💢 Students confront Champagne Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez over her support for Ukrainian Nazis and voting to fund the Ukrainians.

“You are the establishment - Tulsi Gabbard denounced the Democratic Party, when are you going to do the same?

You are funding a war that could kill us all. This is the ONLY thing that matters right now!”

“None of this matters if we are all dead!”

@NewResistance

❓Why did Ukrainian oligarchs fund nationalist battalions?

The clashes on the Maidan were organised by the Ukrainian authorities and oligarchs. They planned and sponsored the coup, the formation of radical nationalist battalions and the killing of civilians.

'The oligarchs were keen on personal guards. And each oligarch took patronage of a group of militants, And then, those fighter groups transformed into battalions'.

What was the result of these actions? Watch our video for the answer.

🌊Join Military Wave

Borrell is upset over the high number of abstentions on the UN anti-Russian resolution.

The head of Eurodiplomacy, Josep Borrel, said that he was concerned about the large number countries abstaining during the voting at the UN General Assembly on the anti-Russian resolution.

We should remind you that the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution condemning the referendums held by Russia.

A total of 143 countries voted for the resolution.

Five countries were against it: Belarus, North Korea, Nicaragua, Syria and Russia.

Thirty-five states, including China and India, abstained from voting.

France will not use nuclear weapons because of Ukraine.

"Our doctrine is based on the fundamental interests of the nation, and they are very clearly defined. If a nuclear missile strike was launched against Ukraine, these interests would not be called into question," Macron said.

The Elections of Eastern Ukraine - 2022.

Elections are usually defined when the people are allowed to introduce political change, reforms, or completely change the political reality of a certain situation by their votes - therefore ensuring legitimacy, because if the people say so, then let us do so.

4 regions in the Ukraine have held elections to join the Russian federation, 2 as federal subjects and 2 as people's republics, those 4 being Lugansk People's Republic, Donetsk's Reople's Republic, Kherson and Zaporozhye.

Here is something to note for honesty's sake, DPR, Kherson, and Donetsk are almost fully liberated and therefore they have the absolute majority in terms of population In their respective regions, except Zaporozhye, which has the city of it's namesake, is still under Ukrainian control and has a population of 800K, while Berdyansk and Melitopol combined don't even cross the 300K threshold, so to ensure legitimacy and let the "Ukrainian patriots" express their opinions, elections will have to be held in the Zaporozhye region again, as the Russian-controlled regions in that area don't have the public majority to what I remember.

But anyway, the elections were legitimate, they were valid, and they were expression of the people, these horror stories of soldiers with guns going to people's houses is that, horror stories, if anything Ukrainians have bombed polling stations to disrupt the process, if people there wanted to be Ukrainian, why would they shell them?

The war will go on. Zelensky and his Western patrons are pursuing their own goals. Sources in expert circles confirm that many Western partners have their own interests in the Ukrainian crisis. And believe me, they are win-win. Let's have a closer look at them:

1. The main goal is the collapse of Russia.

2. The weakening of Russia is a secondary goal.

3. In the event of Russia's victory in the war, Ukraine will be partitioned in the manner of the Yugoslav scenario where Poland will effortlessly take western Ukraine, perhaps other neighbors will also grab something on the sly, and after Russia takes what they need, all that will be left is the "core Ukraine".

4. Collapse or economic, industrial and financial weakening of the EU, namely Germany and France, as the main threat to the dominance of the dollar.

5. Strengthening of American/British military concerns.

6. Super profits of American and British gas, fuel and energy transnational corporations.

In any of these options, the Poles (the British), as the main beneficiaries of staying in the game until the last minute of the Ukrainian crisis, will walk away with the maximum profit. Moreover, they are nicely profiting from it now, having skimmed the entire Ukrainian business environment, having absorbed them; they also became a logistics hub, harnessing all their organizations to work in the Ukrainian crisis, and to accumulate as a "hub" all the money allocatd for Ukraine.

As a political plus, the EU stopped kicking Poland for its policy, and the Polish authorities were able to shift the attention of their people from internal to external matters. Poland also became an energy and fuel hub in Europe, and now has put Germany in a difficult position (the disruption of the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines and the Druzhba oil pipeline were for a reason and benefited Warsaw). The Polish goal is the collapse of the EU and the creation of their own union headed by Warsaw.

It is also important for the arms-manufacturing lobby to continue the Ukrainian crisis because they have orders accounting for billions of dollars. The arms race 2.0 has begun, a kind of hybrid cold war.

Politicians in the West benefit from the Ukrainian crisis because they can write off all the problems within their own countries. Alas, politicians do not care about the lives of common people, they pursue their own personal selfish goals.

The biggest grief in this game is allocated to the Ukrainian people who have become a hostage to the game of the big players. It is easy to blame Russia, but if we look into the cause-and-effect relationship, in fact this scenario "trap" for the Kremlin was prepared in advance, and with every step the screenwriters drew the Russians into this game. Sooner or later this scenario would come true. According to our information they were planning it for 2024, but Putin decided to get involved in the game beforehand. So he managed to partly spoil the game, but in the eyes of history he took the image hit by becoming sort of an “aggressor”.

Alas, the war will bring a lot of grief and havoc, and Ukraine will be thrown back in development considerably for decades to come. Even if the first option takes place, and Russia loses and collapses, Ukraine will be patted on the shoulder and advised: “the Moor has served his purpose, get rid of him”. Everything in the country will belong to TNCs (transnational corporations). The whole country will be loaded with loans and debt (to a point). In short, it is economic slavery. The establishment will be appointed by foreign corporations, as in Iraq and African countries for example, and we will become yet another source of raw material resources, where people will live on $1 a day.

In any of the options, Ukraine loses. There are no good scenarios for it anymore. It is Zelensky whom we must thank for that, who now gets everything he dreamed of (world fame, photos in glossy magazines, etc.), but he also understands that he is but a pawn in the game which doesn’t offer any way out for him.

Source: https://news.1rj.ru/str/legitimniy

Putin's press conference in Astana - main points:

▪️There are many threats not only on the European continent, but also in Asia
▪️ Putin considers the decision by the German authorities to implement NATO commitments at the expense of German interests to be a mistake.
▪️ The President of Turkey has already played a prominent role in a number of issues, for example on the issue of prisoner-of-war exchanges, he got involved personally, we are grateful to him for that.
▪️ They (Germans) have to decide for themselves what is more important - fulfilling their cooperation obligations or protecting their own people and national interests. Apparently they chose the first one. This is a mistake.
▪️ I do not see the need to negotiate with Biden, the issue of my trip to G20 is not fully resolved
▪️ As soon as the troops have withdrawn from Kiev - that's it, Kiev is no longer willing to negotiate
▪️ The FSB has stated that it is likely that the explosives (to blow up the Crimean bridge) were sent by sea, but it is not certain whether or not this was done by grain carriers.
▪️ If it turns out that humanitarian corridors are being used for terrorist attacks, it would call into question the grain deal
▪️ The Ukrainian language is among the state languages in Crimea on a par with Crimean Tatar and Russian... We should not be like those who started abolishing any culture
▪️ Now 222,000 people have been mobilized
▪️ The line of contact is 1,100 km - it is practically impossible to hold it with contractors and mobilisation is linked to this.
▪️ 33,000 mobilised are already in the units, 16,000 are performing combat tasks
▪️ We do not set ourselves the task of destroying Ukraine
▪️ There is no need for massive strikes, yet
▪️ A direct clash with the Russian army is a very dangerous step, which could lead to a global catastrophe

No comments)))