AI responses may confabulate.
A specific, universally accepted schematic for a functional "experimental orgone energy meter" does not exist in mainstream science, as the underlying principle of "orgone energy" is not recognized by established physics
. However, the commercially available devices, such as the LM4, are solid-state reproductions based on principles described by Wilhelm Reich's original "Orgone Energy Field Meter" (OEFM).
Principle of Operation
The original OEFM described by Wilhelm Reich was not a conventional electronic circuit but an apparatus that produced a visible effect:
It typically involved two parallel metal plates, one insulated with an organic material, connected to a simple 40-watt to 60-watt tungsten bulb or an argon gas tube.
When a hand or living organism was brought near or touched the apparatus, the gas tube would luminesce, a phenomenon Reich attributed to the organism's "orgone energy field" interacting with the apparatus's ability to concentrate this energy.
Modern Solid-State Meters (like LM4)
Modern "life energy meters" developed by companies like Heliognosis (which makes the LM4 for Essentia) are solid-state electronic devices that aim to replicate the effect of Reich's original apparatus in a more user-friendly way, using modern circuitry to provide a quantitative meter reading:
These devices use sensitive electronic circuits, likely involving high-impedance inputs and potentially electromagnetic oscillators, to detect subtle energy fields or electrostatic variations.
They typically use various electrodes (probes, plates) and sensitivity settings to measure interactions with objects, living beings, or the environment.
The exact internal circuit schematic for commercially sold meters like the LM4 is considered proprietary and is generally not publicly available. The manuals describe operation and use, but not the technical wiring.
DIY Alternatives
For those interested in building their own, information is available online for creating the original Reich-style devices or simple related circuits:
Plans for the original orgone accumulator construction are available from sources like the Wilhelm Reich Museum.
Simple "radionics" or "orgone amplifier" circuits can be found in various alternative science documents online, often involving quartz crystals, mobius coils, and basic electronic components to create a desired effect. These also are not based on standard scientific principles.
A specific, universally accepted schematic for a functional "experimental orgone energy meter" does not exist in mainstream science, as the underlying principle of "orgone energy" is not recognized by established physics
. However, the commercially available devices, such as the LM4, are solid-state reproductions based on principles described by Wilhelm Reich's original "Orgone Energy Field Meter" (OEFM).
Principle of Operation
The original OEFM described by Wilhelm Reich was not a conventional electronic circuit but an apparatus that produced a visible effect:
It typically involved two parallel metal plates, one insulated with an organic material, connected to a simple 40-watt to 60-watt tungsten bulb or an argon gas tube.
When a hand or living organism was brought near or touched the apparatus, the gas tube would luminesce, a phenomenon Reich attributed to the organism's "orgone energy field" interacting with the apparatus's ability to concentrate this energy.
Modern Solid-State Meters (like LM4)
Modern "life energy meters" developed by companies like Heliognosis (which makes the LM4 for Essentia) are solid-state electronic devices that aim to replicate the effect of Reich's original apparatus in a more user-friendly way, using modern circuitry to provide a quantitative meter reading:
These devices use sensitive electronic circuits, likely involving high-impedance inputs and potentially electromagnetic oscillators, to detect subtle energy fields or electrostatic variations.
They typically use various electrodes (probes, plates) and sensitivity settings to measure interactions with objects, living beings, or the environment.
The exact internal circuit schematic for commercially sold meters like the LM4 is considered proprietary and is generally not publicly available. The manuals describe operation and use, but not the technical wiring.
DIY Alternatives
For those interested in building their own, information is available online for creating the original Reich-style devices or simple related circuits:
Plans for the original orgone accumulator construction are available from sources like the Wilhelm Reich Museum.
Simple "radionics" or "orgone amplifier" circuits can be found in various alternative science documents online, often involving quartz crystals, mobius coils, and basic electronic components to create a desired effect. These also are not based on standard scientific principles.
Forwarded from Carroll Quigley
Google AI response to query:
{what was Edward Mandell House s full quote I anticipated Mussolini by several years given in which context, primary sources or first attestations please}
AI responses may confabulate.
The quote attributed to Edward Mandell House regarding Mussolini is: "
"I am probably the first who has clearly shown that there is no difference between domestic and foreign affairs. I am anticipating Mussolini in the fact that I am ready to be a dictator and to assume power to the limit.""
This quote appears in Charles Seymour's four-volume work, The Intimate Papers of Colonel House, published in 1928.
{what was Edward Mandell House s full quote I anticipated Mussolini by several years given in which context, primary sources or first attestations please}
AI responses may confabulate.
The quote attributed to Edward Mandell House regarding Mussolini is: "
"I am probably the first who has clearly shown that there is no difference between domestic and foreign affairs. I am anticipating Mussolini in the fact that I am ready to be a dictator and to assume power to the limit.""
This quote appears in Charles Seymour's four-volume work, The Intimate Papers of Colonel House, published in 1928.
AI responses may confabulate.
The term
"medicine" refers to the science and practice of diagnosing, treating, and preventing disease, as well as substances used for these purposes. Its linguistic origins trace back to the Proto-Indo-European root *med-, meaning "to measure, limit, consider, or advise".
Etymology
The word "medicine" has the following etymological path:
Proto-Indo-European: Derived from the root *med- ("to measure, limit, consider, advise").
Latin: From *med- came the Latin verb medeor ("I heal") and the noun medicus ("a physician, surgeon"). This led to the feminine noun medicīna ("the healing art, medicine, a physician's shop, a remedy").
Old/Middle French: Adopted as medecine.
Middle English: Adopted as medicin or medicine, from which modern English is derived.
Usage
Modern usage of "medicine" encompasses several related meanings:
The field of study: The broad discipline dedicated to the maintenance of health and the prevention and treatment of disease.
A substance: A drug or preparation used for treatment or prevention of illness (e.g., "Take your medicine").
Indigenous/Cultural: In specific contexts, it can refer to the spiritual or magical practices of Indigenous cultures (e.g., "medicine man," "medicine wheel"), a usage calqued from the Ojibwe word mashkiki.
Proto-Indo-European Cognates
The PIE root *med- has cognates across many Indo-European languages, generally relating to the concepts of "measuring," "advising," or "healing."
Greek: medein ("to rule over, protect")
Germanic: Gothic miton ("to measure, limit"), Old English metan ("to measure")
Celtic: Old Irish midir ("judge")
Avestan: vī-mad-man ("physician")
Synonyms
Synonyms for "medicine" depend heavily on the specific context or sense in which the word is used:
For the field of practice: Healthcare, medical science, physic (archaic).
For a substance: Medication, drug, remedy, cure, treatment, pharmaceutical, specific, nostrum.
The term
"medicine" refers to the science and practice of diagnosing, treating, and preventing disease, as well as substances used for these purposes. Its linguistic origins trace back to the Proto-Indo-European root *med-, meaning "to measure, limit, consider, or advise".
Etymology
The word "medicine" has the following etymological path:
Proto-Indo-European: Derived from the root *med- ("to measure, limit, consider, advise").
Latin: From *med- came the Latin verb medeor ("I heal") and the noun medicus ("a physician, surgeon"). This led to the feminine noun medicīna ("the healing art, medicine, a physician's shop, a remedy").
Old/Middle French: Adopted as medecine.
Middle English: Adopted as medicin or medicine, from which modern English is derived.
Usage
Modern usage of "medicine" encompasses several related meanings:
The field of study: The broad discipline dedicated to the maintenance of health and the prevention and treatment of disease.
A substance: A drug or preparation used for treatment or prevention of illness (e.g., "Take your medicine").
Indigenous/Cultural: In specific contexts, it can refer to the spiritual or magical practices of Indigenous cultures (e.g., "medicine man," "medicine wheel"), a usage calqued from the Ojibwe word mashkiki.
Proto-Indo-European Cognates
The PIE root *med- has cognates across many Indo-European languages, generally relating to the concepts of "measuring," "advising," or "healing."
Greek: medein ("to rule over, protect")
Germanic: Gothic miton ("to measure, limit"), Old English metan ("to measure")
Celtic: Old Irish midir ("judge")
Avestan: vī-mad-man ("physician")
Synonyms
Synonyms for "medicine" depend heavily on the specific context or sense in which the word is used:
For the field of practice: Healthcare, medical science, physic (archaic).
For a substance: Medication, drug, remedy, cure, treatment, pharmaceutical, specific, nostrum.
AI responses may confabulate.
Re: https://www.meta-synthesis.com/webbook/35_pt/pt_database.php
The "Internet Database of Periodic Tables" on the meta-synthesis website is
a specialized, internal database that is not fully indexed in a way that allows a general search engine like Google to perform complex, dynamic searches within its contents.
Here is how general search engines interact with the database:
Indexing Static Pages: Google can index the main entry page and some of the static, pre-defined search results pages (like "All Periodic Tables by Name" or "Top 10 Periodic Tables").
Inability to Run Dynamic Queries: General search engines cannot execute the website's internal search functions (such as searching for specific data points, years, or types using the drop-down menus on the site). This is because the results are generated dynamically based on user input within the site's interface, rather than existing as static, indexable pages.
Data Retrieval: To access specific information from the over 1300 periodic tables in the database, a user must visit the meta-synthesis website and use its dedicated internal search tools and filters.
In summary, the meta-synthesis database is a comprehensive resource, but specialized queries must be performed directly on its website using its built-in functionality.
The meta-synthesis website appears to be a personal project maintained by
Dr. Mark Leach, who describes himself as the "database curator." The site does not appear to be a commercial entity, academic institution, or government body with publicly disclosed financials or institutional funding.
Financial Situation and Risk
The financial situation is not publicly documented, as it is a personal website. The lack of a formal institutional backing might inherently introduce some level of risk compared to a database maintained by a large organization.
Risk Factors: The primary risk seems related to the long-term maintenance and funding being dependent on an individual's personal capacity and resources. If the curator is no longer able to maintain the site, its future would be uncertain.
Mitigating Factors: The site's content is highly specialized and valuable to the chemistry community. Such valuable educational resources are often candidates for preservation by academic or scientific organizations should the original curator step away.
Future of the Database if the Site Closes
If the website were to close, several things could happen:
Data Loss: Without a plan for preservation, the unique compilation of over 1,300 periodic tables could become unavailable.
Archival Efforts: Websites of significant educational value are often preserved by digital archives, such as the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. While not a perfect substitute for the live, searchable database, this would prevent a total loss of the information.
Potential Migration: The site mentions the potential to "expand and open up the data entry to chemists and chemical educators on the web". This suggests a recognition of the value of the data and a possible future path for collaboration or migration to a more robust, community-supported platform, which would ensure its longevity.
For now, the database remains a unique and comprehensive resource curated by an individual expert.
Re: https://www.meta-synthesis.com/webbook/35_pt/pt_database.php
The "Internet Database of Periodic Tables" on the meta-synthesis website is
a specialized, internal database that is not fully indexed in a way that allows a general search engine like Google to perform complex, dynamic searches within its contents.
Here is how general search engines interact with the database:
Indexing Static Pages: Google can index the main entry page and some of the static, pre-defined search results pages (like "All Periodic Tables by Name" or "Top 10 Periodic Tables").
Inability to Run Dynamic Queries: General search engines cannot execute the website's internal search functions (such as searching for specific data points, years, or types using the drop-down menus on the site). This is because the results are generated dynamically based on user input within the site's interface, rather than existing as static, indexable pages.
Data Retrieval: To access specific information from the over 1300 periodic tables in the database, a user must visit the meta-synthesis website and use its dedicated internal search tools and filters.
In summary, the meta-synthesis database is a comprehensive resource, but specialized queries must be performed directly on its website using its built-in functionality.
The meta-synthesis website appears to be a personal project maintained by
Dr. Mark Leach, who describes himself as the "database curator." The site does not appear to be a commercial entity, academic institution, or government body with publicly disclosed financials or institutional funding.
Financial Situation and Risk
The financial situation is not publicly documented, as it is a personal website. The lack of a formal institutional backing might inherently introduce some level of risk compared to a database maintained by a large organization.
Risk Factors: The primary risk seems related to the long-term maintenance and funding being dependent on an individual's personal capacity and resources. If the curator is no longer able to maintain the site, its future would be uncertain.
Mitigating Factors: The site's content is highly specialized and valuable to the chemistry community. Such valuable educational resources are often candidates for preservation by academic or scientific organizations should the original curator step away.
Future of the Database if the Site Closes
If the website were to close, several things could happen:
Data Loss: Without a plan for preservation, the unique compilation of over 1,300 periodic tables could become unavailable.
Archival Efforts: Websites of significant educational value are often preserved by digital archives, such as the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. While not a perfect substitute for the live, searchable database, this would prevent a total loss of the information.
Potential Migration: The site mentions the potential to "expand and open up the data entry to chemists and chemical educators on the web". This suggests a recognition of the value of the data and a possible future path for collaboration or migration to a more robust, community-supported platform, which would ensure its longevity.
For now, the database remains a unique and comprehensive resource curated by an individual expert.
Meta-Synthesis
INTERNET Database of Periodic Tables | Chemogenesis
Dear Friends of the ACO,
As we move toward the end of the year, this season naturally invites reflection, and also inspires us to embrace opportunities for thoughtful change and growth. At the American College of Orgonomy, we’ve been working quietly behind the scenes on one of those meaningful improvements.
We’re delighted to announce the launch of our brand-new ACO website!
The goal of this redesign was simple:Make everything easier to understand, easier to find, and easier to access.A clearer, more welcoming introduction to orgonomy benefits everyone, whether someone is entirely new to this work or has been connected to the ACO for years.
Our new website includes:
A modern, simplified design
Clearer explanations of orgonomy and our programs
Streamlined access to events, education, and resources
An improved registration and donation experience
A fully mobile-friendly layout
We hope this updated site makes learning about orgonomy feel more open, straightforward, and inviting.
Visit the new website:
ORGONOMY.ORG
Thank you for your continued interest and support. We look forward to sharing even more exciting updates with you soon as we continue building a stronger, more accessible future for orgonomy.
Warm regards,
The American College of Orgonomy
This announcement was created by The American College of Orgonomy (ACO), located near Princeton, New Jersey. The ACO is a nonprofit education and scientific organization devoted to setting and maintaining standards for work in the field of orgonomy. The ACO provides information, training, and research support for those interested and involved in orgonomy. This press release is meant to inform those who may have an interest in the science of orgonomy and the activities of the ACO. The ACO is not affiliated with any website, newsgroup, bulletin board, network, service, or other media that may be reproducing this release. The ACO does not endorse any information, data, text, software, music, sound, photographs, graphics, video, messages, or other materials transmitted, posted, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated on any media other than the ACO's website at www.orgonomy.org. Please contact aco (at) orgonomy.org for information on the ACO as well as to verify the original text of this announcement.
As we move toward the end of the year, this season naturally invites reflection, and also inspires us to embrace opportunities for thoughtful change and growth. At the American College of Orgonomy, we’ve been working quietly behind the scenes on one of those meaningful improvements.
We’re delighted to announce the launch of our brand-new ACO website!
The goal of this redesign was simple:Make everything easier to understand, easier to find, and easier to access.A clearer, more welcoming introduction to orgonomy benefits everyone, whether someone is entirely new to this work or has been connected to the ACO for years.
Our new website includes:
A modern, simplified design
Clearer explanations of orgonomy and our programs
Streamlined access to events, education, and resources
An improved registration and donation experience
A fully mobile-friendly layout
We hope this updated site makes learning about orgonomy feel more open, straightforward, and inviting.
Visit the new website:
ORGONOMY.ORG
Thank you for your continued interest and support. We look forward to sharing even more exciting updates with you soon as we continue building a stronger, more accessible future for orgonomy.
Warm regards,
The American College of Orgonomy
This announcement was created by The American College of Orgonomy (ACO), located near Princeton, New Jersey. The ACO is a nonprofit education and scientific organization devoted to setting and maintaining standards for work in the field of orgonomy. The ACO provides information, training, and research support for those interested and involved in orgonomy. This press release is meant to inform those who may have an interest in the science of orgonomy and the activities of the ACO. The ACO is not affiliated with any website, newsgroup, bulletin board, network, service, or other media that may be reproducing this release. The ACO does not endorse any information, data, text, software, music, sound, photographs, graphics, video, messages, or other materials transmitted, posted, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated on any media other than the ACO's website at www.orgonomy.org. Please contact aco (at) orgonomy.org for information on the ACO as well as to verify the original text of this announcement.
Discover Orgonomy:
Discover Orgonomy: - Unlocking the Power of Life Energy for Healing and Well-Being
Explore the Campaign website built with Avada, designed to engage audiences and highlight campaign messages effectively using the ultimate website builder.
Forwarded from Jade Helm 15 Rehash (ned)
AI responses may confabulate and track hyperlink activity.
The Biefeld-Brown effect was first observed by Thomas Townsend Brown and Paul Biefeld in the early 1920s during experiments with Coolidge tubes, but its first public documentation came through patents and articles by T.T. Brown, notably in his 1928 British Patent No. 311 and an article in Science and Invention magazine in 1929, where he described the thrust from an asymmetric capacitor and linked it to gravity.
Key Publications & Milestones:
Early Experiments (1920s): Discovered at Denison University, involving Coolidge tubes and later asymmetric capacitors.
UK Patent No. 311 (1928): T.T. Brown filed this patent for his "Method of and an Apparatus or Machine for Producing Force or Motion".
Science and Invention (1929): Brown published "How I Control Gravitation," detailing the effect and his early theories.
U.S. Patents (1930s-1960s): Brown continued to patent applications of the effect, including the "Electrostatic Motor" (1934) and "Electrokinetic Apparatus" (1960).
While the initial discovery involved both Biefeld and Brown, T.T. Brown was the primary figure in publishing and patenting the phenomenon, which he termed "electrokinetics" and linked to a potential "electrogravitics" or anti-gravity force.
The Biefeld-Brown effect was first observed by Thomas Townsend Brown and Paul Biefeld in the early 1920s during experiments with Coolidge tubes, but its first public documentation came through patents and articles by T.T. Brown, notably in his 1928 British Patent No. 311 and an article in Science and Invention magazine in 1929, where he described the thrust from an asymmetric capacitor and linked it to gravity.
Key Publications & Milestones:
Early Experiments (1920s): Discovered at Denison University, involving Coolidge tubes and later asymmetric capacitors.
UK Patent No. 311 (1928): T.T. Brown filed this patent for his "Method of and an Apparatus or Machine for Producing Force or Motion".
Science and Invention (1929): Brown published "How I Control Gravitation," detailing the effect and his early theories.
U.S. Patents (1930s-1960s): Brown continued to patent applications of the effect, including the "Electrostatic Motor" (1934) and "Electrokinetic Apparatus" (1960).
While the initial discovery involved both Biefeld and Brown, T.T. Brown was the primary figure in publishing and patenting the phenomenon, which he termed "electrokinetics" and linked to a potential "electrogravitics" or anti-gravity force.
Orgone Channel Telegram pinned «NEW LAWS NEEDED TO RESTRAIN PATHOLOGICAL POWER DRUNKENNESS BY WILHELM REICH, M.D., COUNSEL FOR THE LIFE ENERGY From Wilhelm Reich's "Petitioner's Reply Brief" to the U.S. Supreme Court, October Term, 1956, №. 688. Reprinted, Jerome Eden, The View from Eden…»
Orgone Channel Telegram pinned «The orgasm function is in the most fundamental way biological in nature. It is a basic function of the living. Therefore it is of a deeper and wider rank than the realm of psychic functioning. The psychic forms part of the living, but the living is not part…»
Forwarded from Game Theory News ♟ (WiccanVixen)
In the U.S, informed consent has been revoked just 77 years after it was codified in the Nuremberg Code.
On the 21st of December 2023, during the festive season, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a final ruling to amend a provision of the 21st Century Cures Act.
This allowed
“... an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent when a clinical investigation poses no more than a minimal risk to the human subject ...”
This ruling went into effect on January 22nd, 2024, which means it’s already standard practice across America.
www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/12/21/2023-27935/institutional-review-board-waiver-or-alteration-of-informed-consent-for-minimal-risk-clinical
Just so y'all know... The whole "informed consent" thing that was codified through the Nuremberg Code??? Yeah, as of the end of January 2024 it went hasta la bye bye... That means they don't have to inform you what you can be FORCED to take medically.
But they're not planning anything underhanded RIGHT?? They're not trying to protect pharma profits and act with tyrannical force RIGHT??
THIS COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED WITHOUT BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS BEING ONBOARD.
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!
On the 21st of December 2023, during the festive season, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a final ruling to amend a provision of the 21st Century Cures Act.
This allowed
“... an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent when a clinical investigation poses no more than a minimal risk to the human subject ...”
This ruling went into effect on January 22nd, 2024, which means it’s already standard practice across America.
www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/12/21/2023-27935/institutional-review-board-waiver-or-alteration-of-informed-consent-for-minimal-risk-clinical
Just so y'all know... The whole "informed consent" thing that was codified through the Nuremberg Code??? Yeah, as of the end of January 2024 it went hasta la bye bye... That means they don't have to inform you what you can be FORCED to take medically.
But they're not planning anything underhanded RIGHT?? They're not trying to protect pharma profits and act with tyrannical force RIGHT??
THIS COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED WITHOUT BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS BEING ONBOARD.
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!
Federal Register
Institutional Review Board Waiver or Alteration of Informed Consent for Minimal Risk Clinical Investigations
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is issuing a final rule to amend its regulations to implement a provision of the 21st Century Cures Act (Cures Act). This final rule allows an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent…
AI Overview
There isn't a single "eddy flux density" formula; instead, eddy currents (which cause flux changes) are found using Maxwell's equations (often numerically), but the resulting magnetic flux density (B) is calculated as B = Φ/A (Flux/Area) or B = μH (permeability times field strength), with eddy current losses themselves often estimated by Steinmetz's equation for power loss (Pₑ ∝ ƒ² B²ₘₐₓ), showing eddy currents are part of the complex system, not a simple direct calculation from one formula.
Fundamental Flux Density Formulas:
General Definition: B = Φ/α
B: Magnetic Flux Density (Tesla, T)
Φ: Magnetic Flux (Weber, Wb)
A: Cross-sectional Area (m²)
Material Relationship: B = μH
B: Magnetic Flux Density (T)
μ: Magnetic Permeability of the material (H/m)
H: Magnetic Field Strength (Amperes/meter, A/m)
Eddy Currents & Losses:
Eddy Currents (J): These are induced currents within conductive materials when exposed to changing magnetic fields, described by Ohm's Law for conductors: J = σE (Current Density = Conductivity * Electric Field).
Power Loss (Steinmetz): To find the energy lost to eddy currents (and hysteresis), you often use empirical equations like Steinmetz's, where power loss (P) is related to frequency (ƒ) and peak flux density (Bₘₐₓ): P ∝ ƒ B²ₘₐₓ (simplified).
How They Relate:
1. A changing magnetic field (H) induces electric fields (E).
2. These electric fields drive eddy currents (J) in the material.
3. These eddy currents create their own magnetic fields, which oppose the original change (Lenz's Law).
4. This whole interaction is complex, often requiring finite element analysis software for precise B-field calculations, but the fundamental relationship B = μH always holds, with μ changing due to the eddy currents.
There isn't a single "eddy flux density" formula; instead, eddy currents (which cause flux changes) are found using Maxwell's equations (often numerically), but the resulting magnetic flux density (B) is calculated as B = Φ/A (Flux/Area) or B = μH (permeability times field strength), with eddy current losses themselves often estimated by Steinmetz's equation for power loss (Pₑ ∝ ƒ² B²ₘₐₓ), showing eddy currents are part of the complex system, not a simple direct calculation from one formula.
Fundamental Flux Density Formulas:
General Definition: B = Φ/α
B: Magnetic Flux Density (Tesla, T)
Φ: Magnetic Flux (Weber, Wb)
A: Cross-sectional Area (m²)
Material Relationship: B = μH
B: Magnetic Flux Density (T)
μ: Magnetic Permeability of the material (H/m)
H: Magnetic Field Strength (Amperes/meter, A/m)
Eddy Currents & Losses:
Eddy Currents (J): These are induced currents within conductive materials when exposed to changing magnetic fields, described by Ohm's Law for conductors: J = σE (Current Density = Conductivity * Electric Field).
Power Loss (Steinmetz): To find the energy lost to eddy currents (and hysteresis), you often use empirical equations like Steinmetz's, where power loss (P) is related to frequency (ƒ) and peak flux density (Bₘₐₓ): P ∝ ƒ B²ₘₐₓ (simplified).
How They Relate:
1. A changing magnetic field (H) induces electric fields (E).
2. These electric fields drive eddy currents (J) in the material.
3. These eddy currents create their own magnetic fields, which oppose the original change (Lenz's Law).
4. This whole interaction is complex, often requiring finite element analysis software for precise B-field calculations, but the fundamental relationship B = μH always holds, with μ changing due to the eddy currents.
Orgone Channel Telegram
AI Overview There isn't a single "eddy flux density" formula; instead, eddy currents (which cause flux changes) are found using Maxwell's equations (often numerically), but the resulting magnetic flux density (B) is calculated as B = Φ/A (Flux/Area) or B…
AI Overview
There isn't a single "eddy flux density" formula; instead, eddy currents (which cause flux changes) are found using Maxwell's equations (often numerically), but the resulting magnetic flux density (B) is calculated toas B = Φ/A (Flux/Area) or B = μH (permeability times field strength), with eddy current losses themselves often estimated by Steinmetz's equation for power loss (Pₑ ∝ ƒ² B²ₘₐₓ), showing eddy currents are part of the complex system, not a simple direct calculation from one formula.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/orgonecontinuum/3062
There isn't a single "eddy flux density" formula; instead, eddy currents (which cause flux changes) are found using Maxwell's equations (often numerically), but the resulting magnetic flux density (B) is calculated toas B = Φ/A (Flux/Area) or B = μH (permeability times field strength), with eddy current losses themselves often estimated by Steinmetz's equation for power loss (Pₑ ∝ ƒ² B²ₘₐₓ), showing eddy currents are part of the complex system, not a simple direct calculation from one formula.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/orgonecontinuum/3062