🇨🇦 Canada Accused of Fueling Sudan’s Genocide Through UAE Arms Exports

A bombshell release from Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME) is calling on Ottawa to immediately halt all arms exports to the UAE, after Canadian-made armoured vehicles were discovered in the hands of Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) — a paramilitary group accused of committing genocide in El Fasher, where more than 2,000 civilians were massacred.

The UAE — one of the largest buyers of Canadian weapons — is alleged to be illicitly supplying arms to the RSF, including drones and armoured vehicles. UN experts have deemed these accusations “credible.” Among the most shocking discoveries: armoured vehicles produced by Canada’s Streit Group, based in the UAE, were found deployed by RSF fighters during the siege of El Fasher.

CJPME argues Canada’s $7 million in weapons exports to the UAE last year may have been diverted in violation of the Export and Import Permits Act, demanding that Ottawa investigate and suspend all military sales pending review.

The group also warns that Canadian-made weapons could be reaching Sudan through the so-called “U.S. Loophole,” where arms exported to the U.S. can be re-shipped abroad without Canadian oversight. CJPME is urging Parliament to adopt Bill C-233 (“No More Loopholes Act”) to end this practice and ensure all exports via the U.S. are properly tracked.

Canada once claimed a moral high ground on human rights. Today, it risks complicity in one of the world’s worst atrocities.

#Canada #Sudan #UAE

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦🇺🇸 Trump Claims Carney Apologized for Ontario’s Reagan Ad — Ottawa Stays Silent

In the latest twist of the Canada–U.S. trade rift, President Donald Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that Prime Minister Mark Carney personally apologized for Ontario’s anti-tariff ad featuring Ronald Reagan’s 1987 radio address.

“I have a very good relationship with Carney — I like him a lot,” Trump said. “But what they did was wrong. He was very nice. He apologized for what they did with the commercial.” Trump again called the ad “false,” insisting, “Ronald Reagan loved tariffs.”

The Prime Minister’s Office has not confirmed whether an apology was made. The ad — approved by Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s government — used Reagan’s own words condemning tariffs, a move that infuriated Trump and the Reagan Presidential Foundation, prompting him to terminate trade talks with Canada earlier this month.

Ford said Carney and his chief of staff, Marc-André Blanchard, were aware of the ad before it aired in the U.S., and only paused the campaign after it aired again during the World Series.

At this week’s APEC summit, Trump and Carney reportedly shared a “great dinner” and a “very good personal relationship,” but beneath the polite smiles, the tension over tariffs and trade politics clearly lingers.

#Canada #USA

🍁 Maple Chronicles

⛏️🇨🇦 Canada Declares Critical Minerals a National Security Priority — Finally Playing the Long Game

In a landmark shift, Canada has officially classified critical minerals as a national security priority under the Defence Production Act, empowering Ottawa to guarantee price floors and long-term purchasing agreements for domestic producers — a direct bid to counter China’s near-total dominance of global mineral supply chains.

The move, unveiled at the G7 Energy and Environment Ministers’ meeting in Toronto, commits $6.4 billion toward 26 mining projects across the country — from Nouveau Monde Graphite’s Matawinie mine near Montreal to Rio Tinto’s scandium facility and Torngat Metals’ Strange Lake rare earths project. The initiative will establish a “buyers club” among G7 nations to lock in stable prices and secure strategic supply lines.

Energy Minister Tim Hodgson framed it as a matter of economic survival:

“We need certainty of demand and certainty of pricing so that these mines and processing facilities can get built.”

For decades, Beijing cornered the market, controlling over 70% of refining capacity for 19 of 20 critical minerals used in everything from EV batteries to fighter jets. With this step, Canada is finally acknowledging what realists have long known — resource security is national security.

Industry voices say this could ignite a new mining renaissance if backed by real follow-through. But the stakes are geopolitical: whoever controls graphite, lithium, nickel, and rare earths controls the next century’s industrial base.

#Canada

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦🇨🇳 China Proposes Tripling Trade with Canada as Carney–Xi Meeting Marks a “Turning Point”

Beijing is signaling a thaw. After Prime Minister Mark Carney’s first face-to-face meeting with President Xi Jinping since 2017, Chinese Ambassador Wang Di told CTV that Canada and China should aim not just to double, but “triple” bilateral trade if market conditions allow.

“If both sides have enough compatibilities and competitive products, why not make this trade triple?” Wang said.

The timing is notable. Carney has vowed to double Canada’s non-U.S. exports within a decade as Washington flirts with new tariffs, and Ottawa seeks fresh markets for agriculture, minerals, and tech. Total trade with China reached $118.7 billion in 2024, with only $30 billion of that in Canadian exports.

The leaders’ 39-minute meeting on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea tackled outstanding disputes—from canola and seafood tariffs to EV import restrictions—and Carney called it “a turning point… long overdue.” Both sides agreed to accelerate talks to “resolve outstanding trade issues,” with Carney accepting Xi’s invitation to visit China.

Still, caution runs deep. China has hinted it will lift its 100 per cent tariff on Canadian canola only if Ottawa scraps its EV tariffs, a move opposed by Ontario’s Doug Ford and federal Conservatives. Saskatchewan and Manitoba, meanwhile, are urging relief for farmers.

Wang insists tariffs “don’t represent the whole relationship,” framing the broader picture as one of strategic re-engagement. Whether this “turning point” leads to meaningful results—or another diplomatic false dawn—will depend on how far Ottawa is willing to lean east as Washington grows more unpredictable.

#Canada #China

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦 Ottawa Quietly Prepares for Mass Mobilization — Canadian Military Eyes 400,000 Reserve Force

A leaked Defence Mobilization Plan (DMP) directive signed by Chief of Defence Staff Gen. Jennie Carignan and Deputy Minister Stefanie Beck reveals a staggering ambition: expanding Canada’s reserve forces from 28,000 to 400,000.

A new “tiger team” housed at DND’s Carling Campus has been tasked with drafting the legal, logistical, and societal framework for what officials call a “Whole of Society” mobilization — meaning all Canadians could be called upon to contribute in a national emergency, from natural disasters to large-scale war.

“In order to assure the defence of Canada against domestic threats ranging from low-intensity disaster response to high-intensity combat operations, the DMP will empower a timely and scalable response,” the directive states.

The plan’s scale dwarfs anything seen since WWII. Officials are studying Finland’s connoscription-based model, which maintains a large citizen reserve. Ottawa is consulting allies and weighing legislative changes to enable a wartime-style surge of volunteers and supplementary reservists — including retirees who could be recalled.

The timing raises eyebrows. Auditor General Karen Hogan just reported that the Canadian Forces can’t even meet current recruitment needs, struggling to fill skilled positions due to backlogs and limited training capacity. Yet behind the scenes, the military is sketching out a mobilization blueprint that assumes a dramatically altered global threat environment.

Some officers have warned openly that the West could face war with China or Russia by 2030, suggesting the mobilization plan is less about hypothetical readiness — and more about quietly preparing for that scenario.

#Canada

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦⚛️ Canada’s Nuclear Crossroads: Sovereignty or Subordination?

With global electricity demand set to surge 25% by 2030, Ottawa now faces a defining question: will Canada assert nuclear sovereignty—or quietly become a junior partner in America’s atomic supply chain?

This week’s $80B Cameco–Brookfield–Westinghouse deal with the U.S. cements Canada’s uranium in American-built reactors under Washington’s energy umbrella. Pair that with Ottawa’s adoption of U.S.-origin Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)—which require enriched uranium that Canada doesn’t produce—and the pattern is clear: Canada mines the fuel, but others control the flame.

“Do we want to spend those billions within Canada’s economy, or run with U.S. technology and abandon national benefit?” asks Chris Keefer, President of Canadians for Nuclear Energy.

While Energy Minister Tim Hodgson and industry allies celebrate a “nuclear renaissance,” critics warn that Ottawa is trading long-term energy independence for short-term political optics. CANDU reactors, Canada’s homegrown technology, run on unenriched uranium—free from foreign supply chains. But instead of revitalizing it, the government is burying a proven sovereign design in favor of imported systems tied to U.S. enrichment and policy swings.

As uranium prices soar nearly 30% this year, driven by the AI-driven power boom and the West’s effort to decouple from Russian supply, Canada’s leverage has never been stronger. Yet decisions in Ottawa suggest a drift toward vassal status in the emerging nuclear order, where Japan provides financing, Washington controls the tech, and Canada provides the raw material.

Without a domestic enrichment industry, and with mounting red tape throttling new reactor approvals, Canada risks being left with the mines—but not the mastery.

#Canada

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦 Carney Draws Battle Lines: “This Is Not a Game” — Budget Vote Could Trigger Snap Election

At the close of the APEC summit in South Korea, Prime Minister Mark Carney sent an unmistakable signal: if opposition parties sink his first federal budget next week, he’s ready to face voters.

“I am 100% confident this is the right budget for the country — at this moment,” Carney said. “This is not a game. It’s a critical moment for our country.”

The fiscal plan — pitched as a “generational investment” in infrastructure, clean energy, and national renewal — would also restructure federal finances and, according to Carney, bring Canada’s operating account back into balance within three years.

But that optimism masks a political knife fight waiting to happen. The Conservatives demand scrapping the carbon tax and capping deficits below $42 billion. The NDP, meanwhile, balks at Carney’s proposed 7.5% program cuts next year, rising to 15% by 2028, even as defence spending climbs.

If either opposition party votes down the budget, the result is automatic — a new national election barely six months after the last one.

Adding intrigue, Carney also confirmed he personally apologized to Donald Trump for Ontario’s anti-tariff ad that derailed trade talks — a tacit admission that foreign policy turbulence could shadow his economic agenda.

As the budget lands Tuesday, Carney is betting his credibility — and perhaps his premiership — on one gamble: that Canadians are ready for tough medicine, long-term investment, and a leader who dares to call the moment what it is.

“This is not a game,” he said. “This is history in motion.”

#Canada

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦✈️ Bombardier–Saab Alliance Could Bring Fighter Jet Production Back Home

In a move that could redefine Canada’s aerospace industry — and shake up its defence alignment — Bombardier has confirmed it’s in active talks with Sweden’s Saab AB to co-produce the Gripen multirole fighter jet in Canada.

The discussions, first reported by The Globe and Mail, come as Ottawa reviews its $19B F-35 deal with the U.S., a review ordered by Prime Minister Mark Carney amid his broader push to diversify defence procurement and reduce dependence on American suppliers.

“We confirm discussions with Saab about the Gripen,” said Bombardier’s Mark Masluch. “We’re open to providing local expertise if the government decides to go this route.”

A senior federal source confirmed that a joint venture (JV) between the two aerospace giants is being worked out — one that could see thousands of high-skill jobs created at Bombardier’s facilities in Toronto (Pearson) or Dorval, Quebec, or even at a new dedicated site.

For Saab, production capacity is becoming critical: with Ukraine signing a letter of intent to buy up to 150 Gripen-E jets and multiple nations eyeing the model as an F-35 alternative, Sweden wants to license manufacturing abroad. Brazil’s Embraer already produces some Gripens under its 36-jet contract — and Canada could be next.

The geopolitical backdrop is unmistakable. As tensions with Washington mount over trade and procurement, a Bombardier-Saab deal would anchor Canada’s defence industry in a more multipolar framework, deepening ties with Europe’s high-tech manufacturing base while showcasing Canada’s own aerospace muscle.

The Gripen partnership could also dovetail with Saab’s existing collaboration with Bombardier on the GlobalEye surveillance aircraft — built on Bombardier’s Global 6000/6500 platform and capable of detecting threats hundreds of kilometres away.

If approved, this would mark a historic pivot: Canada moving from an F-35 client to a Gripen co-builder — from dependency to quasi industrial autonomy. If approved...don't hold your breath.

#Canada

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦 Carney Says China “Doesn’t Get It” — But Critics Ask If Ottawa Does

Prime Minister Mark Carney emerged from his long-awaited meeting with Xi Jinping declaring that Beijing “doesn’t recognize the level of concern” Canadians have about foreign interference.

That may be true — but the question hanging over Ottawa is whether Carney’s government fully grasps how deeply that interference has already eroded public trust at home.

A public inquiry earlier this year named China as the top perpetrator of political meddling in Canada, targeting democratic institutions and elections. Yet just months later, Carney is sitting down with Xi, talking about “respecting differences” and laying the groundwork for future cooperation — all while Beijing’s tariffs remain firmly in place on Canadian canola, seafood, and pork.

For all the talk of “managing issues,” Carney’s approach seems less about deterrence and more about diplomatic patience — the kind that too often turns into quiet accommodation. He calls the meeting a “turning point,” but for whom? China still holds the cards: control over key exports, leverage in supply chains, and the upper hand in tone.

Canada’s foreign interference scandal exposed a harsh reality — one that can’t be reset with smiles and photo ops. When the Prime Minister says China “doesn’t understand,” it might be worth asking if the lesson has been truly learned in Ottawa either.

#Canada #China

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦 Ambassador Bridge Owners Win Right to Trial Against Ottawa Over “Exclusive Tolls” Claim

A century-old law is about to collide with modern infrastructure.

A judge has ruled that the Canadian Transit Company (CTC) — the Michigan-based owner of the Ambassador Bridge — will get its day in court to argue that it holds exclusive toll-collection rights for the Windsor–Detroit crossing under the 1921 Canadian Transit Company Act.

The dispute centers on whether Canada’s construction of the Gordie Howe International Bridge — set to open in early 2026 — violates those historic rights. The CTC claims Ottawa owes compensation for de facto expropriation, alleging that the new publicly owned bridge infringes on its toll monopoly.

Federal lawyers sought to have the case thrown out, insisting the 1921 Act never granted exclusivity. But Justice Robert Centa disagreed, ruling that the issue “raises a genuine question requiring a trial.”

The CTC’s suit, first filed in 2012, seeks not just recognition of exclusivity but damages for “nuisance, trespass, interference with property rights, and breach of contract.”

If the CTC wins, the verdict could reshape Canada’s approach to cross-border infrastructure — setting a precedent that private, foreign-owned entities can claim compensation for competition from public projects built in the national interest.

#Canada

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦💰 Carney’s “Sacrifice” Speech: The Era of Easy Promises Is Over

Mark Carney has broken one of politics’ golden rules — he said the quiet part out loud.

In his pre-budget address, the prime minister warned Canadians that “we will have to do less of some of the things we want to do, so we can do more of what we must.” Translation: spending cuts are coming, and not just the token trims around the edges. Ottawa is bracing for $15–$20 billion in reductions — the sharpest federal contraction since Paul Martin’s mid-’90s austerity drive.

Carney is selling it as discipline, not desperation — a way to “balance the operating deficit in three years” while pouring billions into defence, infrastructure, and housing. But the word sacrifice carries weight. It means trade-offs, and it means pain. The question now is who bears it — bureaucrats, contractors, or ordinary families already battling inflation and housing costs?

The optics are brutal: a former Goldman banker turned prime minister lecturing Canadians on tightening belts while Ottawa’s own spending has ballooned for years. He’s positioning himself as the adult in the room — but for many, it feels like déjà vu: another elite asking working Canadians to pay for the system’s mismanagement.

Carney may be right that the age of easy money is ending. But if this is his opening act — austerity cloaked in moral language — then the coming budget won’t just test fiscal credibility. It will test political survival.

#Canada

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦 Budget Brinkmanship: Poilievre Holds His Fire, Carney Dares Him to Shoot

Just days before Mark Carney tables his first federal budget, the stage is set for one of the most volatile showdowns in recent Canadian history.

Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre is refusing to say whether he’ll vote down the budget — playing it cool, but clearly sharpening his knives. His demands are simple on paper, brutal in politics: keep the deficit below $42B and scrap the industrial carbon tax. Carney, meanwhile, seems ready to gamble his minority government on what he calls a “generational budget,” boasting that he’s “100% confident it’s the right one for this country.”

It’s a high-stakes standoff — one framed less as economics and more as ideology. Carney wants to restructure federal finances, rebalance spending, and redefine “good debt” in the name of national renewal. Poilievre sees that as spin for runaway deficits and bureaucratic bloat.

The NDP is hedging. The Bloc says it won’t abstain. And inside Parliament, quiet talks are already swirling about who blinks first — or who lets the government fall.

If Carney’s bet fails, Canada could face another election just six months after the last one. If it passes, the “sacrifice era” he’s been hinting at will begin in full force — with austerity cuts, defence splurges, and another round of pain dressed up as patriotism.

Canada isn’t just debating a budget. It’s testing what kind of country it still wants to be.

#Canada

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦⚓️ Ottawa Signs Defence Pact with Manila — While Still Courting Beijing

Canada just inked a Status of Visiting Forces Agreement with the Philippines — a move hailed as part of the “rules-based order” push to counter Chinese aggression in the South China Sea. But the timing couldn’t be more awkward.

Only days ago, Mark Carney spoke of “tripling trade with China” after meeting Xi Jinping. Now, Defence Minister David McGuinty is signing a pact that effectively places Canadian troops and assets inside a U.S.-led containment ring against Beijing. It’s the geopolitical equivalent of trying to date both sides in a divorce.

Officially, the agreement boosts “joint military training, intelligence-sharing, and disaster response.” In practice, it deepens Canada’s military integration into Washington’s Indo-Pacific deterrence network, expanding operations alongside the U.S., Japan, and Australia — all of whom are building fences around China’s trade arteries.

Beijing will see this not as “rules-based cooperation,” but as encirclement — especially with Canadian surveillance tech already being used to track Chinese vessels in the disputed South China Sea.

So while Ottawa publicly talks of “restoring trust” and “doubling exports to China,” its military posture says something else entirely: Canada is now playing both merchant and sentry in the same ocean — selling openness while deploying containment.

In geopolitics, that’s not balance. It’s strategic schizophrenia.

#Canada #Philippines #China

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦💸 Carney’s First Budget: Austerity Meets Ambition

Mark Carney is walking a political tightrope — one foot on fiscal restraint, the other on record spending.

On Tuesday, the prime minister unveils his first federal budget — pitched as “generational” — but it’s shaping up to be a collision between big spending and deep cuts. Ottawa plans billions for defence, infrastructure, and small nuclear reactors while carving $15–20 billion from other programs to “do less of what we want, and more of what we must.”

The deficit could double last year’s $42 billion projection, a figure Carney will defend by redefining what counts as “good debt.” His new format separates operational from capital spending — balancing the first in three years, while allowing massive borrowing for long-term investments. In practice, that means austerity at home and militarization abroad: $9 billion in new defence spending by March 2026 and a path toward 3.5 percent of GDP by 2035.

Carney calls it discipline. Critics call it doublespeak — a “sacrifice budget” where social services are trimmed while arms and infrastructure surge.

Even his allies are nervous. The NDP is warning it won’t support an austerity plan. The Bloc is hedging. If the budget falls, so does the government — just six months after the last election.

Carney wants Canadians to believe this is the price of sovereignty. But to many, it looks like the same neoliberal bargain wrapped in new language: cut domestically, spend strategically, and call it nation-building.

#Canada

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇺🇸🇨🇦 U.S. Treasury Escalates Trade Tensions — Canada Braces for Impact

The trade war drums are beating louder.

On CNN this morning, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent refused to rule out new tariffs on Canadian imports, keeping the threat of a fresh 10% levy alive after the fallout from Ontario’s controversial anti-tariff ad that used Ronald Reagan’s 1987 speech.

Bessent accused Ontario Premier Doug Ford of “sending propaganda across U.S. airwaves” — even comparing the ad to foreign election interference. The White House is reportedly furious, framing the ad as a direct political provocation.

Trump, still fuming after calling the commercial “FAKE” and “fraudulent,” broke off trade talks on Oct. 23 and has already doubled down on existing duties: 50% tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, 25% on autos, and 45%+ on softwood lumber.

Prime Minister Mark Carney confirmed he personally apologized to Trump at the APEC summit, calling the ad “not something I would have done.” But Washington isn’t backing down — and the threat of another tariff wave could crush what remains of Canada’s manufacturing base.

Canada’s last independent steelmaker, Algoma Steel, just reported a $485 million loss and a $500 million writedown directly tied to tariff costs. Industry leaders warn that any additional U.S. sanctions could spark a recession in Ontario’s industrial heartland.

The message from Washington is clear: economic sovereignty comes with a price — and right now, Canada is paying it.

#Canada #USA

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦 Cowichan Fallout: When “Reconciliation” Meets Reality

The National Post’s editorial board has dropped a bombshell — calling Canada’s reconciliation project “a disaster” after the Cowichan ruling opened the door to private property challenges based on Aboriginal noscript.

For years, Ottawa and provincial governments have written blank cheques, renamed schools, and mandated land acknowledgements. But the B.C. Supreme Court’s decision that fee-simple ownership doesn’t automatically displace Aboriginal noscript is the turning point — the moment theory collided with people’s homes, mortgages, and livelihoods.

Landowners in Richmond are now being warned their noscripts may be “compromised.” Realtors can’t move properties. Banks are hesitating on loans. This isn’t just about reconciliation — it’s about legal uncertainty infecting Canada’s property system itself.

The ruling’s logic, if upheld, could ripple nationwide. In New Brunswick, judges have already mused that the Crown might be ordered to seize private land on behalf of Indigenous groups. In Quebec, new noscript claims are expanding across entire regions.

Meanwhile, billions in settlements continue to flow — over $50 billion since 2015 alone — with more claims on the horizon, from hydro profits to treaty renegotiations. And still, no one in government dares say: where does this end?

It’s not racist to ask what a sustainable, fair reconciliation looks like. It’s rational. When “justice for history” turns into legal chaos for the present, Canada risks losing both — reconciliation and stability.

#BC #Canada

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦💸 Budget Day in Canada:

Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne says today’s federal budget will have “something positive for everyone” — even the opposition. Speaking from a Quebec boot factory where he stitched his own pair of shoes, Champagne called it “an investment budget, a generational shift, a great moment for the nation.”

But behind the optimism lies peril. Prime Minister Mark Carney’s minority government is three votes short of a majority — and if this budget fails, Canada heads into a Christmas election.

Carney insists he’s “100 percent confident” in his plan, calling it the right budget for this moment. It promises higher defence spending, housing relief, and support for industries hit by Trump’s tariffs — alongside cuts meant to tame Trudeau-era deficits.

As Champagne put it, “People are looking for change. There won’t be any surprises. People will see something in there for them.”

All eyes on Ottawa. By tonight, we’ll know whether Canada gets a new economic direction — or a new election.

#Canada

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦 Doug Ford fires back at Trump:

“I’ve never apologized to Donald Trump. Donald Trump’s trying to destroy our province, destroy our country — steal manufacturing jobs, auto jobs, steel jobs, aluminum jobs, the list keeps going on. I’ll never apologize to President Trump, and I’m going to keep fighting for the people of Ontario and the people of Canada.”

Ford says he rejected repeated requests from Prime Minister Carney to pull the now-infamous anti-tariff ad that sparked Trump’s fury. He argues the campaign — featuring Reagan’s 1987 words — reached over 12 billion impressions and stood up for Ontario’s workers.

While Carney sought to calm relations, Ford doubled down:

“No deal is better than a bad deal — and that’s what President Trump wants.”

Canada’s trade war with Washington just got personal.

#Ontario #Canada #USA

🍁 Maple Chronicles

🇨🇦📚 Canada finally cracks down — but where was this resolve when the system was being gamed?

Ottawa’s new scrutiny of Indian student visas — with rejection rates soaring to 74% — is a long-overdue correction. For years, shady recruiters and fraudulent admissions letters exploited gaps in oversight while genuine students paid the price in debt, stress, and false promises.

Cleaning house was inevitable. The integrity of Canada’s education system — and its global reputation — depends on it. But it’s fair to ask: why now? Where was this vigilance when fake colleges were issuing letters unchecked and tens of thousands were funneled into exploitation under the banner of “Study, Work, Stay”?

The policy shift is painful but necessary. Still, reform should mean building a cleaner, transparent path for legitimate students — not simply slamming the door shut after the damage is done.

#Canada #India

🍁 Maple Chronicles