Orgone Channel Telegram – Telegram
Orgone Channel Telegram
554 subscribers
662 photos
772 videos
498 files
1.69K links
Orgone Channel Telegram
—Exploring classicists succeeding WR and avant garde succeeding JD.
Download Telegram
Orgone Channel Telegram
[The Sun is NOT a Plasma - Don't Parrot!](https://news.1rj.ru/str/orgonecontinuum/2405) 15:03 freeze frame and screenshot PLUG Comment Carl Frederick Krafft's liquid sun model predicted water, observing that sunspots look like splashes and remarking, in regards to…
The ultimate result will be a gigantic turbulence on the surface of the sun, such as can be observed any time, but which will leave the interior of the sun unaffected.

The cosmic rays which are drawn in by gravitational force consist mainly of subatomic particles such as protons, electrons and neutrons. If these are clusters of vortex rings which were produced in the interstellar ether by the turbulence of light and heat waves, then we have here a cyclic process which could go on indefinitely. The energy which leaves the sun and stars in the form of light and heat radiation is again returned to them in the form of cosmic ray particles, and any matter which is annihilated during this process is similarly returned from interstellar space.
Annandale, Virginia February, 1961.

NOTE: Sunspots are not caused by explosions from inside the sun because they would then be covered by huge clouds similar to the mushroom clouds of atomic explosions.
FURTHER COMMENTS:

Recent photographs taken from a high altitude balloon have shown most clearly that sunspots are definitely splashes, and a well defined splash cannot be produced in a gas but only on the surface of a liquid. The surface of the sun, except for its gaseous atmosphere, must therefore be liquid.

The darkness of sunspots has at times been attributed to large masses of condensate plunging into the hot gaseous surface of the sun and cooling the gases locally. If this were the true explanation, then it would be difficult to explain, not only the splash itself, but also the granular formation of the luminous material which has every appearance of clouds in the sun’s atmosphere. If the heat and light of the sun really does come from its interior, then it would be the spaces between the clouds which should be luminous, and not the clouds themselves. Photographs however have clearly shown that whenever adjacent clouds (luminous granules) leave tiny openings between them, the space behind them thus exposed is always relatively dark–never luminous or incandescent.

The luminosity of these cloudlike granules is probably produced by cosmic protons and neutrons drawn into the sun’s outer atmosphere by gravitational force and condensing into helium ions or atoms. We do not need to assume that such cosmic protons and neutrons are in every respect identical with the protons and neutrons that have been produced in physical laboratories, and the extreme conditions of temperature, pressure, electrification and neutron concentration that exist on the surface of the sun have never been duplicated simultaneously or even approximated artificially. Let us therefore not be so rash as to say the formation of helium in the atmosphere of the sun from cosmic protons and neutrons would be impossible.

From THE STRUCTURE OF THE ATOM by Carl Frederick Krafft, BSRF.
The Structure of the Atom

by Carl F. Krafft

Here is the theory, based on observation and astute insight, that the atom is a vortexian structure, rather than the "swarm of flies" type of atom conceived through high energy electrical experiments. Also included is an Alternative Explanation for the Red Shift, and the Constitution of the Sun and Stars.

Available now through our online cart in classic BSRF xerographic edition.
"Understanding Radionics" [<<]
[Index]
[>>] CQ&C for Sept-Oct 1987

Borderland Sciences Research Foundation

About BSRFBSRF Print Editionshttps://borderlandsciences.org/legal.html

Borderland Sciences Research Foundation
P.O. Box 6250 • Eureka, CA, USA • 95502 • borderlandsciences.org
Orgone Channel Telegram
"Obviously the nuclear theory and the vortex theory cannot both be true. Since the proponents of the nuclear theory have already presented their theory to the public boldly as though it were a known fact, it is all the more incumbent upon the author to present…
https://www.etymonline.com/word/nucleus

nucleus (n.)

1704, "kernel of a nut;" 1708, "head of a comet;" from Latin nucleus "kernel," from nucula "little nut," diminutive of nux (genitive nucis) "nut," from PIE *kneu- "nut" (source also of Middle Irish cnu, Welsh cneuen, Middle Breton knoen "nut," Old Norse hnot, Old English hnutu "nut").

The general sense of "central mass or thing, about which others cluster or matter collects," is from 1762. In biology, "dense, typically rounded structure in a cell, bounded by membranes," from 1831. Later they were found to contain the genetic material. Modern meaning in physics, "positively charged central core of an atom," is from 1912, by Ernest Rutherford, though theoretical use for "central point of an atom" is from 1844, in Faraday.
also from 1704

https://www.etymonline.com/word/quark

quark (n.)

hypothetical subatomic particle having a fractional electric charge, 1964, applied by U.S. physicist Murray Gell-Mann (1929-2019), who said in correspondence with the editors of the OED in 1978 that he took it from a word in James Joyce's "Finnegans Wake" (1939), but also that the sound of the word was in his head before he encountered the printed form in Joyce.

German Quark "curds, rubbish" has been proposed as the ultimate inspiration [Barnhart; Gell-Mann's parents were immigrants from Austria-Hungary]; it is from Old Church Slavonic tvarogu "curds, cottage cheese" (from a suffixed form of PIE root *teue- "to swell," source also of Greek tyros "cheese"). George Zweig, Gell-Mann's co-proposer of the theory, is said to have preferred the name ace for them.
also from 1964
Forwarded from Petrafied News (Petrafied News)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
George Orwell's FINAL MESSAGE TO THE WORLD
👍1