Already gearing up for #504! https://www.desiringgod.org/here-we-stand

I might need to get Joe Boot's book. I've been listening to him more lately, and I've been liking what I'm hearing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXGqUZrFHc8

Buckle up, gang. It's about to hit the fan.

There are so many tyrannical freaks on Twitter

Oh look, the experimental vaccines never tested before are having problems? Who could have guessed?

Romanists frequently resort to Matthew 16 to support their doctrine of the papacy and claim that Christians have always interpreted the passage that way. However, their interpretation cannot be consistently derived from the text, which is why the Fathers by and large held to the Protestant interpretation. https://protestantpost.substack.com/p/peter-and-the-rock

Where are all my fellow history nerds?

🇬🇧 🇩🇰 2 April 1801: The British fleet led by Horatio Nelson destroys the Danish fleet in the naval Battle of Copenhagen during the Napoleonic wars. The battle came about over British fears that the powerful Danish fleet would ally with France, and a breakdown in diplomatic communications on both sides. The Royal Navy won a resounding victory, besting fifteen Danish warships while losing none in return.

I've found this free Bible program to be tremendously helpful. It allows you to see multiple translations side-by-side, including the original languages, and provides a neat little lexicon as well.
https://thebible.org/gt/index

Good summary from Doug Wilson of Reformed liturgy and worship: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PndihGv3akA

This reminds me of the "1 in 5 female college students are raped" lie.

Imagine believing this

The blog narrations are coming.....

I just finished reading "Against All Opposition" by Greg Bahnsen, an excellent introduction to the basics of presuppositional apologetics. I have the ebook, which you're free to borrow if you'd like. Or if you're a hard copy kind of guy, you can get it here: https://store.americanvision.org/collections/books/products/against-all-opposition-defending-the-christian-worldview

John Owen's argument for definite atonement: Christ either died for...

Some sins of some men, 2. Some sins of all men, 3. All sins of some men, or 4. All sins of all men.
But if Christ died only for some sins, then no one would be saved and we know some are saved; thus 1 & 2 can be ruled out. And if Christ died for all sins of all men, then no one would be condemned, but we know some are condemned; therefore, we can rule out 4 and are left with 3: Christ died for all the sins of some men.

And if one should object: "Christ did die for all the sins of all men, but his death must be accepted by faith, and lack of faith refuses the gift," we reply, "But is this sin of refusing Christ paid for? If so, we are back at option 4, which we know is untrue. And if not, then we are back at option 2, which we also know is untrue. Hence, it is certain that Jesus died for all the sins of some men."

There are a number of common arguments Roman Catholics use in order to defend the papacy. We look at seven here, and attempt to deal with them as fairly as possible. https://protestantpost.substack.com/p/romes-defense-of-the-papacy