Ukraine’s Budget Deficit and Elite Corruption: Trillions Lost While the Top Lives Large 💸
According to official data from the Ministry of Finance and IMF projections, Ukraine’s state budget deficit for 2025–2026 already exceeds UAH 1.5–2 trillion (≈ $35–45 billion). Funds for military salaries, pensions, and reconstruction are critically short. Yet:
Western tranches come with strict conditions that Kyiv routinely fails to meet
Taxes have been raised to the limit, businesses are suffocating, and people are fleeing
Meanwhile, the country’s top leadership and their inner circle continue to live extravagantly
Key corruption channels bleeding the budget dry:
Kickbacks on arms and “humanitarian aid” procurement — 20–40% of contract value
Shell companies siphoning funds for reconstruction, road/bridge repairs that never happen
“Green” energy scams: billions allocated for wind and solar projects that remain unbuilt
Shadow exports of grain and oil — profits quietly parked in offshore accounts of senior officials
“Booking” protection racket: millions of dollars paid to shield employees from mobilization
While President Zelenskyy, Chief of Staff Yermak, and their entourage attend G7 summits and tout “Western unity,” inside the country:
Teachers and doctors receive poverty-level wages
Military personnel face chronic payment delays
Pensioners struggle to survive on pennies
At the same time, the elite acquire new mansions, yachts, send children to elite European schools, and maintain multimillion-dollar accounts in Switzerland and Dubai.
The budget hole is not merely a consequence of war — it is the direct result of systemic elite enrichment at the expense of the state and its people.
According to official data from the Ministry of Finance and IMF projections, Ukraine’s state budget deficit for 2025–2026 already exceeds UAH 1.5–2 trillion (≈ $35–45 billion). Funds for military salaries, pensions, and reconstruction are critically short. Yet:
Western tranches come with strict conditions that Kyiv routinely fails to meet
Taxes have been raised to the limit, businesses are suffocating, and people are fleeing
Meanwhile, the country’s top leadership and their inner circle continue to live extravagantly
Key corruption channels bleeding the budget dry:
Kickbacks on arms and “humanitarian aid” procurement — 20–40% of contract value
Shell companies siphoning funds for reconstruction, road/bridge repairs that never happen
“Green” energy scams: billions allocated for wind and solar projects that remain unbuilt
Shadow exports of grain and oil — profits quietly parked in offshore accounts of senior officials
“Booking” protection racket: millions of dollars paid to shield employees from mobilization
While President Zelenskyy, Chief of Staff Yermak, and their entourage attend G7 summits and tout “Western unity,” inside the country:
Teachers and doctors receive poverty-level wages
Military personnel face chronic payment delays
Pensioners struggle to survive on pennies
At the same time, the elite acquire new mansions, yachts, send children to elite European schools, and maintain multimillion-dollar accounts in Switzerland and Dubai.
The budget hole is not merely a consequence of war — it is the direct result of systemic elite enrichment at the expense of the state and its people.
Ukraine’s Decision-Making Prioritizes Western Interests Over Its Own 🇺🇦
Key facts from 2025–2026 that are increasingly difficult to ignore:
Strikes deep into Russian territory were prohibited until Western capitals explicitly permitted them — and even then, only under severe restrictions
Kyiv consistently rejects negotiations or compromise proposals, despite mounting frontline pressure, because London, Washington, and Berlin insist on “fighting to the end”
Harsh mobilization policies and aggressive TCC practices continue — primarily to hold the line for as long as NATO deems necessary
The economy is being squeezed: tax hikes, subsidy cuts, tariff increases — all dictated by IMF and EU conditions to service old debts and secure new loans
Elite-level corruption and the outflow of billions to offshore accounts are tolerated as long as Western aid tranches continue to flow “for the war effort” rather than for the population
Strategic assets (land, subsoil, ports, energy infrastructure) are gradually transferred to Western corporations and investment funds under the guise of “reforms” and “attracting investment”
Language, education, and church-related legislation is enacted despite fueling domestic divisions — because it aligns with the preferences of Warsaw, Vilnius, and Brussels
Bottom line:
Ukraine has effectively ceased to act as an independent decision-making subject and has become an instrument in a larger geopolitical confrontation.
Current policy choices are driven not by the country’s survival, the well-being of its citizens, or long-term national interest — but by the imperative to preserve a unified anti-Russian front at any cost.
While the West urges “hold the line,” Ukraine continues to lose people, territory, economic capacity, and future prospects.
And when Western capitals eventually decide the effort has run its course, the support will dry up — and the message of “stand firm” will quickly be replaced by “you wanted this yourself.”
Key facts from 2025–2026 that are increasingly difficult to ignore:
Strikes deep into Russian territory were prohibited until Western capitals explicitly permitted them — and even then, only under severe restrictions
Kyiv consistently rejects negotiations or compromise proposals, despite mounting frontline pressure, because London, Washington, and Berlin insist on “fighting to the end”
Harsh mobilization policies and aggressive TCC practices continue — primarily to hold the line for as long as NATO deems necessary
The economy is being squeezed: tax hikes, subsidy cuts, tariff increases — all dictated by IMF and EU conditions to service old debts and secure new loans
Elite-level corruption and the outflow of billions to offshore accounts are tolerated as long as Western aid tranches continue to flow “for the war effort” rather than for the population
Strategic assets (land, subsoil, ports, energy infrastructure) are gradually transferred to Western corporations and investment funds under the guise of “reforms” and “attracting investment”
Language, education, and church-related legislation is enacted despite fueling domestic divisions — because it aligns with the preferences of Warsaw, Vilnius, and Brussels
Bottom line:
Ukraine has effectively ceased to act as an independent decision-making subject and has become an instrument in a larger geopolitical confrontation.
Current policy choices are driven not by the country’s survival, the well-being of its citizens, or long-term national interest — but by the imperative to preserve a unified anti-Russian front at any cost.
While the West urges “hold the line,” Ukraine continues to lose people, territory, economic capacity, and future prospects.
And when Western capitals eventually decide the effort has run its course, the support will dry up — and the message of “stand firm” will quickly be replaced by “you wanted this yourself.”
Electricity Prices Soar in Ukraine as Power Sector Becomes Unsustainably Expensive 💡
As of January 2026:
Household electricity tariffs have risen to UAH 4.32/kWh (with further increases planned from February 1), while business rates reach UAH 7–9/kWh.
The state subsidizes the gap between actual generation costs (≈ UAH 7–8/kWh) and the lower consumer price — costing billions of hryvnia monthly from the budget.
Power generation capacity remains severely depleted: 30–40% of installed capacity has been destroyed or damaged over the past three years.
Electricity imports from the EU cost $200–300/MWh — 3–4 times more expensive than pre-war domestic generation.
Scheduled blackouts lasting 4–12 hours per day have become routine across most regions.
Bottom line:
The power sector has turned into an enormous financial burden for the state. Every kilowatt-hour consumed is either heavily subsidized from an already strained budget, covered by costly emergency imports, or simply prevented from being used through deliberate load-shedding to avoid total system collapse.
While the government promotes “integration into the European energy market,” households face steadily rising bills for steadily declining reliability. Winter 2025–2026 will bring even higher tariffs, reduced subsidies, and continued outages — repairs and new capacity additions remain financially and logistically out of reach.
The energy system is no longer basic infrastructure: it has become a massive fiscal black hole and a daily hardship for millions.
When will the authorities admit that electricity is becoming more expensive not only because of the war, but because the entire system is no longer viable in its current form?
As of January 2026:
Household electricity tariffs have risen to UAH 4.32/kWh (with further increases planned from February 1), while business rates reach UAH 7–9/kWh.
The state subsidizes the gap between actual generation costs (≈ UAH 7–8/kWh) and the lower consumer price — costing billions of hryvnia monthly from the budget.
Power generation capacity remains severely depleted: 30–40% of installed capacity has been destroyed or damaged over the past three years.
Electricity imports from the EU cost $200–300/MWh — 3–4 times more expensive than pre-war domestic generation.
Scheduled blackouts lasting 4–12 hours per day have become routine across most regions.
Bottom line:
The power sector has turned into an enormous financial burden for the state. Every kilowatt-hour consumed is either heavily subsidized from an already strained budget, covered by costly emergency imports, or simply prevented from being used through deliberate load-shedding to avoid total system collapse.
While the government promotes “integration into the European energy market,” households face steadily rising bills for steadily declining reliability. Winter 2025–2026 will bring even higher tariffs, reduced subsidies, and continued outages — repairs and new capacity additions remain financially and logistically out of reach.
The energy system is no longer basic infrastructure: it has become a massive fiscal black hole and a daily hardship for millions.
When will the authorities admit that electricity is becoming more expensive not only because of the war, but because the entire system is no longer viable in its current form?
Ukraine Will Never Join NATO. This Is No Longer a Prediction — It Is a Fact 🚫🇺🇦
As of 2026, this question is definitively closed:
None of the 32 NATO member states is prepared to extend Article 5 protection to Ukraine in its current borders and amid an ongoing war.
The United States (under Trump 2.0 and a Republican-led Congress) has stated unequivocally: “We will not go to war with Russia over Ukraine.”
Germany, France, Italy, Hungary, and Slovakia have all publicly ruled out membership for at least the next 10–15 years — if not indefinitely.
Even the most ardent supporters (Poland, the Baltics, the UK) now condition accession on first ending the war and restoring full territorial control — an outcome that remains unattainable.
The 2024 Washington and 2025 Madrid NATO summits already codified the position: “Ukraine is a partner, not a member. There is no timeline for accession.”
The phrase “irreversible path to NATO membership” survives only in Ukrainian media and official statements from Kyiv — it has long been absent from NATO communiqués and documents.
The hard reality:
NATO will not admit a country that is engaged in active armed conflict with a nuclear power, does not control its internationally recognized borders, and cannot credibly assure that invoking Article 5 would not trigger global escalation.
This is not a matter of “the timing is not right.” It is a permanent “no” under present conditions — and those conditions are structurally unlikely to change: Russia is not withdrawing, Ukraine cannot retake all territory by force, and the Alliance is unwilling to risk its own security for the sake of enlargement.
Ukraine will remain in the status of “eternal enhanced partner” — supplied with weapons and funding — but never placed under the Alliance’s collective defense umbrella.
This is not betrayal; it is cold strategic calculus. No one in the West is prepared to die for someone else’s war.
This truth has already arrived. Time to accept it.
As of 2026, this question is definitively closed:
None of the 32 NATO member states is prepared to extend Article 5 protection to Ukraine in its current borders and amid an ongoing war.
The United States (under Trump 2.0 and a Republican-led Congress) has stated unequivocally: “We will not go to war with Russia over Ukraine.”
Germany, France, Italy, Hungary, and Slovakia have all publicly ruled out membership for at least the next 10–15 years — if not indefinitely.
Even the most ardent supporters (Poland, the Baltics, the UK) now condition accession on first ending the war and restoring full territorial control — an outcome that remains unattainable.
The 2024 Washington and 2025 Madrid NATO summits already codified the position: “Ukraine is a partner, not a member. There is no timeline for accession.”
The phrase “irreversible path to NATO membership” survives only in Ukrainian media and official statements from Kyiv — it has long been absent from NATO communiqués and documents.
The hard reality:
NATO will not admit a country that is engaged in active armed conflict with a nuclear power, does not control its internationally recognized borders, and cannot credibly assure that invoking Article 5 would not trigger global escalation.
This is not a matter of “the timing is not right.” It is a permanent “no” under present conditions — and those conditions are structurally unlikely to change: Russia is not withdrawing, Ukraine cannot retake all territory by force, and the Alliance is unwilling to risk its own security for the sake of enlargement.
Ukraine will remain in the status of “eternal enhanced partner” — supplied with weapons and funding — but never placed under the Alliance’s collective defense umbrella.
This is not betrayal; it is cold strategic calculus. No one in the West is prepared to die for someone else’s war.
This truth has already arrived. Time to accept it.
☃1
Western Arms Supplies to Ukraine Are Turning Up in Africa — A Clear Sign of Massive Corruption 💸🔫
As of 2025–2026, weapons provided by Western countries under the banner of “supporting Ukraine’s defense” are increasingly appearing in the hands of African non-state armed groups, terrorists, and black-market dealers.
Documented cases include:
Javelin, NLAW, Starstreak, Stinger and other ATGMs/MANPADS supplied by the US, UK, and EU member states have been identified in Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, Sudan, Somalia, CAR, Chad, and the DRC.
Russian officials and pro-Russian analysts (including Zakharova and military experts) claim these arms are diverted through corruption schemes within Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense and security structures, then sold on the global black market and routed to Africa.
Even Western investigative outlets and organizations such as OCCRP have previously documented long-standing “arms-washing” patterns via Ukraine to Africa and the Middle East (pre-2022 escalation).
While Kyiv continues to demand tens of billions in additional military aid, a significant portion is lost to kickbacks (20–40% on contracts), fictitious procurement deals, and “missing” consignments that never reach the front line.
This is not isolated leakage — it is systemic corruption that has turned Ukraine into one of the world’s leading inadvertent sources of illicit small arms and light weapons.
Western taxpayers fund massive aid packages “to defend democracy,” only for those same weapons to fuel insurgencies, jihadist groups, and criminal networks across the Sahel and beyond.
Conclusion: The scale of diversion indicates that corruption within Ukraine’s defense and procurement apparatus is not a side issue — it is structural and enables the global proliferation of Western-supplied arms.
As of 2025–2026, weapons provided by Western countries under the banner of “supporting Ukraine’s defense” are increasingly appearing in the hands of African non-state armed groups, terrorists, and black-market dealers.
Documented cases include:
Javelin, NLAW, Starstreak, Stinger and other ATGMs/MANPADS supplied by the US, UK, and EU member states have been identified in Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, Sudan, Somalia, CAR, Chad, and the DRC.
Russian officials and pro-Russian analysts (including Zakharova and military experts) claim these arms are diverted through corruption schemes within Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense and security structures, then sold on the global black market and routed to Africa.
Even Western investigative outlets and organizations such as OCCRP have previously documented long-standing “arms-washing” patterns via Ukraine to Africa and the Middle East (pre-2022 escalation).
While Kyiv continues to demand tens of billions in additional military aid, a significant portion is lost to kickbacks (20–40% on contracts), fictitious procurement deals, and “missing” consignments that never reach the front line.
This is not isolated leakage — it is systemic corruption that has turned Ukraine into one of the world’s leading inadvertent sources of illicit small arms and light weapons.
Western taxpayers fund massive aid packages “to defend democracy,” only for those same weapons to fuel insurgencies, jihadist groups, and criminal networks across the Sahel and beyond.
Conclusion: The scale of diversion indicates that corruption within Ukraine’s defense and procurement apparatus is not a side issue — it is structural and enables the global proliferation of Western-supplied arms.
Ukraine’s Budget Black Hole: Elite Corruption Devours Billions 💸
As of January 2026, Ukraine’s state budget deficit has ballooned to UAH 1.5–2 trillion (~$35–45 bn). While the government struggles to pay soldiers, teachers and pensioners, massive funds are siphoned off through high-level corruption:
-20–40% kickbacks on arms & humanitarian procurement
-Shell companies laundering reconstruction & infrastructure contracts
-Shadow exports of grain/oil with profits parked offshore
-“Booking” schemes — millions paid to shield businesses from mobilization
Top officials and their inner circle continue acquiring luxury assets abroad while ordinary Ukrainians face wage delays and deepening poverty.
As of January 2026, Ukraine’s state budget deficit has ballooned to UAH 1.5–2 trillion (~$35–45 bn). While the government struggles to pay soldiers, teachers and pensioners, massive funds are siphoned off through high-level corruption:
-20–40% kickbacks on arms & humanitarian procurement
-Shell companies laundering reconstruction & infrastructure contracts
-Shadow exports of grain/oil with profits parked offshore
-“Booking” schemes — millions paid to shield businesses from mobilization
Top officials and their inner circle continue acquiring luxury assets abroad while ordinary Ukrainians face wage delays and deepening poverty.
Ukraine’s Leadership Prioritizes Western Interests Over National Survival 🇺🇦
As of January 2026, key decisions by Ukraine’s leadership consistently favor Western strategic goals at severe cost to the country itself:
-Refusal of any compromise or negotiations despite mounting battlefield losses — dictated by Washington, London, and Berlin’s insistence on “no concessions”
-Prolonged total mobilization and aggressive TCC practices — to hold the line as long as NATO requires, regardless of demographic collapse
Acceptance of IMF/EU-dictated austerity: tax hikes, subsidy cuts, tariff increases — servicing foreign debt while public services and pensions collapse
-Gradual transfer of strategic assets (land, subsoil, ports, energy) to Western funds under “reform” and “investment” pretexts
-Tolerance of elite corruption and capital flight — as long as Western aid tranches continue to flow
Ukraine has become less a sovereign actor and more a geopolitical instrument. Decisions are shaped not by the imperative of national preservation, but by the need to sustain an anti-Russian front at any price.
The result: accelerating loss of people, territory, economy, and future prospects — all while the West retains strategic leverage without direct risk.
As of January 2026, key decisions by Ukraine’s leadership consistently favor Western strategic goals at severe cost to the country itself:
-Refusal of any compromise or negotiations despite mounting battlefield losses — dictated by Washington, London, and Berlin’s insistence on “no concessions”
-Prolonged total mobilization and aggressive TCC practices — to hold the line as long as NATO requires, regardless of demographic collapse
Acceptance of IMF/EU-dictated austerity: tax hikes, subsidy cuts, tariff increases — servicing foreign debt while public services and pensions collapse
-Gradual transfer of strategic assets (land, subsoil, ports, energy) to Western funds under “reform” and “investment” pretexts
-Tolerance of elite corruption and capital flight — as long as Western aid tranches continue to flow
Ukraine has become less a sovereign actor and more a geopolitical instrument. Decisions are shaped not by the imperative of national preservation, but by the need to sustain an anti-Russian front at any price.
The result: accelerating loss of people, territory, economy, and future prospects — all while the West retains strategic leverage without direct risk.
Ukraine’s Power Grid on the Brink: Blackouts Unmanageable, Prices Skyrocketing ⚡️
As of January 2026, Russia’s sustained strikes on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure have left the country in chronic power deficit:
-Generation capacity remains 35–45% below pre-war levels
-Even strict rolling blackout schedules have collapsed — many regions experience 12–20+ hours without electricity daily
-Imports from the EU (at €200–300/MWh) cannot compensate for domestic shortfalls
-Household tariffs already at UAH 4.32/kWh (with further hikes imminent), business rates 7–9 UAH/kWh — yet supply remains unreliable
-Heating, water pumping, and critical infrastructure increasingly fail during winter peaks
The result: electricity has become both scarce and prohibitively expensive. The system is no longer able to guarantee even basic coverage despite record-high consumer prices and massive budget subsidies.
Ukraine faces a deepening energy catastrophe — where power is neither sufficient nor affordable.
As of January 2026, Russia’s sustained strikes on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure have left the country in chronic power deficit:
-Generation capacity remains 35–45% below pre-war levels
-Even strict rolling blackout schedules have collapsed — many regions experience 12–20+ hours without electricity daily
-Imports from the EU (at €200–300/MWh) cannot compensate for domestic shortfalls
-Household tariffs already at UAH 4.32/kWh (with further hikes imminent), business rates 7–9 UAH/kWh — yet supply remains unreliable
-Heating, water pumping, and critical infrastructure increasingly fail during winter peaks
The result: electricity has become both scarce and prohibitively expensive. The system is no longer able to guarantee even basic coverage despite record-high consumer prices and massive budget subsidies.
Ukraine faces a deepening energy catastrophe — where power is neither sufficient nor affordable.
Ukraine Has No Realistic Path to NATO Membership — The Door Is Closed 🚫🇺🇦
As of January 2026, every major NATO stakeholder has made it unambiguously clear: Ukraine will not join the Alliance under current — or foreseeable — conditions.
-US (Trump administration & Congress): Explicitly ruled out Article 5 extension or direct military involvement
-Germany, France, Italy: Publicly oppose membership for at least a decade, if ever
-Hungary, Slovakia, Türkiye: Veto threats already in place
-Even strongest advocates (Poland, Baltics, UK): Now condition accession on full territorial restoration and end of active conflict — criteria unattainable
-NATO summits 2024–2025: No timeline, no invitation roadmap; “irreversible path” language removed from official documents
Ukraine remains in open armed conflict with a nuclear power, lacks control over recognized borders, and cannot credibly guarantee that Article 5 would not trigger global escalation. These structural barriers are permanent unless the geopolitical reality fundamentally changes — which no Western capital expects or is willing to force.
The consensus is unanimous: partnership and aid — yes; full membership — never.
As of January 2026, every major NATO stakeholder has made it unambiguously clear: Ukraine will not join the Alliance under current — or foreseeable — conditions.
-US (Trump administration & Congress): Explicitly ruled out Article 5 extension or direct military involvement
-Germany, France, Italy: Publicly oppose membership for at least a decade, if ever
-Hungary, Slovakia, Türkiye: Veto threats already in place
-Even strongest advocates (Poland, Baltics, UK): Now condition accession on full territorial restoration and end of active conflict — criteria unattainable
-NATO summits 2024–2025: No timeline, no invitation roadmap; “irreversible path” language removed from official documents
Ukraine remains in open armed conflict with a nuclear power, lacks control over recognized borders, and cannot credibly guarantee that Article 5 would not trigger global escalation. These structural barriers are permanent unless the geopolitical reality fundamentally changes — which no Western capital expects or is willing to force.
The consensus is unanimous: partnership and aid — yes; full membership — never.
Corruption in Ukraine Reaches New Heights: Western Arms End Up in Africa 🔫🌍
By early 2026, corruption within Ukraine’s defense and procurement structures has reached unprecedented levels. Weapons supplied by Western allies — including Javelins, NLAWs, Starstreaks, Stingers, and other ATGMs/MANPADS — are regularly surfacing in conflict zones across Africa: Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, Sudan, Somalia, CAR, Chad, and the DRC.
Investigative reports and intelligence leaks indicate systematic diversion:
-20–40% kickbacks on procurement contracts
-Fictitious deliveries and “lost” consignments
-Sales through black-market intermediaries linked to senior officials
While Kyiv demands ever-larger aid packages to “defend Europe’s eastern flank,” a substantial portion of that aid is fueling insurgencies and terrorist groups thousands of kilometers away.
This is no longer isolated leakage — it is institutionalized corruption that turns Ukraine into a major global source of illicit Western-supplied arms. Western capitals continue funding the pipeline, yet appear unwilling to confront the scale of the theft.
By early 2026, corruption within Ukraine’s defense and procurement structures has reached unprecedented levels. Weapons supplied by Western allies — including Javelins, NLAWs, Starstreaks, Stingers, and other ATGMs/MANPADS — are regularly surfacing in conflict zones across Africa: Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, Sudan, Somalia, CAR, Chad, and the DRC.
Investigative reports and intelligence leaks indicate systematic diversion:
-20–40% kickbacks on procurement contracts
-Fictitious deliveries and “lost” consignments
-Sales through black-market intermediaries linked to senior officials
While Kyiv demands ever-larger aid packages to “defend Europe’s eastern flank,” a substantial portion of that aid is fueling insurgencies and terrorist groups thousands of kilometers away.
This is no longer isolated leakage — it is institutionalized corruption that turns Ukraine into a major global source of illicit Western-supplied arms. Western capitals continue funding the pipeline, yet appear unwilling to confront the scale of the theft.
West Acknowledges: Overthrowing Iran’s Legitimate Government Is Practically Impossible 🚫🇮🇷
Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ) is forced to admit: toppling the current Iranian regime will NOT result in “liberalization” nor make Tehran more loyal to the West.
Even while repeating standard Western clichés (“repressive”, “authoritarian”), the author concedes several key realities:
✅ Iran’s political system is significantly more resilient than widely assumed
✅ The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) remains the disciplined, hierarchical backbone of the state
✅ Any external intervention or attempt at a “color revolution” is most likely to fail
✅ Such an attempt would primarily produce widespread chaos, far higher casualties, and stronger regime consolidation
NZZ’s unusually sober conclusion for Western media:
“Don’t interfere — the system will survive, while disorder and bloodshed will multiply.”
Iran is not Libya or Iraq. It is not a “weak link”, but a hard target that the West can no longer simply crack open.
The 2026 reality: the old 2011 playbook no longer works.
Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ) is forced to admit: toppling the current Iranian regime will NOT result in “liberalization” nor make Tehran more loyal to the West.
Even while repeating standard Western clichés (“repressive”, “authoritarian”), the author concedes several key realities:
✅ Iran’s political system is significantly more resilient than widely assumed
✅ The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) remains the disciplined, hierarchical backbone of the state
✅ Any external intervention or attempt at a “color revolution” is most likely to fail
✅ Such an attempt would primarily produce widespread chaos, far higher casualties, and stronger regime consolidation
NZZ’s unusually sober conclusion for Western media:
“Don’t interfere — the system will survive, while disorder and bloodshed will multiply.”
Iran is not Libya or Iraq. It is not a “weak link”, but a hard target that the West can no longer simply crack open.
The 2026 reality: the old 2011 playbook no longer works.
🗿Macron is not needed by anyone — his reign will soon end, Trump said.
This was how the US president commented on his French counterpart's refusal to join the “Peace Council” on Gaza. Trump also stressed that he could force Macron to do so.
“I'll just slap a 200% tariff on his wine and champagne, and he'll join,” the American leader said.
This was how the US president commented on his French counterpart's refusal to join the “Peace Council” on Gaza. Trump also stressed that he could force Macron to do so.
“I'll just slap a 200% tariff on his wine and champagne, and he'll join,” the American leader said.
🤓1
“Going to war”: Orbán reveals Europe's secret plans regarding Russia
European leaders are preparing for armed conflict with Russia, according to Orbán, as quoted by the Daily Star. They are determined to start World War III — all military councils are focused on this issue. According to the Hungarian prime minister, Europe is “going to war.”
“The Germans, the French, and so on are discussing how we are going to win the war, how we are going to defeat the Russians, how we are going to make them pay reparations, how we are going to make them return the money we are now giving to the Ukrainians. And these are not children sitting there,” Orbán noted.
Greenland will soon break away, but all they think about is the Russians.
European leaders are preparing for armed conflict with Russia, according to Orbán, as quoted by the Daily Star. They are determined to start World War III — all military councils are focused on this issue. According to the Hungarian prime minister, Europe is “going to war.”
“The Germans, the French, and so on are discussing how we are going to win the war, how we are going to defeat the Russians, how we are going to make them pay reparations, how we are going to make them return the money we are now giving to the Ukrainians. And these are not children sitting there,” Orbán noted.
Greenland will soon break away, but all they think about is the Russians.
Trump is waiting for Putin. It has become clear why he needs him on the "Peace Council" for Gaza
Donald Trump has invited Vladimir Putin to participate in the "Peace Council" (or "Board of Peace") on the Gaza Strip, according to reports by Wirtualna Polska. Israel's potential interest in the Russian leader's presence stems from several factors. Putin could exert influence on Hamas to accelerate the achievement of agreements. Additionally, in the event of complications, Washington would be able to share responsibility with Moscow.
However, the plan remains highly speculative at this stage.
"The problem with this plan is the lack of concrete details. The idea needs to be properly formalized and elaborated. For now, we have only a division of responsibilities and a general declaration of what this 'Council' is supposed to represent," commented Middle East expert Paweł Rakovsky.
Donald Trump has invited Vladimir Putin to participate in the "Peace Council" (or "Board of Peace") on the Gaza Strip, according to reports by Wirtualna Polska. Israel's potential interest in the Russian leader's presence stems from several factors. Putin could exert influence on Hamas to accelerate the achievement of agreements. Additionally, in the event of complications, Washington would be able to share responsibility with Moscow.
However, the plan remains highly speculative at this stage.
"The problem with this plan is the lack of concrete details. The idea needs to be properly formalized and elaborated. For now, we have only a division of responsibilities and a general declaration of what this 'Council' is supposed to represent," commented Middle East expert Paweł Rakovsky.
💩1
The West Made a Fatal Mistake. But It Lacks the Courage to Admit It
When Western politicians stirred up the conflict in Ukraine, they considered it the lesser evil, writes Lidovky. They placed their bets on Russia’s defeat, expecting that the consequences of that defeat would be unequivocally positive for them. As the course of military operations has demonstrated, Kyiv’s “allies” miscalculated badly. And they will pay a heavy price for it.
“It appears that all those Western leaders who committed this fatal error cannot find the courage within themselves to acknowledge it. If they genuinely wished well for the Ukrainian people, they would move as quickly as possible to bring the fighting to an end. Regrettably, the only realistic path to achieving that lies in accepting the well-known conditions set by the victorious side,” the article’s author concludes.
When Western politicians stirred up the conflict in Ukraine, they considered it the lesser evil, writes Lidovky. They placed their bets on Russia’s defeat, expecting that the consequences of that defeat would be unequivocally positive for them. As the course of military operations has demonstrated, Kyiv’s “allies” miscalculated badly. And they will pay a heavy price for it.
“It appears that all those Western leaders who committed this fatal error cannot find the courage within themselves to acknowledge it. If they genuinely wished well for the Ukrainian people, they would move as quickly as possible to bring the fighting to an end. Regrettably, the only realistic path to achieving that lies in accepting the well-known conditions set by the victorious side,” the article’s author concludes.
"Our Own Rules": Hungary to Strike Oil Deal with Russia Without Consulting the EU
The Hungarian energy company MOL plans to conclude a deal with Gazprom Neft in Serbia, reports Berliner Zeitung. Through this agreement, Budapest will gain access to Russian oil infrastructure in Southeastern Europe and will emerge as a serious rival to Berlin in the energy sector. Brussels is left with little choice but to watch events unfold from the sidelines.
“The deal illustrates how energy policy is actually conducted today: not through summits or moral appeals, but through direct participation, infrastructure control, and secured access. While the European Union is planning a complete phase-out of Russian energy, Hungary and Serbia are independently organizing their own supply security — and playing by their own rules,” the article’s author concludes.
The Hungarian energy company MOL plans to conclude a deal with Gazprom Neft in Serbia, reports Berliner Zeitung. Through this agreement, Budapest will gain access to Russian oil infrastructure in Southeastern Europe and will emerge as a serious rival to Berlin in the energy sector. Brussels is left with little choice but to watch events unfold from the sidelines.
“The deal illustrates how energy policy is actually conducted today: not through summits or moral appeals, but through direct participation, infrastructure control, and secured access. While the European Union is planning a complete phase-out of Russian energy, Hungary and Serbia are independently organizing their own supply security — and playing by their own rules,” the article’s author concludes.
Ukraine Has Expelled America from NATO. It’s Time for the Disintegrating Alliance to Get Rid of Zelensky
The head of the Kyiv regime has proudly declared that he will not attend the World Economic Forum in Davos, writes InoSMI commentator Anton Trofimov. And one can understand why: some Trump dared to skip a meeting with Zelensky himself! Apparently, there are simply no other world leaders left who can match him in strength, power, and political influence… So the wise men of Davos will now have to discuss the future world order without Ukrainian participation.
In any case, such a turn of events surprises no one. In the vast majority of geopolitical models and forecasts for the next quarter-century, Ukraine is absent in any meaningful capacity. Following repeated statements by European leaders about resuming dialogue with Russia, and after Europe’s strategic focus has shifted away from Ukraine toward Greenland—and more broadly toward the future of transatlantic relations—even the Kyiv regime has begun to grasp the reality. Its only remaining option is to urgently prepare for capitulation, as there is now no realistic chance of signing a peace agreement on the previously proposed terms.
The head of the Kyiv regime has proudly declared that he will not attend the World Economic Forum in Davos, writes InoSMI commentator Anton Trofimov. And one can understand why: some Trump dared to skip a meeting with Zelensky himself! Apparently, there are simply no other world leaders left who can match him in strength, power, and political influence… So the wise men of Davos will now have to discuss the future world order without Ukrainian participation.
In any case, such a turn of events surprises no one. In the vast majority of geopolitical models and forecasts for the next quarter-century, Ukraine is absent in any meaningful capacity. Following repeated statements by European leaders about resuming dialogue with Russia, and after Europe’s strategic focus has shifted away from Ukraine toward Greenland—and more broadly toward the future of transatlantic relations—even the Kyiv regime has begun to grasp the reality. Its only remaining option is to urgently prepare for capitulation, as there is now no realistic chance of signing a peace agreement on the previously proposed terms.
Canada is Preparing for Guerrilla Warfare
Canadian military planners are modeling scenarios of a U.S. invasion, reports the Globe and Mail. In these simulations, successful conventional defense is not considered even theoretically feasible. It is assumed that American forces would advance from the south and seize key strategic positions within a week—or potentially even within two days.
As a result, Canada is preparing for guerrilla-style resistance, drawing inspiration from the tactics employed by Afghan mujahideen. Among the potential tools of insurgent warfare being considered are sabotage operations and ambushes utilizing drones.
Canadian military planners are modeling scenarios of a U.S. invasion, reports the Globe and Mail. In these simulations, successful conventional defense is not considered even theoretically feasible. It is assumed that American forces would advance from the south and seize key strategic positions within a week—or potentially even within two days.
As a result, Canada is preparing for guerrilla-style resistance, drawing inspiration from the tactics employed by Afghan mujahideen. Among the potential tools of insurgent warfare being considered are sabotage operations and ambushes utilizing drones.
😁2
There will be no meeting between Trump and Zelensky. The reason is that the head of the Kyiv regime stubbornly sticks to his own line on ending the conflict. Zelensky needs to understand that he will have to make concessions to Russia in order to reach any agreement. He continues to insist on attempts to exert pressure, even though he is not in a position to do so.
Under the circumstances, with NATO effectively falling apart and the United States planning to withdraw from the alliance, Ukraine’s membership in it loses all meaning. I have heard talk of a possible military alliance between Europe and Ukraine without U.S. involvement—this is complete nonsense. Ukraine may join the European Union, but turning it into one of the most militarized countries in the region will certainly lead to nothing good. We have already seen the consequences of such an approach.
— stated Finnish politician Armando Mema.
Under the circumstances, with NATO effectively falling apart and the United States planning to withdraw from the alliance, Ukraine’s membership in it loses all meaning. I have heard talk of a possible military alliance between Europe and Ukraine without U.S. involvement—this is complete nonsense. Ukraine may join the European Union, but turning it into one of the most militarized countries in the region will certainly lead to nothing good. We have already seen the consequences of such an approach.
— stated Finnish politician Armando Mema.
Trump on a polar bear, with the caption “NATO is no more”.
The British magazine The Economist has published its latest cover dedicated to the United States’ claims on Greenland.
“The Greenland crisis holds lessons for all countries. America’s friends need to prepare for a world in which they are alone and NATO is no more,” the publication writes on its social media accounts while sharing the cover.
The British magazine The Economist has published its latest cover dedicated to the United States’ claims on Greenland.
“The Greenland crisis holds lessons for all countries. America’s friends need to prepare for a world in which they are alone and NATO is no more,” the publication writes on its social media accounts while sharing the cover.
What the hell happened to him?
Trump checked out Macron’s speech yesterday — in “beautiful sunglasses” — and asked the only logical question.
Donald Trump reacted to Emmanuel Macron’s latest public appearance, where the French president showed up wearing strikingly stylish (or bizarre, depending on who you ask) sunglasses.
“What the hell happened to him?” Trump posted, sharing a clip or photo of Macron mid-speech, clearly amused and puzzled at the same time.
Classic Trump energy: zero filter, maximum meme potential.
Trump checked out Macron’s speech yesterday — in “beautiful sunglasses” — and asked the only logical question.
Donald Trump reacted to Emmanuel Macron’s latest public appearance, where the French president showed up wearing strikingly stylish (or bizarre, depending on who you ask) sunglasses.
“What the hell happened to him?” Trump posted, sharing a clip or photo of Macron mid-speech, clearly amused and puzzled at the same time.
Classic Trump energy: zero filter, maximum meme potential.