NEW BOT Телеграм, страница

71 views🇺🇦YoutubeDL, 01:21

http://padrak.com/ine/RS_REF9.html

...

For a much more current model, than LeSage, of a sink-source interpretation of
gravity, see O.C. Hilgenberg's "Gravitation, Tromben, und Wellen in bewegten
Medien" (1931), GieSmann & Bartsch. It's in German. It's in the National Union
Catalogue. If you don't read German, then Carl Frederick Krafft's "Ether and
Matter" (1945), Dietz Printing Co., contains some portions translated from
Hilgenberg's work. Hilgenberg developed a quantum numbering system of the
atoms based upon Krafft's ether-vortex atom model, ennoscriptd "Quantenzahlen,
Wirbelring-Atommodelle und Heliumsechserring- Aufbauprinzip des
Periodensystems der chemischen Elemente" Which means roughly: A Quantum
Number, Vortex Atom model and Hexagonal-ring construction principle of the
periodic system of the chemical elements. Krafft saw the quantization of
energy as a logical consequence of a system of particles consisting of,
basically, pumps, which could take in and give out energy and ether/space at
limited rates, based on rotations of the various rings.

In his model, as opposed to LeSage's, the flux terminates in what he called
equipotential zones, much as one would see if two jets of water were to
collide coaxially. So, the intake of two bodies "squirting" out ether, will be
on the back sides of both bodies, and hence, they are pushed together. LeSage
saw each body acting as sheilds to the ultramundane particles racing in all
directions in space (cosmic rays forseen in the 18th century!) Thus the two
bodies move into each others 'shadow'.

Louis Kevran's work on low energy transmutations of the elements was predicted
by Krafft's model. And there was a man named Nemos who claimed to have
developed a television type microscope not limited by the optical paths of
standard microscopes, and I have a photo he took which shows, it is claimed,
the nucleous of an iron atom, as a collection of vortices arranged
peripherally (non-coaxially). It's like looking down on pearl-like smoke rings
connected by vibrating jets. It's an amazing photo(?) Krafft's prediction was
that the proton and electron would be double vortex structures, and the
neutron a triple vortex structure. The picture seems to confirm that. So much
for my two bits. The work of Krafft is not heavily laden with math. The beauty
of it to me is it can be visualized. (Note: Nemo's "microscope" may be based
on the technology very recently
developed which is known as magnetic microscopy.)

I have a neat little book written by Carl Krafft, back in the 30s. He was an
avid developer of an ether-vortex theory of atomic and gravitational forces.
His theory was underpinned by the writings of O.C. Hilgenberg and Hermanne
Fricke of Germany, pre-Nazi. Hilgenberg's views included a vertical ether sink
as the cause of gravity, and the consequent development of mass in the
enterior of the earth. Hence the earth expanded over time, with periodic
explosive expansions and contractions. Meanwhile, Krafft developed the idea of
combining vortices in face to face rolling contact, which provides four basic
forms: single vortice=neutrino; double vortice, with rolling contact drawing
ether into the periphery-proton; with rolling contact into the poles-electron;
then the neutron which is three vortices combining forming a neutral,
polarizeable particle drawing ether into one end, out the sides, in the sides
out the other end. Krafft's books were all self published.
-- Roger Cathey
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

👍1

286 viewsned, 09:40