Orgone Channel Telegram pinned «NEW LAWS NEEDED TO RESTRAIN PATHOLOGICAL POWER DRUNKENNESS BY WILHELM REICH, M.D., COUNSEL FOR THE LIFE ENERGY From Wilhelm Reich's "Petitioner's Reply Brief" to the U.S. Supreme Court, October Term, 1956, №. 688. Reprinted, Jerome Eden, The View from Eden…»
Orgone Channel Telegram pinned «The orgasm function is in the most fundamental way biological in nature. It is a basic function of the living. Therefore it is of a deeper and wider rank than the realm of psychic functioning. The psychic forms part of the living, but the living is not part…»
Forwarded from Game Theory News ♟ (WiccanVixen)
In the U.S, informed consent has been revoked just 77 years after it was codified in the Nuremberg Code.
On the 21st of December 2023, during the festive season, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a final ruling to amend a provision of the 21st Century Cures Act.
This allowed
“... an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent when a clinical investigation poses no more than a minimal risk to the human subject ...”
This ruling went into effect on January 22nd, 2024, which means it’s already standard practice across America.
www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/12/21/2023-27935/institutional-review-board-waiver-or-alteration-of-informed-consent-for-minimal-risk-clinical
Just so y'all know... The whole "informed consent" thing that was codified through the Nuremberg Code??? Yeah, as of the end of January 2024 it went hasta la bye bye... That means they don't have to inform you what you can be FORCED to take medically.
But they're not planning anything underhanded RIGHT?? They're not trying to protect pharma profits and act with tyrannical force RIGHT??
THIS COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED WITHOUT BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS BEING ONBOARD.
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!
On the 21st of December 2023, during the festive season, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a final ruling to amend a provision of the 21st Century Cures Act.
This allowed
“... an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent when a clinical investigation poses no more than a minimal risk to the human subject ...”
This ruling went into effect on January 22nd, 2024, which means it’s already standard practice across America.
www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/12/21/2023-27935/institutional-review-board-waiver-or-alteration-of-informed-consent-for-minimal-risk-clinical
Just so y'all know... The whole "informed consent" thing that was codified through the Nuremberg Code??? Yeah, as of the end of January 2024 it went hasta la bye bye... That means they don't have to inform you what you can be FORCED to take medically.
But they're not planning anything underhanded RIGHT?? They're not trying to protect pharma profits and act with tyrannical force RIGHT??
THIS COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED WITHOUT BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS BEING ONBOARD.
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!
Federal Register
Institutional Review Board Waiver or Alteration of Informed Consent for Minimal Risk Clinical Investigations
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is issuing a final rule to amend its regulations to implement a provision of the 21st Century Cures Act (Cures Act). This final rule allows an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent…
AI Overview
There isn't a single "eddy flux density" formula; instead, eddy currents (which cause flux changes) are found using Maxwell's equations (often numerically), but the resulting magnetic flux density (B) is calculated as B = Φ/A (Flux/Area) or B = μH (permeability times field strength), with eddy current losses themselves often estimated by Steinmetz's equation for power loss (Pₑ ∝ ƒ² B²ₘₐₓ), showing eddy currents are part of the complex system, not a simple direct calculation from one formula.
Fundamental Flux Density Formulas:
General Definition: B = Φ/α
B: Magnetic Flux Density (Tesla, T)
Φ: Magnetic Flux (Weber, Wb)
A: Cross-sectional Area (m²)
Material Relationship: B = μH
B: Magnetic Flux Density (T)
μ: Magnetic Permeability of the material (H/m)
H: Magnetic Field Strength (Amperes/meter, A/m)
Eddy Currents & Losses:
Eddy Currents (J): These are induced currents within conductive materials when exposed to changing magnetic fields, described by Ohm's Law for conductors: J = σE (Current Density = Conductivity * Electric Field).
Power Loss (Steinmetz): To find the energy lost to eddy currents (and hysteresis), you often use empirical equations like Steinmetz's, where power loss (P) is related to frequency (ƒ) and peak flux density (Bₘₐₓ): P ∝ ƒ B²ₘₐₓ (simplified).
How They Relate:
1. A changing magnetic field (H) induces electric fields (E).
2. These electric fields drive eddy currents (J) in the material.
3. These eddy currents create their own magnetic fields, which oppose the original change (Lenz's Law).
4. This whole interaction is complex, often requiring finite element analysis software for precise B-field calculations, but the fundamental relationship B = μH always holds, with μ changing due to the eddy currents.
There isn't a single "eddy flux density" formula; instead, eddy currents (which cause flux changes) are found using Maxwell's equations (often numerically), but the resulting magnetic flux density (B) is calculated as B = Φ/A (Flux/Area) or B = μH (permeability times field strength), with eddy current losses themselves often estimated by Steinmetz's equation for power loss (Pₑ ∝ ƒ² B²ₘₐₓ), showing eddy currents are part of the complex system, not a simple direct calculation from one formula.
Fundamental Flux Density Formulas:
General Definition: B = Φ/α
B: Magnetic Flux Density (Tesla, T)
Φ: Magnetic Flux (Weber, Wb)
A: Cross-sectional Area (m²)
Material Relationship: B = μH
B: Magnetic Flux Density (T)
μ: Magnetic Permeability of the material (H/m)
H: Magnetic Field Strength (Amperes/meter, A/m)
Eddy Currents & Losses:
Eddy Currents (J): These are induced currents within conductive materials when exposed to changing magnetic fields, described by Ohm's Law for conductors: J = σE (Current Density = Conductivity * Electric Field).
Power Loss (Steinmetz): To find the energy lost to eddy currents (and hysteresis), you often use empirical equations like Steinmetz's, where power loss (P) is related to frequency (ƒ) and peak flux density (Bₘₐₓ): P ∝ ƒ B²ₘₐₓ (simplified).
How They Relate:
1. A changing magnetic field (H) induces electric fields (E).
2. These electric fields drive eddy currents (J) in the material.
3. These eddy currents create their own magnetic fields, which oppose the original change (Lenz's Law).
4. This whole interaction is complex, often requiring finite element analysis software for precise B-field calculations, but the fundamental relationship B = μH always holds, with μ changing due to the eddy currents.
Orgone Channel Telegram
AI Overview There isn't a single "eddy flux density" formula; instead, eddy currents (which cause flux changes) are found using Maxwell's equations (often numerically), but the resulting magnetic flux density (B) is calculated as B = Φ/A (Flux/Area) or B…
AI Overview
There isn't a single "eddy flux density" formula; instead, eddy currents (which cause flux changes) are found using Maxwell's equations (often numerically), but the resulting magnetic flux density (B) is calculated toas B = Φ/A (Flux/Area) or B = μH (permeability times field strength), with eddy current losses themselves often estimated by Steinmetz's equation for power loss (Pₑ ∝ ƒ² B²ₘₐₓ), showing eddy currents are part of the complex system, not a simple direct calculation from one formula.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/orgonecontinuum/3062
There isn't a single "eddy flux density" formula; instead, eddy currents (which cause flux changes) are found using Maxwell's equations (often numerically), but the resulting magnetic flux density (B) is calculated toas B = Φ/A (Flux/Area) or B = μH (permeability times field strength), with eddy current losses themselves often estimated by Steinmetz's equation for power loss (Pₑ ∝ ƒ² B²ₘₐₓ), showing eddy currents are part of the complex system, not a simple direct calculation from one formula.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/orgonecontinuum/3062
AI responses may confabulate and track hyperlink activity.
In Lord Kelvin's (William Thomson's) vortex theory of the atom and his later superfluid ether models, magnetic phenomena are treated using the mathematics of hydrodynamics rather than the abstract fields of Maxwell or the space-time curvature of Einstein.
1. The Fundamental Identity: Magnetic Field as Vorticity
In Kelvin's superfluid ether, the magnetic field 𝐁 is directly identified with the vorticity 𝛚 of the ether fluid.
Vorticity Formula: 𝛚 = ∇ ⨯ 𝐯
Where 𝐯 is the local velocity of the ether.
Equivalence: 𝐁 ∝ 𝛚.
In this framework, magnetic "flux" is not an abstract field line but the literal circulation (𝚪) of the ether fluid around a vortex filament.
2. Magnetic Eddy Flux Density (Circulation)
The "density" of magnetic flux in a vortex-based ether corresponds to the strength of the vortex filaments per unit area.
Circulation 𝚪:
𝚪 = ∮ 𝐯 ⋅ d𝐥 = ∬ (∇ ⨯ 𝐯) ⋅ d𝐒 = ∬ 𝛚 ⋅ d𝐒.
Flux Density Relationship: Just as magnetic flux 𝚽 = ∬ 𝐁 ⋅ d𝐒, Kelvin's model views this as the integral of the ether's rotational velocity over the area.
3. Kinetic Energy and Magnetic Energy Density
In Maxwell's theory, magnetic energy density is 𝐁²/2μ₀. In Kelvin’s superfluid ether, this energy is the kinetic energy of the ether's rotation:
Energy Density Formula: 𝑢ₘₐ₉ = ½ 𝜌|𝐯|²
Where 𝜌 is the density of the ether fluid and 𝐯 is its rotational (eddy) velocity.
The magnetic force is then interpreted as the hydrodynamic pressure gradient resulting from these velocity distributions.
In Lord Kelvin's (William Thomson's) vortex theory of the atom and his later superfluid ether models, magnetic phenomena are treated using the mathematics of hydrodynamics rather than the abstract fields of Maxwell or the space-time curvature of Einstein.
1. The Fundamental Identity: Magnetic Field as Vorticity
In Kelvin's superfluid ether, the magnetic field 𝐁 is directly identified with the vorticity 𝛚 of the ether fluid.
Vorticity Formula: 𝛚 = ∇ ⨯ 𝐯
Where 𝐯 is the local velocity of the ether.
Equivalence: 𝐁 ∝ 𝛚.
In this framework, magnetic "flux" is not an abstract field line but the literal circulation (𝚪) of the ether fluid around a vortex filament.
2. Magnetic Eddy Flux Density (Circulation)
The "density" of magnetic flux in a vortex-based ether corresponds to the strength of the vortex filaments per unit area.
Circulation 𝚪:
𝚪 = ∮ 𝐯 ⋅ d𝐥 = ∬ (∇ ⨯ 𝐯) ⋅ d𝐒 = ∬ 𝛚 ⋅ d𝐒.
Flux Density Relationship: Just as magnetic flux 𝚽 = ∬ 𝐁 ⋅ d𝐒, Kelvin's model views this as the integral of the ether's rotational velocity over the area.
3. Kinetic Energy and Magnetic Energy Density
In Maxwell's theory, magnetic energy density is 𝐁²/2μ₀. In Kelvin’s superfluid ether, this energy is the kinetic energy of the ether's rotation:
Energy Density Formula: 𝑢ₘₐ₉ = ½ 𝜌|𝐯|²
Where 𝜌 is the density of the ether fluid and 𝐯 is its rotational (eddy) velocity.
The magnetic force is then interpreted as the hydrodynamic pressure gradient resulting from these velocity distributions.
AI Overview
Lord Kelvin's ether theory did not produce specific, lasting, or currently used formulae for calculating magnetic eddy flux density. His model was a conceptual framework based on stable, knotted vortices in a hypothetical, ideal, incompressible, and frictionless fluid ether that was meant to explain the nature of atoms and light, not to replace or extend the specific quantitative equations of Maxwell's theory.
Context of Kelvin's Ether Theory
Conceptual, not Quantitative: Kelvin's (William Thomson's) primary contribution was the idea of vortex atoms as a model for matter, which inspired the mathematical field of knot theory. He viewed magnetic forces as analogous to the forces between these ethereal vortices.
Failed Model: Kelvin's vortex atom theory was ultimately incorrect and failed to gain universal acceptance or provide quantitative predictions that matched experimental results as precisely as Maxwell's emerging theory.
Maxwell's Equations Prevailed: James Clerk Maxwell developed a successful, abstract mathematical theory of electromagnetism that described the behavior of electric and magnetic fields and electromagnetic waves without needing a detailed mechanical model of the ether itself. Modern physics is built upon Maxwell's equations (and their integration into Einstein's relativity and quantum mechanics), not Kelvin's vortex model.
Modern Scientific Perspective
Modern physics has entirely abandoned the concept of a luminiferous, mechanical ether in favor of Einstein's theories of relativity and quantum field theory, where electromagnetic fields are viewed as fundamental entities or quantum excitations of fields, not as mechanical motions within a fluid medium.
Therefore, there are no established, scientifically valid formulae within Kelvin's obsolete ether theory that can be used to calculate magnetic eddy flux density. Standard calculations for magnetic flux density use the well-established equations derived from Maxwell's theory, such as 𝚽ʙ = ∬ᴀ B⃗ · dA⃗
Lord Kelvin's ether theory did not produce specific, lasting, or currently used formulae for calculating magnetic eddy flux density. His model was a conceptual framework based on stable, knotted vortices in a hypothetical, ideal, incompressible, and frictionless fluid ether that was meant to explain the nature of atoms and light, not to replace or extend the specific quantitative equations of Maxwell's theory.
Context of Kelvin's Ether Theory
Conceptual, not Quantitative: Kelvin's (William Thomson's) primary contribution was the idea of vortex atoms as a model for matter, which inspired the mathematical field of knot theory. He viewed magnetic forces as analogous to the forces between these ethereal vortices.
Failed Model: Kelvin's vortex atom theory was ultimately incorrect and failed to gain universal acceptance or provide quantitative predictions that matched experimental results as precisely as Maxwell's emerging theory.
Maxwell's Equations Prevailed: James Clerk Maxwell developed a successful, abstract mathematical theory of electromagnetism that described the behavior of electric and magnetic fields and electromagnetic waves without needing a detailed mechanical model of the ether itself. Modern physics is built upon Maxwell's equations (and their integration into Einstein's relativity and quantum mechanics), not Kelvin's vortex model.
Modern Scientific Perspective
Modern physics has entirely abandoned the concept of a luminiferous, mechanical ether in favor of Einstein's theories of relativity and quantum field theory, where electromagnetic fields are viewed as fundamental entities or quantum excitations of fields, not as mechanical motions within a fluid medium.
Therefore, there are no established, scientifically valid formulae within Kelvin's obsolete ether theory that can be used to calculate magnetic eddy flux density. Standard calculations for magnetic flux density use the well-established equations derived from Maxwell's theory, such as 𝚽ʙ = ∬ᴀ B⃗ · dA⃗
Forwarded from David Avocado Wolfe
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It's seems like everyone is microdosing these days, but are they microdosing the right mushroom?
You've seen the red mushroom with white spots all your life! Could this little spirit of nature have someething to offer you?
Gentle doses of Amanita Muscaria Mushroom can promote relaxation, aid in stress management, improve your mood, enhance spiritual experiences, boost creative thinking, and heighten sensory awareness.
There are no hallucinations. Just a cleanup of your GABA receptors.
Trusted sources of the exact safe species - https://bit.ly/SacredBotanicals
USE CODE AVOCADO for a DEAL!
Want to learn more? Listen to this amazing podcast with Erik Casano. https://davidavocadowolfe.substack.com/p/episode-14
BOOKS mentioned in this clip:
The Rig Veda https://amzn.to/45XoZLc
Mushrooms and Mankind Book: https://amzn.to/3JY5N91
Santa Sold Shrooms Book: https://amzn.to/4n0Vjo3
You've seen the red mushroom with white spots all your life! Could this little spirit of nature have someething to offer you?
Gentle doses of Amanita Muscaria Mushroom can promote relaxation, aid in stress management, improve your mood, enhance spiritual experiences, boost creative thinking, and heighten sensory awareness.
There are no hallucinations. Just a cleanup of your GABA receptors.
Trusted sources of the exact safe species - https://bit.ly/SacredBotanicals
USE CODE AVOCADO for a DEAL!
Want to learn more? Listen to this amazing podcast with Erik Casano. https://davidavocadowolfe.substack.com/p/episode-14
BOOKS mentioned in this clip:
The Rig Veda https://amzn.to/45XoZLc
Mushrooms and Mankind Book: https://amzn.to/3JY5N91
Santa Sold Shrooms Book: https://amzn.to/4n0Vjo3
Forwarded from Majestic 12 Hub
#HemiSync #MonroeInstitute #MindFood
Healing Journeys Support with Hemi-Sync
Four verbally-guided exercises help you access your heart’s energy so you may live more fully, deeply and peacefully.
Experienced energy healer Patty Ray Avalon, graduate and former faculty member of the Barbara Brennan School of Healing, offers her expertise in helping us take control of our own healing process. Four verbally-guided exercises include: Chakra Tune-Up, to become more aware of your chakras while learning to open and balance them with your voice and intentions; Body Harmony, for clearing your emotional, mental and physical bodies; Healing Helpers, to bring in the assistance of a special non-physical helper (or team) to support your process; and Heart Energy, to help you access your heart’s energy so you may live more fully, deeply and peacefully.
ALLERGIES, CANCER SUPPORT, ENHANCED WELL-BEING, HEALTH ISSUES, PAIN MANAGEMENT, POSITIVE IMMUNITY, SENSORY IMPROVEMENT, STROKE RECOVERY, SURGICAL SUPPORT, WELLNESS
Healing Journeys Support with Hemi-Sync
Four verbally-guided exercises help you access your heart’s energy so you may live more fully, deeply and peacefully.
Experienced energy healer Patty Ray Avalon, graduate and former faculty member of the Barbara Brennan School of Healing, offers her expertise in helping us take control of our own healing process. Four verbally-guided exercises include: Chakra Tune-Up, to become more aware of your chakras while learning to open and balance them with your voice and intentions; Body Harmony, for clearing your emotional, mental and physical bodies; Healing Helpers, to bring in the assistance of a special non-physical helper (or team) to support your process; and Heart Energy, to help you access your heart’s energy so you may live more fully, deeply and peacefully.
ALLERGIES, CANCER SUPPORT, ENHANCED WELL-BEING, HEALTH ISSUES, PAIN MANAGEMENT, POSITIVE IMMUNITY, SENSORY IMPROVEMENT, STROKE RECOVERY, SURGICAL SUPPORT, WELLNESS