WATCH: I Read Bill Gates’ New Book (So You Don’t Have To!)
Have you read How to Prevent the Next Pandemic by Bill Gates yet? Well, I have, and let me tell you: it’s every bit as infuriating, nauseating, ridiculous, laughable and risible as you would expect. Here are the details.
Sources and shownotes for this episode, as well as download options and an audio-only version – are available here.
https://wp.me/paXmj6-lsF
Have you read How to Prevent the Next Pandemic by Bill Gates yet? Well, I have, and let me tell you: it’s every bit as infuriating, nauseating, ridiculous, laughable and risible as you would expect. Here are the details.
Sources and shownotes for this episode, as well as download options and an audio-only version – are available here.
https://wp.me/paXmj6-lsF
👍34👎2
“Genetically Edited” Food – The next stage of the Great Reset?
Kit Knightly
The Queen’s Speech was interesting this year.
For all the people outside the UK who don’t understand what the “Queens Speech” actually is, it’s a farcical state occasion in which the Queen (or, in this case, Prince Charles since her majesty is ill/secretly dead/having “mobility issues”) makes a speech about what “her government” intends to do for the next 12 months.
Of course, the Queen doesn’t actually write the speech, or have any input on its content, or have any control at all over what “her” government intends to do. She’s just a mouthpiece in a big gold hat.
It’s the UK equivalent of the State of the Union, only done in Halloween costumes made out of shiny stolen rocks…
https://wp.me/paXmj6-lsQ
Kit Knightly
The Queen’s Speech was interesting this year.
For all the people outside the UK who don’t understand what the “Queens Speech” actually is, it’s a farcical state occasion in which the Queen (or, in this case, Prince Charles since her majesty is ill/secretly dead/having “mobility issues”) makes a speech about what “her government” intends to do for the next 12 months.
Of course, the Queen doesn’t actually write the speech, or have any input on its content, or have any control at all over what “her” government intends to do. She’s just a mouthpiece in a big gold hat.
It’s the UK equivalent of the State of the Union, only done in Halloween costumes made out of shiny stolen rocks…
https://wp.me/paXmj6-lsQ
👍32🤮11🔥10😁5🤔1
Someone in our comments just called Justin Trudeau "Juste Un Trou d'Eau" ('just a water hole', or 'just a bit of water') 👏👏
😁43❤5👍4👏3
Heard of the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill?
The proposed bill (which, for some reason is not available through the parliament website) follows on from DEFRA’s announced “loosened regulation” of genetic research back in January.
To quote the National Institute of Agricultural Botany (NIAB), the legislation would “take certain precision breeding techniques out of the scope of restrictive GMO rules”.
Essentially, this would see new “gene-edited” foods as distinct from old-fashioned “genetically modified” foods, and therefore not subject to the same rules and oversight.
The claimed distinction is that gene editing, as opposed to genetic modification, doesn’t introduce DNA from other species. Therefore, in effect, is merely speeding up what could potentially naturally happen over time.
Now, you might think this is just semantics, and that such a law will just provide a loophole for ALL “genetically modified” foods to simply rebrand themselves as “genetically edited” foods, and thereby avoid regulation.
But that is disgustingly cynical and shame on you for even thinking it...
Read full article...
https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/11/gene-edited-food-the-next-stage-of-the-great-reset/
The proposed bill (which, for some reason is not available through the parliament website) follows on from DEFRA’s announced “loosened regulation” of genetic research back in January.
To quote the National Institute of Agricultural Botany (NIAB), the legislation would “take certain precision breeding techniques out of the scope of restrictive GMO rules”.
Essentially, this would see new “gene-edited” foods as distinct from old-fashioned “genetically modified” foods, and therefore not subject to the same rules and oversight.
The claimed distinction is that gene editing, as opposed to genetic modification, doesn’t introduce DNA from other species. Therefore, in effect, is merely speeding up what could potentially naturally happen over time.
Now, you might think this is just semantics, and that such a law will just provide a loophole for ALL “genetically modified” foods to simply rebrand themselves as “genetically edited” foods, and thereby avoid regulation.
But that is disgustingly cynical and shame on you for even thinking it...
Read full article...
https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/11/gene-edited-food-the-next-stage-of-the-great-reset/
👍13😁5🔥2
The OffG View: Fake binaries, fake crises, fake heroes
“The world is different, and we need to live in it as it is, rather than pretending the old rules still apply. The entire geopolitical paradigm has shifted, and we need to shift along with it.”
https://wp.me/paXmj6-lsM
“The world is different, and we need to live in it as it is, rather than pretending the old rules still apply. The entire geopolitical paradigm has shifted, and we need to shift along with it.”
https://wp.me/paXmj6-lsM
👍34🔥5👏1
NEW International Health Regulations: You have just HOURS left to make yourself heard
Back in January, the United States mission to the World Health Organisation submitted a draft proposal to the general assembly.
The proposal amends the International Health Regulations (IHR) – the legislation which empowers the WHO to act – adding new clauses and removing some old ones.
We will be breaking down the most concerning changes in another article, but it’s no exaggeration to say they represent a major threat to national sovereignty.
You can read the draft proposal here. These amendments are set to be subject to a vote at the 75th World Health Assembly, beginning on the 22nd of this month.
The US Department of Health and Human Services has thrown this process open to public consultation via a “listening session”, scheduled for 10am-12pm today.
Read full article...
https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/13/new-international-health-regulations-you-have-just-hours-left-to-make-yourself-heard/
Back in January, the United States mission to the World Health Organisation submitted a draft proposal to the general assembly.
The proposal amends the International Health Regulations (IHR) – the legislation which empowers the WHO to act – adding new clauses and removing some old ones.
We will be breaking down the most concerning changes in another article, but it’s no exaggeration to say they represent a major threat to national sovereignty.
You can read the draft proposal here. These amendments are set to be subject to a vote at the 75th World Health Assembly, beginning on the 22nd of this month.
The US Department of Health and Human Services has thrown this process open to public consultation via a “listening session”, scheduled for 10am-12pm today.
Read full article...
https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/13/new-international-health-regulations-you-have-just-hours-left-to-make-yourself-heard/
👍12🤬3👎1
Audio
“Genetically Edited” Food – The next stage of the Great Reset by Kit Knightly — AUDIO VERSION
https://wp.me/paXmj6-lsQ
https://wp.me/paXmj6-lsQ
👍9🤮5
You’ve Been Flagged as a Threat: Predictive AI Technology Puts a Target on Your Back
John W. Whitehead & Nisha Whitehead
You’ve been flagged as a threat. Before long, every household in America will be similarly flagged and assigned a threat score.
Without having ever knowingly committed a crime or been convicted of one, you and your fellow citizens have likely been assessed for behaviors the government might consider devious, dangerous or concerning; assigned a threat score based on your associations, activities and viewpoints; and catalogued in a government database according to how you should be approached by police and other government agencies based on your particular threat level.
If you’re not unnerved over the ramifications of how such a program could be used and abused, keep reading.
It’s just a matter of time before you find yourself wrongly accused...
Read full article...
https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/14/youve-been-flagged-as-a-threat-predictive-ai-technology-puts-a-target-on-your-back/
John W. Whitehead & Nisha Whitehead
You’ve been flagged as a threat. Before long, every household in America will be similarly flagged and assigned a threat score.
Without having ever knowingly committed a crime or been convicted of one, you and your fellow citizens have likely been assessed for behaviors the government might consider devious, dangerous or concerning; assigned a threat score based on your associations, activities and viewpoints; and catalogued in a government database according to how you should be approached by police and other government agencies based on your particular threat level.
If you’re not unnerved over the ramifications of how such a program could be used and abused, keep reading.
It’s just a matter of time before you find yourself wrongly accused...
Read full article...
https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/14/youve-been-flagged-as-a-threat-predictive-ai-technology-puts-a-target-on-your-back/
👍13🤬5🤔2🤮2
Audio
OffGuardian
You’ve Been Flagged as a Threat: Predictive AI Technology Puts a Target on Your Back by John W. Whitehead & Nisha Whitehead — AUDIO VERSION
https://wp.me/paXmj6-ltq
https://wp.me/paXmj6-ltq
🤬6👍4
REVIEW: To Vac or Novak That is The Question
Joanna Sharp
So what do we do on a weekend evening of the New Normal? ‘To Vac or Novak. That is the Question.’
The exhausting two years under the regime of ‘science-led’ lockdowns and other ‘health’ measures officially aimed at containing the spread, or even more ambitiously, eradicating Covid 19 (which by the standards of mainstream virology is not actually possible) has proved a physical and spiritual assault on humanity.
Here, in the UK we have now been allowed to stop wearing masks, are no longer told to test wherever we go – and the vax pressure seems to have eased.
Most on this side of the Covid propaganda divide realise this a lull before another storm. Still, it is Spring, the freedom might not last, so we must live it to the full before the next instalment of the not-so-great technocratic reset. The sun is shining, and people are out again, enjoying life in busy streets and parks…
https://wp.me/paXmj6-ltz
Joanna Sharp
So what do we do on a weekend evening of the New Normal? ‘To Vac or Novak. That is the Question.’
The exhausting two years under the regime of ‘science-led’ lockdowns and other ‘health’ measures officially aimed at containing the spread, or even more ambitiously, eradicating Covid 19 (which by the standards of mainstream virology is not actually possible) has proved a physical and spiritual assault on humanity.
Here, in the UK we have now been allowed to stop wearing masks, are no longer told to test wherever we go – and the vax pressure seems to have eased.
Most on this side of the Covid propaganda divide realise this a lull before another storm. Still, it is Spring, the freedom might not last, so we must live it to the full before the next instalment of the not-so-great technocratic reset. The sun is shining, and people are out again, enjoying life in busy streets and parks…
https://wp.me/paXmj6-ltz
👍21🤔3
Forwarded from Keep It Cash
Do you live in a town or city where they have closed cashpoints and banks down? Or worse, do you now have no cashpoint at all?
Tell us about it here....
If so why not start your own petition and campaign locally to keep your bank and cashpoint open.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1601044/cashless-society-warning-news-high-street-atm-machines-disappearing/amp
Tell us about it here....
If so why not start your own petition and campaign locally to keep your bank and cashpoint open.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1601044/cashless-society-warning-news-high-street-atm-machines-disappearing/amp
Express.co.uk
Death of cash warning as number of high street cash machines plummets
A CASHLESS SOCIETY warning has been issued as the number of ATMs on the high street plummets.
👍9
This Week in the New Normal #30
Our successor to This Week in the Guardian, This Week in the New Normal is our weekly chart of the progress of autocracy, authoritarianism and economic restructuring around the world.
💢1. CALIFORNIA LAW ALLOWS 12 YEAR OLDS TO BE VACCINATED…WITHOUT PARENTAL CONSENT...
💢2. "THE GOLDEN AGE OF CHEAP FOOD IS OVER”...
💢3. “WE NEED STATE ACTION TO CHALLENGE HATE SPEECH”...
All this and more current globalist insanity here...
https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/15/this-week-in-the-new-normal-30/
Our successor to This Week in the Guardian, This Week in the New Normal is our weekly chart of the progress of autocracy, authoritarianism and economic restructuring around the world.
💢1. CALIFORNIA LAW ALLOWS 12 YEAR OLDS TO BE VACCINATED…WITHOUT PARENTAL CONSENT...
💢2. "THE GOLDEN AGE OF CHEAP FOOD IS OVER”...
💢3. “WE NEED STATE ACTION TO CHALLENGE HATE SPEECH”...
All this and more current globalist insanity here...
https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/15/this-week-in-the-new-normal-30/
👍18🤬7👎1
THE FUNCTION OF THE FAKE BINARY
"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum — even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there’s free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate..." - Chomsky
This remains true despite the increasingly obvious fact that Chomsky himself is part of that function.
What he's describing is the "fake binary". The imposition of the idea that Viewpoint A is the official approved narrative and that Viewpoint B is therefore its antithesis.
Points C through Z can therefore be ignored.
The fact hidden in plain sight being that both Viewpoint A and Viewpoint B actually reinforce the overarching narrative being sold and both lead to the same place.
It's an incredibly effective management tool.
A fake binary allows you to not just manipulate the conformist Normies who automatically obey, but also those who consider themselves to be 'anti-establishment', contrarians or 'rebels'.
How are fake binaries created? They are often initially introduced by the following methods...
💢Using the legacy media to widely publicize Viewpoint B while appearing to deny, refute or ridicule it.
💢 "Leaking" allegedly confidential documents that "expose" Viewpoint B as the "hidden truth". This is usually done through the legacy media, though it's more effective if you can seed it through the indy media sector.
💢 Creating entities that are tagged as "anti-establishment" but given a mass following, and feeding them Viewpoint B material.
Once Viewpoint B becomes a dominant "anti-establishment" view you can afford to sit back and allow the oppositional instinct in human nature to do your work for you, and reinforce the fake binary you created without the slightest awareness this is what is happening.
It becomes widely understood that the only solution to the obvious and real evils of Viewpoint A is Viewpoint B.
The fact Viewpoint B actually concedes all the same falsehoods contained in Viewpoint A remains unnoticed and anyone pointing this out tends to be attacked by both sides.
Fake binaries are a godsend to the opinion-managers.
We'll be talking more about this in the near future...
"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum — even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there’s free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate..." - Chomsky
This remains true despite the increasingly obvious fact that Chomsky himself is part of that function.
What he's describing is the "fake binary". The imposition of the idea that Viewpoint A is the official approved narrative and that Viewpoint B is therefore its antithesis.
Points C through Z can therefore be ignored.
The fact hidden in plain sight being that both Viewpoint A and Viewpoint B actually reinforce the overarching narrative being sold and both lead to the same place.
It's an incredibly effective management tool.
A fake binary allows you to not just manipulate the conformist Normies who automatically obey, but also those who consider themselves to be 'anti-establishment', contrarians or 'rebels'.
How are fake binaries created? They are often initially introduced by the following methods...
💢Using the legacy media to widely publicize Viewpoint B while appearing to deny, refute or ridicule it.
💢 "Leaking" allegedly confidential documents that "expose" Viewpoint B as the "hidden truth". This is usually done through the legacy media, though it's more effective if you can seed it through the indy media sector.
💢 Creating entities that are tagged as "anti-establishment" but given a mass following, and feeding them Viewpoint B material.
Once Viewpoint B becomes a dominant "anti-establishment" view you can afford to sit back and allow the oppositional instinct in human nature to do your work for you, and reinforce the fake binary you created without the slightest awareness this is what is happening.
It becomes widely understood that the only solution to the obvious and real evils of Viewpoint A is Viewpoint B.
The fact Viewpoint B actually concedes all the same falsehoods contained in Viewpoint A remains unnoticed and anyone pointing this out tends to be attacked by both sides.
Fake binaries are a godsend to the opinion-managers.
We'll be talking more about this in the near future...
👍70❤10👎1🔥1😁1
Guys come on. This is very naive. Look at the wording of this petition -- "Do not sign any WHO pandemic treaty UNLESS IT IS APPROVED VIA PUBLIC REFERENDUM".
So, instead of just signing up to world government we ask the politicians to rig a referendum first and THEN sign up to world government?
Let's be clear - the only petition worth signing is one that calls for this toxic Pandemic Treaty to be flushed into the sewage system instantly and forever.
No equivocations. No maybes. No "let's talk about it first".
It needs to be rejected. 100%. Anything else is just a longer route to the same destination.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/614335
So, instead of just signing up to world government we ask the politicians to rig a referendum first and THEN sign up to world government?
Let's be clear - the only petition worth signing is one that calls for this toxic Pandemic Treaty to be flushed into the sewage system instantly and forever.
No equivocations. No maybes. No "let's talk about it first".
It needs to be rejected. 100%. Anything else is just a longer route to the same destination.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/614335
Petitions - UK Government and Parliament
Petition: Do not sign any WHO Pandemic Treaty unless it is approved via public referendum
We want the Government to commit to not signing any international treaty on pandemic prevention and preparedness established by the World Health Organization (WHO), unless this is approved through a public referendum.
👍63🤬3🥰2
Forwarded from Suzanne
IHR_amendments_letter_and_cover_email_plus_instructions_for_sending.docx
19.3 KB
URGENT CALL TO ACTION
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS, DUE TO BE DISCUSSED THIS WEEKEND AT THE 75TH WORLD HEALTH ALLIANCE, AFFECT YOU AND YOUR COUNTRY – ACT NOW!
Please contact your MP to express your deep concern about the proposed amendments using the templates below. Please follow the instructions carefully.
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS, DUE TO BE DISCUSSED THIS WEEKEND AT THE 75TH WORLD HEALTH ALLIANCE, AFFECT YOU AND YOUR COUNTRY – ACT NOW!
Please contact your MP to express your deep concern about the proposed amendments using the templates below. Please follow the instructions carefully.
👍12👏1
BIG PHARMA-FUNDED PAPER RECOMMENDS TAXING THE UNVACCINATED
A new paper published by Oxford University’s Center for Business Taxation discusses – and in the end supports – the idea of a special tax levied on those who decline to be “vaccinated” against “Covid19”.
The paper’s authors argue that a vaccine-related tax would be “justified” because “Taxes on behaviour that is considered undesirable are nothing new“.
And that even if the “vaccines” do cause serious harm to some people…
“some states do adopt policies that can lead to serious harm in exceptional cases when they consider that the benefits outweigh the costs“
Yes, you did read that right.
They go on to suggest all sorts of ways of correcting this “undesirable behaviour”, from straight taxation to tax credits for those who have been vaccinated, to vaccine mandates and compulsory Covid insurance for the unvaccinated (which is just another way of saying “taxation”).
Read the full article...
A new paper published by Oxford University’s Center for Business Taxation discusses – and in the end supports – the idea of a special tax levied on those who decline to be “vaccinated” against “Covid19”.
The paper’s authors argue that a vaccine-related tax would be “justified” because “Taxes on behaviour that is considered undesirable are nothing new“.
And that even if the “vaccines” do cause serious harm to some people…
“some states do adopt policies that can lead to serious harm in exceptional cases when they consider that the benefits outweigh the costs“
Yes, you did read that right.
They go on to suggest all sorts of ways of correcting this “undesirable behaviour”, from straight taxation to tax credits for those who have been vaccinated, to vaccine mandates and compulsory Covid insurance for the unvaccinated (which is just another way of saying “taxation”).
Read the full article...
🤬37👍14🤮12👎1