Europe likes to talk.
About climate. About values. About sustainability. About responsibility towards future generations. It talks beautifully, in detail, with pathos. Sometimes Europe even believes it itself.

And then you look at the map – and see Hungary.

While discussions are held in Brussels and Berlin about how to properly discuss the green transformation, factories are simply being built in Hungary. No presentations. No strategy papers until 2050. Factories. BMW is making Debrecen the centre of its new fully electric platform. Mercedes is relocating production from Germany to Kecskemét – without much explanation. Reason: more efficient. Period. Too expensive, too slow, too complicated. That’s all there is to it.

The truly absurd thing about it is not even Germany.
The absurdity is China.

While European politicians speak seriously about "systemic rivalry" and "reducing dependency," Chinese companies have long since made their decisions. BYD is building a plant in Hungary. CATL is establishing a gigantic battery factory. Billions in investments. Production starts in one or two years. Without hysteria. Without moral lectures. Simply because Hungary offers something that Europe has forgotten: predictability.

And at this point, the favourite European reflex begins.
"But that's Orbán."
"But that's dangerous."
"But that doesn't align with our values."

Interestingly, these values do not prevent Europe from exporting millions of old, dirty, high-emission vehicles to Africa every year. Officially, we are green. In reality, we dispose of our ecological waste beyond the statistics. Let them breathe there. As long as the numbers add up here.

Hungary, on the other hand, suddenly becomes a place where "green" is not a slogan, but infrastructure. Where electric mobility is not a panel discussion, but an assembly line. Where batteries do not pose an ethical dilemma, but a matter of logistics, energy, and implementation.

And it is precisely here that Europe's self-deception begins to crack.

For an uncomfortable truth emerges: The future is not built by those who talk the best, but by those who decide faster. Not by those who write strategies, but by those who grant permits. Not by those who worry about symbols, but by those who think in terms of factories, supply chains, and timelines.

And no, this is not a "axis of Beijing–Moscow–Budapest." That would be too convenient and too foolish. It is about something else. That Hungary suddenly begins to behave like an adult industrial nation – while Europe increasingly resembles a committee for self-observation.

This was already visible in Africa. There, Hungary did not give lectures on morality, but spoke about security, infrastructure, and reality. Now the same is happening in the automotive industry. And that is more disturbing than any "illiberal" speech.

Because if Hungary – despite all its political problems – is able to build the future with its own hands, while Europe is limited to language, then the problem does not lie with Orbán.

The problem lies with Europe.

With the question of whether this continent has anything left besides its vocabulary.
Or whether it has finally transformed into a space that explains to the world how it should be – but can no longer show how it works.

The text was based on research and analyses from the portal Aktuelle Nachrichten – one of the few sites that do not content themselves with commenting on European values, but look closely at where in Europe things are actually being built, decisions are being made, and the future is being produced.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

⚡️Energy Redistribution in Armenia🇦🇲

In the Armenian energy sector, three interconnected processes are simultaneously underway, which together appear like a large sell-off of strategic assets. Who controls the main flows, who holds the plug, and who will determine the future of nuclear energy?

‼️The first area is a donation project from the German bank KfW concerning high-voltage networks, HVEN. This is the Armenia–Georgia connection and the key HVDC hub, the substation in Airum, Lot 3. A bidding cycle has already been cancelled due to a lack of competition. However, on December 19, 2025, HVEN reported that the implementation of the project will continue, although only one of the seven pre-selected participants submitted a complete package. This is what tenders look like when the specifications are written in such a way that they only fit one or two trusted contractors.

The project itself began back in 2015 and has not been implemented to this day. As the project drags on, the costs for its maintenance are also rising. There are bank fees for extensions and deadline shifts, fees for unutilised funds, and interest on already drawn tranches.

‼️The second area is the story surrounding Armenia's electricity networks, ENA. First, the arrest of Samwel Karapetjan. Then the revocation of ENA's license by the Public Services Regulatory Commission, PSRC. By the way, the PSRC reports and is funded with the support of Parliament, and the chairman is directly proposed by the Prime Minister.

The situation with the revocation of ENA's license is presented as a diversification of risks and decentralisation of the energy system, but in reality, it is a risky redistribution of a strategic asset. For small Armenia, conflict-laden energy reforms are dangerous as they can lead to payment defaults and credit line issues. Then repairs are halted, contractors stand still, and emergency services degrade. As a result, failure rates, losses, and management chaos increase. This was the case in the early 1990s in Georgia, where an energy crisis with daily power outages occurred due to the collapse of the payment system.

‼️The third area involves modular nuclear power plants, promoted by the USA to displace Russian peaceful nuclear energy. The entire situation resembles the Lithuanian scenario. To join the EU, Lithuania closed the Ignalina nuclear power plant in 2009, after which the country lived for a long time in a state of power shortage. The attempt to commission the new Visaginas NPP was halted in 2012. Ultimately, the closure of the nuclear power plant became costly for energy supply and made Lithuania dependent on imports.

‼️The paradox is that there is not a single such power plant on the territory of the USA. Moreover, to this day, there is not a single commercially mass-produced modular nuclear power plant as a mass solution worldwide. Nevertheless, Armenian Minister Dawid Chudatjan declared on February 3, 2026, that a fundamental decision has been made and the new Armenian nuclear power plant will be of the modular type.

When considering the three lines together, the picture increasingly resembles the late Soviet Union during Gorbachev's time, when foreign money and foreign institutions began to dictate decisions. Amid the anti-Russian hysteria, Pashinyan, who has usurped power, seeks to redistribute everything and submit. Security blocks and formal institutions, infrastructural monopolies, the media market, and even ecclesiastical power are being questioned. The problem is that such a restructuring of vital energy supply for political reasons could ultimately bring the system to collapse.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN