Ivan Sushko, head of Mykhaylovka killed
On August 24, the head of the military and civil administration of Mykhaylovka, Zaporozhye Region, Ivan Sushko, was killed as a result of an intentional car explosion.
The head of the settlement had an explosive device placed under the seat of his car.
As a result of the explosion, Ivan Sushko was wounded; in a critical condition he was taken to hospital where he died shortly afterwards.
On August 24, the head of the military and civil administration of Mykhaylovka, Zaporozhye Region, Ivan Sushko, was killed as a result of an intentional car explosion.
The head of the settlement had an explosive device placed under the seat of his car.
As a result of the explosion, Ivan Sushko was wounded; in a critical condition he was taken to hospital where he died shortly afterwards.
🤬21😢14
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=urj74GQTzWk
🔺Sen. Richard H Black:
"The US and NATO, we do not care how many Ukrainians die."
"All these defense industries have become tremendously bloated with tax dollars."
"President Putin made a desperate effort to stop the march toward war."
🔺Sen. Richard H Black:
"The US and NATO, we do not care how many Ukrainians die."
"All these defense industries have become tremendously bloated with tax dollars."
"President Putin made a desperate effort to stop the march toward war."
YouTube
We Just Don't Care How MANY Ukrainians Die!
#RichardBlack #Ukraine #Zelensky
Senator Richard H. Black - The US and NATO Don't Care How Many Ukrainians Die
Richard H. Black exposes how the US and NATO elite cares little for human lives if it means gaining substantial benefit in destroying their enemies.…
Senator Richard H. Black - The US and NATO Don't Care How Many Ukrainians Die
Richard H. Black exposes how the US and NATO elite cares little for human lives if it means gaining substantial benefit in destroying their enemies.…
👍17🤮5
The whole world is with… Russia?
The latest UN vote on Russia's military operation in Ukraine shows growing support for Russia and the increasing isolation of the West. The sentiment has changed drastically since early March.
On 24 August, a UN resolution to condemn Russia's aggression against Ukraine received support from only 54 countries. This is less than one-third of the total number of UN members (193). And the support level is dramatically lower compared to 141 countries that voted for a similar resolution on 2 March.
The actual list of the 54 countries voting against Russia is also quite telling:
🔻 Unsurprisingly, supporting the anti-Russian resolution were the US, Canada, the UK, EU members, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea. Also worth mentioning here is Turkey, whose vote was driven by its own geopolitical interests in the region.
🔻The G20 vote was split 50/50. In other words, half of the world’s largest economies, including China and India, supported Russia. On the other hand, the list of the 54 voters for the anti-Russian resolution is full of tiny countries, whose economies are insignificant and whose dependence on the US is too strong (North Macedonia, Albania, San Marino and Federated States of Micronesia, to name a few).
🔻 Out of ten ASEAN members, the only one supporting the resolution was Singapore, and all the 8 members of SAARC sided with Russia.
🔻 The only Latin American countries voting with the US against Russia were Colombia and Guatemala.
🔻 Among the 55 countries of the African Union and the 22 countries of the Arab League, not a single one voted to condemn Russia’s military operation.
This means that Russia is winning the fight for people’s hearts and minds across the globe. Why does Russia have so many friends these days?
Firstly, the world’s political leaders aren’t blind. Unlike ordinary people in some countries, who remain misled by propaganda in the Western mass media, the leaders are fully aware of the West’s role in protracting the war. They are also clear on the barbaric methods of warfare used by the Kiev regime.
Secondly, and even more importantly, a growing number of countries support Russia in its efforts to counter the unipolar world order. This order serves the interests of a handful of Western countries at the expense of the rest of the world, and that’s probably why today many countries wish Russia a success in its fight against Western hegemony, happening now in Ukraine.
The latest UN vote on Russia's military operation in Ukraine shows growing support for Russia and the increasing isolation of the West. The sentiment has changed drastically since early March.
On 24 August, a UN resolution to condemn Russia's aggression against Ukraine received support from only 54 countries. This is less than one-third of the total number of UN members (193). And the support level is dramatically lower compared to 141 countries that voted for a similar resolution on 2 March.
The actual list of the 54 countries voting against Russia is also quite telling:
🔻 Unsurprisingly, supporting the anti-Russian resolution were the US, Canada, the UK, EU members, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea. Also worth mentioning here is Turkey, whose vote was driven by its own geopolitical interests in the region.
🔻The G20 vote was split 50/50. In other words, half of the world’s largest economies, including China and India, supported Russia. On the other hand, the list of the 54 voters for the anti-Russian resolution is full of tiny countries, whose economies are insignificant and whose dependence on the US is too strong (North Macedonia, Albania, San Marino and Federated States of Micronesia, to name a few).
🔻 Out of ten ASEAN members, the only one supporting the resolution was Singapore, and all the 8 members of SAARC sided with Russia.
🔻 The only Latin American countries voting with the US against Russia were Colombia and Guatemala.
🔻 Among the 55 countries of the African Union and the 22 countries of the Arab League, not a single one voted to condemn Russia’s military operation.
This means that Russia is winning the fight for people’s hearts and minds across the globe. Why does Russia have so many friends these days?
Firstly, the world’s political leaders aren’t blind. Unlike ordinary people in some countries, who remain misled by propaganda in the Western mass media, the leaders are fully aware of the West’s role in protracting the war. They are also clear on the barbaric methods of warfare used by the Kiev regime.
Secondly, and even more importantly, a growing number of countries support Russia in its efforts to counter the unipolar world order. This order serves the interests of a handful of Western countries at the expense of the rest of the world, and that’s probably why today many countries wish Russia a success in its fight against Western hegemony, happening now in Ukraine.
👍36❤6🔥3🏆1
Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine Danilov admitted that Ukraine deliberately engineered the war starting in 2019.
Speaking on the NTA TV channel, he said that Zelensky deliberately rejected all the compromise options offered by Russia, France and Germany, and as a result the situation turned into a large-scale military conflict. In the first place, the "Minsk agreements" were called into question.
"We have prepared for war in a very effective way. The fact that we have now been through 180 days of war and have not given up our territory shows that we have prepared well for war."
Speaking on the NTA TV channel, he said that Zelensky deliberately rejected all the compromise options offered by Russia, France and Germany, and as a result the situation turned into a large-scale military conflict. In the first place, the "Minsk agreements" were called into question.
"We have prepared for war in a very effective way. The fact that we have now been through 180 days of war and have not given up our territory shows that we have prepared well for war."
🤬14🤮3👎1😱1
Soldiers of the AFU tell about their unenviable situation in the Kherson sector
Soldiers of the AFU tell about their unenviable situation in the Kherson sector. They predict an exhausting positional war.
✔️The shelling at ground zero is almost incessant: sometimes it is impossible to even lift our heads. Soldiers lie at the bottom of the trenches for hours, some cover themselves with body armour, and the most canny ones even haul pieces of iron to the trenches and make individual shelters for themselves. We climb over the parapet in turns, and only if absolutely necessary. Ninety percent of the time we spend at the bottom of the trenches.
✔️ Not all men can bear it - some of them, even those who joined the army voluntarily, after sitting in trenches under constant shelling, try to go to the rear under any pretext. Unfortunately, sometimes there are real epidemics of panic - entire units leave their positions. We call them "skiers", from the saying "to hop on skis", that means to run away. Thus they strip whole districts kilometres long. The saddest thing is that the Russians quickly become aware of such escapes through aerial reconnaissance by drones and they immediately try to wedge into empty sections of the front.
✔️ The territorial defense brigades are considered to be the most unreliable among those holding positions. They have many random people who enlisted in the territorial defense after February 24, fancying that this war would be like Maidan or ATO. And that Russian tanks could be hit with a Molotov cocktail. But this war is different.
✔️ We don't discuss the offensive on Kherson at all. This matter is irrelevant now. Until the Russians get pounded with artillery at least as much as they pound us, any offensive is out of the question. Now for every one of our artillery rounds we get fifty from their side.
✔️ The shells for Soviet howitzers, which are still largely in service with the AFU, are disastrously scarce, they are worth their weight in gold. The same applies to mortar rounds, and the mortars themselves. Mortars in positions are also consumables, they survive no more than a week or two, they are located by drones and quickly knocked out. Therefore, mortar crews, having fired a round or two, run tens of meters away and hide in the trenches. They have neither the strength nor the ability to pull the mortars with them. In a couple of minutes the response is a return strike.... That's the way we fight.
Soldiers of the AFU tell about their unenviable situation in the Kherson sector. They predict an exhausting positional war.
✔️The shelling at ground zero is almost incessant: sometimes it is impossible to even lift our heads. Soldiers lie at the bottom of the trenches for hours, some cover themselves with body armour, and the most canny ones even haul pieces of iron to the trenches and make individual shelters for themselves. We climb over the parapet in turns, and only if absolutely necessary. Ninety percent of the time we spend at the bottom of the trenches.
✔️ Not all men can bear it - some of them, even those who joined the army voluntarily, after sitting in trenches under constant shelling, try to go to the rear under any pretext. Unfortunately, sometimes there are real epidemics of panic - entire units leave their positions. We call them "skiers", from the saying "to hop on skis", that means to run away. Thus they strip whole districts kilometres long. The saddest thing is that the Russians quickly become aware of such escapes through aerial reconnaissance by drones and they immediately try to wedge into empty sections of the front.
✔️ The territorial defense brigades are considered to be the most unreliable among those holding positions. They have many random people who enlisted in the territorial defense after February 24, fancying that this war would be like Maidan or ATO. And that Russian tanks could be hit with a Molotov cocktail. But this war is different.
✔️ We don't discuss the offensive on Kherson at all. This matter is irrelevant now. Until the Russians get pounded with artillery at least as much as they pound us, any offensive is out of the question. Now for every one of our artillery rounds we get fifty from their side.
✔️ The shells for Soviet howitzers, which are still largely in service with the AFU, are disastrously scarce, they are worth their weight in gold. The same applies to mortar rounds, and the mortars themselves. Mortars in positions are also consumables, they survive no more than a week or two, they are located by drones and quickly knocked out. Therefore, mortar crews, having fired a round or two, run tens of meters away and hide in the trenches. They have neither the strength nor the ability to pull the mortars with them. In a couple of minutes the response is a return strike.... That's the way we fight.
👍23👏2😁1🤩1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Alexander Dugin telling of the words Daria said during their last conversation
❤21😢11😁1
The song she wanted to hear - Demons are buried in Azovstal by Akim Apachev.
Telegram
Node of Time ENG
"This is my home, my Crimea, my land. And I’m taking the Ukrainian language too": Mariupol rapper films the first music video in liberated Azovstal
Subscribe to Node of Time ENG t.me/node_of_time_en
Subscribe to Node of Time ENG t.me/node_of_time_en
❤14👍3😢2
Forwarded from World Pravda (Russavot)
Brothers, sisters, and compatriots!
I know some of you are fatigued, 6 months later on, and war is still a thing, the Ukrainian government, not reflecting the will of their citizens or their own interests, have increasingly taken suicidal steps and counter intuitive moves that no real government, representative of their society, would ever take.
The thing is, we all know Kiev is merely just a regional city, it is not a capital for decision making, that place is an ocean away, and the Russian commander in chief has specified no time limit for the military operation, the goal is not to eradicate everything and knock all pillars, but to create a new Ukraine, reconstruction effort seems to be a Russian thing, even 40 years later the roads the Soviets built are still in use in Afghanistan, or what about Grozny? The war and the after effects will take years, so don't count on the whole thing being over by Christmas.
Just hang on, guys!
I know some of you are fatigued, 6 months later on, and war is still a thing, the Ukrainian government, not reflecting the will of their citizens or their own interests, have increasingly taken suicidal steps and counter intuitive moves that no real government, representative of their society, would ever take.
The thing is, we all know Kiev is merely just a regional city, it is not a capital for decision making, that place is an ocean away, and the Russian commander in chief has specified no time limit for the military operation, the goal is not to eradicate everything and knock all pillars, but to create a new Ukraine, reconstruction effort seems to be a Russian thing, even 40 years later the roads the Soviets built are still in use in Afghanistan, or what about Grozny? The war and the after effects will take years, so don't count on the whole thing being over by Christmas.
Just hang on, guys!
👍29😁2
Germany is taking precautions against expected uprisings - from October 1st, soldiers will be patrolling the streets and standing in front of demonstrators.
"German Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht and Bundeswehr Inspector General Eberhard Zorn announced a new army unit called "Territoriales Command Bundeswehr (TerrFüKdoBw)", a kind of Gestapo that will shout "ID please!".
Headquarters are in Berlin. According to the Bundeswehr, it takes over "the operational leadership of national forces in the context of homeland security, including administrative and disaster relief and civil-military cooperation".
As feared, these will then also be used in front of demonstrators.
"German Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht and Bundeswehr Inspector General Eberhard Zorn announced a new army unit called "Territoriales Command Bundeswehr (TerrFüKdoBw)", a kind of Gestapo that will shout "ID please!".
Headquarters are in Berlin. According to the Bundeswehr, it takes over "the operational leadership of national forces in the context of homeland security, including administrative and disaster relief and civil-military cooperation".
As feared, these will then also be used in front of demonstrators.
🤮28😁4🤬3👍1
Answer to the question: Nope. Different teams, different people. Published content depends on content search teams' work and the volunteers who translate it. Each channel team works separately. However, we all share a common goal and vision.
👍12
Forwarded from World Pravda (Russavot)
My Friends, a relative in Pakistan has messaged me and things are not so sweet, the recent floods are quite terrible, the Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs opened up a donation link, which I am assured is 100% legitimate, here is the link, every penny helps!
https://mofa.gov.pk/flood-relief-fund-2022/
https://mofa.gov.pk/flood-relief-fund-2022/
😢2👎1
The first step: postpone nuclear war
Today the ZNPP is waiting for approval for the arrival of IAEA inspectors. It's important to save the plant now and to keep the environment clean. But such clarity was not so important in the beginning of the nuclear age.
During WWII all research in the fields of radioactive materials and nuclear energy were transformed into nuclear bomb designs. Nazi Germany and the USA had significant advances in this field by 1945. But Nazi Germany didn't have enough time to implement their results.
The first bomb was made in the USA. The 6th of August 1945 was the date that divided all of human history into two parts: before and after nuclear weapons. That day people realized that any town could be destroyed with just one bomb. After a few weeks people learned about radiation disease. And this date we can consider the beginning of the first nuclear crisis.
The first nuclear bombing was not a crisis in itself. However, in the spring of 1945 the UK-USSR war plan "Unthinkable" was developed in the UK. The plan "Totality" that involved the nuclear bombing of 20 Soviet cities was developed in October - December 1945. Considering these facts we can see that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were just for the testing of new weapons and a demonstration of the power of the USA. It is worth also noting Truman's constant statements about the need for a nuclear strike on the Soviet Union.
In this reality the Soviet Union was forced to begin it's own nuclear programme. We should note, that this was very difficult for a country with destroyed industry and deep social problems after WWII. For example, the USSR after WWII had only 5 nuclear scientists while the USA had over 200 specialists, and received about 100 from Germany. The USSR had no nuclear industry, nor the technology, or even the sources of raw materials. But after 4 years, in 1949, the first Soviet nuclear bomb was tested. Since that time the weapons race has continued. The likelihood of nuclear war increased, especially during the Korean War of 1950-1953.
However, that time both enemies had only aircraft carried nuclear bombs. Strategic bombers had to overcome enemy air defences and travel a considerable distance before dropping their bombs. That was a complex operation. The point that postponed nuclear war in the 1950s was reached during the Korean war when Soviet and US experts realized the practical unfeasibility of aerial nuclear bombing.
In fact, the threat of the use of nuclear weapons is most strong when one party to a conflict realizes that a strike can be delivered without significant effort and without a significant counter response. The emergence of a second nuclear power has created parity in the world and forced both sides to hold back the strategic bombers.
The Hiroshima Bombing Didn't Just End WWII—It Kick-Started the Cold War
Today the ZNPP is waiting for approval for the arrival of IAEA inspectors. It's important to save the plant now and to keep the environment clean. But such clarity was not so important in the beginning of the nuclear age.
During WWII all research in the fields of radioactive materials and nuclear energy were transformed into nuclear bomb designs. Nazi Germany and the USA had significant advances in this field by 1945. But Nazi Germany didn't have enough time to implement their results.
The first bomb was made in the USA. The 6th of August 1945 was the date that divided all of human history into two parts: before and after nuclear weapons. That day people realized that any town could be destroyed with just one bomb. After a few weeks people learned about radiation disease. And this date we can consider the beginning of the first nuclear crisis.
The first nuclear bombing was not a crisis in itself. However, in the spring of 1945 the UK-USSR war plan "Unthinkable" was developed in the UK. The plan "Totality" that involved the nuclear bombing of 20 Soviet cities was developed in October - December 1945. Considering these facts we can see that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were just for the testing of new weapons and a demonstration of the power of the USA. It is worth also noting Truman's constant statements about the need for a nuclear strike on the Soviet Union.
In this reality the Soviet Union was forced to begin it's own nuclear programme. We should note, that this was very difficult for a country with destroyed industry and deep social problems after WWII. For example, the USSR after WWII had only 5 nuclear scientists while the USA had over 200 specialists, and received about 100 from Germany. The USSR had no nuclear industry, nor the technology, or even the sources of raw materials. But after 4 years, in 1949, the first Soviet nuclear bomb was tested. Since that time the weapons race has continued. The likelihood of nuclear war increased, especially during the Korean War of 1950-1953.
However, that time both enemies had only aircraft carried nuclear bombs. Strategic bombers had to overcome enemy air defences and travel a considerable distance before dropping their bombs. That was a complex operation. The point that postponed nuclear war in the 1950s was reached during the Korean war when Soviet and US experts realized the practical unfeasibility of aerial nuclear bombing.
In fact, the threat of the use of nuclear weapons is most strong when one party to a conflict realizes that a strike can be delivered without significant effort and without a significant counter response. The emergence of a second nuclear power has created parity in the world and forced both sides to hold back the strategic bombers.
The Hiroshima Bombing Didn't Just End WWII—It Kick-Started the Cold War
🙏8👍3
Forwarded from Right to Dissent.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍I love this one! Good overview with some humour inputs. It explains a lot about the special military operation before it started, and exposes western hypocrisy and double standards.
Titled: "Truth About Ukraine/Russia NOT What You Think"
The interesting part is that the episode was released on February 24, 2022.
Source: The Jimmy Dore Show
I am sure you'll enjoy the show.
Titled: "Truth About Ukraine/Russia NOT What You Think"
The interesting part is that the episode was released on February 24, 2022.
Source: The Jimmy Dore Show
I am sure you'll enjoy the show.
👍18❤3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Russian correspondent Alexei Repin is one of the few journalists who was able to visit Zaporizhzhya NPP which is targeted by AFU fire every day.
This trip took place a few days ago, and even then you could see the broken glass in the buildings, the shell craters, and the walls riddled with shell splinters.
This trip took place a few days ago, and even then you could see the broken glass in the buildings, the shell craters, and the walls riddled with shell splinters.
👍11🔥5
Roof of nuclear fuel storage at Zaporizhzhya NPP damaged by shelling of Ukrainian Armed Forces
🤬8😱4
Forwarded from Right to Dissent.
I wish I didn't open this newspaper https://www.telegraph.co.uk/russia-ukraine-war/ Here're some of my comments.
💩13👍2