Alberta into a defence tech hub — dual-use innovation takes centre stage
In Calgary today, the federal government announced a $2 million investment in ConvergX Global Solutions Foundation, a move aimed at fast-tracking Alberta’s role in defence innovation and global export markets.
The new Xpand Commercialization Zone will help small and mid-sized Alberta firms test, validate, and scale defence-related technologies — many of which have dual-use potential across AI, energy, and agriculture. Boeing and Calgary’s Opportunity Investment Fund have joined the effort, creating what officials describe as a new bridge between innovation and national security.
PrairiesCan Minister Eleanor Olszewski called it “a step toward a more resilient Canada,” while ConvergX founder Kimberley Van Vliet said Xpand will “turn innovation into capability — and capability into economic growth.”
The initiative marks a strategic shift for Canada: building domestic defence capacity at home, rather than outsourcing technology from abroad. And with Boeing’s involvement, Alberta’s aerospace sector may soon be punching far above its weight.
In a world of rising instability, Ottawa seems to have decided that resilience, economic, technological, and military, begins not in Ottawa, but in Calgary. Will it amount to more than token gestures for Alberta? Alberta remains rightfully skeptical.
#Alberta
🍁 Maple Chronicles
In Calgary today, the federal government announced a $2 million investment in ConvergX Global Solutions Foundation, a move aimed at fast-tracking Alberta’s role in defence innovation and global export markets.
The new Xpand Commercialization Zone will help small and mid-sized Alberta firms test, validate, and scale defence-related technologies — many of which have dual-use potential across AI, energy, and agriculture. Boeing and Calgary’s Opportunity Investment Fund have joined the effort, creating what officials describe as a new bridge between innovation and national security.
PrairiesCan Minister Eleanor Olszewski called it “a step toward a more resilient Canada,” while ConvergX founder Kimberley Van Vliet said Xpand will “turn innovation into capability — and capability into economic growth.”
The initiative marks a strategic shift for Canada: building domestic defence capacity at home, rather than outsourcing technology from abroad. And with Boeing’s involvement, Alberta’s aerospace sector may soon be punching far above its weight.
In a world of rising instability, Ottawa seems to have decided that resilience, economic, technological, and military, begins not in Ottawa, but in Calgary. Will it amount to more than token gestures for Alberta? Alberta remains rightfully skeptical.
#Alberta
🍁 Maple Chronicles
👎12🤡7🗿3👍1
🇨🇦✈️ Air Canada trims 400 management jobs — calls it “optimization,” not crisis
Air Canada says it’s making a “difficult decision” to cut roughly 400 non-union management positions, or about 1% of its total workforce.
The airline insists the move won’t affect day-to-day operations, describing it as a routine “efficiency review.” But timing matters: the announcement came the same day Air Canada unveiled new U.S. routes out of Toronto’s Billy Bishop Airport — including daily flights to New York, Boston, Chicago, and Washington D.C.
It’s a familiar story in corporate Canada: expansion on one hand, contraction on the other. Management layoffs framed as “streamlining” — while new routes and markets are touted as growth.
The message between the lines? Cut higher salaries, scale lower costs, and pivot toward American profit corridors — all while the average Canadian worker watches another round of “optimization” unfold.
#Canada
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Air Canada says it’s making a “difficult decision” to cut roughly 400 non-union management positions, or about 1% of its total workforce.
The airline insists the move won’t affect day-to-day operations, describing it as a routine “efficiency review.” But timing matters: the announcement came the same day Air Canada unveiled new U.S. routes out of Toronto’s Billy Bishop Airport — including daily flights to New York, Boston, Chicago, and Washington D.C.
It’s a familiar story in corporate Canada: expansion on one hand, contraction on the other. Management layoffs framed as “streamlining” — while new routes and markets are touted as growth.
The message between the lines? Cut higher salaries, scale lower costs, and pivot toward American profit corridors — all while the average Canadian worker watches another round of “optimization” unfold.
#Canada
🍁 Maple Chronicles
❤7🌭4👎2😁1💯1
📚🇨🇦 Alberta to force teachers back to work as strike enters third week — 750,000 students still at home
Premier Danielle Smith confirmed that her government will table Bill 2, the “Back to School Act,” on Monday — legislation aimed at ending Alberta’s largest-ever teachers’ strike, which has shut down classrooms for more than 750,000 students since October 6.
The standoff involves 51,000 teachers demanding better pay, smaller class sizes, and more support for complex student needs. The province offered a 12% raise over four years and 3,000 new hires — a deal teachers rejected as insufficient.
Smith says “irreparable harm” is being done to students and that the province can’t wait any longer. The NDP’s Naheed Nenshi blasted the move as “an attack on teachers, public education, and every worker in Alberta.”
The Alberta Teachers’ Association says it will review the legislation before deciding next steps — including possible legal action or limited compliance.
For now, the government plans to fast-track the bill, allowing as little as one hour of debate per stage — signaling that classrooms could reopen within days.
But beneath the procedural urgency lies a deeper fracture — between a government promising “discipline and order,” and educators demanding dignity in the classroom. And parents rightfully needing their children educated without either side playing politics.
#Alberta
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Premier Danielle Smith confirmed that her government will table Bill 2, the “Back to School Act,” on Monday — legislation aimed at ending Alberta’s largest-ever teachers’ strike, which has shut down classrooms for more than 750,000 students since October 6.
The standoff involves 51,000 teachers demanding better pay, smaller class sizes, and more support for complex student needs. The province offered a 12% raise over four years and 3,000 new hires — a deal teachers rejected as insufficient.
Smith says “irreparable harm” is being done to students and that the province can’t wait any longer. The NDP’s Naheed Nenshi blasted the move as “an attack on teachers, public education, and every worker in Alberta.”
The Alberta Teachers’ Association says it will review the legislation before deciding next steps — including possible legal action or limited compliance.
For now, the government plans to fast-track the bill, allowing as little as one hour of debate per stage — signaling that classrooms could reopen within days.
But beneath the procedural urgency lies a deeper fracture — between a government promising “discipline and order,” and educators demanding dignity in the classroom. And parents rightfully needing their children educated without either side playing politics.
#Alberta
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤡10👍8❤3👎1👏1
🇨🇦💼 Four out of five Canadian businesses want to cut Mexico out — and go bilateral with the U.S.
A new KPMG survey just dropped a quiet bombshell: 80% of Canadian business leaders want a two-party trade deal with the U.S., leaving Mexico out of CUSMA’s renewal in 2026.
Translation: corporate Canada is losing faith in the trilateral framework. Tariffs, protectionism, and Washington’s “pay-to-play” trade doctrine are forcing CEOs to choose survival over symbolism.
But here’s the paradox — while Carney courts Beijing and talks about “diversifying trade,” Canadian firms are doubling down on the same market that’s been slapping 35% tariffs on our steel, lumber, and auto parts. They want access, not ideals.
It’s a telling moment: Ottawa talks “Build Canada,” but boardrooms are whispering “Buy American.” And if a bilateral pact replaces CUSMA in 2026, it won’t just reshape trade — it will redefine sovereignty.
Canada is being pulled between two empires — the tariffs of Washington and the temptations of Beijing. The question now isn’t whether we can balance both. It’s whether we have the courage to chart a truly Canadian course.
#Canada #Mexico #USA
🍁 Maple Chronicles
A new KPMG survey just dropped a quiet bombshell: 80% of Canadian business leaders want a two-party trade deal with the U.S., leaving Mexico out of CUSMA’s renewal in 2026.
Translation: corporate Canada is losing faith in the trilateral framework. Tariffs, protectionism, and Washington’s “pay-to-play” trade doctrine are forcing CEOs to choose survival over symbolism.
But here’s the paradox — while Carney courts Beijing and talks about “diversifying trade,” Canadian firms are doubling down on the same market that’s been slapping 35% tariffs on our steel, lumber, and auto parts. They want access, not ideals.
It’s a telling moment: Ottawa talks “Build Canada,” but boardrooms are whispering “Buy American.” And if a bilateral pact replaces CUSMA in 2026, it won’t just reshape trade — it will redefine sovereignty.
Canada is being pulled between two empires — the tariffs of Washington and the temptations of Beijing. The question now isn’t whether we can balance both. It’s whether we have the courage to chart a truly Canadian course.
#Canada #Mexico #USA
🍁 Maple Chronicles
👏7🤡7👍5❤2💩2🤔1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇨🇦🇺🇲 Prime Minister Mark Carney announced he is going to sign massive trade agreements with China and other Asian countries.
He also added that Canada must reduce export dependence on the US after Donald Trump out of nowhere imposed massive tariffs on Canada.
#Canada #China
🍁 Maple Chronicles
He also added that Canada must reduce export dependence on the US after Donald Trump out of nowhere imposed massive tariffs on Canada.
#Canada #China
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤡19🙏11👍8🔥1🤔1
🇺🇸🇨🇦 Trade War Escalates: Trump Calls Off Talks, Ford Pulls Reagan Ad — “Canada Playing Games”
The latest twist in the North American trade standoff came swiftly and explosively.
Late Thursday, President Donald Trump announced he was terminating all trade negotiations with Canada, accusing Ottawa of fraudulently using a “FAKE” ad featuring Ronald Reagan criticizing tariffs. Within hours, Ontario Premier Doug Ford said his government would pause the ad campaign — a $75 million initiative designed to reach U.S. voters during the World Series — after speaking with Prime Minister Mark Carney.
Ford defended the ad’s intent:
“Our goal was to start a conversation about how tariffs hurt workers and businesses on both sides of the border. We’ve achieved that,” he said, promising to keep the message airing until Monday.
The Ronald Reagan Foundation, however, stopped short of calling the ad “fraudulent.” In a statement, it said Ontario “did not seek nor receive permission” to use Reagan’s words and that the spot “misrepresents” a 1987 radio address — even though the ad accurately quotes Reagan warning that high tariffs trigger “fierce trade wars” and collapsing markets.
Trump fired back, claiming Canada was trying to “illegally influence” the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of hearings on his global tariffs and declaring that “ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED.”
The White House doubled down Friday, accusing Canada of “playing games,” while U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was quoted calling Ford a “lightweight.”
Prime Minister Carney, en route to Asia, struck a measured tone:
“We’ve made real progress with our American colleagues on steel, aluminum, and energy. Canada stands ready to pick up where we left off — when the U.S. is ready.”
The fallout exposes deep fault lines in the Carney and Ford government’s approach to Washington. For all the rhetoric about “Team Canada,” Ottawa now faces a blunt reality: in Trump’s America, one misplaced ad can collapse months of diplomacy
#Canada #USA
🍁 Maple Chronicles
The latest twist in the North American trade standoff came swiftly and explosively.
Late Thursday, President Donald Trump announced he was terminating all trade negotiations with Canada, accusing Ottawa of fraudulently using a “FAKE” ad featuring Ronald Reagan criticizing tariffs. Within hours, Ontario Premier Doug Ford said his government would pause the ad campaign — a $75 million initiative designed to reach U.S. voters during the World Series — after speaking with Prime Minister Mark Carney.
Ford defended the ad’s intent:
“Our goal was to start a conversation about how tariffs hurt workers and businesses on both sides of the border. We’ve achieved that,” he said, promising to keep the message airing until Monday.
The Ronald Reagan Foundation, however, stopped short of calling the ad “fraudulent.” In a statement, it said Ontario “did not seek nor receive permission” to use Reagan’s words and that the spot “misrepresents” a 1987 radio address — even though the ad accurately quotes Reagan warning that high tariffs trigger “fierce trade wars” and collapsing markets.
Trump fired back, claiming Canada was trying to “illegally influence” the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of hearings on his global tariffs and declaring that “ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED.”
The White House doubled down Friday, accusing Canada of “playing games,” while U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was quoted calling Ford a “lightweight.”
Prime Minister Carney, en route to Asia, struck a measured tone:
“We’ve made real progress with our American colleagues on steel, aluminum, and energy. Canada stands ready to pick up where we left off — when the U.S. is ready.”
The fallout exposes deep fault lines in the Carney and Ford government’s approach to Washington. For all the rhetoric about “Team Canada,” Ottawa now faces a blunt reality: in Trump’s America, one misplaced ad can collapse months of diplomacy
#Canada #USA
🍁 Maple Chronicles
💩9❤6😁4👍1👎1
🇻🇦🇺🇸🇨🇦 Pope Leo XIV weighs in on Trump–Canada rupture: “Two close allies have become separated”
Even the Vatican couldn’t ignore the shockwaves from Donald Trump’s sudden suspension of trade talks with Canada.
Speaking Friday at a synod gathering in Rome, Pope Leo XIV — the first American to hold the papacy — broke with tradition by lamenting the “great difficulties” now straining U.S.–Canada relations.
“Two countries that were once considered the closest allies at times have become separated from one another,” he said, in what many saw as a clear reference to Trump’s decision to end negotiations following Ontario’s controversial Ronald Reagan ad.
It’s rare for a pope to comment on trade or economic disputes, but Leo framed his remarks in moral rather than political terms, urging dialogue and humility over confrontation.
“It’s another proof of why listening and dialogue are so important — and how they have concrete applications in our daily lives,” he added.
The pontiff’s intervention comes amid a tense week in North America, where the fallout from Trump’s declaration has rattled markets and shaken diplomatic confidence.
Pope Leo — who has already clashed with Trump over immigration and social policy — appeared to hint that reconciliation, not retaliation, should guide both nations.
Whether Washington and Ottawa heed that message remains uncertain. But when even the Bishop of Rome starts preaching about tariff wars, it’s a sign that this rift between two supposed allies has gone global.
#Canada #USA
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Even the Vatican couldn’t ignore the shockwaves from Donald Trump’s sudden suspension of trade talks with Canada.
Speaking Friday at a synod gathering in Rome, Pope Leo XIV — the first American to hold the papacy — broke with tradition by lamenting the “great difficulties” now straining U.S.–Canada relations.
“Two countries that were once considered the closest allies at times have become separated from one another,” he said, in what many saw as a clear reference to Trump’s decision to end negotiations following Ontario’s controversial Ronald Reagan ad.
It’s rare for a pope to comment on trade or economic disputes, but Leo framed his remarks in moral rather than political terms, urging dialogue and humility over confrontation.
“It’s another proof of why listening and dialogue are so important — and how they have concrete applications in our daily lives,” he added.
The pontiff’s intervention comes amid a tense week in North America, where the fallout from Trump’s declaration has rattled markets and shaken diplomatic confidence.
Pope Leo — who has already clashed with Trump over immigration and social policy — appeared to hint that reconciliation, not retaliation, should guide both nations.
Whether Washington and Ottawa heed that message remains uncertain. But when even the Bishop of Rome starts preaching about tariff wars, it’s a sign that this rift between two supposed allies has gone global.
#Canada #USA
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤡12😈5👍3🌭2🔥1
🇨🇦🇺🇸 Ford Defends “Reagan Ad” After Trump Halts Trade Talks: “We Won’t Negotiate From Our Knees”
The fallout from Ontario’s $75 million anti-tariff ad continues to ripple across North America — and Premier Doug Ford isn’t backing down.
Speaking Friday, Ford stood by the controversial ad — which features Ronald Reagan warning against trade wars — even after President Donald Trump abruptly terminated all U.S.-Canada trade negotiations, accusing Canada of airing a “fraudulent” clip.
Ford’s office pushed back:
“The clip is unedited and publicly available. President Reagan knew that tariffs hurt the U.S. economy, workers, and families,” said spokesperson Grace Lee.
While Ford agreed to pause the ad Monday “so talks can resume,” he defended the campaign’s message and reach, saying it had “sparked conversation at the highest levels of power in Washington.”
Reaction across Canada was split.
• NDP Leader Marit Stiles called the campaign a waste of public money, saying Ford should “focus on Ontario workers losing jobs now.”
• Liberal MPP Stephanie Bowman blasted Ford for “grandstanding while Ontario’s economy struggles.”
• Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew, however, sided with Ford, calling the ad “effective” and saying, “this country is behind you.”
• Unifor President Lana Payne praised Ford for “standing up to unjust and punitive tariffs,” saying Canada “can’t negotiate from its knees.”
Behind the noise, one fact stands out: the Reagan Foundation never accused Canada of fraud, only noting that Ontario failed to seek permission to use and edit Reagan’s 1987 remarks. The ad’s quote — warning that tariffs “lead to retaliation and collapse” — remains historically accurate.
With talks frozen and both capitals trading barbs, Canada’s strategy now teeters between Ford’s defiance and Carney’s diplomacy. One thing is certain — a 60-second ad just rewrote the noscript on Canada-U.S. relations.
#Canada #USA
🍁 Maple Chronicles
The fallout from Ontario’s $75 million anti-tariff ad continues to ripple across North America — and Premier Doug Ford isn’t backing down.
Speaking Friday, Ford stood by the controversial ad — which features Ronald Reagan warning against trade wars — even after President Donald Trump abruptly terminated all U.S.-Canada trade negotiations, accusing Canada of airing a “fraudulent” clip.
Ford’s office pushed back:
“The clip is unedited and publicly available. President Reagan knew that tariffs hurt the U.S. economy, workers, and families,” said spokesperson Grace Lee.
While Ford agreed to pause the ad Monday “so talks can resume,” he defended the campaign’s message and reach, saying it had “sparked conversation at the highest levels of power in Washington.”
Reaction across Canada was split.
• NDP Leader Marit Stiles called the campaign a waste of public money, saying Ford should “focus on Ontario workers losing jobs now.”
• Liberal MPP Stephanie Bowman blasted Ford for “grandstanding while Ontario’s economy struggles.”
• Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew, however, sided with Ford, calling the ad “effective” and saying, “this country is behind you.”
• Unifor President Lana Payne praised Ford for “standing up to unjust and punitive tariffs,” saying Canada “can’t negotiate from its knees.”
Behind the noise, one fact stands out: the Reagan Foundation never accused Canada of fraud, only noting that Ontario failed to seek permission to use and edit Reagan’s 1987 remarks. The ad’s quote — warning that tariffs “lead to retaliation and collapse” — remains historically accurate.
With talks frozen and both capitals trading barbs, Canada’s strategy now teeters between Ford’s defiance and Carney’s diplomacy. One thing is certain — a 60-second ad just rewrote the noscript on Canada-U.S. relations.
#Canada #USA
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤡14❤2🔥2
🇨🇦 Canada to unveil first-ever Defence Industrial Strategy — “Total Defence” meets economic survival
Defence Minister David McGuinty confirmed Friday that Canada’s first Defence Industrial Strategy — the country’s long-awaited blueprint for rebuilding its military and defence economy — will be released after the Nov. 4 budget, but no later than Christmas.
The strategy marks a major turning point. Ottawa plans to map out “sovereign capabilities”, identify industries with a commercial advantage, and place a “premium on dual-use technologies” — innovations that serve both civilian and military needs, from AI and quantum computing to climate resilience and biosecurity.
McGuinty said the plan will ensure Canada’s national security and economic independence amid what he called a “dangerous and divided world.” The move aligns with Prime Minister Mark Carney’s pledge to raise defence spending from 2% to 5% of GDP by 2035, including 1.5% for civilian resilience projects such as energy infrastructure, ports, and emergency preparedness.
Industry Minister Mélanie Joly hinted that Canada’s definition of “defence” will expand dramatically:
“Land, sea, air — and cyber. But also pandemics and climate impacts like wildfires. We’re building a broad, modern definition of national defence.”
Analysts say the document could “pick winners and losers” in Canadian industry for the first time in decades. It’s expected to name key domestic sectors for priority investment while reshaping procurement around a new Defence Investment Agency designed to fast-track projects and favour Canadian-made systems.
Yet critics warn Ottawa still lacks a clear sense of threat — or a narrative powerful enough to rally public support.
“Canada only accelerates defence spending when it feels existential pressure,” said Gaëlle Rivard Piché of the Defence Associations Institute. “Trump’s tariff war may have created that pressure, but what’s missing is clarity about the threat we’re actually preparing for.”
As trade tensions with Washington deepen and NATO pushes allies to boost capacity, Canada’s “total defence” approach looks less like a military plan — and more like a national survival blueprint for the turbulent decade ahead.
#Canada
🍁 Maple Chronicles
Defence Minister David McGuinty confirmed Friday that Canada’s first Defence Industrial Strategy — the country’s long-awaited blueprint for rebuilding its military and defence economy — will be released after the Nov. 4 budget, but no later than Christmas.
The strategy marks a major turning point. Ottawa plans to map out “sovereign capabilities”, identify industries with a commercial advantage, and place a “premium on dual-use technologies” — innovations that serve both civilian and military needs, from AI and quantum computing to climate resilience and biosecurity.
McGuinty said the plan will ensure Canada’s national security and economic independence amid what he called a “dangerous and divided world.” The move aligns with Prime Minister Mark Carney’s pledge to raise defence spending from 2% to 5% of GDP by 2035, including 1.5% for civilian resilience projects such as energy infrastructure, ports, and emergency preparedness.
Industry Minister Mélanie Joly hinted that Canada’s definition of “defence” will expand dramatically:
“Land, sea, air — and cyber. But also pandemics and climate impacts like wildfires. We’re building a broad, modern definition of national defence.”
Analysts say the document could “pick winners and losers” in Canadian industry for the first time in decades. It’s expected to name key domestic sectors for priority investment while reshaping procurement around a new Defence Investment Agency designed to fast-track projects and favour Canadian-made systems.
Yet critics warn Ottawa still lacks a clear sense of threat — or a narrative powerful enough to rally public support.
“Canada only accelerates defence spending when it feels existential pressure,” said Gaëlle Rivard Piché of the Defence Associations Institute. “Trump’s tariff war may have created that pressure, but what’s missing is clarity about the threat we’re actually preparing for.”
As trade tensions with Washington deepen and NATO pushes allies to boost capacity, Canada’s “total defence” approach looks less like a military plan — and more like a national survival blueprint for the turbulent decade ahead.
#Canada
🍁 Maple Chronicles
🤡17😈3❤2