95% of Frodi's audience believe that COVID passes are part of a malevolent plot by "the technocracy". This is particularly disappointing to me because he's produced so much quality work relevant to nationalism.

The idea that the ruling liberal elite needed you to scan a few QR codes 20 years after the Patriot Act and near 100% adoption of GPS smartphones is frankly retarded and I've never used a tracing app.

This week I'll be using proof of recovery to enter an EU country because I'm unvaccinated. Does that mean Eric Schmidt and Sergey Brin of Google got me, or have they been winning since the CIA backed Alphabet in the 90s?

The real reason for such rules is that shitlibs on a power trip like Trudeau, Arden, Sturgeon, Macron love flexing how benevolent they are protecting the weak. Notice how masculine leaders like Johnson, Bolsonaro, Obrador and various Africans didn't give a shit about hundreds of thousands dying.

https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e

This has been posted many times before but obviously people need a reminder about the real "technocracy".

This page is great for geopolitics updates

There's an emerging trend of Blacks in sport suing their Jewish bosses (Terence Crawford sued Bob Arum and now Brian Flores sues Stephen Ross). You love to see it.

Cats, never relax

This comment highlights the necessity of matter of fact, structural analysis to win the battle of ideas. Frantic and cultish appeals to live in fear of an "evil" and vague "elite", based on falsehoods, is a losing strategy.

When speaking to my friend at the UK Department of Energy, never once did he mention the WEF fuel rationing conspiracy. Instead he spoke about power station decommissioning, lack of investment, pressure on the grid and reliance on Russian gas. Remember to unfollow those that reduce analysis to schizo theories.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/fyrgen/997

Read, lift, network, repeat

Rather than the schizo Chicoms/NWO take promoted by feds like Thuletide, we can rationally examine Chinese energy policy and Trudeau's comments.

China has very few natural energy resources of its own and imports oil by tanker from as far as Angola and Venezuela.

The golden ticket for China is pipelines and many speculate the US invasion of Afghanistan was as much about pipeline control through Asia as encircling Iran. These days China has signed long term deals with Russia and Iran (25 year), to secure its oil and gas supply for the long term.

While China has been coal fired maxing at home and in the Balkans in recent years, they're pivoting heavily into nuclear both domestically and also finalising a project in Argentina just this week (first announced in 2015).

However, this isn't China's first move into low carbon energy. They built the massive Three Gorges Dam in 1994, which at the time was expected to provide 10% of Chinese electricity. They moved 1.3m people from their homes to complete this.

Since government support in 2011, China has come to dominate the world's solar industry and now produces 2/3 of the world's solar panels and domestically solar farms produce 3.5% of Chinese energy.

China also leads the world in wind power, given its excellent geography for it, producing 6% of its electricity needs today, after investing since the mid 00s.

Despite this, China still produces 28% of world carbon (almost double the USA and quadruple India) and this is not slowing down. They promised the UN they'll be carbon neutral by 2060 which is about the same timeline as big oil companies give.

There is also concern over the smog produced by coal and many talented Chinese and Indian workers end up moving West for health and lifestyle reasons. When I visited China in 2008, despite their best efforts to reduce pollution, I developed asthma-like symptoms in 2 weeks.

Trudeau hints that the bold moves in low carbon are only possible in an authoritarian context and he's right. Libtard democracies are beholden to the lobbying powers of their financiers and the voter bases they can conjure, be it conservatard oil maxers or brain-dead greenies, as in Germany.

Trudeau also has consideration for the 5% ethnic Chinese voting bloc in Canada and their trading relations, when he compliments the People's Republic.

Tl;dr China needs energy and invests in all classes of fossil and low carbon, domestically and abroad, whether they're IPCC believers or not. UN believer Trudeau laments his inability to pivot as radically as he would like within libtard democracy. His authoritarian flair, to achieve what he considers moral goods, is very congruent with his other policies like vaccine mandates and ending racism.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/MorgothsReview/2336

Very interesting analysis on the Ukraine situation: https://nationalinterest.org/feature/why-washington-has-lost-its-mind-over-ukraine-200513

Very difficult to find a narrative that makes sense on this. This one I summarize as..

The US made plans to help Kyiv retake the Donbas from Russian separatists, the Russians responded by moving their military to the border, the Americans realized the Russians would smoke them if they tried anything. So, the Americans now want the Ukrainians to accept Russian terms because it it knows it's in a position of weakness, but doesn't want to admit this openly in order to maintain face, negotiating leverage and the moral high ground. So the solution they came up with was to create a psyop that the Russians were about to invade in order to pressure Ukraine to accept Russian terms and then frame it as being under the duress of an immanent Russian invasion.

To quote from the article:

"After telling Biden to chill on the invasion-mongering, he taunted the administration at a press conference: “Tell us openly we will never get into NATO.” Zelensky had heard loud and clear the Washington message, as recalibrated by Biden in December: Accept an offer from Moscow? Politically impossible, morally reprehensible. Prepare to fight them? Are you mad?"

.."The United States now vehemently denies that there was any idea of retaking the Donbas by force and that this is an invention of Russian propagandists. From the outside, it is impossible to know how far these plans advanced and how seriously they were taken, but to say that the Russians had no basis for thinking that something was afoot is clearly absurd."