For those that don't have hours a week to dedicate to research, simply looking at the positions of your enemies is a remarkably accurate way to determine the correct one.
Grindr Greg dislikes Russia because it doesn't have a bathhouse culture.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/countercurrents/1762
Grindr Greg dislikes Russia because it doesn't have a bathhouse culture.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/countercurrents/1762
😁23👍12
Forwarded from Intel Slava
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇲🇪🇷🇺 Montenegrins march under the Katyusha with a banner "Serbs in Montenegro - Russians in Ukraine" and chant Fuck NATO!
👍17😁1
Forwarded from Joel Davis (censored)
Great article on the Ukrainian-Russian political context by Andrew Joyce, a figure that all Nationalists should respect: https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2022/03/01/jewish-subtexts-in-ukraine/
How can Ukraine be a ‘Nazi’ country, goes the logic, when it has a Jewish President in Zelenskyy? To the historiographically literate, it’s obvious that, to Putin and many Russians that share his thinking, the Jewishness of this or that politician or oligarch is irrelevant to the alleged ‘Nazi’ threat facing Russia. Our western-centric background dictates that we view National Socialism and World War II primarily as an action against Jews, and therefore the rhetorical positioning of Nazism and Judaism has a singular, jarring effect. Those media commentators smugly pointing to the Jewishness of Zelenskyy are operating within this paradigm. In the Soviet Union, however, World War II/Fascism was more prominently interpreted as a reactionary capitalist, imperialist, anti-Slavic or anti-Russian affair. Although the slow creep of Holocaust memorials and associated education programs has now reached deep into Eastern Europe, World War II is still primarily remembered for its masses of Slavic, not Jewish, dead. The racial element of National Socialist ideology was acknowledged in early ‘Holocaust’ historiography in the East, but wasn’t foregrounded (even in East Germany) in the way we have become totally absorbed by in the West. When Putin therefore claims he is seeking the de-Nazification of Ukraine, he is speaking, with perfect logic, less of political parties with broad racialist or anti-Jewish ideologies than of a more specific imperialist, militaristic, and anti-Russian movement.
..it is difficult, if not impossible, for “Westerners” to form valid opinions on the moral merits of each cause, since both (Ukrainian nationalist and Russian separatist) bear some validity — this is the harsh reality of multiethnic states where the population is divided on self-assertion and self-determination.
How can Ukraine be a ‘Nazi’ country, goes the logic, when it has a Jewish President in Zelenskyy? To the historiographically literate, it’s obvious that, to Putin and many Russians that share his thinking, the Jewishness of this or that politician or oligarch is irrelevant to the alleged ‘Nazi’ threat facing Russia. Our western-centric background dictates that we view National Socialism and World War II primarily as an action against Jews, and therefore the rhetorical positioning of Nazism and Judaism has a singular, jarring effect. Those media commentators smugly pointing to the Jewishness of Zelenskyy are operating within this paradigm. In the Soviet Union, however, World War II/Fascism was more prominently interpreted as a reactionary capitalist, imperialist, anti-Slavic or anti-Russian affair. Although the slow creep of Holocaust memorials and associated education programs has now reached deep into Eastern Europe, World War II is still primarily remembered for its masses of Slavic, not Jewish, dead. The racial element of National Socialist ideology was acknowledged in early ‘Holocaust’ historiography in the East, but wasn’t foregrounded (even in East Germany) in the way we have become totally absorbed by in the West. When Putin therefore claims he is seeking the de-Nazification of Ukraine, he is speaking, with perfect logic, less of political parties with broad racialist or anti-Jewish ideologies than of a more specific imperialist, militaristic, and anti-Russian movement.
..it is difficult, if not impossible, for “Westerners” to form valid opinions on the moral merits of each cause, since both (Ukrainian nationalist and Russian separatist) bear some validity — this is the harsh reality of multiethnic states where the population is divided on self-assertion and self-determination.
👍16😁1
The culture war in Georgia runs along similar lines. The CIA back leftoid politicians and gay pride rallies, while Russia back Orthodox national socialist types.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e2UFOejcO0U
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BellumActaNews/72622
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e2UFOejcO0U
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BellumActaNews/72622
YouTube
Georgia's rave revolution - BBC News
In May this year, riot police raided the country's most popular nightclubs prompting thousands of young Georgians to rave in the streets in protest.
But the events also revealed an undercurrent - a clash between liberal youth and conservative far-right groups.…
But the events also revealed an undercurrent - a clash between liberal youth and conservative far-right groups.…
👍14🤔1
Great article detailing how Zelensky's Jewish mafia pillaged Ukraine.
https://www.occrp.org/en/the-pandora-papers/pandora-papers-reveal-offshore-holdings-of-ukrainian-president-and-his-inner-circle
https://www.occrp.org/en/the-pandora-papers/pandora-papers-reveal-offshore-holdings-of-ukrainian-president-and-his-inner-circle
OCCRP
Pandora Papers Reveal Offshore Holdings of Ukrainian President and his Inner Circle
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky rode to power on pledges to clean up the Eastern European country, but the Pandora Papers reveal he and his close circle were the beneficiaries of a network of offshore companies, including some that owned expensive…
👍13
Forwarded from Mark Collett
VIDEO: NATO is to Blame for the Conflict in the Ukraine
Whilst the mainstream media is demonising Russia and laying the blame for the current conflict at the feet of the Vladimir Putin, the truth of the matter is very different.
ODYSEE: https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6/20220303---NATO-is-to-Blame-for-the-Conflict-in-Ukraine:4
BITCHUTE: https://www.bitchute.com/video/rhXGluxFW201/
Whilst the mainstream media is demonising Russia and laying the blame for the current conflict at the feet of the Vladimir Putin, the truth of the matter is very different.
ODYSEE: https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6/20220303---NATO-is-to-Blame-for-the-Conflict-in-Ukraine:4
BITCHUTE: https://www.bitchute.com/video/rhXGluxFW201/
👍27
Forwarded from Patriotic Alternative Official
This weekend, Patriotic Alternative held our spring conference at a lovely venue in the south of England.
Six fantastic speakers addressed a sold out venue and our activists and supporters enjoyed a day of networking, followed by an evening meal. We were made to feel very welcome during our stay and the event took place without any issues.
Thank you to everybody who came. The speeches will be posted this week.
Six fantastic speakers addressed a sold out venue and our activists and supporters enjoyed a day of networking, followed by an evening meal. We were made to feel very welcome during our stay and the event took place without any issues.
Thank you to everybody who came. The speeches will be posted this week.
👍32
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The warrior caste understands his position as subjugated by the merchant caste.
👍53🔥7
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The radical feminist group FEMEN protested Putin's special operation this week in Paris. Allegedly founded to oppose prostitution by Anna Hutsol in 2008, I've only ever seen them doing topless protests against "the patriarchy". And before you ask... yes she's Jewish.
😁29👍2
The Brits that went to war with Hitler literally fought for the gay disco... And the gays will tell you as much.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/guidetokulchur/2617
https://news.1rj.ru/str/guidetokulchur/2617
👍25
Forwarded from Saint Harrison
Don’t ever let Hope Not Hate lecture you on violence (which none of us want anyway)
👍29🔥2
Harry Potter remains the Nazi mythology proxy for halfwits born after 1990.
Rowling has daddy issues and was inspired by communist Jessica Mitford (who deserted her aristocratic, fascist family to join the Spanish civil war).
https://odysee.com/@nativistconcern:0/howharrypotterbrainwashedageneration:2
Rowling has daddy issues and was inspired by communist Jessica Mitford (who deserted her aristocratic, fascist family to join the Spanish civil war).
https://odysee.com/@nativistconcern:0/howharrypotterbrainwashedageneration:2
👍20
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Pioneering homosexual adulterer, feminist, abortionist and friend of the Jews, Billie Jean King enters the fray for Zelensky's Ukraine. (Announced by the world's best financial futures trader).
🤔18👍1
Forwarded from Joel Davis (censored)
Sam Francis also isn't afraid to name the Jew, the reality of Jewish Power isn't a "conspiracy theory" - its a structural feature.
..because the new managerial elite rejects and destroys the mechanisms of the old elite that excluded other ethnic, racial, and religious groups, such groups are often able to permeate the managerial power structure and acquire levels of power unavailable to them in pre-managerial society and to advance their own interests and agendas by means of the managerial instruments of power. These ethnic forces, articulating their own strong racial, ethnic, cultural, or religious consciousness, invoke managerial liberal slogans of “equality,” “tolerance,” “diversity,” etc., to challenge traditional white dominance but increasingly aspire to cultural and political supremacy themselves, excluding whites and rejecting and dismantling the institutional fabric of their society.
Kevin MacDonald has documented in immense detail how Jewish groups seeking to advance their own ethnically based agendas have accomplished this, and since a central part of those agendas include the eradication of the historic ethnic, racial, and religious barriers and beliefs that excluded Jews and were perceived as leading to their persecution, the Jewish agenda and that of the managerial elite are in this respect perfectly congruent with each other. Indeed, so prominent have Jews become within the elite (especially its cultural sector) that it is fair to say that Jews within the managerial elite serve as the cultural vanguard of the managerial class, providing ideological justification of its structure and policies, disseminating its ideological formulas to the mass population, formulating and often implementing specific policies, and providing much of the specialized educational training essential to the transmission and perpetuation of the technocratic skills of the elite. In this respect, Jews perform a support function (in this case, a cultural and ideological one rather than tax-collecting or money-lending) for the largely non-Jewish elite similar to those they performed for various European aristocracies in the past.
Thus the emergence of “neo-conservatism” in recent decades reflects not only the Jewish interests and identities of its principal formulators and exponents but also, unlike the older conservatism of the pre-managerial elite, the interests of the managerial class as a whole in conserving the new political and cultural order that class has created but rejecting and dismantling the pre-managerial order the older conservatism sought to defend.
The managerial elite, however, also has allied with other ethnic and racial groups, most of which share its interest in eliminating white racial identity and the cultural forces that support it. Like the Jewish allies of the elite and the elite itself, these non-white groups seek to eradicate white racial identity and its institutional expression, but unlike the elite, they also often seek to promote their own racial consciousness and identity. Thus, while explicitly white racial identity is virtually forbidden and strictly punished by the managerial elite, institutions that reflect explicit nonwhite or anti-white identities are tolerated and encouraged.
In effect, the alliance between racially conscious non-white forces and the rising managerial elite in the last century represents a managerial partnership with a historical process that originally was entirely separate and different from the managerial revolution..the non-white racial forces with which it allied rejected white racial supremacy and identity in part to revolt against and overthrow (“liberate” themselves from) white domination (a phase of the racial revolution generally called by the benign label of the “civil rights movement”) but in part also to pursue their own racial power and aspirations.
..because the new managerial elite rejects and destroys the mechanisms of the old elite that excluded other ethnic, racial, and religious groups, such groups are often able to permeate the managerial power structure and acquire levels of power unavailable to them in pre-managerial society and to advance their own interests and agendas by means of the managerial instruments of power. These ethnic forces, articulating their own strong racial, ethnic, cultural, or religious consciousness, invoke managerial liberal slogans of “equality,” “tolerance,” “diversity,” etc., to challenge traditional white dominance but increasingly aspire to cultural and political supremacy themselves, excluding whites and rejecting and dismantling the institutional fabric of their society.
Kevin MacDonald has documented in immense detail how Jewish groups seeking to advance their own ethnically based agendas have accomplished this, and since a central part of those agendas include the eradication of the historic ethnic, racial, and religious barriers and beliefs that excluded Jews and were perceived as leading to their persecution, the Jewish agenda and that of the managerial elite are in this respect perfectly congruent with each other. Indeed, so prominent have Jews become within the elite (especially its cultural sector) that it is fair to say that Jews within the managerial elite serve as the cultural vanguard of the managerial class, providing ideological justification of its structure and policies, disseminating its ideological formulas to the mass population, formulating and often implementing specific policies, and providing much of the specialized educational training essential to the transmission and perpetuation of the technocratic skills of the elite. In this respect, Jews perform a support function (in this case, a cultural and ideological one rather than tax-collecting or money-lending) for the largely non-Jewish elite similar to those they performed for various European aristocracies in the past.
Thus the emergence of “neo-conservatism” in recent decades reflects not only the Jewish interests and identities of its principal formulators and exponents but also, unlike the older conservatism of the pre-managerial elite, the interests of the managerial class as a whole in conserving the new political and cultural order that class has created but rejecting and dismantling the pre-managerial order the older conservatism sought to defend.
The managerial elite, however, also has allied with other ethnic and racial groups, most of which share its interest in eliminating white racial identity and the cultural forces that support it. Like the Jewish allies of the elite and the elite itself, these non-white groups seek to eradicate white racial identity and its institutional expression, but unlike the elite, they also often seek to promote their own racial consciousness and identity. Thus, while explicitly white racial identity is virtually forbidden and strictly punished by the managerial elite, institutions that reflect explicit nonwhite or anti-white identities are tolerated and encouraged.
In effect, the alliance between racially conscious non-white forces and the rising managerial elite in the last century represents a managerial partnership with a historical process that originally was entirely separate and different from the managerial revolution..the non-white racial forces with which it allied rejected white racial supremacy and identity in part to revolt against and overthrow (“liberate” themselves from) white domination (a phase of the racial revolution generally called by the benign label of the “civil rights movement”) but in part also to pursue their own racial power and aspirations.
👍23
Forwarded from Mark Collett
FILM REVIEW – Joker
7pm UK Time, 2pm EST - LIVE STREAM
Join me, Laura Towler, Nativist and Saint Harrison in the Patriotic Alternative Film Club as we one of the most talked about films of the past few years – Joker. We analyse the meanings behind the movie and ask – is it a film made for the dissident right?
We are LIVE on Odysee, DLive, Radio Albion and Entropy:
Odysee: https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6/FILM-REVIEW---Joker:7
DLive: https://dlive.tv/LauraTowler
Radio Albion: https://www.radioalbion.com/2020/12/players.html
Entropy: https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
7pm UK Time, 2pm EST - LIVE STREAM
Join me, Laura Towler, Nativist and Saint Harrison in the Patriotic Alternative Film Club as we one of the most talked about films of the past few years – Joker. We analyse the meanings behind the movie and ask – is it a film made for the dissident right?
We are LIVE on Odysee, DLive, Radio Albion and Entropy:
Odysee: https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6/FILM-REVIEW---Joker:7
DLive: https://dlive.tv/LauraTowler
Radio Albion: https://www.radioalbion.com/2020/12/players.html
Entropy: https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
👍3🔥1