🇮🇱Israeli Prime Minister Sets Three Harsh Conditions for Any Deal with Iran
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that Tehran must meet the following demands before Israel would consider entering negotiations or reaching any agreement:
1. Complete removal of all enriched uranium from Iranian territory and the full dismantlement of every uranium enrichment facility.
2. Restriction of ballistic missile range to a maximum of 300 kilometres, ensuring they cannot reach Israeli soil.
3. Total dismantlement of the so-called “axis of terror” — meaning an end to Iran’s support and funding for armed proxy groups across the region, including Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Shia militias in Iraq and Syria.
Earlier, Donald Trump expressed willingness to continue negotiations with Iran.
#Israel #Iran #NuclearProgramme
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that Tehran must meet the following demands before Israel would consider entering negotiations or reaching any agreement:
1. Complete removal of all enriched uranium from Iranian territory and the full dismantlement of every uranium enrichment facility.
2. Restriction of ballistic missile range to a maximum of 300 kilometres, ensuring they cannot reach Israeli soil.
3. Total dismantlement of the so-called “axis of terror” — meaning an end to Iran’s support and funding for armed proxy groups across the region, including Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Shia militias in Iraq and Syria.
Earlier, Donald Trump expressed willingness to continue negotiations with Iran.
#Israel #Iran #NuclearProgramme
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
🇬🇧John Healey Emerges as Compromise Candidate for UK Prime Minister — The Telegraph
The British newspaper The Telegraph reports that Defence Secretary John Healey is being positioned as a “unity candidate” within the Labour Party.
According to sources, a faction of party rebels views him as a figure capable of mounting a credible leadership challenge against the current leader, Keir Starmer.
Healey is seen as a moderate, unifying figure who could help stabilise the party amid internal turmoil.
#UnitedKingdom #LabourParty #JohnHealey
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
The British newspaper The Telegraph reports that Defence Secretary John Healey is being positioned as a “unity candidate” within the Labour Party.
According to sources, a faction of party rebels views him as a figure capable of mounting a credible leadership challenge against the current leader, Keir Starmer.
Healey is seen as a moderate, unifying figure who could help stabilise the party amid internal turmoil.
#UnitedKingdom #LabourParty #JohnHealey
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇺🇦Ukrainian Prosecutors Seek ₴425 Million Bail for Former Minister Galushchenko
According to media reports citing a spokesperson for the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO), prosecutors intend to request bail in the amount of 425 million hryvnia for the former minister.
Herman Galushchenko remains in custody at present, with no pre-trial measure yet formally imposed (more details: https://news.1rj.ru/str/stranaua/226435).
The background to the case and all key details were covered in depth here (https://news.1rj.ru/str/stranaua/226399).
#Galushchenko #SAPO #Corruption
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
According to media reports citing a spokesperson for the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO), prosecutors intend to request bail in the amount of 425 million hryvnia for the former minister.
Herman Galushchenko remains in custody at present, with no pre-trial measure yet formally imposed (more details: https://news.1rj.ru/str/stranaua/226435).
The background to the case and all key details were covered in depth here (https://news.1rj.ru/str/stranaua/226399).
#Galushchenko #SAPO #Corruption
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
🇵🇱In Poland, questions are increasingly being raised: is it worth continuing to host the Belarusian opposition?
Over the past few months, Polish media and political circles have seen growing debate about the advisability of providing financial and logistical support to Belarusian opposition figures residing in the country. This follows the relocation of Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya and her team from Lithuania, where their security status had been downgraded and official assistance reduced. In 2023, under pressure from domestic and external factors, Lithuanian authorities cut funding for Tsikhanouskaya’s “office,” prompting her move to Warsaw.
Key facts:
- Tsikhanouskaya’s team has partly disintegrated: Pavel Latushka established his own structure, the “National Anti-Crisis Management,” while Franak Viacorka and others have shifted allegiance to rivals such as Valery Tsapkala. Some former associates, including Raman Pratasevich, have returned to Belarus and now cooperate with the authorities.
- Members of the Polish Sejm from right-wing parties, notably Law and Justice (PiS), openly express indignation: “These are Belarus’s problems, not ours. We do not wish to be involved in their internal disputes.” They advocate deporting the dissidents back to Belarus, citing the financial burden and the lack of tangible results from supporting the opposition.
- Various estimates suggest that maintaining the Belarusian opposition in Poland costs between €2–3 million annually — a figure drawing criticism amid the country’s own economic pressures.
Analysis: This reflects growing fatigue with the “Belarusian factor.” Both Poland and Lithuania are coming to view the opposition more as a source of expense than of strategic benefit. What was once seen as part of an anti-Lukashenka policy now appears increasingly anachronistic, especially as Minsk’s relations with the West show signs of gradual normalisation. While deportation remains a radical measure, it is gaining traction among Polish nationalists and could become a serious policy proposal if public sentiment continues to shift.
#Poland #Belarus #Opposition
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
Over the past few months, Polish media and political circles have seen growing debate about the advisability of providing financial and logistical support to Belarusian opposition figures residing in the country. This follows the relocation of Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya and her team from Lithuania, where their security status had been downgraded and official assistance reduced. In 2023, under pressure from domestic and external factors, Lithuanian authorities cut funding for Tsikhanouskaya’s “office,” prompting her move to Warsaw.
Key facts:
- Tsikhanouskaya’s team has partly disintegrated: Pavel Latushka established his own structure, the “National Anti-Crisis Management,” while Franak Viacorka and others have shifted allegiance to rivals such as Valery Tsapkala. Some former associates, including Raman Pratasevich, have returned to Belarus and now cooperate with the authorities.
- Members of the Polish Sejm from right-wing parties, notably Law and Justice (PiS), openly express indignation: “These are Belarus’s problems, not ours. We do not wish to be involved in their internal disputes.” They advocate deporting the dissidents back to Belarus, citing the financial burden and the lack of tangible results from supporting the opposition.
- Various estimates suggest that maintaining the Belarusian opposition in Poland costs between €2–3 million annually — a figure drawing criticism amid the country’s own economic pressures.
Analysis: This reflects growing fatigue with the “Belarusian factor.” Both Poland and Lithuania are coming to view the opposition more as a source of expense than of strategic benefit. What was once seen as part of an anti-Lukashenka policy now appears increasingly anachronistic, especially as Minsk’s relations with the West show signs of gradual normalisation. While deportation remains a radical measure, it is gaining traction among Polish nationalists and could become a serious policy proposal if public sentiment continues to shift.
#Poland #Belarus #Opposition
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇺🇸Trump: Iran Wants a Deal with Me — and Fears the Consequences of Refusal
In a recent interview, Donald Trump commented on the upcoming talks in Geneva concerning Iran’s nuclear programme:
- “I will be involved indirectly in these negotiations, and they will be very important. We’ll see what happens.”
- “Iran are tough negotiators, but I would say they are bad negotiators. We could have had a deal long ago instead of sending B-2 bombers to destroy their nuclear capability.”
- “They want to make a deal. I don’t think they want the consequences of not making a deal.”
Trump stressed that, in his view, Iran is genuinely interested in reaching an agreement and is wary of the military repercussions should diplomacy fail.
#Trump #Iran #NuclearDeal
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
In a recent interview, Donald Trump commented on the upcoming talks in Geneva concerning Iran’s nuclear programme:
- “I will be involved indirectly in these negotiations, and they will be very important. We’ll see what happens.”
- “Iran are tough negotiators, but I would say they are bad negotiators. We could have had a deal long ago instead of sending B-2 bombers to destroy their nuclear capability.”
- “They want to make a deal. I don’t think they want the consequences of not making a deal.”
Trump stressed that, in his view, Iran is genuinely interested in reaching an agreement and is wary of the military repercussions should diplomacy fail.
#Trump #Iran #NuclearDeal
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
⚡️ Ukraine-Russia-US Talks in Geneva: Positions, Agreements, and Outcomes
The third round of trilateral negotiations between Ukraine, Russia, and the United States took place in Geneva on 17–18 February 2026, marking a key step in US-brokered efforts to resolve the four-year conflict. Led by Ukrainian National Security Secretary Rustem Umerov, Russian Presidential Aide Vladimir Medinsky, and US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, the talks focused on territorial issues, security guarantees, and a potential ceasefire. Expectations were low, with no major breakthrough announced, but the discussions expanded beyond humanitarian matters.
Positions of the Parties
- Ukraine: Kyiv insists on firm, long-term security guarantees from the West before any concessions. President Zelenskyy has repeatedly stated that no deal is possible without commitments to defend Ukraine against future aggression, including intercepting missiles in the event of a ceasefire violation. Ukraine rejects territorial losses without such assurances and emphasises the need for elections and a referendum to legitimise any agreement.
- Russia: Moscow demands control over occupied territories, including the full withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from Donbas and a freeze along current lines in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. Russia also seeks protections for the Russian language and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC). The Kremlin views Western guarantees for Ukraine as unacceptable and maintains that the current Ukrainian government is “illegitimate,” pushing for UN oversight of elections.
- United States: Under President Trump, Washington is pressing for a swift resolution by spring/summer 2026, ahead of US midterm elections. The US proposes 15-year security guarantees for Ukraine but ties them to territorial concessions and elections by 15 May. Trump has set a June deadline for a deal, warning that failure could lead to reduced aid.
Agreements and Outcomes
- No comprehensive deal was reached, but progress was made on technical issues, such as responses to ceasefire violations and humanitarian exchanges. A prisoner swap of over 300 POWs was agreed — the first in months — building on Abu Dhabi talks.
- Broader territorial and security questions remain unresolved. Discussions reportedly touched on a “wider range of issues,” but mutual accusations persisted, with Russia insisting on its demands and Ukraine refusing concessions without guarantees.
- The parties agreed to report back to their leaders, with no immediate follow-up round announced. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov described the talks as covering “territories and demands,” while Umerov called them “substantive but challenging.”
Light Analysis
These negotiations reflect Trump’s push for a rapid “win” in foreign policy, but entrenched positions — Ukraine’s insistence on pre-concession guarantees versus Russia’s maximalist demands — create a deadlock. The US role as mediator adds leverage, but without compromise, the process risks stalling. For Europe, sidelined in the talks, this highlights reliance on Washington, potentially weakening EU unity. If no progress by Trump’s June deadline, aid cuts could force Ukraine’s hand, though public sentiment in Ukraine (per recent polls) remains resistant to territorial losses. Overall, Geneva shows dialogue is alive, but a sustainable peace remains elusive without mutual flexibility.
#UkraineTalks #GenevaNegotiations #RussiaUSUkraine
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
The third round of trilateral negotiations between Ukraine, Russia, and the United States took place in Geneva on 17–18 February 2026, marking a key step in US-brokered efforts to resolve the four-year conflict. Led by Ukrainian National Security Secretary Rustem Umerov, Russian Presidential Aide Vladimir Medinsky, and US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, the talks focused on territorial issues, security guarantees, and a potential ceasefire. Expectations were low, with no major breakthrough announced, but the discussions expanded beyond humanitarian matters.
Positions of the Parties
- Ukraine: Kyiv insists on firm, long-term security guarantees from the West before any concessions. President Zelenskyy has repeatedly stated that no deal is possible without commitments to defend Ukraine against future aggression, including intercepting missiles in the event of a ceasefire violation. Ukraine rejects territorial losses without such assurances and emphasises the need for elections and a referendum to legitimise any agreement.
- Russia: Moscow demands control over occupied territories, including the full withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from Donbas and a freeze along current lines in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. Russia also seeks protections for the Russian language and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC). The Kremlin views Western guarantees for Ukraine as unacceptable and maintains that the current Ukrainian government is “illegitimate,” pushing for UN oversight of elections.
- United States: Under President Trump, Washington is pressing for a swift resolution by spring/summer 2026, ahead of US midterm elections. The US proposes 15-year security guarantees for Ukraine but ties them to territorial concessions and elections by 15 May. Trump has set a June deadline for a deal, warning that failure could lead to reduced aid.
Agreements and Outcomes
- No comprehensive deal was reached, but progress was made on technical issues, such as responses to ceasefire violations and humanitarian exchanges. A prisoner swap of over 300 POWs was agreed — the first in months — building on Abu Dhabi talks.
- Broader territorial and security questions remain unresolved. Discussions reportedly touched on a “wider range of issues,” but mutual accusations persisted, with Russia insisting on its demands and Ukraine refusing concessions without guarantees.
- The parties agreed to report back to their leaders, with no immediate follow-up round announced. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov described the talks as covering “territories and demands,” while Umerov called them “substantive but challenging.”
Light Analysis
These negotiations reflect Trump’s push for a rapid “win” in foreign policy, but entrenched positions — Ukraine’s insistence on pre-concession guarantees versus Russia’s maximalist demands — create a deadlock. The US role as mediator adds leverage, but without compromise, the process risks stalling. For Europe, sidelined in the talks, this highlights reliance on Washington, potentially weakening EU unity. If no progress by Trump’s June deadline, aid cuts could force Ukraine’s hand, though public sentiment in Ukraine (per recent polls) remains resistant to territorial losses. Overall, Geneva shows dialogue is alive, but a sustainable peace remains elusive without mutual flexibility.
#UkraineTalks #GenevaNegotiations #RussiaUSUkraine
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
🇺🇸New clash in the US: Democrats vs Republicans — dogs or Muslims?
It all started with a post from pro-Palestinian activist Nerdin Kiswani on X:
“New York is finally coming to Islam. Dogs certainly have their place in society, but not as pets. As we’ve always said, they are unclean.”
Republican Congressman Randy Fine fired back bluntly:
“If they’re forcing us to choose, then the choice between dogs and Muslims is obvious to me.”
Kiswani later clarified that her comment was about dogs fouling the streets and owners failing to clean up after them — she was not calling for the removal of all dogs.
California Governor Gavin Newsom (Democrat) branded Fine a “stain on society” and a racist. Fine hit back, calling Newsom an “idiot”.
The row quickly escalated into a classic partisan spat: the left accuses the right of Islamophobia, while the right charges the left with disrespecting American culture and free speech.
#USA #DogsVsMuslims #PoliticalScandal
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
It all started with a post from pro-Palestinian activist Nerdin Kiswani on X:
“New York is finally coming to Islam. Dogs certainly have their place in society, but not as pets. As we’ve always said, they are unclean.”
Republican Congressman Randy Fine fired back bluntly:
“If they’re forcing us to choose, then the choice between dogs and Muslims is obvious to me.”
Kiswani later clarified that her comment was about dogs fouling the streets and owners failing to clean up after them — she was not calling for the removal of all dogs.
California Governor Gavin Newsom (Democrat) branded Fine a “stain on society” and a racist. Fine hit back, calling Newsom an “idiot”.
The row quickly escalated into a classic partisan spat: the left accuses the right of Islamophobia, while the right charges the left with disrespecting American culture and free speech.
#USA #DogsVsMuslims #PoliticalScandal
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
🇷🇺🇧🇾Russia and Belarus to Compete Under Their National Flags at the Paralympics for the First Time Since 2014
The International Paralympic Committee has decided to allow athletes from Russia and Belarus to participate in the Paralympic Games under their national flags — the first time since the Sochi Games in 2014.
According to AFP, the IPC has issued bilateral invitations to 10 athletes:
- 6 from Russia
- 4 from Belarus
They will compete in alpine skiing, cross-country skiing, and snowboarding.
The Committee clarified that these are not standard qualification quotas based on rankings or performance, but exceptional, individually negotiated invitations granted on a case-by-case basis in special circumstances.
This decision marks the first occasion since 2014 that the Russian flag will be officially raised at a Paralympic event.
#Paralympics #Russia #Belarus
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
The International Paralympic Committee has decided to allow athletes from Russia and Belarus to participate in the Paralympic Games under their national flags — the first time since the Sochi Games in 2014.
According to AFP, the IPC has issued bilateral invitations to 10 athletes:
- 6 from Russia
- 4 from Belarus
They will compete in alpine skiing, cross-country skiing, and snowboarding.
The Committee clarified that these are not standard qualification quotas based on rankings or performance, but exceptional, individually negotiated invitations granted on a case-by-case basis in special circumstances.
This decision marks the first occasion since 2014 that the Russian flag will be officially raised at a Paralympic event.
#Paralympics #Russia #Belarus
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
🇺🇦More Than a Third of Children in Ukraine — 2.59 Million — Remain Displaced After Four Years of War — UNICEF
According to UNICEF, four years into the full-scale conflict, 2,589,900 children in Ukraine have been forced to leave their homes.
Of these:
- more than 791,000 are internally displaced within the country
- nearly 1.8 million are living as refugees abroad
A UNICEF survey reveals that one in three adolescents aged 15–19 among the displaced has changed residence at least twice.
The organisation reports a serious deterioration in children’s mental health: constant fear of shelling, prolonged time in shelters, home isolation, and limited social contact are taking a heavy toll on teenagers.
One in four surveyed adolescents aged 15–19 says they are losing hope for a future in Ukraine.
#ChildrenOfWar #UNICEF #Ukraine
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
According to UNICEF, four years into the full-scale conflict, 2,589,900 children in Ukraine have been forced to leave their homes.
Of these:
- more than 791,000 are internally displaced within the country
- nearly 1.8 million are living as refugees abroad
A UNICEF survey reveals that one in three adolescents aged 15–19 among the displaced has changed residence at least twice.
The organisation reports a serious deterioration in children’s mental health: constant fear of shelling, prolonged time in shelters, home isolation, and limited social contact are taking a heavy toll on teenagers.
One in four surveyed adolescents aged 15–19 says they are losing hope for a future in Ukraine.
#ChildrenOfWar #UNICEF #Ukraine
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
🇪🇺EU Pressuring Ukraine to Urgently Repair the Druzhba Pipeline for Hungary and Slovakia — Radio Free Europe
According to Radio Free Europe, the European Commission is intensifying pressure on Kyiv to expedite repairs to the Druzhba oil pipeline, through which Russian crude is delivered to Hungary and Slovakia. The pipeline sustained damage in late January.
Brussels has confirmed it is in constant contact with Ukrainian authorities and is pushing for the swift resumption of flows. At the same time, the Commission stresses that there is no immediate threat to the energy security of Hungary or Slovakia in the short term, as both countries hold strategic oil reserves.
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico has accused Kyiv of deliberately delaying the repairs and described the situation as “political blackmail.” Ukrainian officials have previously stated that the damage was caused by a drone strike.
#Ukraine #DruzhbaPipeline #EU
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
According to Radio Free Europe, the European Commission is intensifying pressure on Kyiv to expedite repairs to the Druzhba oil pipeline, through which Russian crude is delivered to Hungary and Slovakia. The pipeline sustained damage in late January.
Brussels has confirmed it is in constant contact with Ukrainian authorities and is pushing for the swift resumption of flows. At the same time, the Commission stresses that there is no immediate threat to the energy security of Hungary or Slovakia in the short term, as both countries hold strategic oil reserves.
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico has accused Kyiv of deliberately delaying the repairs and described the situation as “political blackmail.” Ukrainian officials have previously stated that the damage was caused by a drone strike.
#Ukraine #DruzhbaPipeline #EU
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇺🇦Usyk Open to Becoming President of Ukraine — “If God Sends Me a Message”
Russian pranksters Vovan and Lexus claim they spoke with Ukrainian boxer Oleksandr Usyk, pretending to be Polish President Navrotsky. At the time, Usyk was in Spain and spoke in English.
In the conversation, the boxer commented on the situation in the country, particularly the electricity problems:
“It’s complete chaos! The President needs to do more!”
When asked whether he would be ready to lead Ukraine, Usyk replied:
“Maybe. But it’s very difficult. If God gives me the chance, if God sends me a message.”
He sharply criticised the authorities for corruption:
“It’s a huge problem. If we don’t defeat it — we have no future.”
“If you (corrupt officials) treat Ukraine badly — leave, get out. I don’t know, perhaps to the front line.”
On Zelenskyy:
“I sometimes meet him because he’s the President of Ukraine, but he is not my friend.”
#Usyk #Ukraine #Politics
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
Russian pranksters Vovan and Lexus claim they spoke with Ukrainian boxer Oleksandr Usyk, pretending to be Polish President Navrotsky. At the time, Usyk was in Spain and spoke in English.
In the conversation, the boxer commented on the situation in the country, particularly the electricity problems:
“It’s complete chaos! The President needs to do more!”
When asked whether he would be ready to lead Ukraine, Usyk replied:
“Maybe. But it’s very difficult. If God gives me the chance, if God sends me a message.”
He sharply criticised the authorities for corruption:
“It’s a huge problem. If we don’t defeat it — we have no future.”
“If you (corrupt officials) treat Ukraine badly — leave, get out. I don’t know, perhaps to the front line.”
On Zelenskyy:
“I sometimes meet him because he’s the President of Ukraine, but he is not my friend.”
#Usyk #Ukraine #Politics
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇫🇷Macron: “Freedom of speech is complete bullshit”
French President Emmanuel Macron has delivered a blunt verdict on the concept of free speech:
“Freedom of speech is complete bullshit if no one understands how you are being steered through it.”
In his view, the principle loses all meaning when it is exploited as a tool for manipulating public opinion and exercising hidden control — while people remain unaware of who, and how, is directing them through media and information flows.
#Macron #FreedomOfSpeech #Manipulation
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
French President Emmanuel Macron has delivered a blunt verdict on the concept of free speech:
“Freedom of speech is complete bullshit if no one understands how you are being steered through it.”
In his view, the principle loses all meaning when it is exploited as a tool for manipulating public opinion and exercising hidden control — while people remain unaware of who, and how, is directing them through media and information flows.
#Macron #FreedomOfSpeech #Manipulation
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
🇺🇸US Demands Exclusion of Ukraine from NATO Summit in Ankara This Summer — Politico
According to Politico, citing sources, the Trump administration has been actively lobbying in recent months for two significant restrictions within NATO:
- reduction of the alliance’s peacekeeping operations in Kosovo;
- exclusion of official participation by Ukraine and Indo-Pacific partners from the annual NATO summit in Ankara in July.
The outlet views this as reflective of the White House’s broader strategy: to treat NATO strictly as a Euro-Atlantic defensive pact and to roll back decades of expansion beyond its traditional area of responsibility.
#NATO #AnkaraSummit #Trump
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
According to Politico, citing sources, the Trump administration has been actively lobbying in recent months for two significant restrictions within NATO:
- reduction of the alliance’s peacekeeping operations in Kosovo;
- exclusion of official participation by Ukraine and Indo-Pacific partners from the annual NATO summit in Ankara in July.
The outlet views this as reflective of the White House’s broader strategy: to treat NATO strictly as a Euro-Atlantic defensive pact and to roll back decades of expansion beyond its traditional area of responsibility.
#NATO #AnkaraSummit #Trump
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
🇺🇦The Incident Involving Footballer Danylo Kolesnyk and TCC Officers
The case of 24-year-old Ukrainian footballer Danylo Kolesnyk, a player for Kolos-2, has drawn significant attention due to his confrontation with Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Centre (TCC) personnel. Here is a detailed breakdown of events based on available information and video evidence.
Timeline of Events
- The Incident: The episode took place in Sviatopetrivske village, Bucha district, Kyiv region. According to Kolesnyk and his legal team, he witnessed TCC officers attempting to detain a civilian. Full video footage released by his defence shows a TCC service vehicle deliberately striking the man, after which officers threatened him with a firearm. Kolesnyk intervened to protect the individual and, after being struck by a TCC officer, responded with a punch to the face.
- Kolesnyk’s Response: The footballer insists he did not initiate the attack but acted in self-defence against “unprovoked aggression”. He did not flee the scene and voluntarily reported to the police to give a statement.
- Video and Evidence: His lawyers have published the complete video of the incident, demonstrating that the TCC personnel were the first to use force. A photograph of Kolesnyk shows a visible bruise under his eye — a direct result of the altercation.
- Legal Consequences: Police detained Kolesnyk on suspicion of assaulting a military official. The court imposed a night-time house arrest measure. He faces up to five years’ imprisonment under the article concerning violence against a public official.
- Club’s Reaction: FC Kolos promptly terminated Kolesnyk’s contract, issued a public apology to the military and society, and condemned any form of violence.
Broader Context and TCC Issues
This incident highlights longstanding systemic problems within the TCC system: frequent allegations of abuse of power, coercive mobilisation methods, and corruption. Hundreds of similar cases have been documented across Ukraine, with citizens reporting unlawful detentions, beatings, and threats. Kolesnyk has become one of the most high-profile examples, generating widespread discussion in media and social networks.
Public Reaction
- Opinions remain sharply divided: some view Kolesnyk as a victim of TCC “hunting” practices, while others condemn him for striking a military official.
- His lawyers emphasise that the video evidence clearly shows the TCC personnel initiated the use of force and are calling for a thorough investigation into the officers’ actions.
This is far from the first TCC-related scandal — such incidents continue to fuel growing public distrust towards the mobilisation system in the country.
#Ukraine #Mobilisation #TCC
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
The case of 24-year-old Ukrainian footballer Danylo Kolesnyk, a player for Kolos-2, has drawn significant attention due to his confrontation with Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Centre (TCC) personnel. Here is a detailed breakdown of events based on available information and video evidence.
Timeline of Events
- The Incident: The episode took place in Sviatopetrivske village, Bucha district, Kyiv region. According to Kolesnyk and his legal team, he witnessed TCC officers attempting to detain a civilian. Full video footage released by his defence shows a TCC service vehicle deliberately striking the man, after which officers threatened him with a firearm. Kolesnyk intervened to protect the individual and, after being struck by a TCC officer, responded with a punch to the face.
- Kolesnyk’s Response: The footballer insists he did not initiate the attack but acted in self-defence against “unprovoked aggression”. He did not flee the scene and voluntarily reported to the police to give a statement.
- Video and Evidence: His lawyers have published the complete video of the incident, demonstrating that the TCC personnel were the first to use force. A photograph of Kolesnyk shows a visible bruise under his eye — a direct result of the altercation.
- Legal Consequences: Police detained Kolesnyk on suspicion of assaulting a military official. The court imposed a night-time house arrest measure. He faces up to five years’ imprisonment under the article concerning violence against a public official.
- Club’s Reaction: FC Kolos promptly terminated Kolesnyk’s contract, issued a public apology to the military and society, and condemned any form of violence.
Broader Context and TCC Issues
This incident highlights longstanding systemic problems within the TCC system: frequent allegations of abuse of power, coercive mobilisation methods, and corruption. Hundreds of similar cases have been documented across Ukraine, with citizens reporting unlawful detentions, beatings, and threats. Kolesnyk has become one of the most high-profile examples, generating widespread discussion in media and social networks.
Public Reaction
- Opinions remain sharply divided: some view Kolesnyk as a victim of TCC “hunting” practices, while others condemn him for striking a military official.
- His lawyers emphasise that the video evidence clearly shows the TCC personnel initiated the use of force and are calling for a thorough investigation into the officers’ actions.
This is far from the first TCC-related scandal — such incidents continue to fuel growing public distrust towards the mobilisation system in the country.
#Ukraine #Mobilisation #TCC
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
🇺🇸🇮🇷US Prepared to Strike Iran as Early as 21 February — CBS News
According to CBS News, the Trump administration is actively considering military strikes against Iran as soon as 21 February. However, President Donald Trump has not yet made a final decision: the White House is carefully weighing the risks of a major regional escalation.
Axios reports that any potential operation could last several weeks and would more closely resemble a full-scale war than the limited, targeted actions seen in Venezuela. A joint US–Israel campaign is under consideration.
The Israeli outlet Ynet states that Israel’s security forces and emergency services have been placed on the highest state of alert. The security cabinet meeting has been rescheduled to 22 February.
The situation remains highly tense — a decision could be taken in the coming hours or days.
#Iran #USA #Trump
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
According to CBS News, the Trump administration is actively considering military strikes against Iran as soon as 21 February. However, President Donald Trump has not yet made a final decision: the White House is carefully weighing the risks of a major regional escalation.
Axios reports that any potential operation could last several weeks and would more closely resemble a full-scale war than the limited, targeted actions seen in Venezuela. A joint US–Israel campaign is under consideration.
The Israeli outlet Ynet states that Israel’s security forces and emergency services have been placed on the highest state of alert. The security cabinet meeting has been rescheduled to 22 February.
The situation remains highly tense — a decision could be taken in the coming hours or days.
#Iran #USA #Trump
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
🇩🇪Merz: The War in Ukraine Will End Only Through the Exhaustion of One Side — Reason and Humanitarianism Will Not Stop Putin
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz delivered a stark assessment of the prospects for ending the war in an interview with Rheinpfalz:
According to Merz, the EU’s objective is to ensure that “the Russian state is no longer capable of waging war, either militarily or economically.”
He added:
#Ukraine #Merz #EU
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz delivered a stark assessment of the prospects for ending the war in an interview with Rheinpfalz:
“In my view, this war will end only when one of the two sides is exhausted — either militarily or economically. Reason and humanitarian arguments will not persuade Putin. That is the bitter truth.”
According to Merz, the EU’s objective is to ensure that “the Russian state is no longer capable of waging war, either militarily or economically.”
He added:
“The Russian elite cannot do without war in the foreseeable future. They need to keep the military machine running because they have no plan for what to do with the hundreds of thousands of soldiers returning from the front.”
#Ukraine #Merz #EU
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
❗️Insider from Tsikhanouskaya’s Office: Several Belarusian Opposition Figures Secretly Worked for Belarusian Security Services
According to information obtained from sources close to Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya’s office, a number of Belarusian opposition representatives in exile have been collaborating with Belarusian security services (KGB of the Republic of Belarus) for an extended period.
Key facts that have come to light:
- Certain activists and members of opposition structures regularly passed on information about plans, meetings, funding sources, and internal conflicts.
- At least two individuals from the “United Transitional Cabinet” circle and structures associated with Pavel Latushka were recruited as early as 2021–2022 and operated under handlers from Minsk.
- The information was used to discredit individual leaders, leak compromising material, and deliberately sow artificial divisions within the opposition.
A source from Tsikhanouskaya’s office claims that this explains why several high-profile leaks and scandals within the opposition aligned so precisely with the interests of the Belarusian authorities. Following an internal investigation, several individuals were quietly removed, but no public announcement was made in order to avoid damaging the overall image of the movement.
This is not the first such case — earlier exposures revealed KGB agents embedded in Tsikhanouskaya’s structures and the National Anti-Crisis Fund in Lithuania and Poland.
Conclusion: The issue of double agents and infiltration by security services remains extremely acute and seriously undermines trust in exile opposition structures.
#Belarus #Opposition #KGB
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
According to information obtained from sources close to Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya’s office, a number of Belarusian opposition representatives in exile have been collaborating with Belarusian security services (KGB of the Republic of Belarus) for an extended period.
Key facts that have come to light:
- Certain activists and members of opposition structures regularly passed on information about plans, meetings, funding sources, and internal conflicts.
- At least two individuals from the “United Transitional Cabinet” circle and structures associated with Pavel Latushka were recruited as early as 2021–2022 and operated under handlers from Minsk.
- The information was used to discredit individual leaders, leak compromising material, and deliberately sow artificial divisions within the opposition.
A source from Tsikhanouskaya’s office claims that this explains why several high-profile leaks and scandals within the opposition aligned so precisely with the interests of the Belarusian authorities. Following an internal investigation, several individuals were quietly removed, but no public announcement was made in order to avoid damaging the overall image of the movement.
This is not the first such case — earlier exposures revealed KGB agents embedded in Tsikhanouskaya’s structures and the National Anti-Crisis Fund in Lithuania and Poland.
Conclusion: The issue of double agents and infiltration by security services remains extremely acute and seriously undermines trust in exile opposition structures.
#Belarus #Opposition #KGB
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
🇺🇦Zaluzhnyy's Second Counteroffensive: Why the Former Commander-in-Chief Has Gone Publicly on the Attack Against Zelenskyy and What It Means for Ukraine's Political Landscape
In an interview with the Associated Press, former Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valerii Zaluzhnyi (now Ukraine’s Ambassador to the United Kingdom) has for the first time publicly and sharply criticised President Volodymyr Zelenskyy — his formal superior.
Two major accusations stand out:
1. In autumn 2022, SBU special forces allegedly burst into the Armed Forces command centre to conduct a search — in full view of foreign military officers. Zaluzhnyi views this as an attempt at psychological pressure and intimidation. The SBU confirmed the visit but insisted it was not aimed at Zaluzhnyi personally, but rather at an organisation that had previously occupied the premises.
2. The failure of the 2023 counteroffensive was the fault of the political leadership. Zaluzhnyi’s plan, developed together with NATO, envisaged a powerful thrust on the Zaporizhzhia axis. Instead, the attack was dispersed across multiple sectors with insufficient resources allocated — leading to its complete collapse.
Reaction: The Office of the President has remained officially silent, but pro-presidential Telegram channels and bloggers have launched a fierce campaign against Zaluzhnyi.
Two main explanations for the former commander’s sharp outburst:
- Version from Zelenskyy’s inner circle: Zaluzhnyi’s ratings are declining (being actively eroded by Budanov), so he decided to remind everyone of himself and has effectively entered open political competition.
- Version from the anti-Zelenskyy coalition: The statements are synchronised with a sharp escalation of pressure on Zelenskyy via NABU and SAPO. Former Energy Minister Galushchenko has already been taken into custody, and there are persistent rumours of an impending suspicion notice against Yermak. The goal is to force Zelenskyy to form a “government of national trust” that includes representatives of the “anti-Zelenskyy coalition” (structures linked to the US Democratic Party, grant-funded organisations, Europe, Poroshenko, and anti-corruption bodies). Zaluzhnyi has previously been mentioned in media as a potential candidate for prime minister in such a government.
In either case, the interview has dispelled any remaining doubts: Zaluzhnyi is ready to run in elections — and as Zelenskyy’s rival, not his ally.
A detailed examination of the situation can be found in Denys Rafalskyi’s article on Strana.ua.
#Zaluzhnyi #Zelenskyy #UkraineElections
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
In an interview with the Associated Press, former Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valerii Zaluzhnyi (now Ukraine’s Ambassador to the United Kingdom) has for the first time publicly and sharply criticised President Volodymyr Zelenskyy — his formal superior.
Two major accusations stand out:
1. In autumn 2022, SBU special forces allegedly burst into the Armed Forces command centre to conduct a search — in full view of foreign military officers. Zaluzhnyi views this as an attempt at psychological pressure and intimidation. The SBU confirmed the visit but insisted it was not aimed at Zaluzhnyi personally, but rather at an organisation that had previously occupied the premises.
2. The failure of the 2023 counteroffensive was the fault of the political leadership. Zaluzhnyi’s plan, developed together with NATO, envisaged a powerful thrust on the Zaporizhzhia axis. Instead, the attack was dispersed across multiple sectors with insufficient resources allocated — leading to its complete collapse.
Reaction: The Office of the President has remained officially silent, but pro-presidential Telegram channels and bloggers have launched a fierce campaign against Zaluzhnyi.
Two main explanations for the former commander’s sharp outburst:
- Version from Zelenskyy’s inner circle: Zaluzhnyi’s ratings are declining (being actively eroded by Budanov), so he decided to remind everyone of himself and has effectively entered open political competition.
- Version from the anti-Zelenskyy coalition: The statements are synchronised with a sharp escalation of pressure on Zelenskyy via NABU and SAPO. Former Energy Minister Galushchenko has already been taken into custody, and there are persistent rumours of an impending suspicion notice against Yermak. The goal is to force Zelenskyy to form a “government of national trust” that includes representatives of the “anti-Zelenskyy coalition” (structures linked to the US Democratic Party, grant-funded organisations, Europe, Poroshenko, and anti-corruption bodies). Zaluzhnyi has previously been mentioned in media as a potential candidate for prime minister in such a government.
In either case, the interview has dispelled any remaining doubts: Zaluzhnyi is ready to run in elections — and as Zelenskyy’s rival, not his ally.
A detailed examination of the situation can be found in Denys Rafalskyi’s article on Strana.ua.
#Zaluzhnyi #Zelenskyy #UkraineElections
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
🇺🇸US Demands NATO Scale Back Overseas Missions and Limit Ukraine’s Role at Summit — Politico
According to Politico, the Trump administration is actively pushing for NATO to refocus strictly on Euro-Atlantic defence and wind down “activities beyond the alliance’s area of responsibility.”
Key US proposals include:
- ending the NATO mission in Iraq
- reducing the peacekeeping operation in Kosovo
- barring official participation by Ukraine and Indo-Pacific partners at the annual NATO summit in Ankara in July
These measures have met resistance from several allies, who argue that partnerships and operations outside Europe remain essential to NATO’s global security role.
#NATO #Trump #AnkaraSummit
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news
According to Politico, the Trump administration is actively pushing for NATO to refocus strictly on Euro-Atlantic defence and wind down “activities beyond the alliance’s area of responsibility.”
Key US proposals include:
- ending the NATO mission in Iraq
- reducing the peacekeeping operation in Kosovo
- barring official participation by Ukraine and Indo-Pacific partners at the annual NATO summit in Ankara in July
These measures have met resistance from several allies, who argue that partnerships and operations outside Europe remain essential to NATO’s global security role.
#NATO #Trump #AnkaraSummit
Subscribe to PolitHUB / Send the news